Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory


View Poll Results: Thoughts?
Me likey 97 85.84%
Don't even go there. 16 14.16%
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st July 2009   #31
Lives for gear
 
Adlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,082

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mja View Post
cheers all for this thread- ive learnt loads !
Haven't we all?
Adlen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2009   #32
Gear maniac
 
flober1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yunnan, Lijiang
Posts: 194

I am using PT 7.4, I guess would be the same with v8...

I think u can totally go with the BCF!!

F
__________________
Flober1970

http://www.myspace.com/flober1970

"If it's perfect, it aint jazz..."
damn who said that?


flober1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2009   #33
RTR
Lives for gear
 
RTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 4,383

I used mine in PT7-8 and it worked great..what more do you want for $199.00, It does everything I wanted it to do!!
RTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2009   #34
Lives for gear
 
Adlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,082

Thread Starter
Well I bought one to tide me over til I can get a Tascam US2400. Here's to the next week getting used to it
__________________
Liam Adlen
ShadowplayStudios
Adlen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2009   #35
Gear Head
 
J1mbaFr0sty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 47

report back on ur experiences with it and what not.
J1mbaFr0sty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2009   #36
Lives for gear
 
Adlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,082

Thread Starter
Will-do. Should be arriving Tuesday and I'm showing off a college studio on Tuesday night so should get some use out of it. Now trying to decide if I should buy a BCA2000 to gie me some more inputs...
Adlen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2009   #37
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 28

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjoubaud View Post
I have one and never use it.. This is garbage
By the way they are not touch sensitive, if you want to move your fader when it's alredy following a course... forget it.
Useless is how I would describe it
This is an issue as you cannot use the surface in 'touch' mode. Not hard for me to workaround. Faders are jerky and noisy as someone mentioned.

But having real faders has been great for workflow, no problems yet. Good for the money. thumbsup
SoundFancier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2009   #38
Lives for gear
 
Adlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,082

Thread Starter
Got my dispatch notification an hour or so ago. This NEEEEEEDS to come by tomorow PM!
Adlen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st September 2009   #39
Lives for gear
 
Finnish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 776

Send a message via MSN to Finnish
I use it in MCU-mode in Reaper.

I bought it about 2 years ago. At first I set it to ride faders etc, but maybe I was too slow with it (in the beginning) so I somehow let it collect dust for a long time.

Well, I bought e-drums a week ago, now I'm using it as a transport/record/volume controller 'cause I'm recording everything by myself nowadays. Not so hifi-duties with it, but I really like it.
__________________
Asus p8h67-m evo, Built-in HD3000 GPU
i7 2600k
16gb Kingston DDR3-1333
WD Caviar Black 1 Tb,7200 rpm,64 Mt,SATA-600
Samsung Bluray-DVD
THERMALTAKE ToughPower Grand 650W
Cooler Master CM 690 II Advanced
Win 7 Ultimate 64bit
M-Audio ProFire2626
EMU 0404 USB
MPatch2, BCF2000
GAP pre-73 x2
GAP R1 tube active ribbon mic
REAPER all the way!

My "studio":


My band/recordings:
Rakkauden Ammattilaiset
Finnish is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2009   #40
Lives for gear
 
MrCrowbar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,069

I love the Presonus Faderport. Multiple faders annoy me because the whole bank switching and you never really know which channel is where.

I'd love to have as many faders as I have tracks, along with color colored scribble strip displays, but this is insanely expensive and not really worth it. Just group the tracks you want to automate and use one fader, then click on the desired group in the software mixer and automate them. Subgroups work well for automation because you can still edit the non-automated levels of the single tracks, i.e. make the overheads louder after you've automated the drum set.

The Faderport also has nice backlit buttons (LOVE the transport buttons), all in intuitive colors and you have dedicated "write", "read", "touch" and "off" (disables fader) buttons unlike the Frontier Alphatrack.

The pan control really sucks in Logic though, you need to turn it really slow and then the fader comes motoring up and stopping at your know turning fingers (in touch mode, the fader will stop there because you touched it...). I can't work without that thing anymore, just select the track you want with the mouse or cursors, move fader, proceed.

It's also much more precise than the Behringer (10-bit ALPS Fader vs. 8-bit crap fader), quiet in operation, very responsive (dual motors), touch sensitive (you really need that for automation), and you just plug it in via USB.
MrCrowbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd September 2009   #41
Lives for gear
 
Adlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,082

Thread Starter
Okay it arrived in time for my demo but the screen was damaged (probably a transit issue). I used it for about 20 minutes properly and let it look cool for the rest of the night to impress the folks. From my use with it... wow... I love it! Faders were smoother than I thought, build quality is better than I thought and hey; it's not blue! Well, it's a tiny bit blue but those pictures don't do it justice!

Just bought a BCA2000 interface to match it. When funds are a little better I think I'll get a second BCF and a BCR. Unless of course a Tascam US2400 comes up at a FINE price before then!

But I thoroughly recommend this unit.
Adlen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2009   #42
Lives for gear
 
Adlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,082

Thread Starter
Do you know what I want... BCF and BCR 3000. Check out the BCD2000 vs the BCD3000 and tell me the 3000 doesn't look more professional!
Attached Thumbnails
Behringer BCF 2000-1198816_800.jpg  
Adlen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2009   #43
Gear addict
 
jproc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 395

Just got a white BCF2000.... started looking at the BCR2000.... why do they make the BCF in both white & black, but the BCR only in black ?
Now if I want a "matching" set I'll have to exchange the white one... argh!

So much for getting the white one because I thought it would look better in my setup....
jproc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2009   #44
Lives for gear
 
Adlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,082

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by jproc View Post
Just got a white BCF2000.... started looking at the BCR2000.... why do they make the BCF in both white & black, but the BCR only in black ?
Now if I want a "matching" set I'll have to exchange the white one... argh!

So much for getting the white one because I thought it would look better in my setup....
Yeah I think that's weird too. I really do want them to make 3000s though, the blacks look great!

The others aren't THAT blue but putting it with a white one is... wrong.
Adlen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2009   #45
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 431

I use one and I think it's great. I am probably getting two more eventually. I use it with Cubase in generic remote mode using NRPN's and that gives me 14 bit resolution on the faders, which is great.

It's a great product, from a not so great company....
Nuno_F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th September 2009   #46
Lives for gear
 
Adlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,082

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuno_F View Post
It's a great product, from a not so great company....
Behringer got a few things right to be fair. The B-Control series, the ADA8000 isn't bad, Truth monitors. When you're on a budget they're a great company and really don't deserve the crap they get.
Adlen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th September 2009   #47
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 431

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adlen View Post
Behringer got a few things right to be fair. The B-Control series, the ADA8000 isn't bad, Truth monitors. When you're on a budget they're a great company and really don't deserve the crap they get.
Honestly, just based on thej way they rip off other people's work I think they deserve a lot more crap than they get. The quality (or lack) of their products is not really the issue to me.
Nuno_F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th September 2009   #48
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 649

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjoubaud View Post
I have one and never use it.. This is garbage
By the way they are not touch sensitive, if you want to move your fader when it's alredy following a course... forget it.
Useless is how I would describe it
I'd have to agree with this. I had one for about 10 minutes.. took it straight back to the shop. Try and add to any automation already there and you'll be fighting the motor for control....

get something touch sensitive.. seriously...you'll be glad you did.
scanner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2009   #49
Lives for gear
 
Finnish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 776

Send a message via MSN to Finnish
Quote:
Originally Posted by scanner View Post
I'd have to agree with this. I had one for about 10 minutes.. took it straight back to the shop. Try and add to any automation already there and you'll be fighting the motor for control....

get something touch sensitive.. seriously...you'll be glad you did.
Stop complaining and buy something high-end if you have the money.

BCF2000 is a no brainer for the money and thats it.
Finnish is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2009   #50
Gear addict
 
MMski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 423

Send a message via AIM to MMski
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finnish View Post
Stop complaining and buy something high-end if you have the money.

BCF2000 is a no brainer for the money and thats it.
thumbsupthumbsup
MMski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th September 2009   #51
Lives for gear
 
sleeper1400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ypsilanti
Posts: 1,255

Send a message via Yahoo to sleeper1400
Quote:
Originally Posted by flober1970 View Post
am using it with protools with total satisfaction!!??

need to clean up your greasy fingers or read about the automation mode in PT...

F

um..no.

either you dont truly understand automation or your a troll, most likely the latter.
ive been working in Pt roughly 8 hours a day since 2003, your not gonna school me.

as MANY other poster have already stated. it doesn't follow automation, or, if you like, expect to fight the motorized faders every step of the way.

anyone else other than this joker,trust me on this one, if your using PT dont bother.

just get a second hand MCU or bite the bullet and get the 002/3 factory.
__________________
Neither the Beatles, nor Stevie Wonder had Protools.... maybe you just suck.
.- overheard in a session
sleeper1400 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009   #52
Gear interested
 
unsound1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 6

Better yet!................get a BCF or 3 and don't use P-Tools.....problem solved..... and for the most part anyone looking at the BCF has probably not been using P-Tools (I just can't say it) for very long or is not using it at all. Everyone knows that if you use P-Tools you can only use (to the fullest extent) what digidesign lets you use...........total crap if you ask me............just because it is labeled as "Industry Standard" doesn't always mean it's the best, or the best for every situation anyway.
I automate just fine with the BCF and if I need to get real tedious with automation it's not like I can't use a mouse anymore. Seems to me that the 2 together are a great combination.
I'm sure if we all had the option we probably would be running some sort of P-Tools system using a D-command or Mackie control setup but the BCF is a budget controller aim at lower end studios or home users. No one should be arguing that, but to say it's junk because it doesn't do 1 thing as well as it should (automation) is a joke.
If that's the case then why are you even using P-Tools??? It is not perfect in itself but no one seems to be calling it "junk". P-Tools price wise is not really aimed at the budget studio or home user that is looking to multi-track. But it seems all you have to do is say is the words................"P-Tools".......... and people fall to their knees and flock to the studio (your bedroom) because you have a "P-Tools setup" to get their "Pro" quality recordings done thru an interface with pre-amps and converters that is half the quality and double the price of it's competitors. Not sure who gets screwed there, the person who spent all of their money on the P-Tools and compatible equipment or the person who is convinced that the only way to get a professional recording is thru P-Tools with a $1500 or higher DAW controller. If you are setting up a high-end studio does anyone think or expect that you will then control it with a few BCF2000's??? I doubt it. So why not give Behringer a break on this one, it does exactly what they say it is supposed to do and the quality verses cost really can't be beat and for someone learning to mix or that knows how to mix for the most part but has always done it in the box, a motorized controller at this price can only be a plus.....right????? If you get one and then complain about what it can't do, you obviously didn't do your research on the unit...
All I know is that anyone who has seen my BCF "console" has been rather impressed and have not asked me why I'm not running P-Tools or using a Mackie controller....................but then I'm not recording for a Major or Indie Label either so that may have something to do with it.........



-scott
unsound1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009   #53
Lives for gear
 
Adlen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,082

Thread Starter
What he said.
Adlen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009   #54
Lives for gear
 
mikethedrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,077

i use a bcf in protools just fine. the automation is great, pan pots work great. dont know why youre hatin on the PT. works fine for me


i suppose the bcf's faders arent silent but when im sitting 3 feet away from monitors cranked up all the way... dfegad

again, in the basement its great. if i had the budget to open a commercial studio, id have the cash for something a little nicer but until then ill get a couple more bcfs and mount them up real pretty

all abt the glamor these days right?
mikethedrummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2009   #55
Gear interested
 
unsound1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 6

not hatin on PT man, it just seems that most of the BCF haters are PT users and again it seems that if people don't hear studio and PT together then it must not be a pro studio or at least pro quality, which in reality is a matter of opinion anymore..............
unsound1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2009   #56
Lives for gear
 
mikethedrummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,077

agreed.

howd you put your bcfs together? that looks pretty schnazzy
mikethedrummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2009   #57
Gear interested
 
unsound1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 6

Hey thanks Mike...........The console is actually wrapped around the BCF's, the far right and left sides are screwed to the units with the original screws and also screwed to the front panel and thats pretty much it at the moment. I'll probably add a bottom base for more support.

-scott
unsound1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2009   #58
Lives for gear
 
mdoelger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the shed
Posts: 889

^^wnat to know that too...
mdoelger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2009   #59
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 805

The motors can be turned off temporarily on selected faders. Probably not in the emulation modes. I don't use the BCF for any automation moves.

ns
Attached Thumbnails
Behringer BCF 2000-motor-off.jpg  
nightscope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2009   #60
Gear maniac
 
microwave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London, Europe
Posts: 242

I find the faders so noisy that sometimes I just switch it off mid session. I monitor mostly at low volumes and its a major annoyance. I'll probably be selling mine soon. If you want eight faders for that sort of price its your only choice, but don't forget that for £150 you can buy something like the Frontier Design Alphatrack.
microwave is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vista 64 Bit, Sonar 8, BCF 2000 Joebf Music computers 1 6th August 2009 09:13 PM
bcf 2000 with GarageBand ??? Colonel Blues Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 2 18th September 2008 10:25 AM
A new BCF 2000-WH Killah_Trakz Product Alerts older than 2 months 2 27th June 2007 08:42 PM
BCF 2000 rubish,or not? Marty Shields. Music computers 5 3rd December 2006 09:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 PM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.