recording a singer? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory


recording a singer?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th June 2009   #1
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Elizabeth
Posts: 144

Thread Starter
recording a singer?

hi all, i want to know whats your way to record singers, what tools you use for soft singers and what tools you use for loud singers. as well as the size of the space you think is apropriate for soft or loud singers, preamps etc, thanks.
Petelebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th June 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
rty5150's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: LR,AR
Posts: 2,808

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petelebu View Post
hi all, i want to know whats your way to record singers, what tools you use for soft singers and what tools you use for loud singers. as well as the size of the space you think is apropriate for soft or loud singers, preamps etc, thanks.

mic and pre selection come down to the type of singer. voice and style are the main variables.

for mics, room comes into play. good sounding room, LDC. crappy sounding room, dynamic.

loud inconsistent singers get a compressor in the chain. maybe not for a singer with good mic technique.
__________________
rich

rty5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #3
Lives for gear
 
BOWIE's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ.
Posts: 3,289

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petelebu View Post
hi all, i want to know whats your way to record singers, what tools you use for soft singers and what tools you use for loud singers. as well as the size of the space you think is apropriate for soft or loud singers, preamps etc, thanks.
As mentioned above, there are so many varables. It's good to come to places like this to learn what generally works, then you have to put in endless hours discovering how to develop the sound as you imagine it in your head. There are few rules and the equipment itself makes little difference until you really get famililar with the process. I know that's not what you wanted to hear but after recording for 14 years (which is really nothing compared to many here), I find that most of my knowledge was not gained in school or on a forum, but from just doing it.
__________________
Tube information and sales: ProAudioTubes@aol.com
BOWIE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #4
Project Code CL2465
 
Chris Lago's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Who lives?
Posts: 10,767

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOWIE View Post
As mentioned above, there are so many varables. It's good to come to places like this to learn what generally works, then you have to put in endless hours discovering how to develop the sound as you imagine it in your head. There are few rules and the equipment itself makes little difference until you really get famililar with the process. I know that's not what you wanted to hear but after recording for 14 years (which is really nothing compared to many here), I find that most of my knowledge was not gained in school or on a forum, but from just doing it.
Same here, there are so many variables that can come into play, I think it's a trial and error process where you eventually learn to use certain tools for certain situations.

What is your budget? About the size of the room, it really depends on the mic you're using, and how treated the room is. Just as long as it's not a small closet, any treated room will do.
Chris Lago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
BOWIE's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ.
Posts: 3,289

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrislago View Post
Same here, there are so many variables that can come into play, I think it's a trial and error process where you eventually learn to use certain tools for certain situations.
Absolutely. Experimentation is key. After getting too "set in my ways", my new kick is to go against everything I know by using the "wrong" mic, in the wrong position, etc and I am amazed by all the new sounds that I was previously blind to.
BOWIE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #6
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Elizabeth
Posts: 144

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOWIE View Post
As mentioned above, there are so many varables. It's good to come to places like this to learn what generally works, then you have to put in endless hours discovering how to develop the sound as you imagine it in your head. There are few rules and the equipment itself makes little difference until you really get famililar with the process. I know that's not what you wanted to hear but after recording for 14 years (which is really nothing compared to many here), I find that most of my knowledge was not gained in school or on a forum, but from just doing it.
well actually thats some of the things i wanted to hear lol.
Petelebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #7
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Elizabeth
Posts: 144

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrislago View Post
Same here, there are so many variables that can come into play, I think it's a trial and error process where you eventually learn to use certain tools for certain situations.

What is your budget? About the size of the room, it really depends on the mic you're using, and how treated the room is. Just as long as it's not a small closet, any treated room will do.
yeah man i heard the small closet thingy for dry vocals, what a non sense.
Petelebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
rty5150's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: LR,AR
Posts: 2,808

i hate closets for vocals. not enough absorption in a small space. i would rather track vocals in a decent room with more absorbers. plus comfort level...
rty5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #9
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Elizabeth
Posts: 144

Thread Starter
well to all, the equipment im using, ma-200, grace 101 or solo 610, 705 equivalent now im worried about the room size is a 10 by 10 by 8 high, thats my main worry, oh i have a guitar cab here aswell and i dont like the sound coming out of it trhough the solo 620 and a 57, any tips for that?
Petelebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
rty5150's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: LR,AR
Posts: 2,808

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petelebu View Post
well to all, the equipment im using, ma-200, grace 101 or solo 610, 705 equivalent now im worried about the room size is a 10 by 10 by 8 high, thats my main worry, oh i have a guitar cab here aswell and i dont like the sound coming out of it trhough the solo 620 and a 57, any tips for that?
deaden the crap out of the closet and put the guitar cab in there if your recording high gain stuff. for guitars, no room is better than a bad room.
half of the model numbers you stated don't make sense.
the 705 being a ribbon?
620....solo 610?


i wouldn't use the solo 610 for guitars, but that's just me, especially with a ribbon. have you tried micing both the guitar cab with the 57 and a ribbon adn blending the 2?

props on the ma-200.
that is my main vocal mic and it continues to surprise me with how great it sounds.
rty5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #11
Gear addict
 
vonrichter's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: California
Posts: 469

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petelebu View Post
hi all, i want to know whats your way to record singers, what tools you use for soft singers and what tools you use for loud singers. as well as the size of the space you think is apropriate for soft or loud singers, preamps etc, thanks.
It depends on the song and the singer.

If by 'size of the space' you mean the physical room in real life, chances are you're talking small home studio living rooms and bedrooms. Your best bet in that case is to kill the vocal recording space as much as possible. Boxy early reflections will really make for a "amateur home recording!" sound. There are a lot of things you can try on a budget, the classic being to just hang some blankets across mic stands.

At the low end, don't worry too much about preamps, just find something clean... avoid the el-cheapo "tube" preamps because they are not true tube circuits, and are generally quite muddy and unuseable. Work on getting some kind of usable vocal recording space, then start researching microphone types and what they typically do for different kinds of sources.
__________________
Cheers,
-VR
http://vonrichter.net
vonrichter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #12
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Elizabeth
Posts: 144

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by rty5150 View Post
deaden the crap out of the closet and put the guitar cab in there if your recording high gain stuff. for guitars, no room is better than a bad room.
half of the model numbers you stated don't make sense.
the 705 being a ribbon?
620....solo 610?


i wouldn't use the solo 610 for guitars, but that's just me, especially with a ribbon. have you tried micing both the guitar cab with the 57 and a ribbon adn blending the 2?

props on the ma-200.
that is my main vocal mic and it continues to surprise me with how great it sounds.
705 mineral fiber on the walls, sm57 and the grace maybe? i tried that combination to and didnt like it either
by the way wile recording the cab on with a 57, should i use a room mic or not?
Petelebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #13
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Elizabeth
Posts: 144

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonrichter View Post
It depends on the song and the singer.

If by 'size of the space' you mean the physical room in real life, chances are you're talking small home studio living rooms and bedrooms. Your best bet in that case is to kill the vocal recording space as much as possible. Boxy early reflections will really make for a "amateur home recording!" sound. There are a lot of things you can try on a budget, the classic being to just hang some blankets across mic stands.

At the low end, don't worry too much about preamps, just find something clean... avoid the el-cheapo "tube" preamps because they are not true tube circuits, and are generally quite muddy and unuseable. Work on getting some kind of usable vocal recording space, then start researching microphone types and what they typically do for different kinds of sources.
well the walls are are almost totally covered with 705 mineral fiber panels the floor is carpeted and the roof is drywall. the preamps i have solo 610 and i dont consider it a cheapo preamp, remember jim morrison and frank sinatra used them.
Petelebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #14
Gear addict
 
vonrichter's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: California
Posts: 469

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petelebu View Post
wile recording the cab on with a 57, should i use a room mic or not?
The only way to find out is to try it. Does your room sound good to your ears in general when just playing or talking in it?
vonrichter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #15
Lives for gear
 
rty5150's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: LR,AR
Posts: 2,808

would getting a ribbon be out of the question?

what don't you like about your guitar sound? the 57 may be the problem. maybe and i5 or fathead may be your answer.
rty5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #16
Gear addict
 
vonrichter's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: California
Posts: 469

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petelebu View Post
the preamps i have solo 610 and i dont consider it a cheapo preamp, remember jim morrison and frank sinatra used them.
It should be perfectly capable of doing the job.
vonrichter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #17
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Elizabeth
Posts: 144

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonrichter View Post
The only way to find out is to try it. Does your room sound good to your ears in general when just playing or talking in it?
you know what? now that you mention it, it sounds a little muddy compared with the non treated ones in my house , funny uh?
maybe too many high frequency absorbers?
Petelebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #18
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Elizabeth
Posts: 144

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by rty5150 View Post
would getting a ribbon be out of the question?

what don't you like about your guitar sound? the 57 may be the problem. maybe and i5 or fathead may be your answer.
well what i dont like about my electric guitar sounds basically is the distortion, clean it sounds as it was supposed to but i add the plexitube pedal for distortion and it just doesnt sound right on the recordings, but when im just playing sounds great, i heavent tried with a beta 87a i got because it is designed for vocals and i think it will sound extremely bright, even if it is the only small condenser i have, and what i dont like about the sound, it sounds just too harsh.
Petelebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2009   #19
Gear addict
 
vonrichter's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: California
Posts: 469

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petelebu View Post
you know what? now that you mention it, it sounds a little muddy compared with the non treated ones in my house , funny uh?.
You might want to dampen the reflective ceiling (a cloud assembly of some kind would be nice), and either pull up some carpet and replace with wood floors, or put down a piece of plywood or something under drums/guitars/etc to make the floor more reflective. Hard floor and deadish ceiling always sounds better in my opinion than hard ceiling and dead floor.

Do you have any bass trapping in the corners? How big is the room?

You mentioned you had the walls covered... maybe you should try some more reflective material to cover some of your traps to bring back some of the high end.
vonrichter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #20
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Elizabeth
Posts: 144

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by vonrichter View Post
You might want to dampen the reflective ceiling (a cloud assembly of some kind would be nice), and either pull up some carpet and replace with wood floors, or put down a piece of plywood or something under drums/guitars/etc to make the floor more reflective. Hard floor and deadish ceiling always sounds better in my opinion than hard ceiling and dead floor.

Do you have any bass trapping in the corners? How big is the room?


You mentioned you had the walls covered... maybe you should try some more reflective material to cover some of your traps to bring back some of the high end.
the room is a 10ft by 10 ft by 8ft high, and no i dont have any bass traps, that may be the culprit uh?.
how imprtant are bass traps on a small room anyway?
Petelebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #21
Lives for gear
 
rty5150's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: LR,AR
Posts: 2,808

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petelebu View Post
the room is a 10ft by 10 ft by 8ft high, and no i dont have any bass traps, that may be the culprit uh?.
how imprtant are bass traps on a small room anyway?
way more important than broadband absorbers.
rty5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #22
Gear addict
 
vonrichter's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: California
Posts: 469

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petelebu View Post
how imprtant are bass traps on a small room anyway?
My room isn't much different than yours, and when I built a bunch of traps it made a huge improvement.
vonrichter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #23
Project Code CL2465
 
Chris Lago's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Who lives?
Posts: 10,767

If you don't want to invest in crazy acoustic deadening for vocals, then I suggest you get the sm7b, just match it with the grace and you're good to go.
Chris Lago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #24
Lives for gear
 
BOWIE's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ.
Posts: 3,289

Quote:
Originally Posted by rty5150 View Post
i wouldn't use the solo 610 for guitars
I sure would. I have a 610 that's pretty much dedicated to electric guitars. I greatly prefer it to any other preamp I've used on high-gain amps. Tames the fizz and harshness and puts a big, rich, harmonic glow on the guitars if you set the gain right.
Everyone's got their own style though.

Regarding room treatment, my favorite method in a small room is getting plastic diffusors and stuffing them with bass trapping material. This way, you get your bass under control while keeping the room alive and making it sound larger than it really is. I'm big on getting nice early reflections as it's one of the biggest problems in a home-studio.
BOWIE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #25
Gear nut
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Elizabeth
Posts: 144

Thread Starter
well thanks to all that tried to help me out with the issue, seems lile i have to try buying some bass traps to see if they make a difference.
Petelebu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #26
Lives for gear
 
rty5150's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: LR,AR
Posts: 2,808

Quote:
Originally Posted by BOWIE View Post
I sure would. I have a 610 that's pretty much dedicated to electric guitars. I greatly prefer it to any other preamp I've used on high-gain amps. Tames the fizz and harshness and puts a big, rich, harmonic glow on the guitars if you set the gain right.
Everyone's got their own style though.

Regarding room treatment, my favorite method in a small room is getting plastic diffusors and stuffing them with bass trapping material. This way, you get your bass under control while keeping the room alive and making it sound larger than it really is. I'm big on getting nice early reflections as it's one of the biggest problems in a home-studio.
your right, bowie, in his case with a 57, i would too. the nasally tone from a 57 would be toned a bit with the 610. with a ribbon, not at all.
rty5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #27
Gear addict
 
vonrichter's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: California
Posts: 469

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petelebu View Post
well thanks to all that tried to help me out with the issue, seems lile i have to try buying some bass traps to see if they make a difference.
Personally, I think it's not a big issue with close miced vocals. Just hang some blankets and create a temporary deadspace.
vonrichter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #28
Project Code CL2465
 
Chris Lago's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Location: Who lives?
Posts: 10,767

Quote:
Originally Posted by vonrichter View Post
Personally, I think it's not a big issue with close miced vocals. Just hang some blankets and create a temporary deadspace.
I think the biggest issue can be flutter echoes really.
Chris Lago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #29
Lives for gear
 
BOWIE's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ.
Posts: 3,289

Quote:
Originally Posted by rty5150 View Post
your right, bowie, in his case with a 57, i would too. the nasally tone from a 57 would be toned a bit with the 610. with a ribbon, not at all.
Yea, I could definitely see that being a possibility.
BOWIE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2009   #30
Lives for gear
 
aclarson's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,068

Quote:
Originally Posted by chrislago View Post
If you don't want to invest in crazy acoustic deadening for vocals, then I suggest you get the sm7b, just match it with the grace and you're good to go.
You could make a lot of treatment for the price of an SM7b.

I think it's important to have either way, it's just MORE noticeable with a condenser. But I would at least put something around the mic to kill flutter echo.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rty5150 View Post
way more important than broadband absorbers.
That depends how broadband, right? Often the term 'bass trap' is used interchangeably with 'broadband absorber' if you're referring to the Ethan/GIK type of OC703/mineral wool wrapped in burlap with no facing. I assume this is because they do treat bass frequencies, as well as others. This type of broadband absorber would work. But if you're talking about like thick foam that has no absoptive properties below say 300 Hz, then that's no good.
__________________
My Bands: Fair-Weather Enemies HyperBully Geek by day, rock star by night.
Experience: Musician - 20 years, Electronics Tech - 13 years, AE - 5 years
Read this stuff: Ethan's Acoustics Guide DIY Bass Traps Plans Drum Tuning Bible Slipperman's Guitar Guide Ermz's Mixing Guide
aclarson is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Advice for an opera singer who is a recording noob operaman Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 8 16th May 2009 09:24 AM
Recording singer/songwriters?? china jam So much gear, so little time! 21 23rd February 2008 11:49 PM
Recording a singer who wants to sound like he's screaming but he cant scream.... John_McEnroe So much gear, so little time! 27 11th December 2006 12:19 PM
Recording a singer + stage Piano hywyn Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 10 21st April 2006 12:02 PM
Recording a solo singer/guitarist Saudade Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 0 6th December 2004 12:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:04 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.