Voiceover Mic Preference? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory


Voiceover Mic Preference?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th April 2009   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 8

Thread Starter
Voiceover Mic Preference?

Which mic do you think is best for a voiceover newbie?

1. AKG Perception 120
2. MXL 990
3. SP B1
4. SM58
spinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #2
Gear maniac
 
asap audio's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 234

None of the above.

What kind of voice-over? Audio books, commercials, narration, all benefit from different kinds of mics.

I'd recommend an Electro-Voice RE-20. It will always sound good, it's a flattering mic, and forgiving of less than perfect recording environments.

Cheap ones that sound decent are: MXL V67G, Samson C03, M-Audio Luna, KSM 27.

If you're VERY serious about becoming a great, in demand VO talent,
just go ahead and buy a Neumann U87 and a John Hardy pre-amp.
You'll never say "is my setup good enough?", because the answer will be YES!
asap audio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #3
Gear maniac
 
danno812's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 216

The correct answer is...

The correct answer is:

5) the one you've tested and sounds best on your voice.

The only way to know for sure is to try all of the Large Diaphragm Condensers in your price range and choose the one that sounds best on your voice.

I would steer clear of Rode and Behringer.

GT and MXL make some mic's that are inexpensive and sound pretty good.
danno812 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
2Loud's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 569

Id say from a cheaper park

SM7B
AKG C214

using both, also for voiceovers and quite happy with...
2Loud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #5
Gear nut
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 93

+1 on the SM7B and the RE20.
MeBangkeys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #6
Gear maniac
 
danno812's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 216

Quote:
Originally Posted by MeBangkeys View Post
+1 on the SM7B and the RE20.
If you are more into radio broadcast, these are fine. If you want to be a voice actor you would be better served by a large diaphragm condenser.
danno812 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #7
Lives for gear
 
2Loud's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 569

Quote:
Originally Posted by danno812 View Post
If you are more into radio broadcast, these are fine. If you want to be a voice actor you would be better served by a large diaphragm condenser.
2Loud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
Mark Kaufman's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,233

Electro-voice RE 20!

http://beatlesnumber9.com/ram2

Also a perfect mic for home recordists with untreated rooms. The pic above is Paul McCartney using one in the Ram sessions while an orchestra plays in the same room. If he's too liberal for ya, well, Rush Limbaugh uses one too. It's one of the standards for broadcast recording, and it was designed to reject reflections, and basically focuses on what's directly in front of it. It also has the goods to be a go-to lead vocal mic.
Mark Kaufman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #9
Lives for gear
 
strewnshank's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,604

Quote:
Originally Posted by MeBangkeys View Post
+1 on the SM7B and the RE20.
I've never seen either not do the job well.

I used Re20's extensively, and probably cut over 200 audio books on them while working in college. Worked great on every voice. I'm a big time SM7B fan as well, but oddly enough, I've never cut an audio book on one, just records....used a TLM103 a decent amount as well, and it was way pickier. When it didn't work, it was back to the RE20. I felt like the newer and less talented artists responded better with the RE20.
__________________
Chris Thomas
Chris@strewnshank.com
"facts are stupid things" -Ronald Reagan

I want to purchase your Sony MXP3000 series EQ modules. Email me.
strewnshank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #10
Gear nut
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: Lafayette, Indiana
Posts: 118

Depending on budget, I would agree on the large diaphragm condenser. The AT4040 is a pretty darn good choice that won't break the bank. If you are looking for dynamic, try the Heil PR40. No matter what you choose, a good pre is also very important.
Emorgan_Voice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #11
Lives for gear
 
2Loud's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 569

What I like on C214 it seems to me bit more neutral than 4040, pretty detailed, ...was having also KSM 44 for testing and it was bit artificial sounding, heard something I did not like - in whole fq range...
but some may bash me for it..definitely it is a good mic..
in direct comparance with 214 I heard the difference a lot, ..not say its bad, just went for more open sounding mic...paradoxly with SSL Alpha it sounded 2D and boring, and pretty sizzly, with Great River everything changed, full, dense, highs rounded..my5
2Loud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #12
Lives for gear
 
Phrygian's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Sudbury, ON, Canada
Posts: 726

Send a message via MSN to Phrygian
RE-20's a great all purpose but I prefer the RE-27's we have here at the station. I'd still be happy with the RE-20 though.
Phrygian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #13
Gear maniac
 
musicmatt's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 270

Send a message via AIM to musicmatt
Shure SM7b sets the bar. For the price, NOTHING under 1k touches it. Seems like every interview I see, the guy is using one (like this hilarious one I saw just this morning)

YouTube - Billy Bob Thornton 'Blow Up' on Q TV

You got to get a good pre though, it needs plenty of gain. That means a cheapo pre will sound like ass if you crank it. I recommend API, Great River, John Hardy, Chandler (they aren't cheap).

Any other options are above 1k IMO. I have a TLM-49 which is great, heard good things about the TLM-103, Pearlmans, Gefell's etc.

for 1000 bucks less I'd go with the SM7b.
musicmatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #14
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,339

Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
For the money it's very hard to beat the SM7.

Frank
Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #15
Gear addict
 
scrubs's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 414

In the condenser realm, the CAD M179 is a fairly neutral LDC that works well for voiceover, in my experience. I use the RE20 and SM7 plenty, too.
scrubs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #16
Lives for gear
 
GZsound's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 958

Quote:
Originally Posted by scrubs View Post
In the condenser realm, the CAD M179 is a fairly neutral LDC that works well for voiceover, in my experience. I use the RE20 and SM7 plenty, too.
I agree.. Most of my voice work is done with either the M179 or an RE20 with good results. The M179 is very nuetral.
__________________
Mark G.
GZsound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #17
Lives for gear
 
Yoda117's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 656

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emorgan_Voice View Post
Depending on budget, I would agree on the large diaphragm condenser. The AT4040 is a pretty darn good choice that won't break the bank. If you are looking for dynamic, try the Heil PR40. No matter what you choose, a good pre is also very important.
Another vote for the 4040. For the $, it's a great starter LDC for voice talent. It's a bit less sensitive than other higher-end mics, which if you're not as strong on your mic technique makes it very forgiving.

Regardless, you can get some strong work with that mic, and for new talent a lot of studios in the Philly area (and some in NYC) use them for talent that they've not worked with before since they are so forgiving.

As for the rest, I'm also in agreement with the folks who are suggesting a good preamp. While it might not make a big a difference compared to the mic itself (there are threads where that statement is argued, so I'm not going into it), a good preamp is important to any decent recording chain.

Please note: good gear does not always mean expensive (which is also subjective based on budget and resources). However, better quality does come at a price (just don't expect a $1,000 preamp to sound $500 worse than a $1,500 preamp).
__________________
Voiceovers by Gregory Houser
Philadelphia based Voice Actor

My Blog - A Man, A Martini, and a Lot of Microphones.
Yoda117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #18
Lives for gear
 
rty5150's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: LR,AR
Posts: 2,808

Quote:
Originally Posted by spinner View Post
Which mic do you think is best for a voiceover newbie?

1. AKG Perception 120
2. MXL 990
3. SP B1
4. SM58

budget?
and/or preamp your using?

rich
rty5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2009   #19
JMc
Gear addict
 
JMc's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Boss Angeles
Posts: 457

Nobody has talked about environment yet. Y'know, the ROOM. And that's a very important factor in deciding between a dynamic or condenser, IMHO.

I used a dynamic in an open room studio for years because it was a good starter mic and rejected ambient noise well. But eventually I felt that I had to work too hard sometimes to really get the most out of it, depending on the type of read, particularly the more intimate types of VO reads.

Once I had a booth, I went to a large diaphragm condenser and have never looked back.

I'm not going to bother getting into "which mic" specifics, because the guy who said "the mic that sounds best with YOUR voice way up in the thread hit the nail on the head.
__________________
"This is not some psychotic episode - but a cleansing moment of clarity."
JMc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2009   #20
Lives for gear
 
3rd&4thT's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 761

Some engineers like the RE-20 because it does a great job of killing a bad room. That's what it was designed for.

Any VO's who have worked with other mics will recognize how unflattering it is. The more experienced the talent and the more important the job, the less adequate the RE-20 becomes. Be prepared for talent to bring their own mic to a session in preference to using your RE-20.

The SM7B is just as practical, utilitarian and engineer-friendly, and a lot less butt-ugly in sound.

Cheers,
3rd&4thT
__________________
"Batteries Not Included."
"Safe When Taken As Directed."
"Available at All Fine Stores."
"Check Our Website."
"Ask Your Doctor."
"Now on DVD."
"Member FDIC."
"Except in Nebraska."
---------------- Voiceover Tag Team
3rd&4thT is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
voiceover mic dutchman So much gear, so little time! 50 8th February 2011 06:36 AM
Which Mic for Female Voiceover? Sword in Hand So much gear, so little time! 17 15th January 2009 02:09 AM
All Rounder Mic Preference fingerbeats Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 3 10th July 2008 06:16 AM
How Do You Test a Voiceover Mic? 3rd&4thT Post Production forum! 1 19th October 2007 07:08 PM
Drum Overhead mic placement preference audioslave So much gear, so little time! 19 7th September 2005 10:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.