Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 27th January 2009, 09:20 AM   #91
hognogger
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6
Thumbs up

I've just had a proper listen to the samples of the modded 319 and V67...

They do both share a full-bodied sound. Other than that, they do sound quite different, to me anyway.

The V67 sounds "gloss" to the 319's "sheen". The V67 does sound pretty clean and uncongested, compared to how I remember it from the past, so I'd say it is a significant upgrade. It also still sounds like a V67... :)

If I had to chose between them, for my purposes, I'd take the 319 by a significant margin. It does sound a bit more "boring" than the V67, but my guess would be that it is a lot more tweakable. Still, the V67 has a certain sound to it that I imagine would be quite useful in a lot of cases, but my guess would be that it is going to be less versatile than the 319. (I am very partial to the modded 319; it has been a great mic for me.)

In any case, that's just my take. I'm impressed with the changes made to the mic... this is an excellent service you are offering, Michael... I can imagine myself getting my V67 modded... certainly, if I did, I would actually use it, rather than having it gather dust in a cupboard.
hognogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 09:43 AM   #92
blaugruen7
Lives for gear
 
blaugruen7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: berlin
Posts: 1,879
Send a message via AIM to blaugruen7
thanks michael for the files, very appreciated.
the oktava sounds much darker and with more thump from the lower register.
the v67g sounds in comparison like it has a hf bump which is not the case as far
as i can remember the frequency plot.
the oktava sounds like it has a hf roll off.
which mic sounds more like the source, can you tell this?
blaugruen7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 09:56 AM   #93
Michael_Joly
Lives for gear
 
Michael_Joly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Springfield, MA - Working on mics 16 hrs / day
Posts: 1,825
Thanks for listening, I appreciate your comments.

Yeah, I don't hear the modified V67g as a replacement for the 319, but rather as an upgrade for folks who own a V67, don't have an MK-319 but want classic FET / transformer-coupled sound.

The V67g is also a good mic for people who are in the market for a new LDC, have a very limited budget (it costs $100), want to avoid the overly-bright Chinese sound and also invest in a mic that can be improved down the road instead of tossed aside.

With the exception of the $180 MXL 2003 / 603 package (or a used Mk-219 / 319), I believe the V67g is a clearly superior alternative to most other LDC mics in its price class for these reasons.
Michael_Joly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 10:55 AM   #94
Michael_Joly
Lives for gear
 
Michael_Joly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Springfield, MA - Working on mics 16 hrs / day
Posts: 1,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by blaugruen7 View Post
the oktava sounds much darker and with more thump from the lower register. the v67g sounds in comparison like it has a hf bump which is not the case as far as i can remember the frequency plot. the oktava sounds like it has a hf roll off. which mic sounds more like the source, can you tell this?
The 319's capsule response more closely matches that of the Neumann K47 capsule rather than the brighter K67-style capsule used in the V67g. So yes, there are some differences here. The 319 used in the tests above is my personal mic and is exceptionally flat out to 16kHz, no roll-off. I suspect you're hearing the rise of the V67g's K67-style capsule.

Which mic sounds more like the source? Neither ; )
They're both LDCs and lend a larger-than-life euphonic quality to the source.
Michael_Joly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 10:58 AM   #95
hognogger
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael_Joly View Post
Yeah, I don't hear the modified V67g as a replacement for the 319, but rather as an upgrade for folks who own a V67, don't have an MK-319 but want classic FET / transformer-coupled sound.
I wasn't criticising the sound, as I'm sure you realise.

Fact is, although I prefer the modded 319, I still think the V67 will be better for some things, so from my perspective, getting my V67 modded would be a definite win.

Compare that with my current situation, where I really don't use it at all, and yet, for a modest outlay I could get a "new", quite decent mic.
hognogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2009, 11:17 AM   #96
blaugruen7
Lives for gear
 
blaugruen7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: berlin
Posts: 1,879
Send a message via AIM to blaugruen7
thanks michael,
cant await it until my v67g arrives.
blaugruen7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2009, 01:27 AM   #97
kojak
Gear maniac
 
kojak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidvybes View Post
...consider modding that V77 with a proper tube socket and a NOS GE/RCA 6072/6072A tube and you'll make the best of one of MXL's finest mics...I have 2 such modded V77s and they readily "eat" my NT2, no problem...actually hold up well against my Mojave MA200, a very respected tube LDC...simple solder skills are all that's required...
yeah i heard that mod's pretty simple, and makes a good mic into a great mic...it'll have to wait as i'm hittin the high seas till august, but when i get back i will definitely look into it...cheers
kojak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2009, 06:14 AM   #98
Michael_Joly
Lives for gear
 
Michael_Joly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Springfield, MA - Working on mics 16 hrs / day
Posts: 1,825
MXL V67g - Before & after OktavaMod

Mod Detail: Bass response improvement -

All analog systems exhibit phase shift at their cut-off frequencies. So one of my modification strategies is to lower the system cut-off frequency found in microphones. A very low cut-off improves the amplitude and phase response of bass notes in the audible range because filter effects are shifted to a lower frequency than the bass program material being recorded. Bass has more impact as a result.

Here is a stock MXL V67g and OktavaMod MXL V67g used to record a bass-rich Udu drum. The same sort of improvement would be heard on kick drum, toms or bass string plucks.

SOUND SAMPLE: V67g Stock, Udu drum

SOUND SAMPLE: OktavaMod V67g, Udu drum
Michael_Joly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2009, 09:16 AM   #99
jrogmusc
Gear maniac
 
jrogmusc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Charleston, S.C.
Posts: 181
603s is a great secret weapon mic.
jrogmusc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2009, 05:15 PM   #100
Kronos147
Lives for gear
 
Kronos147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Burbank, California
Posts: 1,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidvybes View Post
...IMHO the best mic of all the MXL models...a rare gem in a sea of "just misses"...

...just saw this one on the bay:
Marshall MXL V77 V77s Mic microphone kit V 77 - eBay (item 320334303501 end time Jan-28-09 08:12:00 PST)

Did you guys all fall asleep? I just snagged that baby at $200!

That is #3 v77 for me.

John Peluso has a mod for it too, using the P12 capsule.

Decisions, decisions....
Kronos147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2009, 05:47 PM   #101
BudgetMC
Lives for gear
 
BudgetMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ameliastan
Posts: 2,531
Ha! Congrats. I was watching it, but felt that cash was a bit tight to be buying any more mics right now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kronos147 View Post
Did you guys all fall asleep? I just snagged that baby at $200!

That is #3 v77 for me.

John Peluso has a mod for it too, using the P12 capsule.

Decisions, decisions....
__________________
Budget MC Productions:
Where Economy and Dignity Meet.
http://46Long.blogspot.com
http://myspace.com/46long
http://cdbaby.com/cd/46long
BudgetMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2009, 07:46 PM   #102
Stevil
Lives for gear
 
Stevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ca
Posts: 1,724
despite their low price i was disappointed with all the MXL mic's i've picked up.
mxl 2001/603 pack & 2 of the mxl 991's
snagged em as cheap condensers to get me started recording drum OH. they all seemed kinda hollow, hissy, gritty & captured more air than tone, one of the 991's has a perpetual squeal now. Much happier with the CAD & AT mics i picked up since. currently considering the OktavaMod since they're collecting dust.
Stevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2009, 08:43 PM   #103
memphisindie
Lives for gear
 
memphisindie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 2,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevil View Post
despite their low price i was disappointed with all the MXL mic's i've picked up.
mxl 2001/603 pack & 2 of the mxl 991's
snagged em as cheap condensers to get me started recording drum OH. they all seemed kinda hollow, hissy, gritty & captured more air than tone, one of the 991's has a perpetual squeal now. Much happier with the CAD & AT mics i picked up since. currently considering the OktavaMod since they're collecting dust.
Do it. You'll be glad you did.
__________________
I think I just ran past myself.
http://www.memphisindie.com

lou judson said ""Auto-tune is the last refuge of the incompetent musician." I heard dat! But it's also the first choice of the lame producer.

Michael Joly said " Its really ironic that while musicians today have more access to inspirational sources than ever before something like the soul-sucking blasphemy of autotune can exist - and is actually used."
memphisindie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2009, 09:32 PM   #104
Stevil
Lives for gear
 
Stevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ca
Posts: 1,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by memphisindie View Post
Do it. You'll be glad you did.
it is w2 season.
Stevil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2009, 02:00 PM   #105
illacov
Lives for gear
 
illacov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,110
Send a message via AIM to illacov Send a message via Yahoo to illacov
Talking Transformer...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael_Joly View Post
Mod Detail: Bass response improvement -

All analog systems exhibit phase shift at their cut-off frequencies. So one of my modification strategies is to lower the system cut-off frequency found in microphones. A very low cut-off improves the amplitude and phase response of bass notes in the audible range because filter effects are shifted to a lower frequency than the bass program material being recorded. Bass has more impact as a result.

Here is a stock MXL V67g and OktavaMod MXL V67g used to record a bass-rich Udu drum. The same sort of improvement would be heard on kick drum, toms or bass string plucks.

SOUND SAMPLE: V67g Stock, Udu drum

SOUND SAMPLE: OktavaMod V67g, Udu drum
Mike, do you suspect that changing the transformer out on the V67g would be of no benefit?

I noticed that you mentioned the mic is very flat and alot of those Chinese transformers really can add less than desirable artifacts to your recordings.

If the capsule is pretty flat, then wouldn't it be better to put something in there like a Jensen? Or for the budget slut a Nickel Core Edcor transformer?? The Jensen would probably be like 50 bucks, the Edcor would be like 20 bucks.

Did you for shits and giggles try swapping out the transformer? Just to see what the resulting sound was?? Maybe a Cinemag tranny??

So far I haven't regretted one transformer upgrade.

Peace
Illumination
__________________
Langston Masingale
Sales and Customer Support @ JJ Audio Mics, USA


**JJ Audio Custom Mics and Mods!!**

JJ Audio Mics Email (Langston/Sales and Customer Support)
illacov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2009, 02:43 PM   #106
Michael_Joly
Lives for gear
 
Michael_Joly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Springfield, MA - Working on mics 16 hrs / day
Posts: 1,825
In the specific case of the V67g, I did not find the expense of a new transformer & installation to offer a good return on the investment.

I went into my V67g modifications with the assumption that the transformer would have to be replaced. This was before I actually listened to and bench tested the transformer. But the first thing I did when upgrading the V67g was do a complete gain-stage evaluation - I wanted to see where distortion occurs first. Turns out the FET is the first stage that is pushed into soft clipping. This is good, sounds much better than if the bipolar transistor had hard clipped first. Once I determined the FET stage defined the headroom limitation of the mic I investigated the transformer.

On the bench I did frequency response, distortion (at normal and FET max levels) and phase response tests. I found the results to be entirely satisfactory - again, the FET stage set the headroom limit and HF phase shift way before the transformer affected these criteria.

Then I went and installed a Peluso transformer - sounded very nice also. But in this circuit, there was no measurable or audible improvement. So I decided the stock transformer offered an excellent value and re-installed it.

Its pretty well documented that a transformer swap in a tube mic like the Apex 460 is well worth the time and expense. But in the particular case of the FET V67g, the stock transformer does a nice job of doing what we like to hear with transformers.
Michael_Joly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2009, 04:27 PM   #107
illacov
Lives for gear
 
illacov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 2,110
Send a message via AIM to illacov Send a message via Yahoo to illacov
Talking Cool beans...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael_Joly View Post
In the specific case of the V67g, I did not find the expense of a new transformer & installation to offer a good return on the investment.

I went into my V67g modifications with the assumption that the transformer would have to be replaced. This was before I actually listened to and bench tested the transformer. But the first thing I did when upgrading the V67g was do a complete gain-stage evaluation - I wanted to see where distortion occurs first. Turns out the FET is the first stage that is pushed into soft clipping. This is good, sounds much better than if the bipolar transistor had hard clipped first. Once I determined the FET stage defined the headroom limitation of the mic I investigated the transformer.

On the bench I did frequency response, distortion (at normal and FET max levels) and phase response tests. I found the results to be entirely satisfactory - again, the FET stage set the headroom limit and HF phase shift way before the transformer affected these criteria.

Then I went and installed a Peluso transformer - sounded very nice also. But in this circuit, there was no measurable or audible improvement. So I decided the stock transformer offered an excellent value and re-installed it.

Its pretty well documented that a transformer swap in a tube mic like the Apex 460 is well worth the time and expense. But in the particular case of the FET V67g, the stock transformer does a nice job of doing what we like to hear with transformers.
Thanks for the explanation.

I did indeed like the modded version of the V67G.

I own the V67i and while it is ok for some things, I find it gets wooly early on vocals and makes them sound cheap. This is the warm side (the v67g side I'm describing).

I'd always figured it was partially the transformers fault. But apparently its the FET. And the capsules. I never really modded it except for the grille, sounds fine on outer kick drum and guitar cabinets.



Peace
Illumination
__________________
Langston Masingale
Sales and Customer Support @ JJ Audio Mics, USA


**JJ Audio Custom Mics and Mods!!**

JJ Audio Mics Email (Langston/Sales and Customer Support)
illacov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2009, 11:38 PM   #108
Michael_Joly
Lives for gear
 
Michael_Joly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Springfield, MA - Working on mics 16 hrs / day
Posts: 1,825
"Ultimate MXL 603 Mod" vs KM 184 as drum OH

Just got some drum OH sound files back from Alan Dossett.

Separate takes, slightly different mic positioning in each take (he's a monster drummer, not an engineer). So just ignore the stereo separation difference and concentrate on the bass extension, mid range impact and cymbal purity. Alan says the "Ultimate MXL 603 mod" kicks major booty.

SOUND FILE: Neumann KM-184 drum OH pair
SOUND FILE: OktavaMod "Ultimate MXL 603 Mod"
Michael_Joly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2009, 04:29 PM   #109
Mark D.
Gear interested
 
Mark D.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 11
I did enjoy hearing the comparisons. They were as expected. Clearly if one insists on having only one mic (I was like that once) for a LDC - one must chose between mics. Myself, I found each would serve a purpose, the Oktava for more bright/siblant voices and the MXL for a voice needing more top end. That explains the size and variety of a mic collection you'll find at most large studios, or gear-obsessed collections.

I am also fascinated by the new varieties of mics offered by MXL that we will soon hear and hear about. And yes, every newer mic lacks the infamous 2001 high end 'super-bump'. It's refreshing to hear this opted for given the emerging i-Pod and in-ear-monitor generation said to show signs of high frequency loss and tinnitus well before the old stage-monitor, bigger headphones (ie. more low end, less highs) generation.

The 'gold' one appears to be their new FET flagship. The V89 appears to be a learning step too. The inference of better response based on design within the headbasket may have learned from Oktava Mod, as surely as the single mesh on the MXL 9090 (Musician's Friend version of the V67i) probably 'learned' from that too. I'm interested in hearing them. So thank God Musician's Friend has a return policy. I use it often.
Mark D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2009, 04:38 PM   #110
lerone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJay View Post
the M3 and V12 are great, versatile, and with a good preamp they sound like more than they cost.
can usually find them used for cheap
+1 of the M3 and a really good pre. One of my favourite mics at any price for acoustic geetar, hi hat and Britishy sounding, cut through the mix male vocals. I think this is because of the output stage on the mic. Made in the USA too. I've heard the V12 is great and also the V69 and the Genesis.
lerone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2009, 04:47 PM   #111
toxostoma rufum
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 252
So basically, most of the mics they're making these days are decent: M3, V6, V87,88,89, Genesis. I'm just thrilled that they're starting to make low-noise mics as I do voiceover work. The v87 looks like a good travel/remote mic, and I really like what I've heard of the Genesis (but I'm going to wait for the MXL 'Abacab' *rimshot*).

That's more than you can say about some mic companies.
toxostoma rufum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2009, 04:53 PM   #112
lerone
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael_Joly View Post
Just got some drum OH sound files back from Alan Dossett.

Separate takes, slightly different mic positioning in each take (he's a monster drummer, not an engineer). So just ignore the stereo separation difference and concentrate on the bass extension, mid range impact and cymbal purity. Alan says the "Ultimate MXL 603 mod" kicks major booty.

SOUND FILE: Neumann KM-184 drum OH pair
SOUND FILE: OktavaMod "Ultimate MXL 603 Mod"

This mod is brilliant!
lerone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2009, 06:22 PM   #113
dickiefunk
Lives for gear
 
dickiefunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cornwall, UK
Posts: 1,273
I'd love to check out all of the new MXL Mics :-

Genesis, v67i tube, v69xm, v89, v87, v67n and Gold 35.

New MXL Products

These new range looks really great!

I'm particularly interested in the new v89xm.
__________________
Echo Layla 3G, SM Pro Audio M Patch 2
Focusrite ISA One, GAP PRE73, M-Audio DMP3
Oktava MK-319, Rode NT1a, MXL v67g, Studio Projects B1
Tannoy Reveal 8D's
Carillon Core 2 Duo 2.4 gHz Audio PC, Cubase 5.1.1
dickiefunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2009, 07:44 AM   #114
DivineMusic
Lives for gear
 
DivineMusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hotlanta
Posts: 2,122
Send a message via Yahoo to DivineMusic
id buy all the new mxl mics. i'll be getting a Genesis in a few weeks though
__________________
DivineMusic 2-23-07 ppl wanna praise protools like its the best thing since pu$$y
DivineMusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2009, 02:56 PM   #115
BudgetMC
Lives for gear
 
BudgetMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ameliastan
Posts: 2,531
Looks like MusicStudioDirect has the V89 in stock. MF expects to start shipping in late March... $399

Buy MXL V89 :: MXL Microphones at Music Studio Direct
__________________
Budget MC Productions:
Where Economy and Dignity Meet.
http://46Long.blogspot.com
http://myspace.com/46long
http://cdbaby.com/cd/46long
BudgetMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2009, 03:00 PM   #116
memphisindie
Lives for gear
 
memphisindie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 2,994
I'd like 2 4000's and if the 993 has the same mount as the 603 I'd like 2 of those.
__________________
I think I just ran past myself.
http://www.memphisindie.com

lou judson said ""Auto-tune is the last refuge of the incompetent musician." I heard dat! But it's also the first choice of the lame producer.

Michael Joly said " Its really ironic that while musicians today have more access to inspirational sources than ever before something like the soul-sucking blasphemy of autotune can exist - and is actually used."
memphisindie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th February 2009, 03:04 PM   #117
memphisindie
Lives for gear
 
memphisindie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Memphis TN
Posts: 2,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by BudgetMC View Post
Looks like MusicStudioDirect has the V89 in stock. MF expects to start shipping in late March... $399

Buy MXL V89 :: MXL Microphones at Music Studio Direct
I just got an MF catalogue in the mail yesterday, looks like they have them all,
cheepy cheepy.
__________________
I think I just ran past myself.
http://www.memphisindie.com

lou judson said ""Auto-tune is the last refuge of the incompetent musician." I heard dat! But it's also the first choice of the lame producer.

Michael Joly said " Its really ironic that while musicians today have more access to inspirational sources than ever before something like the soul-sucking blasphemy of autotune can exist - and is actually used."
memphisindie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2009, 03:18 AM   #118
Dave-H
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4
Thumbs up

I have a pair of 2003's & a pair of 603's. I use the 2003's on toms alot & the 603's for overheads & High hat I am thinking of having the 603's Modded. I really like the 2003 on drums alot & certain vocals.

Dave Huffman
Dave-H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2009, 03:35 AM   #119
Chris Lago
Lives for gear
 
Chris Lago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Toronto/Hollywood
Posts: 5,763
If anyone of you has the Genesis mic, I'd like a sample. I'm still looking for a go-to mic since I am currently doing lots of vocal recording (I got some vocal contracts with producers). Generis or V69XM? I'd like to know which one would be best!
__________________
http://www.chrislago.com
http://www.myspace.com/chrislago
Recording/Mixing/Mastering

Chris Lago is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th February 2009, 04:12 AM   #120
DamnYankee
Lives for gear
 
DamnYankee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 814
Quote:
Originally Posted by memphisindie View Post
I have a V67 G and although I hated it when I got it, I used it on something that worked and it came out more often. My ex-partner loved it.
I'm modding the snot out of it now and I like it even better now. I've heard a lot of MIC GUYS badmouth the capsules, but, I think it's more the electronics, this of course till I finish working on it. I think heir electronics are pretty interesting circuits and I se what they are doing with them, they aren't bad as a start and are quite innovative.
I'd like to see a shootout with ADK, like circuits against each other, assuming there are any.
That's surprising. I own a fair collection of mics from EV RE-xx to Neumanns, and I found the V-67G a terrific vocal mic. I actually bought a second V-67G and they are the only asian mics I own.
DamnYankee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone used MXL 770 or MXL v67g mics? bkspitfire Low End Theory 9 26th February 2009 03:54 AM
Peluso Mics: All 6 Models Compared warhead So much gear, so little time! 83 12th August 2008 07:13 PM
USB Mics: MXL.006 vs. MXL.007 Fourth Quarter So much gear, so little time! 3 10th March 2008 03:32 AM
UAD-1 are the models REALLY any good? stevetgn High end 35 17th August 2007 07:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:34 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0