Mackie Onyx Satellite - Price Drop - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory


Mackie Onyx Satellite - Price Drop

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th April 2008   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8

Thread Starter
Mackie Onyx Satellite - Price Drop

Howdy y'all,

Can anybody explain me why did the price of the Mackie Onyx Satellite Audio Interface dropped SO much? I'm talking about a drop from 500$ to about 150$ now.

I mean, I'm really interested on this device but I just find the price too low to be true.
renato777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
bexarametric's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 2,088

It never caught on. Mackie is discontinuing it.
bexarametric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #3
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,233



I'll go with Bex's assessment.

It was a pretty decent design, but a little late to market (as 2-4 channel interfaces have gotten smaller in the last couple years). I don't think people mind re-patching that much. That was the big idea of the design.



-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #4
Moderator
 
DrDeltaM's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347

It's a pretty nice box which sounds pretty good.
There's one big minor tho: when you're recording say a vocal with it, the direct monitoring of that vocal mic will be panned hard left (or hard right if you use input 2). There's no 'mono' button to place the direct monitoring of the inputs in center...

I've used the 'satellite' unit as a dual headphone amp as well, was a handy problem solver one time

Nice about the base unit, is that you can have a surround output with surround volume control, pretty cool for an on-the-cheap surround setup!
__________________
Mathijs Indesteege aka Mathew Lane
mixing - mastering - audio restoration - plugins
http://www.mathewlane.com

DrMS. Focus on your stereo field. - NEW v3.2 OUT NOW!
DrMS spatial processor - native RTAS/AU/VST plugin ยป

Digital Audio Product Support
Joystick Audio - Benelux High End Distributor
http://www.joystick.be
DrDeltaM is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #5
Gear addict
 
Mylithra's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 359

Can you use this thing as front end pres for another DA converter?
Mylithra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #6
Moderator
 
DrDeltaM's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mylithra View Post
Can you use this thing as front end pres for another DA converter?
You could as the satellite has a 'direct monitoring' controle room stereo line out. I'm not 100% sure if this bypasses the build-in convertor tho, you'd have to check with Mackie to be really sure.
DrDeltaM is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #7
Moderator
 
DrDeltaM's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347

I just checked the manual, the signal on the outputs would indeed have passed the Mackie's AD and DA convertors...

There are inserts on the micpre's tho (using the base-station), so you could use those as (unbalanced) outputs pre-convertor.
DrDeltaM is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #8
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeltaM View Post
It's a pretty nice box which sounds pretty good.
There's one big minor tho: when you're recording say a vocal with it, the direct monitoring of that vocal mic will be panned hard left (or hard right if you use input 2). There's no 'mono' button to place the direct monitoring of the inputs in center...

I've used the 'satellite' unit as a dual headphone amp as well, was a handy problem solver one time

Nice about the base unit, is that you can have a surround output with surround volume control, pretty cool for an on-the-cheap surround setup!
But that only happens with direct monitoring, right? If I monitor on my DAW, I'll hear the vocal mic on both outputs, am I right?
renato777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #9
Moderator
 
DrDeltaM's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,347

Quote:
Originally Posted by renato777 View Post
But that only happens with direct monitoring, right? If I monitor on my DAW, I'll hear the vocal mic on both outputs, am I right?
Of course, if you monitor thru your DAW, you can pan it everywhere you want.
DrDeltaM is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #10
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8

Thread Starter
Thanks. Just checkin'
renato777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #11
Gear maniac
 
Al Rogers's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Posts: 221

I owned one. Sold it on eBay and bought an Apogee Duet. No regrets!
Al Rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #12
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Rogers View Post
I owned one. Sold it on eBay and bought an Apogee Duet. No regrets!
Could you give some more details on that? What was exactly the problem with the unit?
renato777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008   #13
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 96

Quote:
Originally Posted by renato777 View Post
Could you give some more details on that? What was exactly the problem with the unit?
My experience with it was very negative. Mackie replaced it three times and every single unit started artifacting after 15-20 minutes of operation.

Sold it and got a Fast Track Ultra. No regrets!
bengl3rt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2008   #14
Gear addict
 
Mylithra's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 359

Quote:
Originally Posted by DrDeltaM View Post
I just checked the manual, the signal on the outputs would indeed have passed the Mackie's AD and DA convertors...

There are inserts on the micpre's tho (using the base-station), so you could use those as (unbalanced) outputs pre-convertor.

Yeah.. I checked the manual as well and looked through the block diagram. Would be nice to convert those Ctrl Rm. outs on the pod to balanced mic pre outs, but that might be more of a discussion for the geekslutz.

For under under $200, I doubt you'd find something as nice as these Onyx pres.
Mylithra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2008   #15
Gear addict
 
m_gant's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 424

Had one and returned it.
Pros: Price, awesome pres. Built well.
Cons: Hard pan when hardware monitoring. Hum when powering base station by supplied wallwart. Every input goes through AD/DA unless you bypass via insert.

It became clear to me after owning for 3 days that this unit was never fully developed and sadly abandoned by Mackie. I really wanted to keep it, and if the stupid hardware monitor wasn't screwed with that crazy pan thing, I could of lived with the other problems.
m_gant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2008   #16
Gear maniac
 
Al Rogers's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Posts: 221

The sound was OK but not great. Laying down vocals and hearing yourself hard panned to one side is crazy. I couldn't get used to it. What could they have been thinking when they designed that?

With the Apogee Duet it's easy to put yourself in the center. Their Maestro Mixer works great for direct monitoring. The sound quality is substantially better than the Onyx.

-Al
Al Rogers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2008   #17
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 132

Wow that's a great deal. I got mine for $200 because I needed something small and it's been great.
It's true that it lacks direct monitoring where you could mix what's playing back, and if you do use input monitoring it hard pans 1 and 2 to l and r, but if you bring the samples down to 64 and monitor through your DAW, it works perfectly fine. i've had no stability issues and I'm working on a 4 year old computer. if you cant run 64 or even 32 samples in real time, something is up.
it's been rock solid for me.
Enzo Polotso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2008   #18
Lives for gear
 
Vocalvoodoo's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 704

For the money, I also find it hard to beat. While I don't think it sounds better than the Duet, it sure beats the hell out of the Mbox2 and Digi002. The one negative I have found is an annoying whine when using phantom power. Not all Satellites have this problem, but a good number do. Mackie is pretty good about replacing them though. I had one replaced, but never sent the new one back because I wound up getting the Duet.
__________________
pointless text, blah, blah blah, poop

Josh Mahler
Vocalvoodoo Productions/Josh Mahler VO
www.VocalvoodooProductions.com
Vocalvoodoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2008   #19
Gear addict
 
frankie c's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 351

hard pan

Question....

could yout just adapt the headphone to mono by using a mono (un bal) 1/4 inch adapter plug into the unit??? would that mix the L + r AND JUST SOLVE IT?

frankie c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2010   #20
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5

Actually.. you are supposed to half insert the plug.

I don't recall where I read it.. but it works. I use headphones in the headphone jack. You don't plug all the way in. One click before it is all the way in and you'll get mono.
Dilapidus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2011   #21
Gear interested
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1

Mackie Satellite got better

FYI for all you bargain hunters - the Mackie Satellite has a firmware update that updates smoothly, and completely resolves the mic panning problem, and a couple of other things besides.

The Mackie preamps are better than the duet's, and I have been running one on my Mac for a couple of years, without problem.

I keep looking at the apogee on ebay - I think more for the aesthetic than anything. It looks very 'Mac'. It has software controls, which I wanted, but don't miss at all.

As for running on Windows, well!
afro54 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2011   #22
Lives for gear
 
Muser's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 3,358

if I look on the site I see
Firmware download v1.50 Release Notes (.pdf) v1.5.0100 (.zip)

which is odd because my OSX firmware package says 1.7.8.

maybe it's a combo package which isn't very clearly named.

although looking in my OSX library package receipts, the package says 1.7.8 as well.
__________________
.
..
GREAT!! I have this very same versatile, powerful? and high quality amplifier,,,
Quoted frome the Radian6 user guide
Muser is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Tags: ,



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mackie Onyx Satellite Help!!! LEXXX RUGER Low End Theory 7 19th March 2010 11:32 PM
Mackie Onyx Satellite Fourth Quarter So much gear, so little time! 4 17th March 2008 03:16 AM
Mackie Onyx Satellite Jules Product Alerts older than 2 months 21 20th August 2007 05:08 PM
mackie onyx satellite, what about it? gizeh12 Music computers 0 8th August 2007 03:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:11 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.