![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| favorite solid-state acoustic guitar condenser (single mic) | manthe | So much gear, so little time! | 25 | 30th May 2007 04:22 AM |
| small or large condenser mic for acoustic guitar ? | musicsound-2 | High end | 1 | 25th April 2007 10:36 AM |
| New Pre for vocals and acoustic guitar | bzone | High end | 2 | 18th December 2006 08:13 AM |
| Acoustic Guitar and Vocals, | Gaston69 | Work in progress / advice requested / Show & Tell / Artist showcase | 3 | 7th May 2006 07:41 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #31 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 96
| Two votes for the Sputnik from guys who either haven't heard it or own it... In that price range, nothing comes close to the AT4050 for the apps you are looking for. I own both the Sputnik and the AT4050, and for acoustic and "clean/gritty" vocals, the 4050 would get chosen 10 out of 10 times.
__________________ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - It's a coin toss: nuns teaching sex ed, or idiots commenting on gear they have only read about... "The ADL600 is a fine piece...and is absolutely a viable alternative to a GR." - Dan Kennedy |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: C-ville area VA
Posts: 1,284
| AT4047....without a doubt. $500 |
| | |
| | #33 |
| Gear Head | 4050 is such a solid mic. I find it's very nice on certain female vocals. It's nice on ac gtrs too. I've used it as a stereo pair to record a 90 piece orchestra with pretty good results. I'm a fan. I've used the KSM 44 and I like it too, but not enough to switch. |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,044
| CAD VX2 (dual caps) is great for vocals and acoustic guitar. The smaller capsule is brighter, and works very nicely on acoustic guitar. The larger capsule is smooth on vocals. You can regularly find them going for $800. This is a 100% made in the USA microphone that doesn't get the recognition it deserves. Warren turned me onto them. Kudos to him! |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 66
| Thanks for all the suggestions guys. I'm pretty set on the AT4050 at this point. -Joe |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Chicago
Posts: 462
| I wouldn't get too set just yet. An AEA R-84 just went for around $790 on eBay. So yeah...think about that one. |
| | |
| | #37 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 66
| |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 910
| TLM103 I just bought a Neumann TLM103 with shockmount for 700, used. I really like this mic. A/Bed it with several others at work. Thought it held its own against more expensive Neumann's. Liked it better than the KSM33/SM7/SM58/C3000/EV dynamic on my voice (thin tenor) and also a good high baritone singer. VERY VERY VERY subjective of course, but it's in your price range on Ebay. Danny |
| | |
| | #39 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 66
| Quote:
Is it a large diaphragm condensor?? -Joe | |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,297
| The best set up for vocals and acoustic for $700? An Sm7b and a Sm81. You can thank me later. I can't believe that someone, for purely sonic reasons would pick the 4050 over the Sputnik, though. The Sputnik is one of the few LDCs I liked on my voice AND guitar pretty well. |
| | |
| | #41 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Twin Cities, USA
Posts: 10,942
| Quote:
But you said it yourself, on YOUR voice. So why can't you believe it?
__________________ You awake with a start To just the beating of your heart. Just one man beneath the sky, Just two ears, just two eyes. | |
| | |
| | #42 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 14
| I like my sputnik for similar situations, then again, I have a sm7 and sm81 to turn to if I don't. I think the sputnik is worth a shot! |
| | |
| | #43 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4
| for the sound you described, i'd look at ADK mics, too. great prices, and great sounding mics. i have the TC (tube condenser), and it sounds phenomenal on vocals and acoustic guitar. i also own their SC-T, which pairs great on acoustic with the TC. if the TC is a little high $, look at the A6, as well - looks like a pretty sweet mic - probably similar to a 414. |
| | |
| | #44 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Indiana
Posts: 682
| I'd save an extra $300 and get the MA200. For the extra 300 bucks you'd be doing yourself a favor, imo |
| | |
| | #45 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 483
| Quote:
The thing is NO ONE EVER listens to me about the ST-77. I have and like the 4050. It's a great mic for the price range, but when I put it up against the 77, I like it less, especially for acoustic guitar. I guess people are scared off by the Sterling Audio name, and admittedly, I was VERY skeptical at first, but the proof is in the pudding. For acoustic guitar it is smoother, more detailed and never brittle. For drum room mic, it is the best I've used. picks up kick and snare very well and gives an awesome whole kit sound. My band recorded a scratch track with just an i5 on guitar cab and the 77 in the room, and they said they'd be happy if our album sounded that good. One time I was recording hip-hop vocals and didn't have my SM7, which WAS my go-to. I used the 77 and the rapper said to never bring the SM7 again and that he only wanted to use the "porn-star dildo" as he called it (77). I just love the mic and I haven'teven touched my 4050 in months because of the 77. Like I said, you (like everyone else) will get the 4050 because of everyone's suggestions, and you will like it. I just know that the 77 is a better value and, IMO a better all around mic. If you ever have an extra $400, go to GC and talk a salesman into letting you take it home for that. You won't be sorry. | |
| | |
| | #46 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 66
| Quote:
I might just check it out and if I don't like it, I'll return it. Thanks, -Joe | |
| | |
| | #47 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Surfside Fla
Posts: 164
| |
| | |
| | #48 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 20
| or KSM32 ;) |
| | |
| | #49 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 424
| My thoughts as well.
__________________ -Alex |
| | |
| | #50 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 83
| In this price range the KSM 44 would be my first choice. It is extremely versatile; I have used it on vocals, sax, trumpet, and acoustic & electric guitar. |
| | |
| | #51 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 399
| I'm enjoying the KSM 44 here, it's a nice smooth sounding mic and it's features make it pretty versatile. I've no personal experience of the other mics suggested though. |
| | |
| | #52 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Northwest Territories, Canada
Posts: 509
| Quote:
It's true that I do not own a Sputnik...yet.... but I HAVE tried and heard a borrowed one on a variety of sources. I liked what I heard... and will probably pick one up myself when I can afford it. Gee.. do I still not get to vote there Hak | |
| | |
| | #53 |
| Gear maniac | i own both the at4050 and the st77, both great mics. i would go with the 4050 for vocals and drum overheads, and the st77 for guitars, tamborine, hi-hat, and misc stuff over the 4050. really both mics are great all around, can't go wrong with either one for the price, but i like the 4050 more on vocals. hope that helps.
__________________ zac |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Gear Head | I would really think about getting a USED Soundelux/Bock u195, you can usually find em used for around 700-800. Worth every penny, and a step up from most mics around that price range. Great big vocal sound, and great on acoustic gtr. |
| | |
| | #55 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 263
| Quote:
As an alternative, look around ebay etc. for a Soundelux 195. One of the best all-round mics there is. Was my first "serious mic" purchase, and even though I now have a range of 'high end' mics, 195 still gets plenty of use. Vox, acoustic gtr, cello drums etc. etc. B | |
| | |
| | #56 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 355
| Quote:
Also, nobody has mentined the AT4060, you can get a demo or used for $700 and it's a great mic that might work for you as well. Regards, John | |
| | |
| | #57 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Los Angeles CA
Posts: 36
| Do yourself a favor and spend a little bit more and get a mojave 200. If you know people you can get them in the $750 -$800 range if not I think they are about $950 on sweetwater. Ive got a groovetube 66 a nuemann 103 and have used 4050's and none of them are even close. Its the most unbelievable acoustic guitar sound I've ever gotten. You cant find them on ebay cause no one who has thim is selling them. I have a saved search and havent seen any in the 4 months Ive been looking for a used one. Thats gotta tell you something! |
| | |
| | #58 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,001
| I've got a Sputnik and a NTK. I'd get a Sputnik without hesitation. It's a killer killer mic at any price point. They could've easily charged double. Definitely a badass. |
| | |
| | #59 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 96
| Quote:
__________________ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - It's a coin toss: nuns teaching sex ed, or idiots commenting on gear they have only read about... "The ADL600 is a fine piece...and is absolutely a viable alternative to a GR." - Dan Kennedy | |
| | |
| | #60 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Ameliastan
Posts: 867
| Only based on comparisons and shoot-outs, not extensive personal experience, but the Blue Blueberry, which can be had for $600-sh used, is a heck of a vocal and acoustic mic. I want one. ![]()
__________________ Budget MC Productions: Where Economy and Dignity Meet. http://46Long.com http://myspace.com/46long http://cdbaby.com/cd/46long |
| | |