![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #181 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2009 Location: Music City
Posts: 1,535
| Quote:
Intuition and theory would suggest that conversion to analog and back would affect the signal integrity, but to be quite honest, I can't hear it happening. All I can hear between ITB and analog mix is the subtle color of the desk. The HD24xr does quite well, and the extra conversion stage wouldn't be the weakest link in the chain by a long shot when we're talking about using the tubefire with groovetubes and shure mics for classical work. My sapphyre is an extremely quiet desk and paired with HD24xr conversion, it has no effect on the dynamic range and nowhere near the coloring effect of the tubefire. Strictly speaking, this wasn't a critical recording. If it had been, I would have chosen different mics and mic amps, but I probably would still mix through the sapphyre. Classical snobs would probably scoff at that, but to hell with 'em. If it sounds good, I'll try it. I guess I'm a rebel. | |
| | |
| | #182 | |
| Lives for gear | If it sounds good .... Quote:
Just curious about something... in the manual of the tubefire, it says that the output knob is the tube stage ( in the diagram) ... but... on another page of the manuel it says that increasing the gain adds more tube warmth..... I think the manual is wrong... you get more tube when you increase the output knob , and lower the gain....right ? For example....lowering the output knob to about 11 oclock and increasing gain should give you a cleaner sound.... that's how I hear it..... | |
| | |
| | #183 |
| Gear Head | Got two of 'em
Love'em. The only issue are the drivers, very sad dev work there. The pre's sound great. I'm thinking about going straight out of the pres and into a MOTU 24io or Lynx (if I can afford it). Note: You can only go straight through the TubeFire not the OctoTube. TubeFire has the source buttons that allow you to choose the preamp (or DA converter) as the source for that output channel. If you can find them, they are WELL worth it. |
| | |
| | #184 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2006 Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,869
| |
| | |
| | #185 |
| Gear Head Joined: Oct 2010 Location: Plymouth, UK
Posts: 40
| |
| | |
| | #186 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 525
|
i am looking into getting one as well.
|
| | |
| | #187 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6
|
yeah the drivers were such a hassle in XP (supplied, and updated by ART). i tried all the hotfixes, bought a TI based firewire card, bought another TI based firewire card that was PCI-E...nothing worked. what worked for me was upgrading to Win7. from what i understand Win7 has a revamped audio stack more like the Mac. i currently have 2 Tubefire8 units, and they work flawlessly in Win7 and Win8 Dev. i'm bummed they discontinued this unit. |
| | |
| | #188 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2009 Location: Music City
Posts: 1,535
|
I may consider selling my two units, PM me if you're interested.
|
| | |
| | #189 |
| Neotek Lover Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Chicago
Posts: 116
| Tube fire is a really nice 8 channel preamp
I think as far as preamps go for computer based recording the ART Tubefire 8 is an amazing awesome preamp. I havent used the converter side of it yet just the preamps through my Apogee AD-16X. if you cant get a good recording with this preamp. the problem is not the preamp. Its you.
__________________ Neotek series 1e 24x8, Apogee AD-DA -16x combo, Apogee Symphony system, Waves plug ins, Logic Pro, Mac G5. Genelic 8050a, Empirical Labs FATSO, Distressor. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| is anyone even curious about the art tubefire 8 ? | fontenele | Low End Theory | 40 | 27th September 2010 05:46 PM |
| New ART tubefire 8? | projuice | Low End Theory | 43 | 23rd December 2008 07:20 PM |
| |