Best VST multi-band compressor < 250$
Old 5th September 2007
  #1
Gear addict
 

Thread Starter
Best VST multi-band compressor < 250$

...
Old 5th September 2007
  #2
Lives for gear
 

build your own with linear phase filters and good clean compressors like the oxford
one of the reasons that multi-bands are hated so much by many is that most/all the MB plug-ins around suck.
Old 5th September 2007
  #3
Gear addict
 

Thread Starter
...
Old 6th September 2007
  #4
Lives for gear
 
taturana's Avatar
Cool

waves linear phase MB is rather nice...

psp vintage warmer does have multiband capability too and is nice sometimes...

those are the only ones i use...
Old 6th September 2007
  #5
Gear addict
 

Thread Starter
...
Old 6th September 2007
  #6
Gear nut
 
Freudian Slip's Avatar
 

See if you can find a demo of Roger Nichols Dyman-izer or for a multi-band limiter there's digital detailer. He's very highly regarded so it may be worth a test drive.


F.S.
Old 6th September 2007
  #7
Lives for gear
 
feyshay's Avatar
 

The Dynamizer (previously Neodynium), is not the kind of multiband compressor you are talking about. It sounds like you want bands separated by frequency. Neodynium is novel because the bands are separated by volume.

I have Soniformer. It is not that challenging. It does not have to be. Of the others you list, I've liked DQ1, but have not purchased. Wavearts seems to be the most user friendly, but I have yet to buy one of their products.

BTW--DQ1 is more of a dynamic equalizer. If you're comparing it to the other Multiband dynamics, try/get the CQ1. Of course, you could get both. They seem quite pricy IMO, but if you need an equalizer too, that DQ1 is quite nice. You can turn dynamic effect off and use it as a regular equalizer.
Old 6th September 2007
  #8
Gear addict
 

Thread Starter
...
Old 6th September 2007
  #9
Lives for gear
 
taturana's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by diatonic View Post
Thanks taturana. I also use VW2. I find it is very good for coarse general fixes, but I am looking for something a bit more precise.

Sonalksis DQ-1 seems very good so I may just go with that. It has very little discussion surrounding it so it is hard to learn from others' experiences.
i have tried the sonalksis dq-1 and found it very nice but i thought the interface was confusing... mabe i should try it again sometime...
Old 6th September 2007
  #10
Lives for gear
 

What about the Wave Arts isn't good enough for you? I actually like it alot, I don't slam my mix hard with it but I find it extremely useful especially when I get bands with rather flat sounding stereo files that need a little help(I won't call it mastering, just helping).
Old 6th September 2007
  #11
Gear maniac
 

+1 on DQ 1
Old 6th September 2007
  #12
Lives for gear
 
feyshay's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by diatonic View Post
I remember Neodynium from EA days.

I agree DQ-1 is not cheap. I have also tried out CQ-1. From what I can tell, DQ-1 can do much of what CQ-1 can do, but in a more subtle fashion. If I am missing something with CQ-1, please let me know.

Soniformer is a good tool, but the several tabs of settings and means of manipulating the parameters is not as useful for me compared to wavearts or sonalksis equivalents.

The CQ1 is a multiband compressor/expander.
The DQ1 is a dynamic equalizer.
That's the difference. I do like the DQ1 better, but with multiband compression, I would think you would be wanting to have more significant effect.
Old 6th September 2007
  #13
Lives for gear
 
feyshay's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by feyshay View Post
The CQ1 is a multiband compressor/expander.
The DQ1 is a dynamic equalizer.
That's the difference. I do like the DQ1 better, but with multiband compression, I would think you would be wanting to have more significant effect.
Diatonic,
I was thinking--I liked the DQ1 but went with GlissEQ from Voxengo. You might find that to be a cheaper (and I think as good) alternative to the DQ1. That would still leave you good money for the CQ1.
Old 7th September 2007
  #14
Gear addict
 

Thread Starter
...
Old 7th September 2007
  #15
Lives for gear
 

Sonitus multiband, $79 from Cakewalk. 5 discreet bands with every parameter you can think of.
Old 7th September 2007
  #16
Gear maniac
 
NotVeryLoud's Avatar
 

Is the mention of WAVES C4 being avoided because its, well . . . WAVES?
I've been using it for years for both music and sound-design and think it's pretty useful. Though, other than the PSP, I've not tried any of the other MB's mentioned.
Old 7th September 2007
  #17
Gear addict
 
Timothy Lawler's Avatar
 

+ for Waves Linear MB. Very good sound quality IMO but the Masters bundle is over your budget. Soniformer is very good, and not hard to use. Reaper now has a MB comp in it, ReaXcomp, that has good sound quality, and is simple.
Old 7th September 2007
  #18
Gear addict
 

Thread Starter
...
Old 7th September 2007
  #19
Have you had a look at the new Roger Nichols Spl-izer plug-in?

aussie_techie suggested a similar approach, but it's not expensive ($129) and then you could use any great comp on the divided bands...
Old 7th September 2007
  #20
Gear maniac
 
DowntownScience's Avatar
 

Well For $250 (Technically) UAD Precision Multiband. But you'd have to purchase a UAD-1 card firstly.
Old 7th September 2007
  #21
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
hgen's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by NotVeryLoud View Post
Is the mention of WAVES C4 being avoided because its, well . . . WAVES?
I've been using it for years for both music and sound-design and think it's pretty useful. Though, other than the PSP, I've not tried any of the other MB's mentioned.
C4, great for vocals too. Alot of pro ppl i know use above all else.
Old 7th September 2007
  #22
Lives for gear
 

Here"s a link the the Sonitus MB, not sure if a demo version is available. I've been using it for mastering on the last few projects I've done, about the only feature it doesn't have is M/S capability.

fx:multiband
Old 7th September 2007
  #23
Gear nut
 
Freudian Slip's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by diatonic View Post
but I'm just not getting the broad smooth tonal correction I need.
I'm not sure your using the right tool for the job. I try to compress without broad tonal changes. On my own recordings I never use multiband for tonal correction. That's all done at the track level.

I'm not sure who's matirial you are working on? Do you have access at the track level?

F.S.
Old 7th September 2007
  #24
Lives for gear
 
mljung's Avatar
Voxengo Soniformer 2

Oh but you allready tried it -

hmm, I would try again!

Old 7th September 2007
  #25
Gear addict
 

Thread Starter
...
Old 20th August 2008
  #26
Gear nut
 
vo1k1's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by terminal3 View Post
Have you had a look at the new Roger Nichols Spl-izer plug-in?

aussie_techie suggested a similar approach, but it's not expensive ($129) and then you could use any great comp on the divided bands...
There is currently a deal going on - it's $99. I tried the demo - playing with putting different dynamics processors on each band - very easy to use.
Old 20th August 2008
  #27
LPK
Gear maniac
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by feyshay View Post
The CQ1 is a multiband compressor/expander.
The DQ1 is a dynamic equalizer.
That's the difference. I do like the DQ1 better, but with multiband compression, I would think you would be wanting to have more significant effect.
To me the CQ1 also looks more like a dynamic EQ. I know they say "Multi-Band Compander", but it's still using dynamic equalization to achieve the results.

Never understood, why they are offering two tools with slightly different options, which basically do the same thing.
Old 28th June 2009
  #28
Gear interested
 
gaxxard's Avatar
 

I read an article in SOS this year on Parallel compression. As a result I made a preset in EnergyXT VST plugin that is a kind of parallel compression/multiband thing with 5 instances of Magnus' Nyquist eq and a collection of various free compressors: Digitalfishphones' Blockfish; Christian Budde's Fast Soft Knee Compressor; Audio damage's Rough Rider; Buzzroom's Buzcomp andhonic XPressor. All set around 2.0:1 to start.

As highlighted in the SOS article the sound is very open with excellent transients and with reduction in the weaker characteristics of any of the separate compressors. The Nyquist eqs smoothly and subtly maintains level and provides multiband separation.

Compared to other free and commercial MB's I've used, I am getting some excellent results. I've been putting this XT preset in as frequently as I've been using my UAD 1076LN and LA-2A.
Old 28th June 2009
  #29
Lives for gear
 
dickiefunk's Avatar
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
HA_DA_JA / Product Alerts older than 2 months
36
xdementia / Mastering forum
4
PoorGlory / So much gear, so little time!
9
Stoneroses6300 / So much gear, so little time!
0
Branislav / Gearslutz Secondhand Gear Classifieds
11

Forum Jump
 
Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.