where does the most creamiest, smoothness, phatness comes from... - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory

where does the most creamiest, smoothness, phatness comes from...
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th June 2007   #1
Gear maniac
 
ine-kpro...'s Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 233

Thread Starter
where does the most creamiest, smoothness, phatness comes from...

is it the mic, preamp, compressor, converters or daw or tape that adds the most cream, smoothness and phatness to a signal?

what units would that be.
__________________
ine-kpro... (eye-yen-kay pro)
<--- watch this space --->
www.ine-kpro.com
www.3views.ine-kpro.com
ine-kpro... is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
lowfreq33's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,186

Yes.
lowfreq33 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2007   #3
member no 666
 
Fletcher's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Suffern, NY
Posts: 10,412

... it comes from the player [singer, what have you]... all we do is try to have the gear not get in the way as much as possible and try to be true to the aesthetic of the artist and help them communicate their music.
__________________

CN Fletcher

Professional Affiliation:

R/E/P Professional Recording Engineer and Producer forums


mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33
We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid

Roscoe Ambel once said:
Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light
Fletcher is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2007   #4
Gear maniac
 
ine-kpro...'s Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 233

Thread Starter
there must be one gear out there that you have tried that you would say adds the most creamiest, smoothness and phatness to a signal out of all the other gear.
ine-kpro... is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
themaidsroom's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: nyc / london
Posts: 3,518

a great mic with a great class a mixing desk and a really well maintained
2" tape recorder wins the race every time in my opinion. things recorded this way
sound good yesterday, today and tomorrow.


i have recorded katell keineg and rufus wainwright - two great singers - to both digital and to 2" 8 track - fletcher's observation about
the importance of the artist is assumed in my post above - the 2" 8 track has no comparison for recording anything, let alone a truly
great singer - higher resolution than any digital and smooth, deep and and rich......the todd ao of sound



be well


- jack
themaidsroom is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
Mastering101's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 1,550

it all starts with the mic's and a high quality preamp, the best converters..i could go on and on..its your full tracking chain..if you try to get a sound with one box
you will miss it....
__________________
Mastering101 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
not_so_new's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,712

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletcher View Post
... it comes from the player [singer, what have you]... all we do is try to have the gear not get in the way as much as possible and try to be true to the aesthetic of the artist and help them communicate their music.
So...... I can stick a Radio Shack cassette deck any-ol-place in the room and get "creamy smooth phatness" from any player as long as they know how to get "creamy smooth phatness" from their instrument or voice?

And just exactly how does one get "creamy smooth phatness" from their vocal cords?

Oh and point me to a guitar amp that has "creamy smooth phatness" when recorded to a Radio Shack cassette deck because I have recorded some GREAT players with some great guitars through Marshalls, Fenders, Bogners, Randalls, Egnaters, Ampegs, Supros, Peaveys, Oranges, Gallien-Kruegars, Voxs, and a whole sh*tload of others and not once have they come out sounding "creamy smooth" OR "phat" when I didn't use the proper tools on my side of the glass.

dfegad

WTF?... I get so sick of this answer it makes my head spin. I don't know what world others are living in by in my world I really don't control who stands in front of my microphones. My job is to make them sound as good as I can with the tools and techniques I have available. NOTHING has "creamy smooth phatness" if I don't hold up my end of the bargain and "my end of the bargain" includes experience, techniques and EQUIPMENT.

ine-kpro..., I agree with effectsnut, it usually starts with the mics and preamps BUT part of that is what I mentioned above, you have to have good micing techniques on the right source to get there. And you need the back side of the chain as well.

There is no one magic bullet that you and Fletcher seem to be pointing to for good sounds (and I know Fletcher agrees with this but his post really makes it sound like it is ALL in the hands of the performer which I think even he would agree is not the case)..

It is the accumulation of all the steps.

Quality premaps with transformers and good mics placed in the right position on a good player would be a good starting point.
__________________
Michael
not_so_new is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
Stitch333's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Western MA, USA
Posts: 3,435

V72/76
Stitch333 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2007   #9
Lives for gear
 
Mastering101's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 1,550

I myself never mention a guitarist or singer because that would be stating the obvious...but if some people need to hear it yes you need a good musician/singer…
Mastering101 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
not_so_new's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,712

Quote:
Originally Posted by effectsnut View Post
I myself never mention a guitarist or singer because that would be stating the obvious...but if some people need to hear it yes you need a good musician/singer…
I know... stating the obvious gets a little... well... obvious after a while doesn't it?

LOL

not_so_new is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2007   #11
Lives for gear
 
Mastering101's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 1,550

Quote:
Originally Posted by not_so_new View Post
I know... stating the obvious gets a little... well... obvious after a while doesn't it?

LOL



yes!!!
Mastering101 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2007   #12
Gear maniac
 
CommunityMart's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 226

Hope this helps.

That Sound

One said the sound of tape makes them smile.

Like someone said here, it is probably all of the things you mentioned.

Just list what you have and see if anyone can help you from then on.

Good luck with this. Gees.

Last edited by CommunityMart; 24th June 2007 at 05:55 PM.. Reason: actually don't know if that link will help now
CommunityMart is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mixing for smoothness = blanket over speakers when compared? Help Please TyRip So much gear, so little time! 13 3rd March 2007 04:29 AM
"Let Me" Jay-z Type Smoothness! UpstateboiBeats Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 1 22nd December 2006 04:41 PM
Pultec Fatness and Smoothness Bump Music High end 55 19th February 2006 06:23 AM
Which LDC beats my MD441 in smoothness? bram So much gear, so little time! 12 15th September 2005 02:07 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:25 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.