ART MPA GOLD & API A2D & UA M-610 WHICH ONE IS BEST? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory


ART MPA GOLD & API A2D & UA M-610 WHICH ONE IS BEST?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th April 2007   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 21

Thread Starter
ART MPA GOLD & API A2D & UA M-610 WHICH ONE IS BEST?

What`s up !

ART DIGITAL MPA(Upgraded to TungSol 12AX7)
API A2D
UA M-610
GREAT RIVER ME1NV

Which thinks it to be the best way to get a bigger and phatter sound for tracking and recording in synth and drum machine between digital recordings?
slum-beats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2007   #2
Gear addict
 
RBowlin's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 330

It depends on what you are using it for. But unlike others around here, my m-610 is one great sounding piece of kit for the money.

-Rich
RBowlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2007   #3
Lives for gear
 
lpkyer's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Montréal
Posts: 1,809

Send a message via Skype™ to lpkyer
Quote:
Originally Posted by slum-beats View Post
What`s up !

ART DIGITAL MPA(Upgraded to TungSol 12AX7)
API A2D
UA M-610
GREAT RIVER ME1NV

Which thinks it to be the best way to get a bigger and phatter sound for tracking and recording in synth and drum machine between digital recordings?
I'd say UA
lpkyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada (by Vancouver)
Posts: 4,071

Send a message via MSN to dkelley
for fat? top to bottom my suggestions:

#1 UA
#2 ART
#3 API
#4 GR (not honestly too sure bout it though)

API is best of the lot for performance, but if you want fat that UA can do it (it's hard to make it NOT fat). ART will do it too just not as much but it's more like vocal presencey and taming the highsy and velveting the soundy than fatting it uppy.

er.... be talking to my 20 month old twin daughters too much I think.

and the GR I don't actually have much experience with but the very limited use tells me it's similar to the API sound.


Cheers,
Don
dkelley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
Gear Tramp's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 660

GR or API A2D if you can afford that shiz.

Either of these will make your art more artistic than the ART.

thumbsup
Gear Tramp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
woomanmoomin's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,021

My list would be just about the same as dkelley's, but I have my doubts about this as in general I would definitely rather have either the GR or the API than the ART. The GR has great potential on vocals and the API is pretty hard to beat for aggressive midrange-heavy stuff like rock guitar. Actually, the GR is also very popular for rock guitar, but I think I prefer the API tone. It's so punchy in the mids. The API is probably very good on rock vocals, but a lot of people would prefer a Neve-clone like the GR for that application. I think even the vocals on Nirvana's 'Nevermind' were recorded with a Neve pre.

I think the API would work very well on snappy, percussive stuff like snare effects but it's probably punchy rather than fat. The Great River would be great for adding warmth in the lows, but again, I don't know whether I would call the effect fat.
woomanmoomin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2007   #7
Gear nut
 
MaestroNYC's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 101

I've been looking at these same pres myself, but more for general purposes recording (from rock to calssical -- instruments to voice) and to upgrade my setup overall. With this in mind how do they stack up?

**my first post on gearslutz**
MaestroNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada (by Vancouver)
Posts: 4,071

Send a message via MSN to dkelley
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaestroNYC View Post
I've been looking at these same pres myself, but more for general purposes recording (from rock to calssical -- instruments to voice) and to upgrade my setup overall. With this in mind how do they stack up?

**my first post on gearslutz**
I use grace for classical piano often, and for my own classical solo violin recordings I actually prefer the focusrite ISA220 or if that isn't available (I don't own it) I use my focusrite platinum trakmaster pro for violin, does a great job, so clean and sparkling I love it. However for strings in a rock mix I use the mpa gold, it makes the tracks sit in a rock mix better than the grace or either focusrite does.

However if I'm in a serious studio I don't touch that stuff, I use api or neve or whatever is available (one studio has a wierd old altec tube preamp, sounds amazing). But I don't get to record classical in high end studios often, it's normally at my home studio or on location, so my gear restrictions limit me, but the recordings sound great still (and I'm very very picky, I try to make my recordings as commercial quality as possible. I play violin for session work often, the recording matters...)

Don
dkelley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th April 2007   #9
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 21

Thread Starter
All rights !! So, UA M610 has a fattest sound ? but Is it to be hard to put it together in the mix that make a sound too fat as of tracking ? is so so one best for tracking ? thought. So, it is strange thing to bring API and GR staff for fatten up ?

How about a thing of a huge sound ?


I want you to start it if there is more some suggestion.
slum-beats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th April 2007   #10
Gear addict
 
homestudioguy's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 488

Quote:
Originally Posted by slum-beats View Post
What`s up !
ART DIGITAL MPA(Upgraded to TungSol 12AX7)
API A2D
UA M-610
GREAT RIVER ME1NV
Which thinks it to be the best way to get a bigger and phatter sound for tracking and recording in synth and drum machine between digital recordings?
By changing tubes in ART MPA to RCA 12AX7 Blackplate you might get a "richer creamier", smoother tone....
https://www.tubeworld.com/index_high.htm
(Do search on 12AX7 and click on 12AX7/ECC83/CV4004/7025 link)
__________________
HSG
http://www.homestudioguy.com
homestudioguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th April 2007   #11
Gear nut
 
MaestroNYC's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 101

Thanks for the info dkelley!
MaestroNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2007   #12
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 21

Thread Starter
I mean huge & fat sound is like Raekwon`s - Heroin Only & Infamouse mobb`s - What`s us gangsta do ? There is still it in various songs elsewhere.

So, I exchange tube of ART MPA and can make it more huge & fat sound ? With the thing which wants to like E80CC Philips Miniwatt SQ and ?
And although yes !! fat & huge sound needs certain sounds, yes !!
slum-beats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd April 2007   #13
Gear addict
 
frankie c's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 351

tube upgrade....

I would do a search for a Telefunken 12ax7/ecc83 tube....

I guarantee you will hear the difference...

frankie c is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
ART MPA Gold vs. Digital MPA indravayu Low End Theory 57 22nd December 2007 03:31 PM
ART MPA and VLA pre amp capkutay Low End Theory 2 3rd January 2007 02:36 PM
ART MPA Gold? stones@rocheste So much gear, so little time! 0 23rd April 2006 08:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:45 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.