![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Switch box for audio? | paulneedles | Geekslutz forum | 4 | 8th February 2007 10:20 AM |
| M-Audio Black Box | elmkid | Low End Theory | 0 | 5th May 2006 06:07 PM |
| M Box 2 vs. M-Audio LE? | Power Supply | Music computers | 9 | 27th September 2005 02:35 PM |
| Options for getting audio out of a Mackie box? | drew | Low End Theory | 8 | 9th May 2005 02:16 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: New York
Posts: 17
| M-Audio or M-Box? I am a PC user and want to buy a basic Pro Tools system, my budget is limited so I am considering two options: M-Powered or LE (M-box2 or M-box mini). I have no experience with PT and would like to know which one is better. Any suggestions? Experiences? What about M-Audio interfaces, which one is the best? Michal |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 8
| then your best bet is probably an MBox. You can get an MBox 2 Mini for around $300 which includes ProTools LE software. Personally, I prefer M-Audio hardware over the LE line. My main dislike with M-Powered is that you have to purchase ProTools seperately which adds another $250-$300 to your purchase price. However, you can use M-Audio hardware with more software than just ProTools. For more help, post what you plan on doing with your ProTools rig. Are you just planning on recording a guitar and a vocal? Or do you want to mic up a whole drum kit? |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,622
| Quote:
One thing to consider: will you (molownia) ever need Digitranslator and/or DV Toolkit functions with PTLE? If so, you must go with LE as M-Powered doesn't support those expansions. If the answer is NO, then you're back on a level playing field and you should probably then make your choice based on hardware functionality/needs and/or budget. | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: New York
Posts: 17
| thanks, I know that I can't record the whole drum kit using these interfaces :) I only want to have PT at home to mix already recorded sessions what about sound? does M-audio sound better than Mbox, or there's no significant difference, any experience with both? do they both come with the same plugin bundles? |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear Head | i would go with the mbox...software included!
__________________ myspace.com/handmedownbuick |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear nut | Get M-Audio and try Reaper, I took the MBox-plunge 2 years ago and I wasn't happy with that setup.
__________________ HP Pavilion dv5-1035eo XP Pro, AMD Turion x2 (2,0ghz) XP Pro, LaCie D2/D3 250gb ext.drives, EMU 0404 USB, Pro Tools LE 7.0 MPatch2, BCF2000 M-Audio FW1814, REAPER-software Vox AC-30 modded re-issue, 1979 Fender Stratocaster Pearl Echo Orbit-tape delay My band/first record: http://www.rakkaudenammattilaiset.net |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Nashville, TN - USA
Posts: 379
| M-Audio All The Way Ok, here goes. You can spend the $300 on an Mbox Mini and get the software and all that jazz for free with it, or you can go with M-Audio and have heaps of upgradeability (is this even a word) later. For example. You can get a very basic M-Audio interface for $100-$150 with a couple of mic pres and no digital i/o, and buy the MPowered Pro Tools to run on your computer. When you are ready to upgrade you can get an M-Audio Firewire 1814. It's $600 with 2 pres, and ADAT. It handles sample rates up to 192kHz and has line livel i/o on the back, and word clock. It's basically a 002r/003r with two less pres and two less line outs. All in all you've spent less than the price of a 002/003 and have a way more possabilities should you choose to dump PT and use something else. my $.02 Creston
__________________ "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what's right." - Isaac Asimov |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 72
| The Mbox Mini is the best $202 I ever spent. The thing is terribly useful. I'm considering ripping the thing apart and seeing if I can clean up the analog stages much like Black Lion Audio does.
__________________ Jared D. Wynne, the raddest. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5
| Where did you get your Mbox mini for such a low price ? Thanks very much ! |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: mexico
Posts: 3,592
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear maniac | absolutely, with no doubt : Digidesign Mbox Maudio .... brrrrrrrr |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 319
| um, why would anybody say maudio.... brrrrrrr?? They're products have been considered mid level to high end for years now, the delta 1010 Inon-lt) is incredible and with outboard clock (which any high end pro studio should use anyway) the quality is equal to anything other than esoteric stuff. even the 1010lt is widely used and excellent sounding. Not to mention the rest of their gear... they're not the same midiman any more, haven't been for a very very long time. And any m-audio delta interface outperforms any m-box interface or in some ways also outperforms the digi 002 interface, at least according to what I've read over the last couple of years. Cheers, Don |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Gear Head | Quote:
__________________ myspace.com/handmedownbuick | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: New York
Posts: 17
| I think I'll go for Digidesign since I don't really need digital I/O thanks for all the replies |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear interested Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 20
| Did you get the mini? And are you happy with it? |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: New York
Posts: 17
| Yes, I did and I am quite happy with it. Sounds decent, I didn't expect anything better or worse. I have a "bedroom studio" setup so I don't need anything more than mini. No problems with OS on my PC, which is nice. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear interested Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 20
| Nice! I'm facing a similar decision (between the E-MU 1616m and the Mini). I know the E-MU is a much better unit, but it also requires it's own power and is bigger. Also, being realistic, I'm not going to use anywhere near the E-MU's capabilities. I'm a songwriter not an engineer, and despite my thorough nature when it comes to music, I just don't have the time to be best at both. I read a great article recently that pointed out the mistake a lot of singer songwriters make in trying to set up home recording - they end up losing years to the engineering curve, and stop making music. I choose music Two more questions: 1. What mic are you using? 2. Have you had an issue with latency? |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 101
| Cheaper to get ProTools with the Mbox, no doubt. So if the software is more important than the hardware, go that route. M-audio's hardware spans a much better range from the very simple/small/low-end up to some passable mid-range gear. If you're willing to pay for ProTools M-Powered ($250) then go with M-Audio for the hardware flexibility down the road. Start with a MobilePre, move up to something like an 1814 later. You can even get the Profire Lightbridge and run 32 channels of any kind of i/o you want via optical into ProTools M-Powered. Heck, wire up some Mytek/Apogee gear into M-powered through that thing if you want! I'd say Lavry, but it's only got AES/EBU out... sigh... And consider having Black Lion Audio mod any of the Digi or M-Audio gear you get. |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |