anyone use a DBX 163x compressor on Vocals? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory


anyone use a DBX 163x compressor on Vocals?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th March 2007   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 19

Thread Starter
Talking anyone use a DBX 163x compressor on Vocals?

Hey guys!
I wanted to try using an older DBX 163x compressor to record a few vocal tracks, and I was wondering if anyone out there has used these little guys on vocals, and how much do you usually compress the vocals with these things, and what LEVEL SET & COMPRESSION SLIDER settings that typically like tom use for vocals?

Thanks guys!
Ginazgifs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
firby's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,491

I use them on stuff all of the time. I set the makeup gain to 0 and set the compressor on the "o" in compressor. For a little compression set it on the first "o" In the word Compression or more set it on the second "o".

that should do it.
firby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2007   #3
Lives for gear
 
lowswing's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,451

don't like it on vocal but it kick ass for snare
lowswing is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13th March 2007   #4
Gear nut
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 146

I am not trying to tease you on purpose, but I always giggle a little when people ask for setting advice on the 163x. I mean it only has one knob and one slider, so you should be able to discover pretty quickly what it will do to source x or y. Its kind of like "I'm thinking of putting a 60w bulb in the lamp next to my be for reading. What setting would you recommend?"
Setting the slider at any one point may or not make a whole lot of difference since the level of you signal going in is going to vary from source to source. On the other hand asking whether or not people like it on source x or y makes some sense. Hard not to like it on bass. Haven't tried it on vocals yet but might...
lancebug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2007   #5
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 305

awhile back I picked up a 163 and a 163x, usualy they end up with the 163 on kick and the 163x on snare when I mix live. their both not too bad on vocals.. but not ideal for it
__________________
The Gear-less Slut
username is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 847

I wouldn't use them on vocals. As far as budget comps go, I'd probably pick the RNC for vox.

I don't have 163s anymore so I can't do a direct shootout but I remember not liking them very much... love 160s, x or xt, might want to check those out, they are a bit more expensive but I doubt you'd ever get rid of them...

These are very cool and actually are useable for vocals. Depends what style you're recording but I've had very good results for hip-hop.
chandlersonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
firby's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,491

Quote:
Originally Posted by lancebug View Post
I am not trying to tease you on purpose, but I always giggle a little when people ask for setting advice on the 163x. I mean it only has one knob and one slider, so you should be able to discover pretty quickly what it will do to source x or y. Its kind of like "I'm thinking of putting a 60w bulb in the lamp next to my be for reading. What setting would you recommend?"
Setting the slider at any one point may or not make a whole lot of difference since the level of you signal going in is going to vary from source to source. On the other hand asking whether or not people like it on source x or y makes some sense. Hard not to like it on bass. Haven't tried it on vocals yet but might...
Mine are set up on overheads. Now I know that that is a simple compressor and what not but there are four compression circuits in that box. Also there is TRS on the back for stereo linking. Mine are stereo linked to my drum overheads. I control how hard I hit it from the direct out (fader) on my mixer. The 163x is not a one trick pony its more of a 2 and 1/2 trick pony. Its a good compressor seeing how I spent 60 bucks for the pair racked. I do like them. I wouldn't sell mine for less than 200. But I would be willing to trade ....
HA
firby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th March 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
Nu-tra's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,305

They are killer for bass. They add a nice dirt!
Nu-tra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th March 2007   #9
Gear nut
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 146

Quote:
Originally Posted by firby View Post
Mine are set up on overheads. Now I know that that is a simple compressor and what not but there are four compression circuits in that box. Also there is TRS on the back for stereo linking. Mine are stereo linked to my drum overheads. I control how hard I hit it from the direct out (fader) on my mixer. The 163x is not a one trick pony its more of a 2 and 1/2 trick pony. Its a good compressor seeing how I spent 60 bucks for the pair racked. I do like them. I wouldn't sell mine for less than 200. But I would be willing to trade ....
HA
Agreed they are exceptionally flexible for a one slider box, just not complicated to discover all the different posibilities. I have a pair that I like to link as well but I recently picked up an original 164 stereo version which I have been keeping permanently patched into my motu 828 as a send. That is a nice box for the $75 I paid for it.
lancebug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
firby's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,491

Damn that sounds nice. I would go an extra 15 bucks to have a two channel 164 as well!
firby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th March 2007   #11
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Hollywood, CA
Posts: 80

I have two of them and love them on vocals. They also sound cool on clean guitars.
mikebalboa is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Settings 4 vox that you use for DBX 163X and........ illacov Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 5 18th November 2011 06:54 AM
DBX 163X BruceTheProduce So much gear, so little time! 59 21st February 2011 09:50 PM
DBX 163x??? rockcamaro97 Low End Theory 3 29th September 2006 10:55 AM
DBX 163X question BruceTheProduce So much gear, so little time! 7 16th July 2005 07:40 PM
DBX 163X Umlaaat So much gear, so little time! 4 22nd November 2003 05:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.