4th March 2007
|
#1 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Brasil
Posts: 755
Thread Starter | Tortuous room, need mixing positioning advice !
Dear friends. My room is tourtuous !
What will be better, Mix positioning A or B ?
Or "sonically " doesn´t matter for my room shape ?( Room not treated yet )
As you see, im an professional drawing maker !
Thanks for any input.
__________________
"Be not fond of the dull smoke-colored light from hell." - Tibetan Book of the Dead
|
| |
4th March 2007
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Brasil
Posts: 755
Thread Starter |
Some "expert" opinion? Or doesn´t matter the mix side of my room? |
| |
4th March 2007
|
#3 | | Gear Guru
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,878
|
Perpendicular to the longer wall and out a foot or more from the wall to the back you your speakers. That shouldn't be a horrible room to mix in with near fields.
|
| |
4th March 2007
|
#4 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,139
|
Is it treated? I'd say "B", but what do I know?  Only reason I say that is because position "B" is symetrical and should (in theory) give you a better stereo image. However, frequency response is a whole other thing. If it's not treated, then it really doesn't matter.
-Aaron
__________________
If you don't spank it, you can't crank it! |
| |
4th March 2007
|
#5 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Brasil
Posts: 755
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid Viscous Perpendicular to the longer wall and out a foot or more from the wall to the back you your speakers. That shouldn't be a horrible room to mix in with near fields. |
Sid, get it, perpendicular to the longer wall to avoyd the geometric figure formed by the tortuous wall. Thanks a lot ! |
| |
4th March 2007
|
#6 | | 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
Joined: May 2004 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 785
|
A is probably the Better position, B is basically rectangle, and has square symetrical walls, plus A position has the back wall furthest away. ie On all accounts A will produce the least ammount of resonating freq problem and easier to control the immediate listening area.
|
| |
4th March 2007
|
#7 | | Gear Guru
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,878
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hgen A is probably the Better position, B is basically rectangle, and has square symetrical walls, plus A position has the back wall furthest away. ie On all accounts A will produce the least ammount of resonating freq problem and easier to control the immediate listening area. | Those were pretty much my thoughts. All near fields require is being able to control a small area, and that should be possible in that room.
|
| |
4th March 2007
|
#8 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Brasil
Posts: 755
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by absrec Is it treated? I'd say "B", but what do I know?  Only reason I say that is because position "B" is symetrical and should (in theory) give you a better stereo image. However, frequency response is a whole other thing. If it's not treated, then it really doesn't matter.
-Aaron | absrec, not with coconuts fiber bass traps yet.( you can breath with coconuts fiber panels )
Stereo image, i see. you right friend. |
| |
4th March 2007
|
#9 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Brasil
Posts: 755
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by hgen A is probably the Better position, B is basically rectangle, and has square symetrical walls, plus A position has the back wall furthest away. ie On all accounts A will produce the least ammount of resonating freq problem and easier to control the immediate listening area. | hgen friend, resonating problems because tortuous wall, understood !
I did think first we choose right place for monitors according room shape and then treat the walls ! ( teorically ) ! ?
|
| |
5th March 2007
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 903
|
Think that's bad, look at where I'm mixing during the day
|
| |
5th March 2007
|
#11 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Brasil
Posts: 755
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by bobwarren Think that's bad, look at where I'm mixing during the day |
I see bobwarren, in your back wall have a big absorver panel.( Good for the absorption of the first reflections ) covering probably entire wall...
I mixing in my "B" position i will have the benefit of an absortive entire wall for first reflections, but like said the other guys the bigger distance in "A"positioning could be good for avoid resonation sound feedback!Thanks, i will need test real thing after acoustic treatment the room, here i go hunt wood , screws and fibers!
well... |
| |
5th March 2007
|
#12 | | Gear Guru
Joined: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 13,106
| Quote:
Originally Posted by No4PCs What will be better, Mix positioning A or B ? | A, no question. See this for the proof: http://www.realtraps.com/art_room-setup.htm
--Ethan
|
| |
5th March 2007
|
#13 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Brasil
Posts: 755
Thread Starter | Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer |
Thanks Mr Ethan, learning your tips. |
| |
8th March 2007
|
#14 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Oct 2005 Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,173
|
Set them both up and listen and do some frequency sweeps. Then decide.
|
| |
8th March 2007
|
#15 | | Gear Guru
Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 14,393
| Quote:
Originally Posted by bobwarren Think that's bad, look at where I'm mixing during the day | You should think about flipping the room to face the back wall.
Glenn
|
| | | |