Tortuous room, need mixing positioning advice ! - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Low End Theory

Tortuous room, need mixing positioning advice !
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th March 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
No4PCs's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Brasil
Posts: 755

Thread Starter
Tortuous room, need mixing positioning advice !

Dear friends. My room is tourtuous !

What will be better, Mix positioning A or B ?

Or "sonically " doesn´t matter for my room shape ?( Room not treated yet )

As you see, im an professional drawing maker !

Thanks for any input.
Attached Thumbnails
Tortuous room, need mixing positioning advice !-mixpositioning.jpg  
__________________
"Be not fond of the dull smoke-colored light from hell." - Tibetan Book of the Dead
No4PCs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #2
Lives for gear
 
No4PCs's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Brasil
Posts: 755

Thread Starter
Some "expert" opinion? Or doesn´t matter the mix side of my room?
No4PCs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #3
Gear Guru
 
Sid Viscous's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,878

Perpendicular to the longer wall and out a foot or more from the wall to the back you your speakers. That shouldn't be a horrible room to mix in with near fields.
Sid Viscous is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #4
Lives for gear
 
absrec's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,139

Is it treated? I'd say "B", but what do I know? Only reason I say that is because position "B" is symetrical and should (in theory) give you a better stereo image. However, frequency response is a whole other thing. If it's not treated, then it really doesn't matter.

-Aaron
__________________
If you don't spank it, you can't crank it!
absrec is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
No4PCs's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Brasil
Posts: 755

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sid Viscous View Post
Perpendicular to the longer wall and out a foot or more from the wall to the back you your speakers. That shouldn't be a horrible room to mix in with near fields.

Sid, get it, perpendicular to the longer wall to avoyd the geometric figure formed by the tortuous wall. Thanks a lot !
No4PCs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #6
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
hgen's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 785

A is probably the Better position, B is basically rectangle, and has square symetrical walls, plus A position has the back wall furthest away. ie On all accounts A will produce the least ammount of resonating freq problem and easier to control the immediate listening area.
hgen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #7
Gear Guru
 
Sid Viscous's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,878

Quote:
Originally Posted by hgen View Post
A is probably the Better position, B is basically rectangle, and has square symetrical walls, plus A position has the back wall furthest away. ie On all accounts A will produce the least ammount of resonating freq problem and easier to control the immediate listening area.
Those were pretty much my thoughts. All near fields require is being able to control a small area, and that should be possible in that room.
Sid Viscous is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #8
Lives for gear
 
No4PCs's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Brasil
Posts: 755

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by absrec View Post
Is it treated? I'd say "B", but what do I know? Only reason I say that is because position "B" is symetrical and should (in theory) give you a better stereo image. However, frequency response is a whole other thing. If it's not treated, then it really doesn't matter.

-Aaron
absrec, not with coconuts fiber bass traps yet.( you can breath with coconuts fiber panels )
Stereo image, i see. you right friend.
No4PCs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th March 2007   #9
Lives for gear
 
No4PCs's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Brasil
Posts: 755

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by hgen View Post
A is probably the Better position, B is basically rectangle, and has square symetrical walls, plus A position has the back wall furthest away. ie On all accounts A will produce the least ammount of resonating freq problem and easier to control the immediate listening area.
hgen friend, resonating problems because tortuous wall, understood !
I did think first we choose right place for monitors according room shape and then treat the walls ! ( teorically ) ! ?
No4PCs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
bobwarren's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 903

Think that's bad, look at where I'm mixing during the day
Attached Thumbnails
Tortuous room, need mixing positioning advice !-studio.jpg  
bobwarren is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2007   #11
Lives for gear
 
No4PCs's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Brasil
Posts: 755

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobwarren View Post
Think that's bad, look at where I'm mixing during the day

I see bobwarren, in your back wall have a big absorver panel.( Good for the absorption of the first reflections ) covering probably entire wall...
I mixing in my "B" position i will have the benefit of an absortive entire wall for first reflections, but like said the other guys the bigger distance in "A"positioning could be good for avoid resonation sound feedback!Thanks, i will need test real thing after acoustic treatment the room, here i go hunt wood , screws and fibers!
well...
No4PCs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2007   #12
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 13,106

Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by No4PCs View Post
What will be better, Mix positioning A or B ?
A, no question. See this for the proof:

http://www.realtraps.com/art_room-setup.htm

--Ethan
__________________
Ethan's Audio Expert book
Ethan Winer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th March 2007   #13
Lives for gear
 
No4PCs's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Brasil
Posts: 755

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer View Post
A, no question. See this for the proof:

http://www.realtraps.com/art_room-setup.htm

--Ethan

Thanks Mr Ethan, learning your tips.
No4PCs is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2007   #14
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,173

Set them both up and listen and do some frequency sweeps. Then decide.
mltamisin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th March 2007   #15
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 14,393

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobwarren View Post
Think that's bad, look at where I'm mixing during the day
You should think about flipping the room to face the back wall.

Glenn
Glenn Kuras is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need advice on new control room layout Brad McGowan So much gear, so little time! 11 3rd March 2007 04:41 PM
Positioning drums and other instruments in new room--help appreciated! kittyboy So much gear, so little time! 5 29th January 2007 09:42 PM
Mixing in a mastering room... planet red Mastering forum 7 27th June 2006 06:43 AM
Recording and mixing in the same room. Advice from experience needed. The Greening High end 12 1st June 2006 02:06 PM
Advice on room and speakers wafze So much gear, so little time! 0 3rd January 2005 10:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:39 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.