![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Want to see the new 003? Well HERE IT IS!! | Gerax | New product alert! | 338 | 18th November 2007 04:59 AM |
| DIGI 003 | kingofthecrate | Low End Theory | 172 | 26th February 2007 01:16 PM |
| THE NEW digi 003 | SRDmusic54 | Low End Theory | 2 | 14th December 2006 02:19 PM |
| THE NEW digi 003 | SRDmusic54 | Low End Theory | 0 | 14th December 2006 04:10 AM |
| digi 003 ?????? | G-lay | New product alert! | 5 | 22nd March 2006 08:10 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #31 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 93
| Nope. It's been tried before. The only answer is people stop buying. Why wont people stop buying ?!?!?! from me already DigiLast edited by Sir.Audio; 1st March 2007 at 06:27 PM. Reason: my middle fringer wasn't stretched enough |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: NYC
Posts: 240
| I own an 002 console, and do not see a reason to upgrade. |
| | |
| | #33 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Indiana
Posts: 120
| 003 Digidesign
__________________ Brad "Dedicated to the future, with honor to the past." - Neil Peart |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10
| The 003 line is very disappointing (and that's an understatement). Digi needs to jump to the 004 fast ! |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,469
| My real confusion comes from the fact that I don't see why ANYONE would buy this, when the M-Powered line offers WAY more options. The marketing team at Digi seems like no one is talking to each other in regards to the M-Powered vs. LE range. What is the real incentive to go with the 003 over the M-Audio PFLB or even the 1814 if you need a couple on-board preamps? Both those units will end up being quite a bit cheaper even after you tack on the M-Powered software. Plus the obvious reason that with the PFLB you can use the converters of your choice for all 18 I/O. Considering the 003 will be the most expensive way to get into the LE or M-Powered software, you'de think they would want to sell a few? |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Gear nut Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 107
| Ultimately this is good for Protools users because it will help their competition gain market share, then and only then will you see digi compete. HD has a few years left period and digi knows it so they're just milking it as long as they can before they become a software only company. |
| | |
| | #37 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: LA-NYC
Posts: 32
| another reason another reason I'm glad I just got Logic Pro 7.............. Digi can eat me- Good sounds, songs,creativity, and front end will always beat out $20k HD systems, anyday, anyhow- Give me 16 bit and a good tune- |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,786
| exactly, throw the 003 out. anybody waiting for 004?
__________________ the Dude abides. |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: VA.
Posts: 1,967
| If it wasn't for knowing PT pretty well (no expert) and needing to move projects around from time to time I would already be on a new platform. Hell I started on DP. At this point it's a crap shoot because if you invest in an HD system and computers get faster and faster why would you move up to HD?. I'd say most will move over, not up. And THAT is something Digi obviously hasn't thought about enough. It's my fear HD will go the way of the dodo in a few short years. There's just too much competition offering way more for way less IMHO. We'll see I guess . Bdiggy |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Lives for gear | im not a pro tools user but this was my thought exactly
__________________ Myspace Youtube Channel Subscribe Now! Sonar 4, Reason 4, Ensoniq EPS, Behringer BCF2000, Roland Xp-30, Emu Proteus X2,Roland Alpha Juno 2, Stanton Str8 60, a lot of vinyl |
| | |
| | #41 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: VA.
Posts: 1,967
| Pulled it. |
| | |
| | #42 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: LA
Posts: 106
| Quote:
I think you're right on base with the rest... Digi is desperate to protect their expensive HD systems. | |
| | |
| | #43 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 56
| I just recently bought an 002. I'm nervous that Digi is gonna do with the 002 what they did with the 001 where you can't upgrade the software. I wish I wasn't so comfortable within PT This is definetly making me re-think why I'm using it. I'd write a letter but I think it's pointless. |
| | |
| | #44 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Hot Louis (Nellyville)
Posts: 428
| What a mess. Out of the dozens of professional audio guys I talk to locally and all the forums I frequent... absolutely NOBODY is even interested in this new box. Us audio guys are impressed with even the most miniscule upgrades but with this one you have a whole community of very loyal people extremely disappointed. I work on several HD systems every day but I certainly don't make enough money to get one at home. I would love to be able to bring projects back home (even though the girlfriend would hate it I'm sure) but there is no point if I'm not going to be able to open it because of track count or ADC or plug compatibility. Being a hardcore HD guy, I understand that there has to be a significant difference in operation from the lower level products, so when people ask for a 003 with 32 i/o, ADC, 192 kHz, and all the post capabilities, it is ridiculous but this latest attempt by Digi is just pathetic. I wonder if the people at digi read these forums. Nuendo is looking better and better nowadays (not that i'll switch anytime soon) |
| | |
| | #45 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 22
| yeah. This unit pretty much looks like a suckgrade .... not an upgrade. I was hoping for the best, too. I really was. Seriously, about an hour and a half ago I was kinda pumped, cause I thought there might be a new tool available for us folks who don't wanna drop five figures on HD. At least a tool that was a little better than the 002. This looks gay (not that there is anything wrong with that), but I'm sorry. It does look gay. Or retarded. Or idiotic. Just whatever is least offensive to you, cause I didn't mean any offense. |
| | |
| | #46 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Hot Louis (Nellyville)
Posts: 428
| Quote:
I wonder if thats less or more offensive. | |
| | |
| | #47 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Atlanta
Posts: 351
| From the description, it sounds like a direct reaction to the BLA modded 002. |
| | |
| | #48 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 22
| |
| | |
| | #49 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 543
| digidesign releases a product that has a bunch of new features...word clock, 2 headphone outs(great for small home studios...or where the 002/003s are mostly used) and a/b monitor outs... not to mention, according to sweetwater better pres and a/d ... and no arguments about this until someone actually gets their hands on one... also better design on the board unit all for the same price... and everyone just complains? when has motu, apogee, rme, presonus etc etc. made that much of an upgrade... or an upgrade at all to their similar products? that being said, if digi makes the 002 incompatible with the next software update I will be pissed. but as far as I know the main reason why the 001 was made incompatible is because it was pci which at the time the new macs did not use, and they were coding above 6.4 for the new macs... hence the problem. (still they should keep the support, but at least they have a reason).
__________________ Check out my new EP, its acoustic with a touch electric, mellow, a little folky, indie rock/pop. |
| | |
| | #50 |
| Lives for gear | ^something tells me these pres arent going to be any better than the ones found on the mbox 2
__________________ Myspace Youtube Channel Subscribe Now! Sonar 4, Reason 4, Ensoniq EPS, Behringer BCF2000, Roland Xp-30, Emu Proteus X2,Roland Alpha Juno 2, Stanton Str8 60, a lot of vinyl |
| | |
| | #51 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Working on my skills more =)
Posts: 6,090
| Here are the Spec differences Apparently, the sonics are considerably better...pity about the rest. 002: THD+N (line input): Inputs 1-4: 0.004% @ -3 dBFS input level (minimum gain) Inputs 5-6: 0.002% @ -1 dBFS input level Inputs 7-8: 0.003% @ -1 dBFS input level Main Outputs: <0.0016% (-95 dB) Monitor Outputs: <0.0016% (-95 dB) Outputs 3-8: <0.0023% (-93 dB) Alt. -10 dBV Outputs: <0.0023% (-93 dB) 003: Mic Inputs THD + N: 0.0007% (-103 dB) Line Inputs THD + N: 0.0007% (-103 dB) Line Outputs (1-8) THD + N: 0.0007% (-103 dB) Monitor Outputs (Main & Alt) THD + N: 0.0008% (-102 dB) These are ~10db improvements (quite significant in my book!)...I imagine the clock and power harness have been fixed too. Anyone know if this will external synch to 96k? (Why have word clock in if no?) |
| | |
| | #52 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,256
| i'm gonna buy one so i'll let you know.... i am going to buy one. i have an Mbox2 and this exchange offer is too good to resist: http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?...2&itemid=24722 i can trade in my Mbox2 and get the 003R WITH the Music Production Toolkit for retail $1,145 USD which i imagine from a dealer will only be about $1,050 USD. to me that is a good deal. i am not expecting it to be a unit with great preamps (i have outboard for that). so shoot me. i'll let you guys know how much it sucks when i get it in a few weeks. cheers. ~j.d.
__________________ jdjustice.net |
| | |
| | #53 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 397
| Surely the biggest upgrade LE users are chasing is an increase in sound quality? We are making music after all. LE users aren't silly enough to actually expect digidesign to roll over and hand them the key features that makes people choose HD in the first place are they? You know what Cubase SE/SL users or Logic Express users do when they need features that aren't offered in the software that they use? They upgrade... Cubase Sx or Logic Pro. Why is it that Protools LE users get upset and stamp their feet and throw a tantrum? Digidesign already sell and market what most of you guys want. Its called Protools HD. The fact that you don't want to fork out for it is a completely different issue. This is nothing more than a case of LE users wanting everything for next to nothing... and its plain gobsmacking and very niave. ![]() |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2
| Here's what Digidesign has to say about it at the DUC. " Hi All, Sorry for this relatively slow response post to what is clearly a headline issue for many DUC citizens – the thread arrived ahead of the actual launch, and I didn’t want to post until after we’d got the official news up on our own website, and given it time to propagate around the world a little. As several posters have concluded, our intention with the 003 family was to provide a refresh of an already successful product. This is a smaller scale effort than some of the projects we do at Digidesign, and the decision to approach it this way limited our freedom to innovate with features, or change the price. Why would Digidesign choose to just do a refresh? It’s certainly not our first preference: we’ve come into our current position in the creative world of audio on a foundation of innovation. We’re wired that way still. Even a relatively large company like Digi still has to make tough trade-offs over what to spend time on however, and since the 002’s continue to fit the bill for many users, we decided to go with a refresh. This left us free to pursue some other projects we’d long wanted to do, like the Mbox2 Pro, Mbox Mini, the Profile live console, a lot of Pro Tools feature development, and a bunch of other things I can’t talk about yet. Despite the constraints of doing a “refresh only” project, we still worked at making improvements to every aspect of the design that we could. The I/O complement had to remain the same, so the differences in that area are relatively few. The biggest change is in audio quality. The mic pres were completely re-designed, and we upgraded their dynamic range by almost 6dB, and their distortion performance by almost an order of magnitude from 0.004% to 0.0007% (note the three zero’s after the period.) We found several ways to enhance the 002 control surface as we re-worked it for 003: it now includes dedicated automation controls, and you can use the meters to provide an auto mode status display. The 2-line display provides much better visual feedback for all functions, allowing you to see 6-character channel names at the same time as parameter value readouts. With a jog/shuttle wheel and an external clock input, the product is more at home than before in post production environments. And the updated MIDI mapping mode will make controlling other MIDI apps and devices much more fluid for music producers. Despite these changes, I can see how this intro is disappointing to existing 002 owners who were looking to upgrade to a product that would take them to the next level. We don’t mean to limit anyone’s options, and clearly the 003 family is not intended to serve that “step-up” purpose – it’s for new users. We understand the desire, though: we are hard at work on products which will allow people to move beyond today’s LE family (whaaaat! like I said, I can’t talk about that stuff!) I hope this post helps with understanding our moves (I know it won’t help much with the disappointment) and that we are thinking along the same lines as many of you. Despite some of the harsher comments, I’m glad we have such a passionate and engaged customer base – it makes the communication open and easy. One last note: some of the posters on this thread were concerned that 002 support will be going away with Vista. As we state elsewhere on our website, we’re beavering away at Vista support right now, and I’m glad to confirm that 002 will be fully supported in the forthcoming Vista-compatible release of Pro Tools. - David Senior Director, Product Marketing Digidesign" |
| | |
| | #55 | |
| Gear nut Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 94
| Quote:
As far as PTHD goes, technically it is not even directly comparable with Nuendo, Cubase 4, Sequoia, Samplitude, Logic Pro, etc... Due to their proprietary processing design, they are able to create a system that at least ACTS like a multitrack-tape-machine when you go to punch-in or overdub, no matter how many plugins you have running. That's ultimately why people use it, aside from the compatibility benefits from pro studio to pro studio. Ultimately, you have to add a lot of high end gear to the other systems (awesome converters, clocking, external proprietary processing boxes or cards like WAVES APA44, Muze Receptor, UA's UAD-1, etc.) to begin to approach near-non-existent latency. Now, I am a deeply conflicted individual because, while I admire Digidesign for what they provide in their high end hardware (meaning, a system that "acts" like a tape machine (but is most certainly not a Studer A800 mkIII), I really am not a fan of the way ProTools SOUNDS. A lot of my engineer friends and I discuss this and we have come up with this... "ProTools sounds big, but that big sound does not translate to clarity and depth." That last statement is going to be rather controversial and will probably earn me some hate mail. But this is the opinion of several who have used PTHD, PTLE, Nuendo, Sonar, etc.. I've heard and read all of their sound engine hype and I ultimately feel that the proof is in the pudding. It's quite an amazing difference to be heard when you export your sessions from ProTools to Nuendo. Frankly, I grew up with ProTools and I love the routing and all of the available plugins. I like the way it works. But I wish that they could just make it sound better. I know! People are going to hate me! But the reason why I went on this rant is because, if Digidesign is going to release a new product, then they ought to make sure that LE can at least create a "bounce to disk" AIFF that sounds exactly like what you were monitoring to begin with. Otherwise, what's the 'effing point? While we like to rant about the hardware because we are all STUCK with it in Digi-land, I really wish that more of us would demand some changes to the way the audio itself is handled once it's inside. With all the available gear we can use to bypass the Chinese-Garbage that ultimately is the LE line, we can certainly make some great sounding tracks. I just wish that I could have my cake and eat it too... in the same hardware/software system. To me there is no excuse for making substandard audio-engine when there are plenty of other reasons to upgrade to HD. Hell HD's audio engine is still questionable (big, but not deep), but at least you can punch in and out like you should without having to play around to get it to sit right.
__________________ MoonPi "Look out honey, 'cause I'm usin' technology!" - IGGY | |
| | |
| | #56 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Beezers' Nook
Posts: 681
| really what a bunch of whiners here. That price on the upgrade path is pretty darn good! |
| | |
| | #57 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,932
| Quote:
This thread made my day - PT bashing. And it isn't even closed yet.
__________________ "You're either with a native DAW, or you're with the terrorists." G.W. Busch Lite | |
| | |
| | #58 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 397
| Quote:
You won't catch me buying a digidesign product ever, but the 002 and persumably the 003 fit very comfortable in both performance and features considering its price range (it surprises me that you have already formed an opinion on the way the 003 series sounds. I assume you have actually heard it?). | |
| | |
| | #59 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: in that happy place
Posts: 69
| Quote:
TRUE! But you get to put in the ALL new flight case supplied A weelee bin!
__________________ I like to turn water into wine,thunder and lightning and my all time fave. parting the red sea. | |
| | |
| | #60 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 22
| You know, I was thinking, I wonder if this has something to do with DIGI and Focusrite parting ways and DIGI not having Pre-amps or not being able to use them. So they go with a different pre and call it new. Any thoughts or confirmation on that? I love my 002R and will not upgrade and I love Protools but as far as I'm concerned MBox2, MBox Pro, and 003 have all been jokes. I can't believe nobody in a meeting said " I think they are all going to laugh at us" |
| | |