![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2005 Location: 954/305
Posts: 27
Thread Starter | Mbox and latency
ok.. so i have an mbox running 6.4 and im recording from my rode K2 (yo what a dope tube mic for the price by the way) straight into the mbox using only the preamp on the mbox, screw compression, ride the preamp! lol... anyways, im gettin a delay in the headphones from the vocal track and its messin up my girl cuz shes hearin herself delayed instead of live.. now i know about the low latency monitor mode in LE but is that only available in the 002? cuz i dont see the option pleace someone tell me theres a fix to this.. good lookin yall! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested Joined: Dec 2006 Location: SF, CA & Seattle, WA
Posts: 20
|
the mbox 2 (i assume that is what you have) doesn't have an insert, so you can't split the mic pre. Your only choice is to buy a mic split and split your mic into the mbox as well as an seperate hardware mixer. then use the mixer as a monitor. this will give you proper "0" latency. Otherwise turn your latency in the mbox down as far as you can, but when singing i think i can notice like 10~ms even, which is pretty low, maybe even 5... Other option: get her to sing without her voice in the headphones. Sing with only one headphone side on one ear. (Maybe she'll even sing better this way...). Turn off monitoring on your vocal track to do this. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2005 Location: 954/305
Posts: 27
Thread Starter |
where can i turn the latency down at? and i have a little mixer.. didnt think of that idea, thanks.. she already records with one ear off and i've tried muting the open track in her ears too.. i mean, its working and its not bothering her, we've been recording like that.. but this issue sticks in the back of my mind and i been tryin to figure it out.. so where do i turn down the latency in the mbox?.. i have the older mbox too so what are you talkin about when you can split the mic pre? thanks for the help homie |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Joined: May 2006 Location: VA
Posts: 419
|
Doesnt the MBox have some sort of "mix" control so you can do hardware monitoring? Otherwise, you'd have to try and set the buffer as low as possible. -D
__________________ "Dont you see it? It's our island...that's where we have to go.."-Snitter __________________________ www.myspace.com/tremorsaudio |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,129
|
Either set your system up as effectively as possible using all of digidesign and other users suggested settings, and then set your H/W Buffer to something like like 128-256-or-64 and you should be fine to go. OR simply turn the mix knob on the M-Box If you turn it all the way towards 'input' and that will allow her to hear Zero Latency Monitoring of herself through the headphone output. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2006 Location: Phila, PA/Upstate MA
Posts: 3,432
|
dfegad usb
|
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2005 Location: 954/305
Posts: 27
Thread Starter | Quote:
turning the knob all the way to input cuts out the music so she cant hear what else is going on... AHHH.. just answered my own problem.. keep the mix/input knob centered and mute the open vocal track.. shit, that one was obvious.. now i remember that problem when i first got the mbox years ago.. i been doin recording in professional studios for a while for other clients and decieded to whip out the old mbox and buy a mic and record at the crib for my girls stuff since we dont have a budget like them other guys lol... thanks sluts | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 318
| easy solution: mix knob Quote:
this is digidesign's piss poor way of dealing with latency on the mbox2. you'd be making life harder for yourself to split the mic and use mixer, the mbox2 had that built in with the mix knob. the downside is the vocalist wont be able to hear their voice with reverb or compression, but thats what you gotta deal with for low latency monitoring on a mbox2. if you find that the vocal is audibly off time from the track (if the system latency is really bad), then you can fix it by nudging the region (if you dont hear a problem, then ignore what i just said). when it comes time to mix, set the mix knob all the way back to the default position (100% audio coming out of pro tools). edit- after i wrote all that i realized u already figured that shit out. my bad. Last edited by nerogtr; 6th January 2007 at 08:44 AM.. Reason: im a ****-tard | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear interested Joined: Dec 2006 Location: SF, CA & Seattle, WA
Posts: 20
|
Ahhh, I didn't know the mbox 2 had the mix knob. I had an mbox for about, well, 1 month, and i glanced at the pictures they had online of it. My bad |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 318
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 986
| Quote:
Daaaamn yo, ain't you dizown witta minimum buffer size yo? You best check that shizil, ain't nuthin like sum latency to be wackin on a ho's style, damn! Best peep yo Playback Engine menu fool! Or start yankin yo mix knob, yo be outta dis jam lickety splits!
__________________ "When life gives you lemons, just say f@*k the lemons and bail" http://www.myspace.com/mattdistad http://www.myspace.com/froghollowdaycamp | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 318
| |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear nut |
Greetings ILLSON, I know you've already found a solution that works for you and that's great. However, I'm a little curious as to why you didn't use your "little mixer" in the first place? Of course, if the preamps are shit (at least in comparison to those in the MBox) that answers my question, but if they're decent you could hook the mixer up to the MBox and have the best of both worlds. You can use the mixer to monitor - zero latency ('cept for the physical hardware latency of the signal passing through the circuitry and nothing's gonna get rid of that) - plus, if it has any inserts and/or aux you can put some verb or comp or whatever into the monitoring and/or recording chain to taste. Just a thought. |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2004 Location: New York CIty
Posts: 276
| Quote:
the mix knob was on the 'original' mbox. digidesign had a pisspoor way of dealing with latency from the beginning....ignoring it. | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 318
| really? i never owned an original mbox, so i was under the impression it didn't have one. my bad haha. the only reason I have an mbox2 right now is because my school made me buy one, even though I've had a 002 for years.
|
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear interested Joined: May 2005 Location: The O.C., CA
Posts: 13
|
Mute the track you're recording, this will eliminate the latency you're hearing. Edit: Nevermind, I just saw that you figured it out.... |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2005 Location: 954/305
Posts: 27
Thread Starter | Quote:
yea i just bought some small bullshit 6 channel mixer just to have another headphone output so we can both hear whats goin on.. we're trackin vocals in the same room with the computer setup.. set up some blankets and mic stands, does the job.. the pre on the mixer sucks.. but so does the pre on the mbox, but the mbox sounds better than the pre on the mixer.. i do rough mixes at the crib then mix it in the studio on the client's time cuz rappers are always late lol.. | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,348
| For reverb you can use a Send in "Pre". That way, if you mute the vocals, you can still hear reverb on the output and the no-latency vocal comming in.
|
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 318
| but then wouldn't there be a delay on the reverb? i guess if its not enough to bother the vocalist, then a pre fader send is a great solution.
|
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,714
| Quote:
JSL | |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 318
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 190
|
i'm no expert in pro tools but can't you just go to the options menu and click low latency should be there, not unless it's just on the m-box 2 pro and i would set your buffer size low and select auto input monitoring from the track menu, and for rehearsing with the track select input only monitoring i dunno like i said i'm no expert so if it doesn't work then i must be dumb |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 318
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: Hillsboro, OR
Posts: 986
| |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 190
|
yes the m-box 2 pro is firewire
|
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 318
|
crap on a stick- i didn't mean to say pro. i was thinking how the pro was firewire when i was typing that (vs the non pro's usb connection, which is what i own, and meant to be talking about). i even wrote the word "normal" before "mbox" to differentiate it from the pro, but wrote pro anyway for some reason. whatever. too late to edit. my bad. dfegad |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,714
| Quote:
JSL | |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 318
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 15
|
sorry to bring this back to life, but I am having issues with low latency monitoring on my mbox 2 pro. im using it with ableton, not protools... can I still directly monitor my inputs as opposed to go to my computer then back to my monitors? I have a very low buffer on ableton but still... i need some help as to how to do zero latency monitorning from the mbox its self.. is there a hidden switch or knob?
|
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Gear addict | Quote:
One way, which I prefer to low-latency, is to use a small mixer for monitoring. Obviously it's more gear and cash but small mixers are pretty useful things. The MBox 2 Pro has another cool function where the second headphone can monitor outputs 3/4, so you can route the mix to both 1/2 and 3/4, and route the tracks currently recorded only to 3/4, so the engineer can monitor the latent output (with any processing or effects he wants to try out) while the performer can monitor without latency (and possibly with other monitoring processing and effects if you want them and know what you are doing). | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mbox 2 Convertors vs Mbox, 002, Maudio? | composer | Low End Theory | 6 | 27th December 2007 11:05 PM |
| UAD-"What Latency?" + other PT-LE latency results | BradG | So much gear, so little time! | 16 | 29th March 2006 01:52 AM |
| Mbox- less latency with a Mac? | Pointbreakd | Music computers | 1 | 10th February 2006 10:25 PM |
| MBOX and 164 latency | kelly pettit | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 13th April 2005 08:26 AM |
| Latency in Digi 002R as compared to MBOX | littledoodler | Music computers | 8 | 29th March 2004 09:55 PM |
| |