Recommendations for Telecaster strings - Page 3 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time! > Sub forums > instruments, guitar, bass, amps


Recommendations for Telecaster strings

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th January 2012   #61
Voiding warranties
 
Jim Williams's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 10,070

Weird thread.... Some stuff is missing like the anti-satan Humbucker guy I responded too. Sort of makes me look like I'm replying to my own imagination...

Which isn't necessarly a bad thing as long as everyone else is in on the joke.

He did say something about set neck Gibsons having more string sustain than the 'devil's preference' of a bolt on neck???

I have set neck Tele's too, guess what? The bolt on's ring longer. That rosewood telecaster rings like there's a built in compressor. It ought too, it weighs more than a Les Paul.
Jim Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2012   #62
Gear addict
 
litepipe's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 362

Send a message via AIM to litepipe
The sustain conversation lacks any real world use. It's a bullshit marketing guitarist mumbo jumbo. I can't even count the records I've recorded on or the tours/gigs I've done at this point... Not once has someone asked me to switch guitars for more sustain!! They've asked for less twang, more twang, softer, trashy, etc... All kinds of adjectives.

I also find most people that are obsessed with sustain play with a lot of distortion and compression and don't hold a note long enough to get the full benefits of added sustain.

There is a lot of sustain in your fingers. I never even consider that when I'm picking a guitar for a session. It's more about the tone. Put me in front of a great amp. I'll push it and get all the sustain you'll ever need. Also whenever I've talked to other pro guitarists this never comes up. Never.
__________________
Mark Marshall
Knob Twiddler
www.knobtwiddler.net
www.facebook.com/markmarshallmusic
litepipe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2012   #63
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 176

litepipe, I agree completely. As well, many guitarists who talk about 'sustain' (the metal crowd) have their actions so low that fret buzz diminishes any possible sustain, and what they perceive to be sustain is actually just feedback induced.

As for strings, the most important thing for me is the tonal balance between the wound and unwound strings. For me, only the TI Blues Sliders accomplish that to my satisfaction.
krusty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2012   #64
Gear addict
 
Johnny Favorite's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 353

D'addarios are always fresh. I tried them all, been playing Teles for a long time and D'addarios never let me down. Tone is there and you can rely on them.

I use 11s
Johnny Favorite is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9th February 2012   #65
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1

absolutely correct

Quote:
Originally Posted by RasCricket View Post
Ehh, not really true at all. Sorry to demystify things but the truth is, Joe Walsh was talking out of his ass. Theres a thing called "pickup height adjustment" thats far more indicative of overall tone. Its when you take into consideration the pickup height along with the string height ~ thats where its at.

When I was young and inexperienced, I maybe used to think "Oh, its a TELE...that means things are like so because I heard it from some guy..."

Pffft....a guitar is a guitar ~ people overthink things and ascribe 'magical' properties to a certian brand or type of guitar and its just stupid. Ill play you some of the best Jazz ya ever heard.....on a Telecaster. Yes....Jazz.

Dont overthink things ~ if youre still worried about what strings to put on, youve got a LONG way to go and should probably just get any strings on there for now and get to practicing.
The truth.


If you're payin' attention through years of playing, you'll find all this true. And, no matter how much you try to help some, they still won't believe you until they experience it all themselves.

If they have a clue, they'll figure it out.
TL in TX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2012   #66
Gear nut
 
rumbletone's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 103

Quote:
Originally Posted by lane thaw View Post
On a tele or strat - I'll second the D'Addario XL 11's. Best of both worlds, you can still bend, but fat enough for a rich sound.

me too. maple board 1975 tele with kinman noiseless pups. amazing tone . . .
rumbletone is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
telecaster dilemma doctormonella instruments, guitar, bass, amps 26 25th March 2011 08:12 AM
Has Anyone Seen/Used A Telecaster Like This? Curve Dominant So much gear, so little time! 24 6th April 2010 04:39 PM
G/B Benders for Telecaster KurtR So much gear, so little time! 2 16th May 2006 10:47 PM
G/B Benders for Telecaster KurtR So much gear, so little time! 0 15th May 2006 08:01 PM
TELECASTER!! PlayItLoud So much gear, so little time! 70 15th February 2006 02:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.