![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 122
Thread Starter | How to lower tube amp volume? How to lower tube amp volume? I have acquired some great amps lately, but they are all 130watts+ and sound best of course, at loud volumes. I got a Bugera 1960 (140 watts) and a Musciman HD-130 (130 Watts). Having a new born baby girl...cranking the amp isnt always an option so i bought a groove tubes speaker emulator. The speaker emulator says it can only had 100 watts max. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2008 Location: UK & France
Posts: 852
|
You are pretty unlikely to break the speaker sim, as they are usually a big ol` resistor that gets very hot but is unlikely to cook unless you run cranked for hours on end. And you have obviously found the Fatal Flaw in that great toob sound/ Big or little, they only start sounding really hot when they are cranked. Just remember there are a lot of very good smaller wattage tube amps out there too. This is a lot of the reason people are turning away from the big ol` 100watt plus mo`fo`s. At least they are in the UK. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 183
|
Look up Power Scale: Power Scaling Tips | FargenAmps.com |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Sep 2006 Location: Cologne/Germany
Posts: 64
| Quote:
www.amptechnik.de | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,242
|
Look at the Dr. Z Air Brake, THD Hot Plate, etc. You need an attenuator, not a speaker simulator. These have big resistors and are rated for 100-150 watts. The Music Man is a great amp; with a baby, you may want to consider selling one of the amps and getting a smaller amp - a Princeton Reverb, for example, or get a solid state that you can plug in headphones and not wake anyone. Roland's Microcubes are fun, inexpensive and could be great for late hour practicing.
__________________ nedoramaMonkey Boy Studios Summit 2BA-221, TLA-50 mBox Pro 3, Pro Tools 10.1.3 Radial JDI x 2, ProD2, ProRMP '65 Bandmaster 2x12 combo with Dr. Z Brake Lite, '65 Showman, '74 Princeton, '77 Princeton Reverb, Dr. Z. Mini Z Head, Dr. Z 1x12 Cab, pedals, George L's cabling |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Joined: Nov 2010 Location: chicago, IL
Posts: 304
|
go hot plate!! they aren't super cheap, but i see up pop up used often enough nothing beats the real thing of letting an amp open up! - also opens up a nice world of tones that would otherwise deafen you Also there's the marshall power break, though i think it is a bit pricier than the THD unit |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 122
Thread Starter |
i would check out a smaller amp in ADDITION to these amps but come on....i cant get rid of this stuff!! it sounds amazing i just need to tame them. your going to put a roland cube in the same thread as a plexi?!? come on now... the reason i have a speaker simulator is so i can record at home without comprising the sound of a mic'd speaker cab. i cant stand amp plug ins. i would get a hot plate but i was looking at them and they are some $$$ (which is fine) but it seems like i need a different hot plate for each ohm load?!? if thats how it is, then f*ck them. thanks for all the input guys |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear |
How loud do you need to crank up? A 130 watt amp sounds really loud putting out 4 watts. Or to put it differently, fully cranked it puts out 200w, at 20w it sounds 1/2 as loud, at 2w it's 1/4 as loud. So, if you don't need the same effect as having it cranked up to 10, you should be fine with the speaker simulator. BTW, does that one have a built in load so that you don't need a speaker plugged in? Many of them don't and you need a dummy load to keep the amp from blowing up. You can actually build your own dummy load... you can buy 20w, 16 ohm resistors at Radio Shack. 4 in parallel gives you 4 ohms at 80w, 4 sets of 4 in series gives you 16 ohms at 320 w and you'd be fine...
|
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear addict Joined: Oct 2009 Location: Germany
Posts: 337
| Yes, there is a way to easily lower the wattage without any changes to the amp - Tone Bones. They allow you to install EL84 tubes (app. 8 watt each) in lieu of the power tubes of your amp. On my Marshall 2203 I've installes 2 of them, so it has 16 watts - in just pulling them out and reinstalling the 4 original tubes ist a 100 Watt amp again. This is possible as the EL84 with the Tone Bones dont need a bias adjustment. There are different grades of EL84 tubes available giving you a hrder or softer tone. I started 5 years ago experimenting with these with awesome results. My amps are modded anyhow, so after some further changes I'm in a position to record really greaat rock sounds (I'm no Heavy Metal guy) aswell as crunch and clean sounds. If you've got the right cabs - in my case pre Rola G12H30 and G12M25's - you will never look back. Here is a link: Röhren, AMP Kits und Lautsprecher - Tube Amp Doctor By the way, to further change your tone with Tone Bones, you can get Penthode and Triode versions.
__________________ there are two things in the world that count - ROCK and ROLL |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Orlando
Posts: 3,686
|
I have the same dilemma since I don't want to annoy my neighbors. Tube amps sound how I want at 10. I am thinking of going 30 watt max, even for gigging. For practice, I bought an Orange Microcrush. For not being tube, it still has a very cool tone with a les paul or tele. I can keep it at low volumes and get a very nice tone for practice purposes. It is no tube amp, but it is really cool for the price. For your 100 watters, I would dummyload.
__________________ Professionally played Basslines for $35 a Track. www.professionalbassguitar.com |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Moderator Joined: Dec 2003 Location: London
Posts: 4,597
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear addict Joined: Oct 2009 Location: Germany
Posts: 337
| |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 122
Thread Starter |
Finally! This THD yellow jacket seems to be what im looking for. Now i just have to figure out what sockets each amp has? Thank you guys, i knew id get an answer here
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15
| ..::: Faustine Phantom Attenuator :::.. incredible box.....if retaining the sonic signature of your amp ie. transparency is a priority, these attenuators are amazing. Lots of good footage and clips in the media section of the site.... (proof as it were) |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Moderator Joined: Dec 2003 Location: London
Posts: 4,597
|
OUCH! $949 ![]() Checking out the clips rigt now (I have told my wallet to go for a nice stroll for an hour or so....) Pete Thorn is a tone-meister so it must be great
__________________ :: New Album "Rooms" out now http://www.andymitchellmusic.com :: twitter > http://twitter.com/mitchellmusic - http://www.twitter.com/theyardbirds |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Moderator Joined: Dec 2003 Location: London
Posts: 4,597
|
Sounds great. With the gtr soloed I prefer the scumback's sparkle in the clean tones But... I definitely prefer the attenuator with the dirty tones thumbsup I guess the Sm57 is picking up more highs in the centre of the cone |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,242
| Quote:
The MusicMan is a good amp, but no one needs that amount of wattage for home, clubs or live unless you're on a 40' stage. It's also the reason why Fender Twin Reverbs are going so cheap used - no one needs that anymore. Anything over 40 watts nowadays is overkill for playing in a band with others unless you're playing that big of a show. Even then, a lot of folks are playing with 40-50 watters and under. But if you're happy with the sound, by all means. The reason I suggested the Roland cube is that it's cheap and has a headphone jack - even with Yellow Jackets and attenuators, your Music Man will still be a loud amp. There's also no guarantee with the different tubes that you'll like the sound of your amp, since it was voiced for 6L6 tubes and now you're putting in something completely different. The Roland is $100 new - a lot cheaper than modding your amp. Think of this as a home baby solution, not replacing your rig. I have 2 kids and when they were a baby I had to use my old rack guitar setup instead of my Fenders or Dr. Z - it wasn't better, but it kept the volume down and I could still practice, play and record. As for the Bugera, if it's still working I'd still sell it. Behringer isn't known for quality, but if you're happy with it and haven't had any issues then by all means keep it. | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 15
|
blast9...... Pete is a tone-meister!!! I bought mine to tame an old Burman creation and have since become a bit of an addict |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 122
Thread Starter |
people can say what they want about he bugera but mine is a beast. i had mercury magnetics build a custom power transformer, choke, and install their input and output transformers. id love to stack it up against a real plexi but for the price point this thing sounds close enough.
|
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2010 Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,174
| Just coming 'round to the Faustine myself. In Pete's video, isn't he using the V-Speaker output for those tones rather than the attenuator output? That certainly would change things. Maybe I misunderstood though!
__________________ Dallas/Fort Worth area musician forum: http://musicdfw.com http://www.scottwhigham.com |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2009 Location: los angeles
Posts: 1,719
|
Interested in the Faustine V-speaker recording, as well. Even at nearly $1k there's a 4 month wait list.
|
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 639
| Quote:
What was suggested to me was to try using a 1x12 cab to reduce the volume. THD hotplates are good, but they only come in one flavour which is very annoying. Koch make a load box which is meant to be very good and there are loads of other attenuators that work in similar ways. Just be aware that using attenuators will suck a bit of the high end out of the sound. You can add this back in later or try to compensate for it with EQ but they do affect the sound a little bit. | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 44
|
Yeah if you get a load box try and get one like one of the weber ones with a speaker coil in it. Since a load resistor applies a linear impedence accross all frequencys which wont sound very natural and if you use a speaker coil for the load it'll act much more like an actual speaker.
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Tags: attenuators, lowering amp volume |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Logic 9: Lower only the bottom of volume Automation points? | Equiv_Exchange | Music computers | 2 | 20th August 2009 10:57 AM |
| amp suggestions for Tannoy System 10 DMT II (at lower volume!) | beingmf | Geekslutz forum | 0 | 16th May 2008 10:26 AM |
| How do you edit/lower volume of picking during guitar solos? | Arkitecht | So much gear, so little time! | 21 | 29th December 2007 04:04 AM |
| Lower Volume Tracking/Mixing=Good...BUT | filthyrich | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 25th May 2007 01:51 AM |
| Lower volume when using stomp pedals | geiristudio | instruments, guitar, bass, amps | 3 | 2nd March 2007 12:28 AM |
| |