![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | Lil Orphan Ampeg I just place the order for a sweet find. 1964 R12R Ampeg Reverberocket !!!! Very clean, all original including NOS Wurlitzer and RCA tubes. Original CTS speaker, original pedal and hand written tube chart notes from Mr. Everett Hull himself? Ok maybe not, but still cool! Needless to say, I'm smitten with this little wonder. Everything works, though I may need to have my amp tech give it a thorough check-up to get her dead quiet for recording. These amps were the first with on board Reverb and Trem and from all I've heard, the best Reverb and Trem in any small amp. I missed this amp by one day when it sold to someone else, but in a turn of fate, the buyer returned Lil Orphan Ampeg saying it was too clean for his use. Not to worry, I'l be sure to give this little wonder a loving home.
__________________ Don't look at me in that tone of voice |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 812
| Congrats, it's seriously a beauty! |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | Indeed she is that! This was the best one I found out of several available on the market. At worst, it may have a few caps replaced, but overall she's very close to original. Most of the one's out there did not have the original speaker which if I have my facts straight is a CTS AlNiCo. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 2,524
| i had a j-12 jet. the store thought it was a re-issue because someone had replaced the handle with a new one. best sounding little amp i've ever had. sold it to pay medical bills :( |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 372
| The best clean sound in the business...and the break-up is just as good! |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 987
| congrats!! very nice amp |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,636
| I sold one just like this to a lucky gearslut about 2 years ago for I think $250. A friend of mine didn't want it and being the young whipper snapper that he was didn't think a vintage amp like this was worth a crap because it didn't have 15 different dsp distortion sounds built in with 400 different effect presets. So I told him I'd sell it for what I could and he agreed. It was all original as well. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | Depending on condition, these amps are now getting the attention they deserve and prices are climbing rather rapidly. The listed asking prices I found ranged between $650.00 and $1300.00 This is an original hand wired Ampeg, 45 years young. While still not fetching the average values of a BF Princeton Reverb, these are becoming highly collectable and getting much harder to find without mods or a replacement speaker. I have read that the Reverb circuit may need some attention to prevent feedback at higher volumes, but the overall tone of the Reverb and Tremelo circuits is exceptional. I've heard the RR2's and Gemini I series are also excellent choices. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,055
| I doubt that. Hand notations on Ampeg tube charts are common, as are circuit mods made right at the factory for transitional pieces or amps that didn't sound good enough when first tested, and Hull wasn't particularly technical and wouldn't have been working on the line. Nice amp though. It's hard to go wrong with a healthy Ampeg from the time period of the original ownership of the company. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | You are very likely correct regarding the hand written notes actually be Hull's. Even so, the whole hand built hand noted coolness of this amp was just too hard to resist. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,055
| As the owner of a '62 Echo Sattelite, '60 Jet, '63 B15N, '59? variant of a Manhattan (?) 2x12 combo, '60 ? B12X, and Noble Artiste and Noble Super, let me just say...I understand ! |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,808
| wow. i remember my friend carl had this old crappy looking amp that we found in the closet. It wasn't a fender or marshall so we didn't know any better. I plugged in my ibanez and was really into the sound. It sounded a little better then my solid state 20watt amp!!! Well. Once day I came over and the whole thing was torn apart. Carl said he was curious if he could use any of the parts with his frankenstereo!!!!!!! Anyway. It was an ampeg jet.
__________________ http://www.myspace.com/polishedproductions MacPro 2.66 quad, Macbook Pro 13" 2.4, Protools 8 LE 003, Logic 8, McDsp, Sonnox, API 512c, GR NV500, Buzz Essence, Focusrite Solo, DBX 160A, Telefunken AK47, AKG 414eb Adam A7 Sub 8, Laney, Fender, Martin, Musicman, Marshall. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | Thanks for the tip on the reverb teleharmonium. I'm really excited to hear how she sounds with the stock speaker. Getting it studio quiet without any drastic mods is my only concern. It has been well taken care of considering 45 years. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | Thanks to Jeff at Retro Music for allowing me to buy this little wonder on layaway. It shipped out today. Now to suffer waiting for Fed Ex to get it here from New Hampshire. I've heard that I should get the best Reverb tube I can find and cushion the reverb tank with rubber washers. Any suggestions on the ideal reverb section tube? |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | It's HERE! ![]() ![]() What an amazing tone machine! I am all grins big time! ![]() The cleans are sweet and the crunch is amazing. Very Stonesy wide open. Reverb and Trem to die for! The best money I ever spent on an amp. Would not change a single thing. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | It all came together this morning messing around with my '93 Strat Plus capoed at the 4th fret, Street Fighting Man! Amp wide open and dead on Stones! I'll try to do a short clip if I can get to it this weekend. ![]() |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | This afternoon I sat down ready to try another clip showing the cleans-crunch tones and just moments after I started warming up, the amp just quit. No Sound. I was only at half volume, so I thought it was in the amp. I took the amp over to my friend Eric at Viking Amps who was kind enough to do a quick check to see what had gone wrong. The good news is that the amp is FINE The sad news is that the original driver tested for an open voice coil. So as I feared, playing a 45 year old driver at full volume is not a good idea. For the time being, Eric set me up with an Eminence Canibis Rex. The amp still sounds great but the mixed blessing is now the amp is twice as loud !!! The C-Rex has an SPL efficiency of 102, where the original AlNiCo driver might have been around 97 or less. I'm going to have the original driver re-coned and store it away. The original lower efficiency driver made the amp perfect for great tones at lower volumes for recording and for long term listening comfort. The more efficient C-Rex makes this amp much better suited for live band performance, adding not only volume but increased clean headroom and greater response from the control knobs. Ampeg's specs of 18 watts are quite conservative. Eric tested the output @ 21 watts clean RMS and 28 watts peak wide open. We tried a bunch of guitars through it and it totally rocks, but I'm afraid I'm gonna need to hunt down a less efficient AlNiCo that can handle at least 30 watts. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Black Gnat, Kentucky
Posts: 1,370
| One of my fav amps. Mine is a first year, very early model, still in the sparkle tolex with a jet tube chart scratched out with the rocket tubes and model number added in. Love the trem and verb on these things. Nothing like it. I use Skip Simmons for repair. He's the sh!t on the old amps and even made my Kendrick 2112 sing.
__________________ Where you going to run when the worlds on fire? |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | I'm heartbroken about the original driver. I tried the amp this morning and the C-Rex is WAY too bass responsive using the same guitar and same settings and it was too loud. The original driver sounded PERFECT, but this speaker really was not meant to handle the amp at full volume and power chords. I've written Weber, mindful that Ted is quite ill, asking if the original driver can be re-coned and maybe beefed up to handle a bit more power. The amp craves AlNiCo detail and smoothness, but many new AlNiCos are considerably more efficient than the originals. If you are trying to control volume, the difference between a speaker rated @ SLP 97 vs. a speaker rated @ SPL 102 is HUGE. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,055
| Too bad about the speaker. I would suggest picking up a vintage Eminence black frame alnico magnet speaker with the square magnet cover, as used on many amps in the late 60s/early 70s. Those have a similar sound and efficiency to that CTS (Eminence was started by a guy that worked for CTS and their early models were similar to CTS speakers) but somewhat higher power handling. Honestly I wouldn't bother reconing the CTS. You can probably find another with the original cone for less than what the recone would cost, if you are patient, and a recone for a speaker like that where an exact replacement cone is not going to be available, isn't going to sound like the original speaker anyway. Very few speakers retain even 50% of their value once they have been reconed (with the reconing cost often exceeding 50% of their value as original speakers), and as a rule CTS, Utah, and the like are not among them although they made some great sounding stuff. Case in point, the original CTS 15" from my Portaflex has a partially rotted surround and buzzes as a result. Reconing one of those is about $60 to $75 plus shipping both ways and that's with a generic or Waldom (shudder) cone, probably a heavier one than the original. Instead of that, I got a low miles original speaker of the same model on ebay for $65. The market value for non sexy speakers like these being what it is, if I reconed the old one, I could probably only get maybe $25 for it (for a net loss of course), and I'd feel like I was selling somebody a jive speaker; they might think they would be getting the right speaker for their B15, but it wouldn't sound like it. |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | Jeff at Retro Music is going to keep his eye out for another Ampeg label CTS AlniCo so I can have it for preservation. The amp really does need a conservatively rated 25-30 watt AlNiCo for rock. The original 15 watt driver was fine for cleans and smooth jazz at 1/2 volume. You know what they say, A speaker reaches its' pinnacle of tone right before it blows. At least it went out on a good note. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 807
| I've got a R12R as well, although I have to say it's nowhere near as nice looking as that one. That is a clean machine! I'm sorry to hear about the speaker, I know how you feel. On the plus side, you can now become a speaker slut (like I am) and play around with how different speakers will sound being driven within an inch of their lives by your wicked little combo! Fenders have a classic sound, glassy, percussive and awesome, but there's just nothing like the throaty roar of an Ampeg, they're the King of the Mids! |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | This one is a bit different with the RCA 7868's in the power section The pre printed tube sticker has factory hand written tube designations above with these tubes in this order. 12AX7, 12AU7, 12AX7, 12AX7 7868, 7868 The 7868's are more like an over sized EL84 than a 7591, 6V6 or 6L6 The sticker also has the model number R12R with M added at the end. My neighbor has a Suhr Badger 18 and it was WAY louder than the R12R with the original driver, even though the Ampeg actually has more power. It's all in the speaker efficiency. I'm avoiding any use of the original handle, carrying the amp as a box rather than risking breakage of the well worn original handle. I know I can get a new replacement from fliptops, but for now, I'm not taking any more chances. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | Some close friends have asked to borrow the R12R for an event they have scheduled next month as part of their back line. I'm going to take it over to rehearsal and hope the amp holds together. I didn't buy this amp to admire it in a display case, so I'm actually looking forward to a good shake down test. While I feel terrible about the original driver, at least it didn't happen at the moment of truth in front of a sold out show. I'm definitely replacing the C-Rex with an AlNiCo ASAP, but having purchased two fine amps in the last month, my fun money is gone for the moment. |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | I've been in touch with Ted Weber and he tells me they can re-cone the original driver to spec and beef it up a bit to better handle 30 watts RMS. We are truly blessed to have such a good friend in the music community. Since I still want to preserve the original driver, Ted is also suggesting one of his low efficiency AlNiCo drivers as a replacement for regular use. 12A125A, lightly doped, 30 watts. 12A125A $105.00 Replaces Chicago Jensen P12Q and other medium power AlNiCo 12's. 12", 11oz AlNiCo magnet, 20 or 30 watts, 1-1/4" voice coil, curved seam, ribbed cone. Woody, reedy, early 60's Fender tone. Tight low end, detailed high end. Compressed and fattened at higher volumes https://taweber.powweb.com/weber/12a125a.htm |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | Added a rough clip working on a rhythm track arrangement . Clean to crunch through the Cannabis Rex. YouTube - Ampeg R12R Old Girl test I did another take, just hacking out the basic arrangement, still not happy with the results. YouTube - Old Girl Tremelo and Reverb The C-Rex is simply way too bass responsive for this amp. I can't play using the neck pickups without way too much low end. |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | R12R Reverb & Tremelo Clean This is a MUCH better representation of the amp in clean with Reverb and Tremelo. This should make it easy to understand why I wanted this specialty amp so much. The C-Rex sounds purdy dad gum good here! |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: A stoned throw from ground zero
Posts: 5,577
Thread Starter | The R12R survived a very good shake down test. I loaned the amp to my friends in 4 Out Of 5 Doctors for a heavy week of rehearsals and two packed shows and it worked beautifully without a hitch. The Cannabis Rex is now officially broken in and the band tells me George Pittaway has never had a better tone through any amp he has played through for stage or studio. As you might expect, they are now looking at every vintage Ampeg they come across. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Copyright in danger - Orphan Works bill USA and Europe??? | Reptil | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 7th May 2008 04:52 AM |
| Quad-8 Orphan Audio | Hattrick | High end | 4 | 1st December 2007 03:40 AM |
| A lil' help | ChrisG | Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production | 3 | 25th January 2007 04:25 AM |
| The Orphan Child - Are Monitors not considered "Gear"? | barefoot | So much gear, so little time! | 53 | 20th January 2004 06:44 AM |
| |