![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Northern California
Posts: 3
Thread Starter | The Never Ending Debate...
Tube or Solid State? Both have ups and downs, and from what I hear, tube usually comes out the victor. But I am a novice musician and interested in solid state. Is there any definite advantages to solid state to keep me interested, or am I running into an inevitable wall of disappointment? |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2007 Location: Happy Valley, California
Posts: 2,000
| Quote:
thats an easy answer: BOTH! solidstate is good at coloring the sound and tube gear can be rather clean or they can add color as well....but solid state has color done pretty good...but both are great.
__________________ -I'm one of the five best audio engineer/rappers of ALL time.- _____bcgood ![]() (Chael) - Michael Thomas Candido- | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 17
| tubed or not tubed
A more interesting question for me is : transformer or transformerless. If your doing classical music, I would say transformerless, but for any other type of music, you should use gear with great transformers (lundhal, cinemag...)
|
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2007 Location: Happy Valley, California
Posts: 2,000
| Quote:
i always prefer transfromer and i like my ochestra music colored... like the 50's and 60's there is music from that time that i dont find rivaled now or anytime soon..dynamics of course are important but i like my sound to have some soul in it | |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear maniac | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Apr 2008 Location: The City of Angels
Posts: 172
|
First, there is solid state and solid state, if you know what I mean. I own quite a few amps - we're talking about guitar amps, right? - among them some tube monsters but an 80s Randall RG100ES stands up right next to them ALL the time in shootouts. Tighter low end for sure but more dry/sterile/cold sounding (though that might be the sound you're after!). My best "chugga chugga" tone for metal band was working with at the time was a 3 channel stack of a 5150 block letter, the RG100Es, and a Bumbox Lead 1 Plexi.
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2007 Location: Nawlins
Posts: 216
|
No question in my book. A good tube amp just sounds better than solid state...and definitely better than modeling. That said...I've always liked the Roland JC-120...but I wouldn't want that over my tube fender and vox...i might still get one eventually for that sound.
__________________ http://www.myspace.com/electropoet |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2009 Location: St. Louis
Posts: 248
|
It's far more complicated than "is one better than the other." there are many horrible and aweful Tube amps. There are also some great solid state amps. I think Tom Scholz of Boston played solid state and he has a very distinct tone that can only be associated with him. I believe that Billy Corgan played solid state amps and may still. He also is considered incredible by many people. His tone is distinctly his. The problem with solid state is that most amp builders seem to make them to save cost. As a result the "good" solid state amps may not be any cheaper than comparable tube amps. They are, however, cheaper to maintain. Keep in mind that many entry level tube amps are also terrible. I like the tone of Fender Blues Jr. but other than that I can't think of a small tube amp that they sell at Guitar Center that I like. Roland Jazz Chorus is a very popular solid state amp if I'm not mistaken. If you have a particular sound in mind then we could talk about if solid state is good or not. But in general there is nothing inherently wrong with solid state. These are just my opinions. anthony |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Indiana
Posts: 809
|
Tubes are constant maintenance. I just dropped nearly $200 retubing my amps. Even if you take perfect care of them they are like tires on your car... they will eventually wear out. An over driven tube amp is the definitive tone of rock and roll but a lot of solid stage gear has held its own... probably the most popular chorus tones ever are from the Roland Jazz Chorus... that, my friend, is 100% solid state if I'm not mistaken. A lot of metal heads like the "tight" feeling of solid state. You can get the same tightness from Mesa/Boogie amps as well but will be paying a lot more. If you're a novice and are just going to be plunking around you may want to try something like the Line 6 Spider Valve... probably the most accurate marriage of tube circuitry and modern digital and solid state technology. Its not perfect but its great for beginners.
__________________ theGeek Springload - Juice Rock Tremor Christ Pearl Jam Tribute Shouldn't you be practicing? |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2007 Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,267
|
I wasn't aware there was a debate - I thought tubes had won that one. I have all tube amps now, and the vast majority have been tubes. But, I'm not willing to say that tube amps are categorically better, or to write off transistor amps. The average tube amp is probably better than the average transistor amp, but that makes no difference. You're not buying an average of amps - you're buying the one that suits you. One thing is for sure - transistor amps weigh a lot less, and that's important in that it makes it easier to play out. So, how's that for some non-advice?
__________________ - It looks just like a Telefunken U47 - with leather. You'll love it ... - Jazz is not dead - it just smells funny. - It doesn't make much difference how the paint is put on as long as something has been said. Technique is just a means of arriving at a statement. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2004 Location: London
Posts: 5,450
|
Tubes- by a long, long, long way if you are talking about sound quality.
|
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 340
| Quote:
What is a good solid state guitar amp? I never tried one. Yes they take care. Yes they have to be retubed. But they sound great. | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear nut Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 96
|
Almost always tubes for guitar amps. There exists a handful of good transistor amps, but they are generally only useful for pretty specific and freakish sounds(Sunn Beta Lead for a certain noisy kind of heavy, Roland JC120 for pretending to be Pat Metheny, Traynor TS-** makes a good ugly bass preamp).
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Indiana
Posts: 809
|
I again go back to the Roland Jazz Chorus as a good clean amp. This amp has been used on countless albums. True, if you are looking for anything other than super clean then tube is the way to go.
|
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 69
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2007 Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,267
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,636
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Indiana
Posts: 809
|
I play out nearly every weekend and various practices through the week... my power tubes only last about a year before they sound really dead. I have had the same preamp tubes for a while. Some could reasonably last indefinitely if the amp is well taken care of.
|
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2009 Location: St. Louis
Posts: 248
|
I think they don't make tubes like they used to. Maybe there's no truth to that but I've heard the same thing from others.
|
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,636
| Quote:
This is very true. I don't know how many kids I've had tell me why a Spider III is so much better than any tube amp I can name. "But it can do so much different stuff for so cheap". The only answer I usually give back is, "eventually you'll understand what I'm talking about"(when it comes to why tube amps are tonally superior). | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2007 Location: Indiana
Posts: 809
|
In the end the average listener won't notice the difference. Its mostly for your own enjoyment. Don't play a tube amp just because people give you crap about your SS gear. If you find a SS tone that works with what YOU are trying to do then run with it. If you like it then screw everyone else. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 743
| "It's far more complicated than "is one better than the other." No it's not- tube amps are alive, solid state sounds awful |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Gear Head Joined: Feb 2009 Location: SFBA
Posts: 67
|
For guitar amps, tubes all the way. Why use anything else? The sound is better, and the feel is better. IMHO of course. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,636
| This is how I've always felt. If you need to versatility of some of the modeling solidstate amp then get a multi effects pedal. I've even found distortion pedals to sound worlds better through tube amps.
|
| | |
| | #25 |
| Gear interested Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Some Where In Time
Posts: 20
| Solid what?
That's was a joke. I am valve guy all the way. As I posted on one of the other forums the valves make or break your amp. You may have to try several sets of pre's and powers to get the tone you like. I hear people complaining of the tone of their amps but I don't hear them painstakingly researching and trying various valves. I am aware the power valves need to be biased in case that was going to come up. When you revalve work with your amp tech and play the various valves, your paying the guy anyway. It's amazing how different they will sound. I am an accomplished guitar player and I have played both solid state and valve and valve amps just have a better "feel" to them. Plus I like being able to valve my amp to my taste, which in my opinion makes it my signature. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2009 Location: St. Louis
Posts: 248
|
I think the "feel" that everyone keeps talking about is the way the amp responds. When you hit a chord the tube amp hits you back with a much more natural intensity. Solid state seems artificial in that sense. Not to say that the artificial sound of solid state is bad. As I said earlier on this thread there are many guitarists with platinum records in their living rooms who never put a tube amp on their recordings. If you want something industrial or uncomfortably unnatural, solid state may be far more capable of creating that. Trent Reznor comes to mind. I don't think he uses amps at all on his records any more. He uses "Amp Farm" for everything. It's some sort of computer emulator.
|
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,546
| Quote:
siamese dream was a jcm800 tube mcis was a jmp tube pre with mesa tube power amp, the jcm800 again, and a vox ac30 tube zeitgest was a diezel herbert tube with uberschall tube so all tubes that i'm aware of. solid state's just cheaper, not generally better. | |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Gear interested Joined: Mar 2009 Location: Some Where In Time
Posts: 20
| Good article on the matter |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2009 Location: St. Louis
Posts: 248
| Quote: | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Never-Ending Mix | Teo Macero | So much gear, so little time! | 23 | 24th November 2008 03:02 AM |
| SALES ENDING 11-29-06 | InsaneMixaken | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 36 | 21st February 2007 01:05 PM |
| the never ending neve debate | dog haus | High end | 9 | 15th February 2005 03:21 AM |
| Never ending eq´s....... | Neve Sucks! | So much gear, so little time! | 12 | 21st December 2002 12:37 PM |
| |