![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #31 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,636
| I'm with you, every time I've heard someone talk about having problems dialing in a Mesa someone always chimes in with "you need an OD box to really make it shine" or something like that. I've worked with plenty of Mesa's and not just Rectumfriers and I've never had a problem with not having enough gain. They do take a while to dial in but once you get your sound they get the job done. |
| | |
| | #32 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: new mexico
Posts: 643
| Quote:
i have actually used a gain pedal in front of a boogie w it on a clean channel just to get a different type of gain out of it. w the right pedal it can work very well. | |
| | |
| | #33 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NYC
Posts: 1,801
| |
| | |
| | #34 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: new mexico
Posts: 643
| |
| | |
| | #35 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Chicago
Posts: 700
| Quote:
__________________ "One could hate digidesign and like protools." A quote from mtstudi@pacbell ____________________________________ Michael | |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,736
| I have mine on the way! The head is $2000 and the combo is $2100.
__________________ My Music House: www.JingleJackal.com My Studio: www.MySpace.com/NebulostProductions My Band: www.OneEyedDoll.com |
| | |
| | #37 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: new mexico
Posts: 643
| Quote:
pic 1 pic 2 pic 3 article these are just some quick links | |
| | |
| | #38 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: new mexico
Posts: 643
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: San Diego,Ca
Posts: 756
| Have him do a review for us and maybe post a few clips......that could be cool! Ron Florentine Soundswest Studio |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: new mexico
Posts: 643
| sorry, by buddy i meant a friend of mine that owns a music store and is a boogie dealer, had him order it for me. his initial order was 1 combo and 2 heads. the combo has sold, and waiting for the heads, 1 is mine and 1 is sold to someone in houston. but i have a project i am waiting for it to do some reamping. will post some clips. |
| | |
| | #41 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: NYC
Posts: 1,801
| Quote:
Right, but what's going on in the power amp section when you step on the channel-select footswitch that allows it to go from a true 10 watts rms to 90 watts rms? Usually that involves disabling some tubes (at the very least), no? I'm trying to figure out how MESA/Boogie gets around risking high voltages arcing over relay contacts, or else non-instantaneous power output changes. | |
| | |
| | #42 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 608
| They explain on their website, basically yes it drops a couple of tubes. Mesa Boogie Mark Five Guitar Amplifier About half way down there's a section "POWER MULTI_WATT(tm)" that sort of gives a laymans explanation of it. |
| | |
| | #43 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Chicago
Posts: 700
| Quote:
I wonder if he was using the Mark IV's on Metropolis Part II? I didn't like the album from front to back but his rhythm tone on "overture" was really good.
__________________ "One could hate digidesign and like protools." A quote from mtstudi@pacbell ____________________________________ Michael | |
| | |
| | #44 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: new mexico
Posts: 643
| Quote:
![]() that album to my knowledge is all mark IV on the heavy rhythm and was recorded with the original builds of the first ernie ball guitars. i honestly dont know what was used for the clean guitars though ![]() | |
| | |
| | #45 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: new mexico
Posts: 643
| Quote:
they have been doing this for a while now and the roadkings had a similar layout only you could select the actual tubes you wanted individually for each channel on the output side 4-6l6's and 2-el34's and how many of them used together. POWER: MULTI-WATT™ The bottom 3 position mini toggle in each Channel (lower left corner) is the MULTI-WATT™ Power feature that determines the amount (wattage) and type (configuration) of power each preamp Channel will be coupled with to create a classic sound. Any amplifier’s sound is 50% preamp and 50% power, so this switch is responsible for a large part of a given Channel’s personality and feel. The choices repeat for all 3 Channels and they are 90 W, 45, and 10 W. Using the switch is simple… just select the power you want for each Channel, keeping in mind that the greatest headroom, focus and authority will always be found in the 90 watt position. That’s how to use it, but for those who want the full story, here it is. Since 1981 Simul-Class™ Power has been the heart and soul of the MARK Series amplifiers, imparting its sweet, musical character onto any sound in the vast library of the now classic MARK legacy. Cleans that shimmer with transparent layers of sweet delicate highs, while the bottom end breathes a warm fundamental under a bed of rich low mid ambience. Never harsh - always fat, the Simul lead tone is the quintessential single-note solo sound that is best described with a human trait…vocal. This patented way of wiring an output section with two (or more) pair of output tubes combines two different styles of wiring configurations to arrive at a blend that showcases the best attributes of both. In Simul-Class™, one pair of output tubes is wired in the more efficient, cooler running CLASS A/B PENTODE configuration, which produces the greater portion of power and headroom while running cooler. This was the popular way of wiring amplifiers from about the early ‘60’s forward - chosen for its efficient use of tubes, greater power and reliability (recently a quest for the sweetest low-watt circuits triggered a resurgence of amps wired in CLASS A). The only sonic penalty for its greater power (Class A/B Pentode wiring) is that it can have a tendency to bring forward the harsher odd-order harmonic content. The Simul solution; add a pair of tubes running in the less efficient, but infinitely sweeter CLASS A TRIODE configuration. This style of wiring produces far less power out of a pair of tubes while creating more heat, but it emphasizes the even- order sweeter harmonics and transitions to clip with a soft, rich purring quality like no other. The MARK 5 presents you with two ways to utilize this power. 90 WATTS combines the two wiring styles to deliver the maximum power and headroom. It is substantially sweeter and warmer, and is little more scooped than a standard 100 Watt amp, yet with plenty of punch and authority. 45 WATTS shuts down the middle pair of output tubes wired in CLASS AB and allows you to operate the output section in just the CLASS A mode for a perfect lower wattage range that clips sweeter and earlier, and yet is still plenty powerful enough to play out in medium sized venues. Combining these two opposite styles of wiring in one amplifier gives you the best of vintage and modern amplifier styles. Headroom and power are there when you need it… but there is always a naturally pleasing and musically curvaceous quality to the sound that is magic to your ears and to your hands. Simul feels great and is inspiring to play! And finally, the MULTI-WATT™ feature allows you to switch down to 10 watts of pure CLASS A TRIODE wired in a Single-Ended configuration. This is the ultimate low wattage output section that captures the essence of the best vintage circuits. Here, the 2nd Harmonic (an octave above the note played) is allowed to pass freely through the circuit, putting a magical halo around the notes that shines and rings with beyond-vintage soul. These three power choices give you ultimate flexibility as to the styles and venues the MARK 5 can adapt to instantly and in fact, it’s like having three separate amps in one case - each having the perfect amount of power for a different application. And when you combine the power of the separate PREAMP Channels, the combinations of EQ and the POWER options, you have the most comprehensive collection of tube amplifiers ever brought together in one chassis. That’s a bold statement; but after you spend some time exploring the combinations we’re sure you’ll feel the same. | |
| | |
| | #46 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: new mexico
Posts: 643
| well got 'er sittin here beside me plugged into a mesa roadster 2x12 side by side with my road king swappin between the cabinet. initial thoughts.... VERY nice layout and most usable boogie imo opionion made to date. every channel and voicing is completely usable, though oddly the extreme setting on chnl 3 is my least fav so far. channel 1 is killer, the tweed setting is amazing, had my strat in it rockin out some blues and sounded very nice, can get shimmery to dirty very and actually responds to touch very well unlike a lot of boogies. channel 2 is the oddball. mark i does not belong on this channel. the first 2 voicings edge and crunch sound very midrangey, bit of saturated tones, then the mark voicing is scooped, WAY lower in volume. and can get flat out heavy. i also say this that the mark i voicing sounds GREAT, just does not match the other 2 voicings. channel 3 kicks a$% , the mark IIc+ sounds very...alive i guess you could say. have a lot of range with this channel. the mark IV is exactly as expected. keep hearing it is less gain than the actual IV but has not been much an issue to a lot of people. i like it a lot!!! the extreme was just a bit much it seemed. could not find a tone i liked out of it. sure it will take some time and experimenting, it is a boogie. side by side with a rectifier was interesting. the mark is WAY tighter and more focused than the rec. did not have no wheres near the amount of low end of the rec either, but the rec is always has more than enough to spare. the mark has quite a bit less saturation than the rec as well. still feels WAAY heavy if need be. the rec feels more powerful overall but the mark is just more pleasurable to listen to and easier on the ears. very happy so far. obviously need to give it a bit more time to dig in it more. will try to get some stuff posted fairly soon. will be using a royer 121, sm57, api pre's>vintech x73i eq's> api a2d converters. so a fairly nice chain |
| | |
| | #47 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Topanga, CA
Posts: 1,205
| I'm hot on this amp right now.... ![]()
__________________ "Hell, you're easily amused... I can say wimpy....wompy....wambly...." |
| | |
| | #48 |
| Moderator Join Date: May 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4,976
| SoundClick artist: High Gain Amp Shootout 2009 - page with MP3 music downloads Check out about 1:30 into video
__________________ Vocal Asylum, 818.259.0190 North Hollywood, CA http://www.JamesLugo.com http://www.WritingGiants.com http://www.myspace.com/jameslugo Clients Include: The Smashing Pumpkins, 311, A Fine Frenzy, The Veronica's, American Idol My Videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/jameslugo |
| | |
| | #49 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Hannover / Germany
Posts: 779
| Quote:
Seriously, european music shops are all run by criminals, simply because there's absolutely *no* way shipping, taxes, customs and what not could even remotely make up for such a horrible price difference on a single amp. Fwiw, I own a MkIV and quite love it, but both the green and red channels leave something to be desired for my personal needs (I love the yellow channel). A MkV could be the defenite answer, but I will never pay that much money for it, and right now I don't have enough time to arrange a flight to the USA, some dealer search and what not. In addition, I don't think a MkV would accept 220V, so I might have to get the PSU replaced, too. Cheers Sascha | |
| | |
| | #50 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: new mexico
Posts: 643
| Quote:
![]() the channel 1 is nothing like other marks for sure, it is AMAZING! though the tweed voicing has an attraction to it, have been finding it just a bit TO much, to clean for tracking with a lot. the clean voicing is quite sweet though. channel 1 also SHINES on 10 w. starts to break up and can actually overdrive like no other boogie i have heard. sounds great. you never mentioned the mark 1 voicing on channel 2. it is CRAZY. really i think it should be on a different channel. sounds nothing like the other 2 voicings on that channel. can have a creamy lead channel or a pretty ballsy distortion channel w it. the other 2 voicing on that channel lead to more of a almost 80's hair metal distortion (marshally) but w/o the awful midrange. the combo was nice when i was playing it, but the head smokes it for sure. the combo felt a bit tubby with the open back, palm muted notes could get a bit tubby. i am running my head through closed back combo's and really tightens it up. been tracking and reamping like a madman through it lately and really enjoying it. still a bit of geting used to after years of rectifier use and abuse! sad thing is, my road king kinda sounds like ass to me now......... my biggest issues i had when tracking is the clean channel, especially the tweed voicing gets a bit hissy. actually completely ruined tracking with it for me at first. my dr z was so much quiter!! i ended up putting a tube package together from eurotubes and got them in and been using it for about a week now. SO much quieter and a bit more gain and tighter. which for me i wanted on channel 3. it is got a descent amount of gain, but does not have that over the top grind if you want it. i am now a bit closer there is a serious notable difference in channel 1 as well. a bit chimier and the clean voicing took on a whole new sound and is beautiful. but imo opinion boogie tubes are the weakest link and have never owned one w/o replacing them asap. i also grabbed a couple kt77 tubes wich are a slight variation of the el34 to pop in there. want to get a couple weeks hearing the 6l6's before trying them.still not lovin the extreme voicing on channel 3. the mark iv voicing seems to be just right! | |
| | |
| | #51 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 608
| Gave one a try today, I gotta say the cleans are killer, it virtually out fenders a Fender, absolutely stunning as a clean amp... the only trouble was that I was finding it hard to get that creamy drive from it through any channel, it has the characteristics of clean even at it's most overdriven, which makes for a very articulate sound, but much closer to a Fender than a Marshall in overall tone, it doesn't have that compressed sustain and smoothed out transients. For me that means that I'm not so keen on the driven sounds as they feel a bit cold. Right now I must say that it would be my clean amp of choice even possibly over a fender, but for gain/drive I think I'd have to go with the a Marshall for it's oh so forgiving fuzzy super saturated feel. |
| | |
| | #52 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: new mexico
Posts: 643
| not sure how much of a boogie guy you are, you may know them insided and out but not sure? they are tweaker amps for sure and takes some time to get it dialed in. the mark I is WAY creamy. really nice. also the eq settings are MAJOR players in the tone of this amp. the preset on each channel dialed 1/2 to all the way up is a great place to start and really seems to work on all 3 channels surprisingly well as they all have their own preset. with no eq at all from the preset or the graphic the channels sound kina blahhh the other 2 voicings on channel 2 get quite a way into marshall territory just tighter mids than a marshall. channel 3 is for the metal lovers though! i have also noticed with tracking it has a lot more saturation than it seems. i keep turning the gain down when multitracking because it gets to be to much, and i am a metal guyit is definatley more defined and articate if you will than some other boogies and especially in comparison to the rectifiers. but enjoying it more and more for tracking. mixing better than recs for sure! but will also say i am not a marshall lover so could just be a difference in prefered tones????? also for me, the combo was not flattering, kinda woofy in the lows and for heavier stuff. getting it to a closed back cab made a HUGE difference. when some time permits i would like to get some clips posted. |
| | |
| | #53 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 608
| Hah, no I own a mesa, but I certainly don't know it inside out for sure! To me it's a temperamental mystery that always seems tantalizingly close to being solvable but never quite is. I suppose the biggest thing is that I'm used to a more standard configuration with the low/mid/high rather than Mesa's cascading additive system that has a far greater effect on the final tone or amount of gain than in other amps, where it just sort of reduces the bands, and which I can never really figure out comfortably or remember which way it goes. It just doesn't seem to respond quite how they describe in the manual for me. Actually I find that most of the time the (non graphic) eq isn't all that responsive with a large change at the very start of the sweep between 0 and 1 and then very little from then on, but perhaps my ears are just atrophied from too many rock concerts :D The sound was very awesome though even though I couldn't get that tight heavy distortion that I was after personally, it felt very organic and would kick ass for anything from country and surf through to blues and classic rock. It's a totally desirable amp no two ways about it, but I'm not sure I could justify it for myself only for those wonderful cleans and crunches... then again maybe I could also buy a nice compression pedal and bung that in front for those tones, not sure how it would react though to pedals. |
| | |
| | #54 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Hannover / Germany
Posts: 779
| Quote:
- Sascha | |
| | |
| | #55 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 608
| Hmm, that's a shame, I had expected the amps pres to be much more overdriven/gainy and less crunchy, with a much tighter tone, but the bass seemed a bit... flubby? Can that be fixed (this was using the head on a halfstack), when I tried it the graphic EQ seemed to be tamer than I remember Marks being in the past, but that could totally be perception, and I couldn't quite manage to dial that out. I was testing it at super low volumes, though I wouldn't expect that to so drastically affect the amount of gain unless it really depends on pushing the power section to get up there, but maybe that was the reason. |
| | |
| | #56 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Hannover / Germany
Posts: 779
| Quote:
During the last 1-2 years a few friends and me have been doing more or less intensive tests to kinda prove this (and hm, it wasn't even necessary as it's quite common knowledge). Almost any amp is starting to sound a whole LOT better as soon as you drive the PA stage a bit harder - even regardless of whether you insert a digital FX unit in its loop or not. Sometimes (especially on amps such as Marshalls or Voxes) the differences are like night and day. My early 90s Fender "The Twin" (the one with the red pots) sounds like shit at lower volumes. But it starts to sound quite great once the overall volume is raised (too bad it's too loud for any club stages in that case already). With my MkIV it's a little different as it allows to set the output section to half power, triode operation and what not. But again, those very settings make up for a world of a difference. If you really need those "organic" sounding overdrives, do yourself a favour and purchase some loadbox (the mentioned Marshall SE-100 apparently still being king, but the Palmers aren't too bad, either). You wouldn't even have to bring it to "real" overdrive territory as it seems (so you could still use some digital FX unit in the loop), just a somewhat hotter driven PA section seems to be what it's all about. - Sascha | |
| | |
| | #57 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,987
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #58 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 608
| I'm going to go back and give it another try tomorrow, now armed with a little more knowledge about the amp and it's controls. Assuming I have a better session with it the main thing I'll want to find out is whether it's (alleged) versatility goes as far as covering all the sounds I get out of my Express 5:25, if so I might do the exchange as that channel 1 was truly lovely. |
| | |
| | #59 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 251
| Quote:
Hey, man, what tubes specifically are in that package? I've been thinking about doing some tube swapping in my Mk IV and your descriptions sound like exactly what I'm after. | |
| | |
| | #60 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: new mexico
Posts: 643
| Quote:
| |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mesa/Boogie Mark III | Space Nugget | So much gear, so little time! | 15 | 26th February 2009 03:46 AM |
| Mesa Boogie Mark IV discontinued? WTF? | qsblues | Geekslutz forum | 3 | 22nd January 2009 07:47 AM |