![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut | Word Clock, BNC T-splitter or distribution box?
At what point would it be a good idea to use some sort of word clock distribution system? How many devices can you safely chain together using BNC T-splitters? I would like to sync three devices together, a Crane Song HEDD 192, a LynxTwo and a Metric Halo 2882, where the HEDD is the master clock. Another question that I'm having difficulty finding an answer to: does external clocking impact A/D conversion, D/A conversion or both? From reading various things I get the impression that A/D conversion IS impacted by external word clock and D/A is clocked by the clock imbedded in the digital signal and is not impacted by word clock carried on a separate BNC clock cable. Is this true? The reason I'm asking is that I will be using the HEDD for (virtually) all A/D conversion and the LynxTwo and Metric Halo are for extra D/A (analog stem mixing) and the interface(s) to the computer. Do I even need to sync all three together if only the HEDD is used for A/D? Ultimately I'm trying to determine if I should spend money on a word clock distributor, or a master clock with lots of clock outputs, taking into account that the HEDD connected to the LynxTwo or the Metric Halo will be doing most of the A/D and D/A work. Thanks, Robert |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: EU
Posts: 2,431
|
T connectors will be fine. I always clock from the most important AD when possible. From there I go the shortest route for the BNC cables. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2005 Location: New York Friggin' City
Posts: 2,562
|
Daisy chaining works for me for two or three units, max. There is no real "standard" for word clock, so I'd call Crane Song and see what they think about how robust the word clock is when daisy chained. When I got outside a couple of devices (remote truck, larger installs) I found the word clock degraded significantly and the presence of a VDA (video distribution amplifier, which is a pretty straightforward circuit, and inexpensive) made a large sonic impact. Try without, eventually you may find the same results I did. Yamaha originally specified military-spec T's for word clock; I had so many issues with seven different PM1D consoles using the T method that I will only use the desk with a proper VDA providing clock distribution. It's actually cheaper than mil-spec T's. Jim |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2004 Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 988
| Quote:
The right strategy depends on a number of things. The goal is to minimize jitter (which is *only* an issue at the D/A stage, not in the digital interconnects.) If you have a good quality DAC with good clocking, using internal clocking (and sending word clock from the DAC to any upstream digital boxes) is usually best, all other things being equal. Cheap converters may benefit from external clocking. | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any limit on length of BNC-to-BNC word clock cable? | Mike H | Geekslutz forum | 2 | 1st November 2009 05:22 AM |
| Word Clock Distribution | sfaudiogeek | So much gear, so little time! | 13 | 24th October 2006 05:12 PM |
| BNC Cable & Word Clock termination | theblotted | So much gear, so little time! | 10 | 9th October 2006 10:27 PM |
| BNC Word Clock Cable | cc1 | High end | 3 | 9th September 2006 09:39 PM |
| Word Clock cables vs regular BNC. Is there a difference? | TEMAS | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 8th September 2006 03:36 AM |
| |