A.P.I 3124 Review - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


A.P.I 3124 Review

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th December 2006   #1
Gear Guru
 
AllAboutTone's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: S.Carolina
Posts: 11,479

Thread Starter
A.P.I 3124 Review

You guys have talked alot about API pres, eq etc, well my 3124 arrived today and i must stay its worth the buck. I have not tried it on everything but here is a list that i test drove.

Kick, very sweet ...Love it.......... D112, Beta 52, ATM25
Vocals. a different flavor with a nice full edge
Bass, what i heard was decent, i do not have a real good bass guitar, still like my VC3 to
Guitars.....omg, thats where the 3124 shines so nice. 414
Snare, no good results YET !!! my tascam pres sound better. yes i was using sm57
Toms : have not tried but i like what i have now with the Tascam, 421s

If i end up using the 3124 for Kick and guitars it will be worth the $$$, but i have no intentions of stoping there, cant wait to see how it works with bluegrass and other music.

This does not mean that i hate my Avalon gear, trust me the 2022s and 2044 are staying in my rack right below the API. I also love that silky 2022 sound, o so sweet.

I guess i have the best of both worlds now, API works for me.

ps: about that issue with pushing the 3124s in and pading the outputs, that was something i did not have trouble with, my m2600 had tons of headroom in the line input area to do so. That must be a PT / Cubebase/etc issue.
Gotta say again, I love the APIs, thanks to all mt gearslutz buds that said they were great.
__________________
Don't Fu*k with my Tone !!!.
I need a spell check app
Harrison~ API~ Dan Alexander~ Fuchs~ John Hardy~ JLM~ Urei/UA

Fuchs Amps = Amazing Tone !!
AllAboutTone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2006   #2
Lives for gear
 
Brad McGowan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582

It's interesting that you say you didn't like the API on snare. That's one application where I personally feel it really shines. What do you like about your Tascam pres that the API isn't giving you? Are you listening in the context of a full mix or just solo?

Brad
__________________
plotagainstrachel.bandcamp.com

Little Red Wagon Studios
How to integrate your analog tape deck with your DAW:
http://youtu.be/bswx5zrFRl0
http://youtu.be/W-II32AvVd8
Brad McGowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2006   #3
Gear Head
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 53

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad McGowan View Post
It's interesting that you say you didn't like the API on snare. That's one application where I personally feel it really shines. What do you like about your Tascam pres that the API isn't giving you? Are you listening in the context of a full mix or just solo?

Brad
Ditto what Brad says... API pres have always been goto items for me on all drums. There must be some variable at play here...

esrsteve
esrsteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
Soldier777c's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 1,133

Send the box back to API and let them know that one of the pres is broken (whichever one it was you used on the snare).

But in seriousness, I'm surprised that it didn't sound good to you in that application. The API 3124 (and 512c) is one of my favorites on the top snr head. Did you pad it and crank the gain? You should really be able to get that pre to punch nicely for you. Give it a second go.

Or maybe swap the snare out with another one and see if you get better results there. You never know.
__________________
It's not about the sonic quality of the track, or even the music itself . . . it's about the Bears going to the Super Bowl.

92' Trinidad Fundadores - the 1073 of cigars!!
Soldier777c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2006   #5
Gear Guru
 
AllAboutTone's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: S.Carolina
Posts: 11,479

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad McGowan View Post
It's interesting that you say you didn't like the API on snare. That's one application where I personally feel it really shines. What do you like about your Tascam pres that the API isn't giving you? Are you listening in the context of a full mix or just solo?

Brad

Full mix, it was cold and harsh sounding. i will try again tho.
AllAboutTone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2006   #6
Gear addict
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 494

Quote:
Originally Posted by zaza View Post
Full mix, it was cold and harsh sounding. i will try again tho.
Don't second guess yourself. I have the 3124 aswell and it shines on certain things and can sound very "cold and harsh" in other applications. It's a nice pre, but it's not the panacea you may have been lead to believe.
I wouldn't think of getting rid of it though.
fross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2006   #7
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 411

Quote:
Originally Posted by fross View Post
Don't second guess yourself. I have the 3124 aswell and it shines on certain things and can sound very "cold and harsh" in other applications. It's a nice pre, but it's not the panacea you may have been lead to believe.
I wouldn't think of getting rid of it though.

Agreed. I LOVE API on kick and guitars (and not snare); isn't that enough?
-E
hurricaneE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
crypticglobe's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Nashville
Posts: 2,523

Yeah... I have always preferred a Neve type pre on snare over API. Same with Toms for the most part. I prefer API on everything else though (OH's, HH, Ride, Kick, Room, etc...)

I like the natural compression and supa-fat low end of the Neve for snare. It's just the ticket.

However.. if the API just sounded BAD on the snare... and the Tascam sounded good... I would agree that something must be wrong with it. I would be perfectly happy to do a snare drum with any API pre if it was my only choice. I know I could get it to sound good... unless the drum sucked... or the mic was broken... or something like that.

jmtc..
crypticglobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2006   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 510

Quote:
Originally Posted by zaza View Post
Snare, no good results YET !!! my tascam pres sound better. yes i was using sm57

ps: about that issue with pushing the 3124s in and pading the outputs, that was something i did not have trouble with, my m2600 had tons of headroom in the line input area to do so.
I was going to joke and point out that you are using a door-stop to record the snare, but obviously a bazillion fine recordings were make with that mic....
AND....
The api has 1500 ohm impedance at the mic input which IMO is the optimum level for the SM57!

It just may not be the sound you like to hear from your snare.

How does the snare sound thru the OHs (thru the api of coarse)?

Regards,
David
David@MVS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2006   #10
Gear Guru
 
AllAboutTone's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: S.Carolina
Posts: 11,479

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by crypticglobe View Post
Yeah... I have always preferred a Neve type pre on snare over API. Same with Toms for the most part. I prefer API on everything else though (OH's, HH, Ride, Kick, Room, etc...)

I like the natural compression and supa-fat low end of the Neve for snare. It's just the ticket.

However.. if the API just sounded BAD on the snare... and the Tascam sounded good... I would agree that something must be wrong with it. I would be perfectly happy to do a snare drum with any API pre if it was my only choice. I know I could get it to sound good... unless the drum sucked... or the mic was broken... or something like that.

jmtc..
Everything is good on ail the pres on the 3124, the tascam m2600 has always been under rated, the pres are super warm , i admit that i did get a semi good sound after working myself to death with the eq running the snare thru the api. whats missing is the warm low end in the snare vs my pres in the m2600, the other stuff like vocals, guitar, bass, kick are KILLER. Again i will keep at it, just takes some work.
another thing that is cool if you are looking for a different but o so sweet thick sound, try recording with the api etc and mix your finish product, then run your master back thru the line of the 3124, 2 channels, stereo back to a finished master, wow thats nice, anyone tried that ????
AllAboutTone is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Api 3124+ vs 3124 AllAboutTone High end 4 12th December 2006 03:45 AM
IS ANYONE USING TUNECORE OR HAVE ANY REVIEW OF IT Slater So much gear, so little time! 0 30th May 2006 05:58 AM
AB-CD review RainbowStorm So much gear, so little time! 3 25th May 2006 10:57 AM
Monitor Review Pockets So much gear, so little time! 2 7th March 2006 03:11 PM
review my mix please FinnJ Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs 4 9th March 2005 12:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.