![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear | Neve 8816 vs Nicerizer16
Hi, I am deciding between those two summing amps, mainly mixing rock/metal. I am looking for color and punch. I would like to hear some opinions from somebody who had a chance testing them both. thanks david |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear |
well that's not too good. apart from the technical problems what did it actually sound like ? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Rocket Scientist |
I really like the sound and features of the Neve 8816. Search and you should find lots of feedback about it and the 8804 fader pack.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear |
I have read through almost every post about the 8816 and the nicerizer. as always the feedback is very varying. there were many posts about defective 8816s and now effectsnut says the same about the nicerizer as I see build quality is dfegad theese days |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2004 Location: here
Posts: 4,290
|
I had both and kept Nicerizer. It's matter of taste, I could work equally well with any of them, as well as, with other good summing boxes. I used 2 Nicerizers (took one from firend), as well as, with Mixdream. To my ears Nicerizer has more of nice analogue warmth and dynamic coupled with great resolution what's actually I looked for. I don't say that 8816 misses it, but to my style of work Nicer is just much closer sonically, although I would be happy to have Neve's added functions. I heard about technical issues with Nicerizers, but in my case during non-stop usage for quite a long period it never failed. Build quality appears good. New modified Nicerizer 16 differs visually inside, so I really don't know what is real reason behind quality problems. In my case an impression from Neve was that built quality is just rather average and whole concept looks attractive to reach good sales figures. I dare to suggest that Neve is probably better buy (badge, features, fader pack add-on), but I wouldn't swap my Nicer for 8816 with faders, as I know I would miss its sonics. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear |
well i'll think I should take both for a demo and keep one. it's really a matter of taste as everytnig "music" related |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,661
|
It would be great if people would stop using every opportunity they could to bash Phoenix! I'm not sure what happened with Effectsnut's Nicerizer, but Phoenix is not the type of company to have shoddy build qualitiy, not in the least. All of my phoenix gear (recently acquired over the last 6 months) has been in perfect shape, well built, built to last. Effectsnut may indeed have a problem with his unit, but I'm sure it can be taken care of. I'm also sure that it is not a "standard problem" that will be common. We need to be careful about propogating issues like this like they're some kind of commonplace occurance. This is the first time I've ever heard of Phoenix gear arriving messed up!!! The Nicerizer16 is extraordinary. I can't imagine the 8816 being much better, but that's a biased owner's opinion. Just so sweet and ballsy. I'd lean towards Phoenix just because of the love they put into the design of their products. If I were choosing just one and not shooting them out, that's the way I'd go. Hell, that *is* the way I went.
__________________ -Matthew |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,661
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2003 Location: China
Posts: 2,336
|
The fader pack is very pricey - is it motorized? Sorry I haven't read about the Fader pack - just saw the price when I was scrolling through a price list pdf....
__________________ Moderators you can't kill my art! |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
I did love the sound if it I have to say. I wish I could have got one that worked… I think its worth letting people know about the issues… | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear |
this is the reason I have started this thread - I wanted to hear real life experiences. But it really narrows down to try both of them. there were both excellent and very bad reviews to both of the products, in each case somebody responded that he had a faulty unit ... so god knows |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Oct 2004 Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 11,292
|
i used to be the trumpeter of all things nicerizer, but it appears phoenix is adrift somewhere at sea. too bad, their gear sounds as good or better than anything on the planet. i'd have to say the new colorbox champion is the tonelux, this thing is like the studer and the nicer in that what goes in comes out sounding better in every way. it's the perfect contrast to the nicer too, when i push the phoenix things get gooey and thicker in a very lovely way, when i push the tonelux things get bigger and hit harder. gregoire del ubk . |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear addict Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 338
|
the Aurora minimixer!
|
| | |
| | #15 |
| Moderator Joined: May 2004 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 6,994
|
I spoke with larrysings today about his Tonelux and he said it's the s**t. I PM Gil, waiting for a reply.
__________________ Vocal Asylum & Hemispheres Recording - http://www.sslmixingonline.com/ http://www.HemispheresRecording.com - http://www.youtube.com/user/jameslugo Now affiliated with Sound Pure Pro Audio & Guitars / Boutique Amps ![]() Check out my first video tutorial release on Groove3: http://www.groove3.com/str/vocal-asylum.html |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2004 Location: here
Posts: 4,290
| Quote:
Anyway I'll not replace Nicerizer or Mixdream with Tonelux, I decided to keep them all and even with addition of 32-48 ch console in upcoming future I see all mentioned summing boxes as part of stuido set up. | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear |
Thanks effectsnut for your advice! |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear |
the tonelux is waaaay over my budget a 16 ch summing amp would be over5000 EUR while the nicerizer is around 2700 so the tonelux is out for me
|
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear addict Joined: Aug 2005 Location: South Florida / NYC for now
Posts: 332
|
morpheuzrecords, are you sure it would be over 5000EUR. With VRack, PSU, (6)FX2 and (2)FX2+ you get 16channels of summing for 3513Euros. While still more expensive than than a Nicerizer, it' not 5000.
|
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear |
I have checked the german distributor's price list. where did you check the prices if I may ask ?
|
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear addict Joined: Aug 2005 Location: South Florida / NYC for now
Posts: 332
|
morpheuzrecords, You probably are right. But I went to Tonelux website to find the price. http://www.tonelux.com/ConfigulizerEU_USBeta.swf Just configure your setup and make sure it's in Euros and not Dollars. But to be honest I didnt take into account any international "taxes or charges". |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nicerizer16 + Neve 8804 FaderPack? | jindrich | High end | 16 | 23rd October 2006 09:51 AM |
| Neve 8816 Available NOW | Neve Outboard | So much gear, so little time! | 9 | 28th April 2006 03:06 AM |
| M149/SPL Channel One or NEVE 1073/GT Glory Comp/Aurora 16/Neve 8816/Benchmark ADC -1 | blue_scorpion | High end | 21 | 27th February 2006 08:12 PM |
| neve 8816 | markus enochson | High end | 1 | 28th January 2006 12:42 PM |
| Does anyone have tried the Neve 8816 ? | Julien Apruzzese | High end | 7 | 18th January 2006 02:46 AM |
| |