![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: ITB now unfortunately!
Posts: 1,725
Thread Starter | Can a Smart C2 do the Distressor Drum Room Mic Thing?
I've not yet had the pleasure of using one but I understand the Distressor is great on room mics for the drum kit. Obviously never having used one I don't know what it does soundwise, so my question to those that have used both is can I get my AS C2 to do a similar thing and how should I be setting it? Cheers guys Steve |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2003 Location: Austin
Posts: 1,243
|
I love my distressors on rooms but the C2 in crush mode is pretty cool. It s a different thing on rooms but when I have to use distressors for other tracks the C2 rocks. Adjust att, rel accordingly. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear |
The crush mode adds a whacked ratio and agressive high mid eq boost that just flattens eveything like a steamroller then drizzles honey over it. Nice! |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: ITB now unfortunately!
Posts: 1,725
Thread Starter |
Cheers guys So for the distressor thing select crush, what about ratio... set it to limit? and how many db of GR are you using on the distressor for room mics? Thanks again Steve |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2005 Location: USA
Posts: 661
|
The C2 can get you in that ballpark, it's definitely not exactly the same thing, but that could be seen as even better, slightly worse, or just different. The crush mode has its uses. I think the difference in the units is that the Distressor is more user friendly and it's easier to just crank the dials and get it sounding a certain way. The C2 is a lot touchier. You need to be more aware of the mechanics of compression and how the setting effect things, and spend more time with the unit getting to know the settings - i.e. a few clicks in one direction or the other on some of the C2 controls can be the difference between bad and awesome, while on the Distressor it might all be equally usable for your source. Notwithstanding the name, you do need to be smarter in your application of compression using the Smart compressor. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,695
|
For me personally the CRUSH button allways has been and will be pretty useless. I wish he would have added a power ON LED instead. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,525
|
Crush is great if you run an eq after it to get the desired sound. Superb on strings too.
__________________ If you don't like it don't do it, its like banging your head into a brick wall, you always feel better once you stop. http://au.myspace.com/mandalatheband http://www.myspace.com/lizard42c http://www.myspace.com/eggshellrecords http://www.underworldmusicproductions.com http://www.myspace.com/poetlaureatte http://www.myspace.com/thanorthernlightscrew http://www.myspace.com/originaldrzeus |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,233
| C2 vs Distressor
I agree with Mark. They are just different and the C2 is definitely more sensitive/interactive within it's controls. The crush feature does sound great, but as with the harmonic distortion modes on the Distressor can add up an aweful lot if over used. Once the track gets mastered a little sounds like a lot. I love the crush feature, but rarely use it. I would love it to be a side chain continuously variable effect. Now there is a mod for some tech to post. (I would do it to mine in a flash) Cheers, Scott. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear nut Joined: May 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 104
|
To answer to you question, No the C2 can't do what the distressors do on room mics. You can slam the distressor up to 30db GR and you still hear something, completly smashed but there is still something coming through, sometime even useable. 30dB GR with the smart.. you might hear some pok pok... but that is about it. The crush look for the mids and hypes them... nothing to do with the Nuke option on the distressors. The smart is useable to me up until 4dB of GR. It has great punch and is super fast, after that, it sucks the life out of everything. Distressors and Smart can't really be compared, they do different thing and I like them both for that reason.
|
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear |
I have a C2 and never really understood the crush thing. Never found it pleasing to the ears except for effect
|
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: ITB now unfortunately!
Posts: 1,725
Thread Starter |
I sometimes wish I could have the crush's extra FET compression but without the EQ boost. Going back to my orginal question... I looks like I need a Distressor! |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2006 Location: San Diego
Posts: 288
| Quote:
I've used the Smart and can't say anything bad about it. And I do like 'crush mode' it's not for every application mind you but if the application calls for it than please do.
__________________ Mr. Man | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: ITB now unfortunately!
Posts: 1,725
Thread Starter |
Getting some great results! Crush on Ratio to limit Attack 0.1 or 0.3 Release 100 or auto for less kick in the room mics Bring threshold down as low as you can before the snare starts going "Pok" increase make-up gain to get your peak leave back to where it was. about 1.00 normally The C2 is working great for this. A small amount of the stereo "crushed" room mic track is making the kit sound superb! |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 8,853
|
C2 crush has some great uses.. - great for adding a fantastic aggresive parallel drum/bass/vocal sub.. sometimes just one channel brought straight up the middle with a bunch of stuff shoved through it in a rock mix thumbsup |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: ITB now unfortunately!
Posts: 1,725
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 756
|
yeah..did not get it!
|
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jan 2003 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 282
|
I'm a huge fan of the Distressor but haven't used one on room mics in years. A C2 in crush mode is one of my top choices for room mics. As with many of the other great boxes, not a lot of gain reduction has to happen for it to do it's thing. Steven |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,102
|
Karma Police?
|
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear |
I dig the C2 on Crush mode (EQ needed!) or off depending on the situation. But for squashing room mics I would pick a couple of the other compressors in the rack before I would reach for a Distressor myself. 1176 all buttons in (or not) is a classic example. Spectrasonics 610 is another. There are a couple cheapos that are pretty brutal in a good way that I use too. I just never seem to get the pump I want out of the Distressors. A lot of times I want something that clamps down hard enough that it would go pok pok with 30 db of compression (I'm not using 30db obviously). Maybe it's just me though. |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 215
| Quote:
I actually prefer my C2 on room mics over my distressors. Personal taste I guess. I use my Distressors on kick and snare almost exclusively though. | |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: hell, michigan
Posts: 2,797
| |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: hell, michigan
Posts: 2,797
| the free SSL talkback compressor plug is cool for this thing too... basically the same idea but crush will give you more top end..
__________________ 3WO - Mixing Without Tears "Some think I should teach men the way to heaven. But I would rather teach them the way to hell so they'll know how to go around it..." -- Niccolo Machiavelli |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2006 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,728
|
C2 on crush, send a mult of the whole mix to it, blend back in with the original. "Excitement" |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2003 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 641
|
I just hit the rooms mics, 414's through API 4:1 ratio with the C2 med attack auto release. It maintains a sound that is not over the top but makes the room more explosive and brighter. C2 crush will do the over top sound as does the Distressor. The C2 it brighter to my ears. Peace, Todd
__________________ Todd Fitzgerald Producer/Engineer Winterland Studios Minneapolis API Legacy + http://www.winterlandstudios.com |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| old rme multiface 2nd buy smart thing to do? | gizeh12 | Music computers | 22 | 30th May 2006 03:43 PM |
| Small Drum Room...Mono Overhead Mic Suggestions? | commaKaze | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 25th May 2006 11:14 PM |
| Printing drum room mic compression | Matt Grondin | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 24th February 2006 10:11 PM |
| what's the next best thing to a distressor? | sadworld | So much gear, so little time! | 46 | 26th May 2004 08:11 PM |
| Low ceiling room drum overhead mic suggestions? | Jules | So much gear, so little time! | 37 | 28th April 2004 04:58 PM |
| |