![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #61 |
| Lives for gear | The big mic is the Pearlman Moved them around to lock in phase, of course...
__________________ "We need to legitimize peer-to-peer sharing as a business model, because it's already a business. If [the P2P companies] are going to make money on us, we should have a chance to make money along with them." -- Perry Farrell on the failure of national intellectual property policy to keep up with the rapid evolution of online media "Every Internet transmission of a musical work constitutes a public performance of that work. " http://www.ascap.com/weblicense/webfaq.html |
| | |
| | #62 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 606
| Some from a month or two ago. |
| | |
| | #63 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 606
| another |
| | |
| | #64 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 606
| last one..We did not record all the mics at once. =) It was a pick and choose thing. |
| | |
| | #65 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 606
| Can't resist one more. The blurry thing was a shotgun mic accross the room from the VERY loud amp. It sounded pretty good. And then we blew a fuse in the amp. |
| | |
| | #66 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 1,138
| I'm a single SM57 guy. I just move it around until I think it sits in the track nicely. I sometimes use an E609 to change it up. I like the SM57/MD421 combo but it seems like every time I use more than one mic on a cab, I find myself pulling out frequencies between 300 and 500 Hz more than usual. I mean, it sounds good when I'm tracking, but when mix time comes, it's like mud city. Anyone have the same issue? -Aaron
__________________ If you don't spank it, you can't crank it! |
| | |
| | #67 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Alaska
Posts: 1,370
| Manley Gold and field coil speaker Field coil speaker and Manley Gold |
| | |
| | #68 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Austin
Posts: 946
| cool thread. |
| | |
| | #69 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Since the IBP will be on one mic only (usually the one closest to the source but there are no rules) the beauty of the method is that even if you decide only to use one mic in the mix, the IBP won't affect it since it deals with the combination of 2 mics recording the same source. The IBP is great for tightening up the sound, exactly what you describe in siuations where phase cancellations result in a hollow-midrange sound. But it's not necessarily about 'perfect phase alignment' either, you might see the IBP as a kind of tone control. For multi-miced application, this is often much better than to apply EQ while tracking.
__________________ 'If you have trouble writing, just write what you mean' - Allen Ginsberg http://www.doorknocker.ch/ | |
| | |
| | #70 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 163
| Here's the setup my band ran through while we were recording guitars for our EP (colors were augmented): ![]() - microtech gefell umt70s - sennheiser e609s - beyerdynamic m201 (surprised at this microphone... i bought it for snare drum but had to try it out on the guitar. had a nice, "warmer" tone than the e609s) This is setup in my garage with the head (jcm2000) in the kitchen. ![]() |
| | |
| | #71 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33
| miking picts When you use an ambient mic, which I often do (distance = depth) in combination with a close mic, are you delaying the signal of the upclose mic to match the ambient mic? If so, do you use the 1 ms delay per foot formula? Do you pay attention to DI to DAW cable length matching the mic to DAW cable length to accomodate delay as well? |
| | |
| | #72 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33
| miking picts What is the best technique to check for phase when you multi-mike a cab with mikes at varying distances from the front of the cab? |
| | |
| | #73 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,703
| |
| | |
| | #74 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 33
| miking picts What is the best way to check for phase during multi-miking a cab from the front? |
| | |
| | #75 |
| Lives for gear | Set 'em up into different tracks on PT. Get the levels kinda matched. "Click" a single string mute -- high string, tight mute -- so you get a sharp waveform. Zoom WAAAAY in on the waveform -- see where the waves hit or crest/trough differently? They should be somewhat different because they're different mics, but if the crests + troughs are consistently ahead/behind each other, move the "behind" mic forward (or the "ahead" mic back). Repeat until the waves match. Then put one of the pres out of phase & match volumes until they get close to nulling out -- there should be a major drop in level when you phase-out the mics. Put 'em back in phase, and it should (hopefully) sound "like" the amp, or "good," or SOMETHING. If it's wack, strip it down and start over. This is the way I do it, anyway. |
| | |
| | #76 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Hamburg
Posts: 1,205
| |
| | |
| | #77 |
| Gear addict | I love this thread, it's freakin badass. Keep all them pictures coming. |
| | |
| | #78 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 606
| |
| | |
| | #79 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,338
| Guitar cab mic'ing on a record I'm producing (will post some songs later on so you can give me your opinion). At first there was a 57 also but after some tests I got the sound I was looking for with just the R-122, sounded great but in mixdown I did had to EQ it. ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #80 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,703
| Amp: Naylor Cab: Borger 4x12 Miced with a royer R-121 (dead center on the cone of the speaker, about 4" back) into a chandler TG2 and a Distressor on opto with 2-5dB of gain reduction (slow attack, faster release) on the clean parts. We recorded everything from moderately clean to grunch to full on dirt guitars, no eq needed in the mix on any tracks, apart from some functional high-end roll of on some of the wah wah parts or "distant" guitar parts. Best sound I got ever. Greetings, Dirk
__________________ -progress takes away what forever took to find- Dave Matthews |
| | |
| | #81 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,632
| God, what was I thinking... I was such an engineering geek back then. |
| | |
| | #82 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: tx
Posts: 8,802
| |
| | |
| | #83 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 318
| |
| | |
| | #84 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 318
| Quote:
read a little down in the post.. | |
| | |
| | #85 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Ky.
Posts: 637
| Quote:
__________________ You CAN polish a turd... if you freeze it first. | |
| | |
| | #86 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 596
| ****in scary....I don't know much, but I do know if I had paid $1500 for a 121 or 122, THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL IT WOULD EVEN BE IN THE SAME ROOM AS A GUITAR AMP, much less 4" away from the damn speaker...say what you will about SPL handleing, I guess I'd just like to be able to use my gear in 30 years...
__________________ Resonant Electronic Design "If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe." -Carl Sagan |
| | |
| | #87 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Southern California
Posts: 579
| You are right.... you dont know much..... The Royers can take it.... They are no SM57, but they can take high SPL like MFers. I don't know if I would try it with a traditional reconditioned ribbon... but I don't know much.
__________________ --------------------------------------------------- Curtis Franklin - Owner www.phantom48.com - proudly sells: Antares, Blackout Effectors, Brainworx, Flux, Hosa, iZoptope, On-Stage, Presonus, Softube, Sonnox, SoundToys, SPL, Suhr, TC Electronic, Waves, and more. A better deal is only a pm away. |
| | |
| | #88 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 596
| wow. I have had EXTENSIVE expirience with Royers...just saying I wouldn't endanger a close-to-$2000 investement by stickin in in front of a ****in Marshall, that's what a $100 dynamic mic is for. They may be able to handle the SPL now, and for years in the future, but if I spent that amount of dough on a mic, I'd make for damn sure that it would last for 25-30 years. With the sole exception of a SM57, NO MIC in the world will last that long in front of guitar cabs... |
| | |
| | #89 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 741
| TLM103 |
| | |
| | #90 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 577
| Quote:
Yes it will, that's why you MOVE the tracks until they line up, you fix the fact that one mic is getting the signal later than the other. This works very well and can make amps sound huge...IBP and Phasetone work well to but it's a different kind of thing. I have both BTW and I also align the tracks | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pictures Of Mic'ed Up Drum Kits In The Studio | Bobalou | High end | 2736 | 5 Days Ago 10:57 PM |
| Mic'ing a Guitar Cab with a single SM57 | bryan k | So much gear, so little time! | 52 | 1st November 2011 06:08 AM |
| Pictures of Mic'ed up ACCOUSTIC GUITARs | pete | High end | 15 | 8th March 2011 02:24 PM |
| What's the best method of mic'ing up a 'Cello? | nick-the-sax | So much gear, so little time! | 14 | 5th November 2009 11:19 PM |
| Pictures Of Mic'ed Up Pianos In The Studio | Dot | High end | 13 | 12th May 2008 09:21 AM |
| |