![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,097
Thread Starter | Peterson Strobe Tuner I've decided to go with the best... but I'm not sure which one. I'll need it for tuning electric and acoustic guitar, bass, and sometimes cello. The vintage ones on ebay seem to be going for a reasonable price but I'm not sure if they can be used for acoustic instruments as well? And the last time I used an old Peterson I couldn't set it up to tune half a step down (Eb). I know how to get around that...but I'd rather have a tuner that recognizes the key of the note being plucked (so maybe vintage is out of the question). Any suggestions (model types)? thx Jason |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 196
| I have the digital tabletop one (not sure of the model # but it is not the stomp box) and it is my favorite. I have used both the analog versions and they are great, but they can be erratic, especially if they have ever fallen. good luck. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 269
| Peterson VS-1 I have a peterson VS-1 that can do everything you've described. I have used it on acoustic and electric guitars and basses. Acoustics without pickups require a small clip on sensor that can be purchased from Peterson. I have not tried it with a Cello but I imagine the sensor would work fine with that as well. I love mine and could not live without one now. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: London
Posts: 1,688
| I've got a peterson VS-II - highly recomended. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 217
| I carry my Peterson Strobo Stomp (the cheapest they make!) to every guitar session I do and do a quick (or more involved) intonation on the guitars before tracking. It works great! |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,097
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Idyllwild, CA
Posts: 2,570
| Quote:
As Peterson says on their website, "Built-In Microphone For Acoustic Instruments." Cheers, -- Don | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2006 Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 918
| I believe Peterson has a bundle with the VS-II and a clip on mic for acoustic instruments. I have the original VS and use it to tune acoustic guitar with the built in mic. It's fine in a quiet enviornment, but I would go the clip on mic route in a live situation. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,097
Thread Starter | Quote:
Can anyone comment on the vintage units? | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| member no 666 Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 9,464
| In case y'all have never been around one of these things... if you take a pair of headphones, spread the earcups, put them on the instrument and plug the headphones into the tuner it works remarkably well... its an 'old guy' trick so you might not have heard about it.
__________________ CN Fletcher Professional Affiliations: R/E/P Professional Recording Engineer and Producer forums - serious hobbyists welcome TELEFUNKEN Elektroakustik SoundPure.com mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33 We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid Roscoe Ambel once said: Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 269
| Quote:
My VS-1 does work with the built in mike. It's just a lot easier and the signal is more stable with the clip on (or headphones!) | |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 217
| Quote:
Great tip, thank you. | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: San Francisco
Posts: 86
| For many years I had a model 420, which worked great. A few years ago, I sold that and got the new 490 ST. While this model has a lot of great features, it is noisier than my older 420. I also have a VS-II which I bought for travel. It is what I use now, since my main application is tuning guitars and adjusting intonation. If I were to start doing some keyboard tuning, I would probably use the 490 ST more. The Petersons are by far the best tuners I have used. |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,097
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Dublin, CA
Posts: 250
| Quote:
Best Regards, Mike. | |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Gear nut | Quote:
Do you have any suggestions for which cans would work best, let's say for a 1930's parlor guitar, or a 70's ovation 12 string? Maybe someone should do a shoot out. But I have to admit it, I'm going to try this as soon as I can. And I'm an old guy, how on earth did I miss this? It makes me fear what else I don't know. | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear | I'll be an even older guy....I still use my Conn Strobotuner. Guitar players look at the Strobotuner like a vampire looks at a garlic clove...... |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,074
| +1 Peterson VS-1 ' |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,408
| I have several of the petersons of both the digital range as well as the huge actual strobe versions and lI ove them all. I think for your purpose you would be best served with the stroboflip or possibly the VSAM. If you are tuning cello which requires perfect fifths you are best served with the stroboflip as it has presets for all the string instruments. If you tune string instruments (meaning vln,vla,cello) with a regular tuner you can only do the open a strings and would have to tune the rest "manually" the old fashioned way. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear maniac | I have both, an analogue one and the digital one (don't remember exact names). Since I bought the analogue one, the digital is rotting in my cupboard! The 490ST is much more precise and with it every instrument is much faster in tune (EG, BA, Pno, Minimoog,...). But it sadly generates that annoying motor noise... |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 2,408
| We have the 590 and it is a remarkably good tuner. The digital ones are far cheaper and not as fast and accurate, but they are still better than any competing tuner. The stroboflip is still preferable for strings IMO as the analogue ones do not have presets for the open strings. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| member no 666 Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 9,464
| The cool thing about strobe tuners is that if you pay attention to which octave band you're reading they'll give you a 'tempered' tuning which I've found none of the "digital tuners" to do nearly as well. I have 3x Conn Strobotuners [two of them are tube!!] One from the Record Plant NYC, one from Capricorn Studios in Macon, GA... and the real one which is an absolute gem [the tube ones work but they're more like props than tools]. I should mention that if you decide to go the strobe tuner route and have any plans on using a 'real piano' it's usually a good idea to record a "tuning note" from the piano before you start recording the song... and then calibrate the tuner to that tuning note [vs. the internal calibration]. Peace |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 624
| Quote:
Edit: Okay, revisiting this. The ST-6 is tube, the ST-8 is tube, the ST-11 is solid state. Last edited by CompEq; 7th January 2010 at 10:30 PM.. Reason: add'l info | |
| | |
| | #24 | ||
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Quote:
![]() Just turn the wheel to Eb, Ab, Db, etc.
__________________ "I know of several comparisons [right here on this board] where no one could tell the difference between a Martech pre-amp and a Behringer." - Fletcher Darian Rundall | ||
| | |
| | #25 |
| mymixisbetterthanyours! Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,665
| +1 on stroboflip |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Wales
Posts: 1,408
| I've got a Stroborack and love it. I got sick of cheap tuners breaking or getting lost. It is one of the best things I have ever brought, it does get some funny looks from guitar players too which is good entertainment! |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Gear addict | I Have to say Peterson is the best Co. as far as tuners go.... Slayer and countless many other acts/techs use these.... In fact the plant is about a mile away from my place,,, many good things have come from this general area as well.......... STYX' DISTURBED the keyboard player from THE DOORS and Van Halen aunt lives a block away!!!!!!!!!!! Swear by their tuners....Rock the world!!! ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________ Inside a Dream........................ ![]() Dungeon of Noise Recording Studio Alsip, IL Located in the Former ARS studios location. One of Chicago's oldest recording rooms in operation. 708-629-0599 312-933-0113 Protools HD 24 Track Analog Www.DungeonOfNoise.com www.myspace.com/Dungeonofnoisestudio Contact: DungeonOfNoiseStudio@gmail.com 312.933.0113 |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Posts: 1,703
| What has Van Halen's aunt got to swear by the Peterson tuners anyway? B. |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Miami
Posts: 307
| are any of these tuners mentioned fender rhodes friendly? im in the market for a tuner for my piano but havent really come across any good information pointing me in the right direction. |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 156
| Which one for minimoog? Looking to pick up a Peterson for tuning MiniMoog oscillators. ...secondary use perhaps drum pitch shifting/tuning, suggestions? |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Peterson StroboSoft tuner | VivaLaVinyl | Music computers | 9 | 8th September 2006 09:37 PM |
| Peterson make software STROBE TUNER! | Jules | So much gear, so little time! | 18 | 12th July 2005 03:21 AM |
| Strobe Tuner | BevvyB | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 5th May 2003 08:00 PM |
| |