![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: chicagoland
Posts: 724
Thread Starter | Buzz Elixir..... Buzz Elixir, it's supposed to be clean and detailed. right? Ok I'm trying to make a choice here hopefully you guys will help.... Right now I'm looking at the Elixer, DAV, Pendulum, and GML. I'll be buying two pres and I was originally thinking the DAV and the MDP-1....but I cant get the other two out of my mind for some reason. Clean and detailed with some what saturated lows (Elixer) sounds really interesting. What do you guys think???? AA |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Very detailed and extended bandwidth. Natpub did a nice review here: Buzz Elixir trials and applications
__________________ Nathan Eldred Visit Atlas Pro Audio USA Distributor for Buzz Audio Atlas Recording Studios, Inc. | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 146
| all I know is, choose wisely, Isle......... ![]() |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: chicagoland
Posts: 724
Thread Starter | Quote:
I hoped that I would get some comments from those who owned two or more of these pres. I read natpub's review already.... I've used the GML a long time ago and the quartet II (i think the pendulum is a definite!) but I'll be getting two stereo pres and I was looking for some comparisons to the elixir. maybe it's to soon for comparisons? any other weight ins??? ![]() How about you Nathan? | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: chicagoland
Posts: 724
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Bunbury Australia
Posts: 40
| Hi, I ave both the DAV and the Buzz, Out of all our pre,s the Buzz is the most requested. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: chicagoland
Posts: 724
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Gear interested Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Chicago
Posts: 14
| Quote:
I read that natpub review and it sounds pretty tempting! I'm interested to here more about it. This is my wallet getting abducted by the Gearlians!
__________________ __________________________________________ Ian M. | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: The Deep End
Posts: 1,327
| |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear nut Join Date: May 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 104
| I've got a Buzz elixir at the moment, along with all the OSA pres in my 500 Serie Rack. I really wanted a buzz pre as they got that very detailed, clean but sweet sound. I had the chance to get the Buzz 2.2 pres and an Elixir so I could pick the one I wanted (thanks to Scott at GBG and Tim at Buzz for that opportunity). Now, the difference between the 2. The 2.2 is really fast, detailed and give a very "exciting" type of sound. On vocal, you will hear everything all the way down to your throat... and beyond! Really nice on strings, piano, Ac guitar and OH. The Elixir got the same quality to it but with a little bit more warmth, Nicer in the lows (the lundahl transformer being the reason for that) It also got a very good instrument input as well and 70dB of gain, which is great to run my ribbons. I general I find that pre more versatile than the 2.2 I love both pres but the elixir got the little extras that make the difference in my opinion! |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Did you have the MA2.2 (transformerless) or the MA2.2TX (with Sowter on the output)? ....the transformer option on the MA2.2TX gives more weight/color to the lows if desired (it's switchable, i.e. each channel has two seperate physical connections). Where (as you said) the Elixir comes standard with the Lundahl on the output. Just to make the comparison a little more apples to apples. | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear nut Join Date: May 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 104
| it was the MA2.2, so less coloration than the MX2.2, nevertheless, both pres are really nice! just love the extra 5dB gain and the instrument input on the elixir |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear nut Join Date: May 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 104
| I know, I love the buzz stuff. I'm not the kind of guy who will rave about gear all day long, but I'm must say that so far, Buzz is the kind of brand that never disappoint, great and original design. Thanks Tim, you're the man! |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 43
| Hey Steeve - Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! Don't tell em! Two Elixers cost less than 1 MA 2.2. It's good to hear feedback from the pro users out there - we also think the Elixer is very cool! Scott - GBG Technology - Buzz Distributor Australia. |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: chicagoland
Posts: 724
Thread Starter | Quote:
for feedback and comparisons. thanks so much for your weight in's! AA | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,320
| Hey Nathan. How will the Exlir perform as an " only" pre? ( could you stack multible tracks and make a record without " mud"..?)... ![]()
__________________ Thanks for your time and ears! |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Sure, I don't see why not...it's a very clear and open sounding preamp, with just a bit of 'hair' in the lows from the transformer. So if there is any mud, it's going to be from the source, not from the preamp. | |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,289
| Quote:
I just ordered my API lunch box (empty at the moment) but there's goina be a place for the Exlir's thats for sure. Just got the OSA's from Steve...thanks mate, see you tomorrow. Nick | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear | AAAAAAAAAAAATENTION: if you buy the Buzz and the Pendulum pre you're in deep trouble: I find myself fighting everyday which of both pres to use NOT FUNNY AT ALL I love Buzz - and the Pendulum is also another great pre - very good choice IMVHO Jo |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,368
| Quote:
![]() | |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Considering the OSA's and Elixirs are extremely different (especially the OSA C, L, and L3) I doubt that's going to happen. It's like saying your Neve or API or Calrec is going to sit idle because there is another kick ass preamp in the rack that sounds completely different than those three. Strange logic, but maybe that's just the way I think (and engineer). These are all excellent pieces that provide a certain aesthetic of their own at a very high end level. Just my humble opinion. | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear | Anybody out there get to put the Buzz Audio Elixir to work yet? If so, give us some feedback |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear | I got my Elixir in the mail today. WOW!! I haven't tried it on much yet, just Bass DI and distorted guitar, it sounds awesome. Very detailed, and the quality of build is excellent. Can't wait to really put it to work this weekend Matt |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,270
| Bringing back an old thread. Will two elixers handle an entire mix out of a folcrom? Looking for a reasonably priced one for this very task.
__________________ http://www.nu-tra.com |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Yes, it's a great choice IME. First the gain is on a detented switch in small steps, not a common feature on 500 series that I'm aware of (usually preamps are either fully variable only, or they have larger gain steps with a fully variable output). This is perfect for repeatability and setting L/R identically for your stereo outputs on the Folcrom. Realize the Elixir will be fast bandwidth and an articulate character without a huge amount of coloration (just a subtle amount in the low frequencies, but the highs are quite fast with the Lundahl on the output). So you'll be able to hear a lot of nuances and extension in the high and low frequencies from the multitrack through the Folcrom rather than a 'smoothing over' like a preamp intended to have a significant amount of coloration would have (i.e. Neve, Telefunken Tube, EMI, etc, etc). For me it's a good thing to have a more natural sounding console because my individual tracks are VERY colored. It rocks for tracking too, it's god on overheads (tom lows are very extended with no phase shift), acoustic guitar, kick, bass DI, and especially with ribbon mics because it's extremely quiet at it's highest gain of 70db. | |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,270
| Thanks Nathan! I will be looking into the elixer. Anyone try a Jensen twin servo with a folcrom? |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 393
| Can any Pendulum MDP-1A owners chime in on how the Elixir might differ from the MDP-1A. I own the Pendulum pre and love it. Sounds very similar to what has been described about the elixir but I'vebeen thinking of moving back to a lunchbox format. Anyone?
__________________ edIT (The Glitch Mob, Alpha Pup, Planet-Mu) http://www.facebook.com/edITmusic http://www.facebook.com/theglitchmobmusic |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| 500 series nutjob | Quote:
i had not been in the market for some new compressors at the time i reviewed elixer i had it would still be here.
__________________ www.pan60.com BLAST PAD Inventor just one invention among others. A CHARTER MEMBER OF THE 500 FORMAT, MAFIA Never EVER let the quality of your tools dictate what you do and don't get done, that's irresponsible and disrespectful to yourself as well as the muse. Gregory Scott - ubk it is easy to sound as though one was endowed with great intelligence, whilst speaking amongst a crowd of total morons | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,956
| just tried my elixir w/ the pad in on acoustic...wooooowww...probably the best acoustic sound ive ever gotten the elixir just sounds so ridiculously natural, detailed, and big...all 500 series sluts should have one of these!
__________________ "i have extra money and i have two chances, the first is ****ing strippers women, in an incredible party, and the other is get a lachapell preamp... |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: ITB now unfortunately!
Posts: 1,725
| Sorry to thread hi-jack but has anyone heard the new Buzz Potion FET comp yet? I'm really interested that that puppy! |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Buzz Audio "Elixir" 500-Series Preamp Modules | jdjustice | High end | 12 | 22nd October 2006 07:28 PM |
| Buzz Elixir trials and applications | natpub | So much gear, so little time! | 11 | 29th July 2006 05:12 AM |
| Heard a buzz, bought a Buzz!! | Trulsux | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 6th April 2006 03:52 PM |
| Snooping After The Great Elixir | Ruphus | High end | 4 | 18th May 2005 09:03 PM |
| Buzz SOC-1.1 | Neve Sucks! | So much gear, so little time! | 17 | 26th July 2003 07:36 AM |
| |