Vintage Neumann Mic shootout on acoustic - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


Vintage Neumann Mic shootout on acoustic

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th July 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
Andreas G's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,096

Thread Starter
Vintage Neumann Mic shootout on acoustic

Hi, on request of a gearslut member and for those who are interested I did a little mic shootout on a acoustic guitar with some old highender.
The mics were U67, KM56 and U47. The guitar was 1964 Gibson J-50, the mic were around 12 inch away pointing to the 12th freet, the pre was a clean but soft sounding tubepre followed by the AD. The tracks are of course pretty raw and unfinished like in a real tracking situation, anyway what mic would you prefer?

Have fun... Andreas
Andreas G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2006   #2
Lives for gear
 
blaugruen7's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: berlin
Posts: 1,887

Send a message via AIM to blaugruen7
U67, then u47.
i have birthday this year. please give me both.
blaugruen7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2006   #3
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 3,858

Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
I actually did not like any of them. Sound sharp, flat and tubey to my ears. A pair of Schoeps/Gefell/ etc. would sound like heaven comparing to this ...
__________________
Ivo Sedlacek

Savita Music
Velvet Mastering
Velvet Sound
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2006   #4
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 12

The guitar is wonderful. I have a J-60 and it doesn't sound that fresh.
All three mics work fine.
Kardoso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2006   #5
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 32

The U47 was the only one that didn't hurt my ears, the others sounded harsh and piercing.
manomanoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
T.RayBullard's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Columbus County, North Carolina
Posts: 2,426

Send a message via AIM to T.RayBullard Send a message via MSN to T.RayBullard Send a message via Yahoo to T.RayBullard
Ouch. None of those samples did it for me. Almost painful. Playing was good, but the mics ...well.I wouldnt use any of them based on those samples....

Pair of Gefells or Schoeps SDCs.....thats the ticket.
__________________
I think it is wrong to make everything equidistant
from the listener with too many mics. The pasting-on effects end up like bad Photoshop work on graphics & photos - too unbelievable.
-Tony Faulkner

http://www.last.fm/user/TeddyBullard/
T.RayBullard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2006   #7
Gear addict
 
Fruition2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Ft.Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 336

Been working on a project using a 60's J45 mic'd with a KM54 and/or an M269.
I wasnt surprised that the KM54 worked great on a Jumbo Guild (maple) and a Taylor 314, but the J45 seemed more brittle and ended up using an M269 which perfect and very close to that "Julia" Beatles tone.

Also put my new racked Q8 MM310's through the same paces, not harsh at all and the Eq although not surgical its very usable..but I'm realizing why the 550a was
so widely accepted when they first came out.
BTW Ken Hirsch at Orphan Audio did an amazing job racking MM310's modules...
a bit pricey but worth the money now that the tracks are coming togther and how everything is sitting in the mix.

I'll try to post a few examples in the next few days...
__________________
Dean Dydek
www.myspace.com/deandydek
Fruition2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
djui5's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,664

Send a message via Yahoo to djui5
Do you have pictures of the mic placement?
djui5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2006   #9
Lives for gear
 
Andreas G's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,096

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by djui5
Do you have pictures of the mic placement?
No, I recorded myself so how could I take a picture? But hey, I did a carefully recreation of the mic placement, my assistant BigBunny tuk my place :-)



Quote:
Originally Posted by ISedlacek
A pair of Schoeps/Gefell/ etc. would sound like heaven comparing to this ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by T.RayBullard
Pair of Gefells or Schoeps SDCs.....thats the ticket.
O.K. I'll try those Gefells or Schoeps, of course only a single mic with the same placement, otherwise it wouldn't be a fair comparison don't you think so?! ...and if doesn't sound like in heaven I'll send you BigBunny...

Andreas
Andreas G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2006   #10
Lives for gear
 
elambo's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Up here
Posts: 6,180

I have a 47, km54 and 184, Schoeps cmc6/mk4 and a 50's Gibson-esque guitar. My favorite by a substantial margin has always been the KM54. It's been picky with mic placement though.

When setting up each mic did you place them in the exact same position or did you play around to get them to sound their best. I'd be surprised if the best placement for one mic would work for all three.
elambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2006   #11
Lives for gear
 
True North's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Richmond Hill, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 3,213

Quote:
Originally Posted by blaugruen7
U67, then u47.
i have birthday this year. please give me both.

don't you have a birthday every year

sorry couldn't resist.


What was that bunny smokin?
__________________
"In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey" - Beck, Loser

"I do use compressors/limiters but not for controlling dynamics, I use EQ for that!" Jp22 (damn I miss him)

"Education is a progressive discovery of our own ignorance." -- Will Durant, historian (1885-1981)

"I try to get a boom out of the bass drum, in one of my albums, my CD, boom, I try to get that big boom, I could not get a big boom, I paid bucks, and could not get the boom" - Recording Expert, Tad Donley
True North is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2006   #12
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 3,858

Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andreas G

O.K. I'll try those Gefells or Schoeps, of course only a single mic with the same placement, otherwise it wouldn't be a fair comparison don't you think so?! ...and if doesn't sound like in heaven I'll send you BigBunny...

Andreas
I personally would never record guitar (and most of other instruments) with one mic, always in stereo. One mic always sounds a bit poor and flat to me ... (we have two ears). I have Horch RM2J and for few days I had even a pair of them here. It is a fabulous vocal mic - kind of mega U47. Of course, I was very eager to try them on instruments. But I somehow I did not like it too much on guitar, violin, flute, drum etc. The vocals sound amazing (the best vocal mic I ever heard). But for a beautiful, natural, deep rendering of instruments, a SD pair seems to be the way ... YMMV, of course ...
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2006   #13
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,323

Ivo speaks the truth. The best way to record acoustic guitar is at a decent distance (1m) with a stereo pair in a decent acoustic. I prefer Blumlein and ribbons. The Royer SF24 is my favourite, closely followed by a KM120 pair in Blumlein.
David Spearritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2006   #14
Lives for gear
 
rwhitney's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035

They're all nice. I like the clear highs of the KM56 (my choice for tracking with other instruments), U67 for the lows and forward mids, U47 for it's smooth overall balanced response.
__________________
Ross Whitney
(non-professional)
rwhitney@uci.edu
rwhitney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2006   #15
Lives for gear
 
rwhitney's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035

Here's last night's Hippie Guitar Music recorded through a modern M149 and Daking preamp (no eq or comp-just 960 plate preset).
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 M149-Daking.mp3 (823.6 KB, 639 views)
rwhitney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st August 2006   #16
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 127

Km54 is my favorite followed by a Km56. The 54 is a bit brighter but neither require EQ for me when the placement is on. The Shoeps is also sweet and similar, maybe more available. The recording seem a bit bright making me thing their are eq'd too much with 12k but maybe it's the guitar. I am using a 60's 000-18 and it is amazing sounding. I will post some recordings.
Bimini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2006   #17
Lives for gear
 
Andreas G's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,096

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by elambo
When setting up each mic did you place them in the exact same position or did you play around to get them to sound their best. I'd be surprised if the best placement for one mic would work for all three.
I didn't play around to get the best sound, I set up the U67 first, recorded it and used the same setup for the other mics as well. I even didn't monitor myself with cans. I just listened to what I've recorded and if the typical character of the particular mic was there. My goal was not to make the best possible recording of an acoustic, I just want to show the different characteristic of these mikes in a quick and easy way.

The KM54 is no doubt an amazing mic, with more work on the mic positioning and maybe with an additional engineer who would be responsible for the quality of the recording, the hole picture would look quite different. If done well the choice of mic is more a matter of taste than quality.

Andreas
Andreas G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2006   #18
Lives for gear
 
Andreas G's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,096

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by ISedlacek
I personally would never record guitar (and most of other instruments) with one mic, always in stereo. One mic always sounds a bit poor and flat to me ... (we have two ears). I have Horch RM2J and for few days I had even a pair of them here. It is a fabulous vocal mic - kind of mega U47. Of course, I was very eager to try them on instruments. But I somehow I did not like it too much on guitar, violin, flute, drum etc. The vocals sound amazing (the best vocal mic I ever heard). But for a beautiful, natural, deep rendering of instruments, a SD pair seems to be the way ... YMMV, of course ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Spearritt
Ivo speaks the truth. The best way to record acoustic guitar is at a decent distance (1m) with a stereo pair in a decent acoustic. I prefer Blumlein and ribbons. The Royer SF24 is my favourite, closely followed by a KM120 pair in Blumlein.
The reason why I've done this shootout was the interrest of a gearslutz member in a SINGLE Neumann Vintage mic for recording acoustic guitar. I've recorded it in my very little own studio which has a flat frequency response but therefor sounds pretty dry. Others than that I of course agree with you, that a stereo- or multimic setup in a great room can sound amazing but that wasn't the subject of matter in this case.

Andreas
Andreas G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2006   #19
Lives for gear
 
Andreas G's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,096

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwhitney
Here's last night's Hippie Guitar Music recorded through a modern M149 and Daking preamp (no eq or comp-just 960 plate preset).
Nice work Ross! I'm a bit jealous of you tracking-room.

Andreas
Andreas G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2006   #20
Gear maniac
 
Melodioso's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 278

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISedlacek
I personally would never record guitar (and most of other instruments) with one mic, always in stereo. One mic always sounds a bit poor and flat to me ... (we have two ears) ...
Just curious, what kind of mic configuration do you use when recording acoustic instruments in stereo? The example you posted earlier (DAV pre's) sounded good -

Personally, I use a pair of MG M930 in a XY setup, sounds great in near and mid position. But like I said, I'm curious what other people are doing.

(and sorry for hiajcking the thread...)
Melodioso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2006   #21
Lives for gear
 
Empty Planet's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Location: Beautiful NYC
Posts: 1,201

Thanks for doing this.

Informative.



Cheers.

Empty Planet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2006   #22
Lives for gear
 
rwhitney's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andreas G
Nice work Ross! I'm a bit jealous of you tracking-room.

Andreas
Your kind, but you wouldn't be jealous if you saw it! In fact, you can:

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BkP50l-bmyc"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BkP50l-bmyc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="600" height="350"></embed></object>
rwhitney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2006   #23
Lives for gear
 
ISedlacek's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Czech mountains and forests
Posts: 3,858

Send a message via ICQ to ISedlacek
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melodioso
Just curious, what kind of mic configuration do you use when recording acoustic instruments in stereo? The example you posted earlier (DAV pre's) sounded good -
Well, it VERY MUCH depends on the type of recorded instruments ... Basically always a type of AB stereo ... I never liked much a kind of XY or ORTF stereo sound (for solo instruments)
ISedlacek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2006   #24
Lives for gear
 
Andreas G's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,096

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwhitney
Your kind, but you wouldn't be jealous if you saw it! In fact, you can:

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BkP50l-bmyc"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BkP50l-bmyc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="600" height="350"></embed></object>
Hi Ross, assuming that there is a picture of your tracking room which I can't see (maybe my browser is to old to show this) and assuming it doesn't look like in a major studio, well then... you are even more are a genius.

Seriously, I think it is time to say Thank YOU, for all that shootouts, comparisons and test, you've done in a very accurate and disciplined manner! I remember the micing of a larrivrée guitar with two Neumann 147 mics with one month old strings and no eq, which blows me simply away!

Keep up your cool work!

Andreas
Andreas G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2006   #25
Lives for gear
 
rwhitney's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035

It's basically a souped-up classroom, though it does have a wood floor. Too bad you can't see it in all it's glory, but yeah, it's the same place I recorded that Larrivee. I appreciate your compliment very much.
rwhitney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2006   #26
Lives for gear
 
rwhitney's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 1,035

BTW, I use M149s not 147s. I think there's a huge difference in sound between those mics. I would never recommend a 147 (from my experience).
rwhitney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2006   #27
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 380

Send a message via AIM to Beauarts
To me it sounds like the mic is not in the right spot. I don't hear enough tone, more like the fingerboard area sound. I'd move it closer to the edge of the soundhole to get more of the soundboard. I believe micing at the 12th fret is used when you have a 2nd on the body or behind the bridge, not for a single mic.

Thank you, thank you, thank you for giving us samples where there's an actual musician playing. This should be a gearslutz requirment, no lame playing if you want us to critique your recording setup.
Beauarts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2006   #28
Lives for gear
 
dim light's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: China
Posts: 2,336

what application do I need to play the files? No luck here. The M149 SOUNDS NICE!
__________________
Moderators you can't kill my art!
dim light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2006   #29
Lives for gear
 
djui5's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,664

Send a message via Yahoo to djui5
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwhitney
BTW, I use M149s not 147s. I think there's a huge difference in sound between those mics. I would never recommend a 147 (from my experience).



djui5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd August 2006   #30
Lives for gear
 
Andreas G's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,096

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwhitney
It's basically a souped-up classroom, though it does have a wood floor. Too bad you can't see it in all it's glory, but yeah, it's the same place I recorded that Larrivee. I appreciate your compliment very much.
I can see it now, cool... who is Tanuki?
Andreas G is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vintage King Sponsored Summing Shootout jumpnyc High end 15 14th August 2006 10:28 PM
Gefell UM900, UM75, Neumann U87 shootout ISedlacek High end 53 20th March 2006 08:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:57 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.