Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th July 2006   #1
Gear addict
 
phelbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 355

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to phelbin
TDIF Signal Degraded...Please Help!!

In my studio I have a Trident Series 80, a Radar 24, and PT HD. Usually we go through the Radar as A/D into PT. I noticed recently that the TDIF signal is degraded somewhat when going into PT. I did some A/B tests


1 - I recorded to the Radar, burned the files onto a CD and imported them into PT.

2 - I recorded through the Radar onto PT using AES/EBU

3 - I recorded through the Radar onto PT using TDIF


The TDIF signal is definitely degraded a bit. The low end isn't as crisp and the upper mid range is a bit dull. The other two methods are fine. Please help me figure out what to do.

I've heard that not all TDIF cables are created equal. Do you guys think that's true? Digidesign has a TDIF cable specifically for their gear, but it costs $150 for one cable. Is that worth it? Can you recommend another cable company? Mine are cheap cables I bought on ebbay...so I probably should upgrade them anyway.

Or should I send my Radar to IZ Corp and have them take out the TDIF card and put in an AES card?

Thanks for helping me.
phelbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2006   #2
Gear maniac
 
alessio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Livorno, Italy
Posts: 190

How do you sync the digital machines?
alessio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006   #3
Gear addict
 
phelbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 355

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to phelbin
Word clock with a BNC cable. The Radar is the master and PT is the slave.
phelbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
Mike O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,094

Call IZs toll free number. Even if you are not the original owner they will be most happy to help you get to the bottom of the issue.
Mike O is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006   #5
Gear addict
 
phelbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 355

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to phelbin
They suggested Redco. But they only sell Mogami TDIF cable without the connectors...and there is no way I'm soldering a TDIF cable.
phelbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
TheSweetener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany / Frankfurt
Posts: 1,209

Strange problem. I have used TDIF fr a long time and have never noticed something like this.

I remember that the people from Soundscape told me that ribbon cables are superior to "normal round" ones. Otherwise it's very critical to use long TDIF cables. How long are yours?

Have you tried using a different clock? Have you clocked PT via TDIF? Have you used PT as the master?
TheSweetener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006   #7
Lives for gear
 
Zwinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 639

I have heard of similar things happening. I would try some different cables to make sure that is not the problem. My other idea is to check with Digidesign to see if there is some compressions scheme on the TDIF inputs. I doubt there is, but I have heard that some companies do this without advertising that it is being done.
__________________
Zach Winterfeld

Chariots of Fire, "you can't put in what God's left out"

"It is slightly illegal, but who the f@*k cares at this point."
Zwinter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
Ruudman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 3,079

It sound like emphasize is turned on for some reason..


ruudman
Ruudman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2006   #9
Gear addict
 
phelbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 355

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to phelbin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruudman
It sound like emphasize is turned on for some reason..
I know emphasis can be turned on in the Radar. I'll check that tonight. Does anyone know if that's possible in PT? Or would it be on the 192 itself?
phelbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006   #10
Gear nut
 
N.J.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 96

Hi Phelbin,
When you evaluate the TDIF is it during the transfer or playback from PT once transferred?

I would try a different cable. Maybe only change a bank of 8, and see if the cable makes any difference.

Experiment on your RADAR with the below settings.
TDIF SETTINGS:
IN SAMPLE POINT
SAMPLE RATE IN
EMPHASIS IN
EMPHASIS OUT
See pg 138 and 139 of RADAR manual for definitions.

If you can create files from the two transfers, there are software programs that will compare files. This would determine if the data in the two files are different.

If you'd like to send me short clips of each transfer, I'd be happy to evaluate them for you.

If you'd like an AES card, that is something you can install in the field with iZ telephone support.
AES is great because it supports single wire 96kHZ, and you don't have to worry about framing, etc.
__________________
Cheers,
N.J.
support@izcorp.com
1-800-776-1356
"...actually I can hold a note forever. But eventually that's just noise. It's the change we're listening for. The note coming after, and the one after that. That's what makes it music."
N.J. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006   #11
Gear addict
 
phelbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 355

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to phelbin
Thanks for your help NJ. What TDIF cable would you recommend? I'm having trouble finding a good one other than Digidesign's cable at $150 apiece. Or is that even a reasonable price?
phelbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006   #12
Gear nut
 
N.J.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 96

Hi Phil,
Radial (cable-tek), Redco. The pinout is on our website if you want to hand make them.
N.J. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006   #13
Lives for gear
 
heyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 2,660

For all those companies out there that sell products with shoddy warranties and substandard tech support. Get a pen and paper, write down and take notes as to what NJ and the rest of IZCorp does for there customers..

Proud owner of a Radar 24 for 3 years.

thumbsup
__________________
Best quote ever....!
Posted by Infernal Device..

"Guitar Center....
Even the good news is in the moan zone."
heyman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006   #14
Lives for gear
 
TheSweetener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany / Frankfurt
Posts: 1,209

Quote:
Originally Posted by phelbin
Thanks for your help NJ. What TDIF cable would you recommend? I'm having trouble finding a good one other than Digidesign's cable at $150 apiece. Or is that even a reasonable price?
Hi!
Like I said, try to contact Soundscape. In Europe they sell great TDIF cables much cheaper. It will be the same in the US.
TheSweetener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006   #15
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 286

N.J.

I have a Radar 24 and quite some time ago I bought six good quality glass toslink cables planning to get the Adat card and a Hammerfall HDSP 9652 card that I still don`t have.

Is there any difference, soundwise, between the Adat card/toslink cables and TDIF/AES route when going 24-bit/48kHz?

The Lightpipe/TDIF thing was discussed on rec.audio a long time ago I remember.

Oh, right, it`s been discussed here too:

"lightpipe vs coaxial

a mastering engineer recently told me that recording via lightpipe is sonically inferior to recording via coaxial (spdif) or AES/EBU. he made me listen to files and i instantly agreed.

i did two recording tests with my own gear which confirmed this. the tests are waterproof. basically comparing the same signal via lightpipe spdif and coaxial spdif from an apogee rosetta into an rme multiface. clock was the rosetta via wordclock. short quality cables on both connections.

i find that especially the high end suffers - its less transparent on lightpipe. anyone here with more insight? i got loads of slagging off... but the results here are clear and blind tested by about 8 people."

"sorry... forgot to mention that a tek guy told me that its not the transmission via lightpipe which is the problem, it supposedly is the conversion onto optical. "
http://gearslutz.com/board/showthrea...threadid=10882


On the other hand Bob Katz writes, when asked about the same thing;

"My answer is that the apparent sonic differences between interface technologies such as Toslink, glass, and copper are IRRELEVANT when doing transfers or when passing signal from one processor to another. You can forget about that question with COMPLETE CONFIDENCE--since all of the technologies are capable of passing perfectly good data, within their specified cable lengths. Remember: the clock is not transferred along with the data. Only the data is transferred to the processor's circuits.

The apparent sonic differences between interface technologies come into play in only ONE place... and that is at the input to the converters (A/D and D/A)."
http://www.digido.com/portal/pmodule...#anchor6490002
threm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006   #16
Lives for gear
 
Ruudman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 3,079

Quote:
Originally Posted by phelbin
I know emphasis can be turned on in the Radar. I'll check that tonight. Does anyone know if that's possible in PT? Or would it be on the 192 itself?
I think it would be the Radar. It may have turned emphasis on automaticly by sensing an uncorrect signal, or a mismatched one.


ruudman
__________________
Working Class Hero



Visit this website of Noma Children Hospital Sokoto
Ruudman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006   #17
Gear addict
 
phelbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 355

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to phelbin
I'm going to check out the emphasis as soon as I can. I also ordered one good ribbon TDIF cable from soundscape. I'll know more within a week or so.

Every time I talk to IZ they say that AES is superior to TDIF. Does anyone else agree or disagree?
phelbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006   #18
Lives for gear
 
indie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: C-ville area VA
Posts: 1,618

Quote:
Originally Posted by heyman
For all those companies out there that sell products with shoddy warranties and substandard tech support. Get a pen and paper, write down and take notes as to what NJ and the rest of IZCorp does for there customers..

Proud owner of a Radar 24 for 3 years.

thumbsup

thumbsup thumbsup thumbsup
indie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2006   #19
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 286

Quote:
Originally Posted by phelbin
Every time I talk to IZ they say that AES is superior to TDIF. Does anyone else agree or disagree?
Superior in what way?
threm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2006   #20
Gear nut
 
chrisredco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 96

Redco TDIF cable

We can make you a TDIF cable of any length using Mogami TDIF cable, which is a very specific type of twisted pair cable as you already know. Be aware that TDIF has an "approved" length of 15', but we have made many TDIF cables using this Mogami cable much longer with siccess.

It is not a cheap cable to make, but we will try and be reasonable as much as possible. Let me know if we can help you out, or what you find is the result with the ribbon cable you got.

Thanks,
Chris Stubbs
Redco Audio
chrisredco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2006   #21
Gear nut
 
N.J.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 96

Quote:
Originally Posted by threm
N.J.
Is there any difference, soundwise, between the Adat card/toslink cables and TDIF/AES route when going 24-bit/48kHz?
If you are listening during the transfer, one format may be stronger than the other in terms of clocking, jitter, etc.
If you are playing back audio after the transfer from the same platform, I don't think there would be, but I really haven't done any critical listening tests.

Quote:
Originally Posted by phelbin
Every time I talk to IZ they say that AES is superior to TDIF. Does anyone else agree or disagree?
Quote:
Originally Posted by threm
Superior in what way?
If you were talking to me, I wasn't referring to sound quality. I prefer AES because of:
1. Supports single wire at up to 96kHz (ie full 24 track count)
2. No need to worry about framing, etc.
3. In my experience, had less hassles setting up.
4. More common than TDIF for high end gear.

YMMV
N.J. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2006   #22
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 286

Thanks N.J.!

My budget doesn`t allow the AES route. I`ll stick with the ADAT card into a RME Digiface breakout box and into a PC for the 24ch I/O from the Radar.
threm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2006   #23
Gear addict
 
phelbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 355

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to phelbin
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisredco
It is not a cheap cable to make, but we will try and be reasonable as much as possible. Let me know if we can help you out, or what you find is the result with the ribbon cable you got.
I already ordered a ribbon cable from Soundscape for $50 including shipping. But just for information, what would you charge to make me a 2' cable? I might have you make me one if the ribbon doesn't solve my problem.



Quote:
Originally Posted by N.J.
I prefer AES because of:
1. Supports single wire at up to 96kHz (ie full 24 track count)
2. No need to worry about framing, etc.
Does TDIF not support 96KHz. Mine seems to. Although I have noticed that I can record a full 24 tracks at 96 using the Radar for A/D. But I can only do 44.1/48 when mixing back through the Radar for D/A. Why is that?

What is framing?
phelbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2006   #24
Gear addict
 
phelbin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 355

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to phelbin
Problem solved!!

I bought a ribbon TDIF cable from Soundscape and plugged it in tonight. It made a huge difference! I was planning to do some elaborate A/B tests, but after the first two tests, the difference was so noticeable that I don't feel the need to do any more testing.

So, I can definitely say that all TDIF cables are not created equal. I'm in much better shape now!

phelbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2006   #25
Lives for gear
 
heyman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 2,660

Great..!! Best of luck...
heyman is online now   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
RADAR II to RME via TDIF Loa So much gear, so little time! 3 1st September 2006 06:50 PM
balanced signal through Avalon U5 Hi-Z input to bring down to MIC level signal beesting So much gear, so little time! 8 17th August 2006 08:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:16 PM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.