U87ai thin sound with pad on? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end

U87ai thin sound with pad on?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th October 2012   #1
Lives for gear
 
tha]-[acksaw's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,058

Thread Starter
U87ai thin sound with pad on?

I got a brand new U87ai several years back. I use it for all sorts of stuff. Once about a year ago I used it for something on drums. Cant remember what. But I had the pad engaged on the mic. I recorded some vocals the next days, and they sounded thin for some reason. I remembered that I
had left the pad on. I turned it off, and all was back to normal.

Last week I used it for front of a Cajon box drum, and I used the pad. Worked great. Then I went to cut vocals the next day and there were the thin vocals again. I remembered the pad, turned it off and it was back to normal.

Later when I had time I messed around with it a bit more. I tested the mic with no pad. Then engaged it, and turned by my pre by 10dB. The level was pretty much right on point with the first test. Minus all the low end.

And no, I'm not confusing the low roll off with the pad.

And help. Thoughts. Similar experiences.


Sent from my DROID3 using Tapatalk
tha]-[acksaw is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
AlexK's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Cardiff, UK
Posts: 1,588

Similar experiences here. I've noticed quite a bit of dulling at the top end too...
__________________
Alex

Twitter
AlexK is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,169

innerTUBE Audio Vacuum Tube Up-Grade kit for Neumann u-87

It is mentioned a couple of times in this thread.
jupiter8 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2012   #4
Gear Head
 
Davideo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: London
Posts: 50

Same thing happened to me.
There's definitely something wrong with that pad
Davideo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
tha]-[acksaw's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,058

Thread Starter
Thank god its not just me.

Aside from knocking down the level, the pad just seems useless to me now. The mids sound less focused, and the high end detail is gone. I really expect a lot more from a $3000 mic.
tha]-[acksaw is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2012   #6
Gear maniac
 
Cathedral Guitar's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 250

The pad is for emergency use only, when all other options are exhausted and the choice is to either use the pad or not get ANY recording at all. Kind of like your car is equipped with a donut tire -- not to be thought of as a real tire, but it can get you home in an emergency.
Cathedral Guitar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2012   #7
Gear Head
 
Davideo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: London
Posts: 50

I thought that the pad should just trim the volume -10db and not change the sound. Am I wrong?
Davideo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2012   #8
Lives for gear
 
tha]-[acksaw's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,058

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davideo View Post
I thought that the pad should just trim the volume -10db and not change the sound. Am I wrong?
That's the point, and should be the function. But unfortunately its far from reality.

The degradation of tone with the pad on is borderline unacceptable. I'd be less pissed about it if this were a chinese mic costing a few hundred dollars.

Part of me cant help but thing that Neumann did this for one reason or another. Only because they are so established and well loved. How could they let this sip past their tests? So, I cant figure out what that reason would be. Until them I'm gonna have to tack it up as a major engineering slip up.
tha]-[acksaw is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2012   #9
Gear maniac
 
Cathedral Guitar's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 250

Here are some more details on why it is the way it is:

<Mic Pads- When And How To Use Them>
Cathedral Guitar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2012   #10
Lives for gear
 
tha]-[acksaw's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,058

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cathedral Guitar View Post
Here are some more details on why it is the way it is:

<Mic Pads- When And How To Use Them>
Thanks for posting that dood. It was an interesting read.

Although I'd still love to know why the tone changes so much with the pad on. They talked about all the adverse effects of the pad, in a general sense. But the tone effect wasn't mentioned.

I have a good deal of mics, from Chinese made to the really nice ones. I cant remember having any tone loss when using any of them. I use a pair of B-5's pretty often, and they have a pad. That pad for sure has no tone loss when engaged. Or so little I cant hear it. And that mic only costs $100. Just seems funny to me.

Sent from my DROID3 using Tapatalk
tha]-[acksaw is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2012   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: OTTAWA
Posts: 690

Thats odd , since I've read that engaging the pad will actually help the mic sound like the BETTER sounding pre-1986 U87i versions .. ie. by not stressing out the new AI circuitry.

Whats REALLY going on with this pad ??
jlsgear is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2012   #12
Lives for gear
 
Ward Pike's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,544

the thinning of tone from the U87ai is widely accepted and acknowledged. It is a design "flaw".

It is unfortunate that it never needs to be used as it sucks the tone out as well... not so with the U87. Weird, right? Anyhow, there are other options such as a line pad.
__________________
--
Free the electrons! Use tubes/valves when possible.
Ward Pike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2012   #13
Gear addict
 
Emwolb's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Rectum of a dead skunk
Posts: 378

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlsgear View Post
Thats odd , since I've read that engaging the pad will actually help the mic sound like the BETTER sounding pre-1986 U87i versions .. ie. by not stressing out the new AI circuitry.
You should stop reading/listening to whoever told you this...
Emwolb is offline  
1
Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2012   #14
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,178

Something's broken. I had a similar problem. Get someone to look at it.
Something in the connectors. Goes "One Legged."
Flymax is online now  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gig Report: On the Road with Streetlight Manifesto bishopthomas Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 13 23rd November 2007 06:37 PM
Need Single Drum Pad + Brain for Live Handclaps Etc. aermotor Drums! 3 11th October 2007 02:57 PM
Need Single Drum Pad + Brain for Live Handclaps Etc. aermotor So much gear, so little time! 5 11th October 2007 05:52 AM
BEFORE I BUST MY PIGGY BANK... U87 OR U87ai? (VOICEOVERS) grexter So much gear, so little time! 7 31st December 2006 01:38 PM
?Using A/D D/A on live sound to better the mix... primomusic Live Sound 17 10th February 2005 09:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.