5th October 2012
|
#1 | | Gear nut
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 106
Thread Starter | Audiophile Marketshare?
Does anyone know what the audiophile market share of music sales is, what that total market is worth annually, or how to find out? It seems to me that music piracy centers around popular music, but a lot of people can get fans and a following for their music, and sell direct, with a reasonable amount of fan loyalty, and the issues of piracy being less. I'm particularly interested in how well audiophile purchases are going, esp. legitimate digital downloads. Even in 24bit/44.1 But especially it seems to me anyway, that 88.2/96 and especially 192k is really a huge step up in sound reproduction quality over 44.1, - in the case of 192, it's really like listening to tape (a good tape at that) only better, it's more transparent (notwithstanding arguments for the aesthetic benefits of tape, just as an "honest" recording medium). It seems to me there *must* be a decent enough market out there for quality music and at prices that make it at least worthwhile if you can garner a following, without having to prostitute yourself into a fictional image to inspire people to buy - who buy because they like the music.
From my own experience I've found lots of music I like and would like to buy that I had never heard of before, that certainly isn't popular, and that is for sale digitally, and in hi def (96k) non-mp3 format. I'm not even talking about hi def remasters, but new music.
Anyone got any thoughts about that?
|
| |
6th October 2012
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2003 Location: Birmingham, UK |
I'd be interested in knowing this too -- it seems a growing number of people are doing stuff for HDTracks, I'm probably going to put a bunch of albums up there as an experiment, but I have yet to see any hard statistics about how many people are actually purchasing from there or the few other similar services.
__________________ -oudplayer ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Anatolian oud session player; world/esoteric music recording, mixing, and mastering musiq.com on soundcloud ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
| |
6th October 2012
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Nov 2004 Location: here
Posts: 4,469
|
Between 0,1-0,11% globally, in the States may be better, may be 0,15%. Very narrow niche business. On the other hand, who can be able to make really true statistics on that? Manufacturers? Advertisers? Shops?
I guess - gearslutzs
__________________
Be free or be rich ! 
Ask girl who knows |
| |
6th October 2012
|
#4 | | Gear nut
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 106
Thread Starter |
I think there's going to be a growing trend moving towards higher quality sound over the next decade as more and more people realise there is better and care enough to find out what that means (speaking of mp3 downloads). You will always have people who don't care. But there are always going to be those that do. And I think it's going to keep building slowly, but a lot was lost over the last 20 years, and I think there's a huge potential for rediscovery - not only of vinyl - but the next best thing to "being there" (master tape), which is 96/192/HD formats. The music market is a think potentially much larger. And you don't have to compete with music stores - the digital revolution is already done, now you just have to garner market share from the big boys who've already shown it an be done, and how. With the flac formats on those sites, you can have your digital download as well - no need to buy a boxed version. Why not have one price for flac file, and another price for boxed multiformat disc version, plus a download so you can listen right away. If I was them I would match itunes pricing or maybe make it a dollar over for an album download only, just to pay the bandwidth / processing costs but otherwise why not compete with itunes. Make more money on physical packaging for those who like physical liner notes etc. Make it something desirable, cool and interesting to own (like a good LP is). This 17$ an album for a digital download business with todays bandwidth costs doesn't make sense to me. Why not give people an incentive to try it out at least. They can always encode an mp3 on their machine. Better yet, have an mp3 version or AAC version for your ipod, and a HD flac for your home stereo. Seems to me the market is so small, just being there is a good thing? Also, while there are a lot of re-releases (the origins and processing of which is rarely disclosed) I don't see a lot of material tracked and processed in HD that you can go and enjoy. It's nice to hear the master tapes but personally I find it even more interesting to hear what people are doing with it now, in many ways. At least when it comes to re-releases, I would rather at least have a clear idea ok yes it was the master tape, yes it was properly treated for the format etc. Most mac and desktop computers and even laptops being produced today all go up to 96k as standard as far as I'm aware.
|
| | | |