Riding gain Vocal track: pre fader or post fader compression? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end

Riding gain Vocal track: pre fader or post fader compression?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th September 2012   #1
Gear addict
 
Lorenzop's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 392

Thread Starter
Riding gain Vocal track: pre fader or post fader compression?

Hi
Just wander what you experienced guys have to say about this.

Intuitively, seems to me if you compress post fader, you run the risk of making compressor work harder than if it's sits pre fader?
Unless you actually do a lot/ most of the "compression" yourself on the fader by pulling down before hand right??

Conversly if a singer is "intimate" in style probably post fader is working harder if you end up "riding up" his mostly quiet bits??

So the real question: for loud, dynamic vocals, which approach would yield a more NATURAL sound?
I.e. how to avoid the overtly squashed compression with a dynamic singer??
__________________
"You can do anything you like as long as it sounds the way u imagined. If anyone says otherwise, he is probably a chemical, structural or civil engineer, and is here by accident".
-a genius Gearslutz User
Lorenzop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th September 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 3,358

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorenzop View Post
Hi
Just wander what you experienced guys have to say about this.

Intuitively, seems to me if you compress post fader, you run the risk of making compressor work harder than if it's sits pre fader?
Unless you actually do a lot/ most of the "compression" yourself on the fader by pulling down before hand right??

Conversly if a singer is "intimate" in style probably post fader is working harder if you end up "riding up" his mostly quiet bits??

So the real question: for loud, dynamic vocals, which approach would yield a more NATURAL sound?
I.e. how to avoid the overtly squashed compression with a dynamic singer??
I just automate it in Pro tools, then slap a couple of compressors on so I don't overburden one of them..
__________________
http://mixalliance.co.uk Trade mixing and mastering skills.
ShadowAMD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2012   #3
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 188

I always ride a fader into a compressor (or two) when I am tracking. I like to get a good average sound, and then turn down for loud parts.

It usually works pretty well, but you have to learn the tune.
bluejbill is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2012   #4
Gear addict
 
Lorenzop's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 392

Thread Starter
So if I understand correct, basically if riding, is it mostly turning down as opposed to gaining up? In order to avoid driving the comp too hard??
Lorenzop is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 3,358

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorenzop View Post
So if I understand correct, basically if riding, is it mostly turning down as opposed to gaining up? In order to avoid driving the comp too hard??
The whole point in it is to balance levels, turn down when needed and vice versa.
ShadowAMD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2012   #6
Gear Head
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 40

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorenzop View Post
Hi
Just wander what you experienced guys have to say about this.

Intuitively, seems to me if you compress post fader, you run the risk of making compressor work harder than if it's sits pre fader?
Unless you actually do a lot/ most of the "compression" yourself on the fader by pulling down before hand right??

Conversly if a singer is "intimate" in style probably post fader is working harder if you end up "riding up" his mostly quiet bits??

So the real question: for loud, dynamic vocals, which approach would yield a more NATURAL sound?
I.e. how to avoid the overtly squashed compression with a dynamic singer??

When mixing, I do both. A general compression for vibe on the channel (pre fader) and then I set a stereo box buss compressor up and push the fader up and down into that. It may seem counter intuitive, but I feel that if set up right the compressor grabbing harder on louder parts helps with making the louder parts sound more natural and less pokey. I tend to like sounds that feel like they are pushing through something though.
stanmisner is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th September 2012   #7
Gear maniac
 
Rascal Audio's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 207

On occasion I have automated into a compressor, but generally I just cut the vocal up and spread it over two or more tracks and then process sections differently, relative to dynamic level, timbre, etc., to create a more consistent overall final performance.

Joel
__________________
Joel Cameron
www.rascalaudio.net
Rascal Audio is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fader riding... AlexLakis So much gear, so little time! 61 23rd January 2011 06:15 PM
Live Rock + Compression, Feedback, Vocal Harmonies: I need your wisdom!!! deafboy Live Sound 43 25th August 2009 10:54 AM
Pop Vocals! Mic Pre for U87? SoniqKwality So much gear, so little time! 18 14th December 2007 02:46 AM
Stereo mix compression with Vocals high in the mix bdmctear High end 22 7th March 2007 11:15 AM
ITB Vocal Compressor - what do you use? KrisNY So much gear, so little time! 34 4th March 2007 07:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:21 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.