4th September 2012
|
#1 | | Gear interested
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
Thread Starter | AEA R44 in an imperfect room
Hi,
I'm in love with the AEA R44 sound. The bass response, the smooth high end, the lack of sibilance (at least w/my voice) ... love it all. I even love AEA the company, Wes and his crazy top hats, and the look of the damn things. I want one.
So far, so good.
Right now, I track vocals in what is best described as an imperfect room. The dimensions are good (12 x 30 x 11 with weird corners, a built-in reflection-free zone, and moderate treatment) and the sound is pretty good.
What it isn't is the world's quietest room. There is ambient noise, some rumble from air conditioners, and so on.
I can get around the ambient noise and the rumbles with either dynamics or condensers with a combination of GIK screen panels and moving around bass traps if I need to.
BUT ... I know that the R44 is a total low end magnet. I'm concerned that no matter how well screen panels and other absorption tames the reflections, the the mic might suck up the AC rumble no matter what I do.
I do NOT need my tracks to be perfectly quiet, but I also don't want to deal with the 6 foot proximity effect of the 44 turning a quiet rumble into a thunderstorm.
Long way of getting to the question ---
Does anyone have any experience or comments with using gobos/screen panels and the 44 in a situation like that?
I know I could make a "smaller" ribbon work fine, just not sure about the 44's monster proximity effect and whether I can isolate it enough.
Thanks in advance.
Michael
|
| |
4th September 2012
|
#2 | | Gear addict
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 335
|
Well, the 44 ain't the world's most versatile vocal mic in the first place...if something else sounds better, why not use something else - particularly if your environment doesn't suit it?
|
| |
4th September 2012
|
#3 | | Gear interested
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
Thread Starter |
Jono,
Thanks for the reply.
I've tried the mic and I love it. It is a great fit me for (haven't found any better).
If I can find a way to tame that proximity effect in the room I have, that is absolutely my first choice. I'm hoping someone has some experience that can tell me whether it is even worth trying before I drop the coin and bring it home. :-)
If I can't make it work, I'll go to the AEA KU4. It still works for my voice. I don't love it as much (missing that amazing low end of the 44) ... but the pattern and reduced proximity effect would make it work easier in the space.
If someone has tried a 44 in a similar situation and hasn't been able to make it work b/c of the rumble being overwhelming, I'll avoid the step of buying and having to resell or return the mic (I've never returned a mic before, and I'd feel like crap making a vendor resell it as a demo --- especially since I'm biased towards smaller shops like ZenPro.)
Michael
|
| |
4th September 2012
|
#4 | | Gear interested
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 29
Thread Starter |
P.S. I completely understand that I won't 100% know until I have it in my room in my circumstances. But I'm hoping there is a tortured engineer out there who has tracked in a noisy cabin somewhere that sounded good in terms of reflections and room modes but had some ambient noise from A/C or a nearby highway. If that person tried and succeeded w/a 44 ... or failed ... in that kind of environment or one similar, it'd make me feel a lot better about buying (or not).
|
| |
4th September 2012
|
#5 | | Gear addict
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 335
|
To be honest, I've never had any luck with a figure of eight mic in a less-than-decent room for any application, other than mic'ing guitar cabs. I love love love the 44, but I do think it would be worth trying a Wunder or Lucas or Flea or Blackspade or something - for the price of that KU4 you can get a fantastic LDC that offers multiple patterns....you may want to try the Blackspade UM17r - not a ribbon but VERY smooth. I don't own one but had one here for a few days. Amazing mic for the dough. Of course, none of them look as cool as the 44... When people come to check my studio out before booking, they like to take pictures of the 44! Then they try it next to the Lucas/C12/U87/Brauner, etc....all but one chose the Lucas for vocals. If you're convinced that the 44 is the only way to go, then I'm sure you'll figure it out. I would NOT feel bad about trying mic's and sending them back however...if you can have them at the same time to try so much the better. It's the only way you'll really know...
|
| |
4th September 2012
|
#6 | | 70% Coffee, 30% Beer
Joined: Dec 2006 Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 9,135
|
Agree with Jono, about just trying it out. Also really dig his suggestion on the UM17R. That and the 44CNE have been haunting my gear purchase dreams.
I can tell you we encourage this sort of thing at our shop. For sure we want to help you pick the right tools in the first place, and we want to help educate our clients to the fullest, at all costs, but you just gotta try it out in a project to see how it fits.
FWIW, AEA does have their own demo program to help! They are amazing people!! Wes, Renee, Julian and Crew are simply awesome to work with!
Check it out http://www.ribbonmics.com/pdf/AEA_Na...mo_Program.pdf
I would say, there are a couple things to consider. How loud your performances are, and how well you can isolate the noise. If you have quieter performances, it may be harder to isolate. It may not matter that much if you take care with placement, perhaps a slight rumble filter [like the ones on the RPQ] could work magic and save the day. I would also try and use that side null, to your advantage.
The KU4 is also an amazing option here, and would help further the isolation for sure. You can always touch the bottom with a nice EQ. Depends how much of a purist you are. I would say the 44 is so special, that is doesn't matter, working with it, is all worth while to me. I love its thicker mid range and warm smooth top end. It has an amazing sound to me. The KU4, a hair leaner and more "finished", and tucked, but still in the same exact realm of possibility to me. And I would just use some slight boost on a Pultec, or something with some color.
__________________ Adam Brass adam@dspdoctor.com DSPdoctor.com "Where High End is Still King"
__________________ "Any opinions above are worth exactly what you paid for them." Anonymous "If I find 10,000 ways something won't work, I haven't failed. I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded is another step forward. Thomas Edison RTFM |
| |
4th September 2012
|
#7 | | Gear addict
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 335
|
Ha! When I suggested trying them out, I was thinking of the time Mixwell was nice enough/silly enough to send me FOUR ribbon mic's to try - had em all for a week. Big rooms, small rooms, vocals, guitars, etc. etc. VERY helpful. Can't be done any other way...and years later, he also sold me my 44 in similar circumstances!
|
| |
4th September 2012
|
#8 | | 70% Coffee, 30% Beer
Joined: Dec 2006 Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 9,135
| Quote:
Originally Posted by jono Ha! When I suggested trying them out, I was thinking of the time Mixwell was nice enough/silly enough to send me FOUR ribbon mic's to try - had em all for a week. Big rooms, small rooms, vocals, guitars, etc. etc. VERY helpful. Can't be done any other way...and years later, he also sold me my 44 in similar circumstances! | 
Glad your digging your 44CNE Jono!
[and all that other kool stuff I am salivating over]
|
| |
19th September 2012
|
#9 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Aug 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA / Duesseldorf, Germany
Posts: 237
|
Hi Michael,
The KU4 is quite different from the R44. It's not just the differences in polar pattern or the reduced proximity effect - you're also looking at different top end characteristics. It's construction is actually more similar to an RCA 77 than a 44.
If you love the R44 on your voice, but you're concerned with the proximity effect, you could consider the AEA RPQ or RPQ500 preamps which have the built-in low frequency roll-off that was specifically designed to reduce the proximity effect. If you don't care so much about the cosmetics of our museum-quality R44C, you could get the R44CE version plus a two-channel RPQ preamp for just a little less money than a KU4!
That all being said, if the LF rumble in your room is loud enough that it is an issue at close to medium distances, it will be a tough issue with basically any microphone.
Hope this helps!
Julian Quote:
Originally Posted by mc2600 Jono,
Thanks for the reply.
I've tried the mic and I love it. It is a great fit me for (haven't found any better).
If I can find a way to tame that proximity effect in the room I have, that is absolutely my first choice. I'm hoping someone has some experience that can tell me whether it is even worth trying before I drop the coin and bring it home. :-)
If I can't make it work, I'll go to the AEA KU4. It still works for my voice. I don't love it as much (missing that amazing low end of the 44) ... but the pattern and reduced proximity effect would make it work easier in the space.
If someone has tried a 44 in a similar situation and hasn't been able to make it work b/c of the rumble being overwhelming, I'll avoid the step of buying and having to resell or return the mic (I've never returned a mic before, and I'd feel like crap making a vendor resell it as a demo --- especially since I'm biased towards smaller shops like ZenPro.)
Michael | |
| |
19th September 2012
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 503
|
do the AEA44's have the M and V switches or tbs that the old RCA's have?
|
| |
19th September 2012
|
#11 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2004 Location: seattle,wa
Posts: 528
|
I have a R44CE it is awesome! but not for every situation, but like the previous poster had suggested why not a pre with a built in high pass filter like my 5012! |
| |
19th September 2012
|
#12 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 270
|
FWIW, I use an R84 in a crappy sounding room (as in bedroom apartment crappy). In my experience, ribbons take EQ so well that I can usually - not always - overcome the impact of the figure-8 pattern. Very happy with the results on my Taylor and often my voice.
|
| |
19th September 2012
|
#13 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Aug 2007 Location: Los Angeles, CA / Duesseldorf, Germany
Posts: 237
| Quote:
Originally Posted by nnajar do the AEA44's have the M and V switches or tbs that the old RCA's have? | No, the AEA 44s do not have any voicing switches.
Julian
|
| |
20th September 2012
|
#14 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jun 2005 Location: germany
Posts: 1,730
|
I my experience, even though we´re talking low frequencies (omni radiation), this sort of low rumble of air cons CAN be minimized a bit with good placement... and the huge null of a figure 8 ribbon also can tame this sometimes.... plus as others said a good sounding low-cut will help as those mics take eq like nothing else!
...on a side note, (not saying this is your solution) IF you ever had been given this kind of recordings, a touch of multiband-expansion (using only the lowest band) can work wonders for this.
and lastly I concur with Julian: "if the LF rumble in your room is loud enough that it is an issue at close to medium distances, it will be a tough issue with basically any microphone."
He´s a damn fine engineer himself and has probably used the AEA mics more than 99% of us here, so I´d just ask him ;-))
|
| |
21st September 2012
|
#15 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Finland
Posts: 3,963
|
I think fig. of 8 can be beneficial in many situations rejecting unwanted signals, even of bad acoustics, but low frequencies are all over the place because of their wave length.
Try hpf or notch filters if the acoustics cannot be altered and remember 8 is the opposite of an omni thinking of the proximity effect
Matti
|
| | | |