Rupert Neve 5088--eight channel board - Page 4 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end

Rupert Neve 5088--eight channel board
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th September 2012   #91
Toronto Maple Leafs fan
 
jordanvoth's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: Winnipeg MB
Posts: 2,053

Send a message via MSN to jordanvoth
I think this would be a pleasure to work on. I work with rock bands so I would be submixing from the daw

1 - Kick
2 - Snare
3 - Drums L
4 - Drums R
5 - Bass
6 - GTR L
7 - GTR R
8 - Lead Vocal

possibly use a summing mixer for fx and extra nonsense.

24k isn't that bad, I'm sure it's an amazing sounding desk, I'd love one, but I do audio for fun and I'm not really a business owner. This would be a luxury sort of thing and I'd be totally content to drive a Honda and use this when I get home from my day job. What I'm really wondering is if API will ever make an 8 channel of their 1608 or if SSL will come up with a similar offering to studios looking for small format analog consoles. At 8 channels recall wouldn't be a big issue. I could definitely see myself shifting my priorities to get something like this. 24k is cheap for a console, but isn't cheap for day jobbers, for what it's worth, I get along very well with plugins, summing and hardware on the mix bus. I've never been happier with my output quality and I'm learning that the output quality is more related to the input quality from the song to instruments. So that would be another choice as to whether a 5088 would improve my work as opposed to 24k worth of different drums, guitars and amps but I could go on forever pondering this stuff. Either way, it's a brave new world. Cool stuff.
jordanvoth is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2012   #92
Lives for gear
 
AllBread's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 998

Let's face it - if the point of our careers was to make the best hourly rate with the lowest overhead then we'd all be plumbers. Not every decision that we make is going to be about the bottom line - some of it is about the tone that we can hear but no one will pay for, personal workflow preferences, and enjoying the time we spend at our jobs.

If anyone is surprised that an 8 channel RND console isn't the best value in the industry then they have all sorts of surprises coming. Here's a few eceonomic trends that seem to apply to all industries:

1. Buying used is almost always a better value than buying new. Consoles, cards, watermelons and most every other thing that you can buy looses a substantial amount of its value the second it leaves the shop. There are many used 5088s out there but the rest of the RND line (and most audio gear) can usually be had for 60-70% of new prices buying used.

2. You get better value when buying in bulk. An 8 channel console is going to cost more per channel than a 32 channel console by the same designer.

3. People who have built a serious reputation usually get to charge more for their names than those who haven't. If anyone in audio can tack on an extra 10% (or more) on name alone it's Rupert Neve.

So, yes, a brand new 8 channel console from RND - is going to cost a whole hell of a lot more than a 20 year old Soundcraft - big freaking surprise! Kind of like how the $100 bottle of doesn't get you any more drunk than a ten dollar bottle of wine - the point isn't always to get drunk, but to enjoy the process.

As far as paying off a $50k 16 channel console - if it's a quality piece of kit that you can expect to run with very low upkeep costs for the next ten years (and hopefully much more) then were talking a 5k a year tax deductible expense. I would think that most that can make even $50k a year could stomach that expense.
AllBread is offline  
3
Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2012   #93
Lives for gear
 
NEWTON IN ORBIT's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 2,340

Great post Allbread!
john

BTW: The getting drunk thing is the BEST analogy I have heard in all my life.

Why? Because getting drunk and mixing audio do have some parallels, as they both have the overall outcome of the next day.

Cheap, crap sounding gear...MAD DOG MD 20/20.

Nice smooth discrete console...a fine pure Vodka.

You end up with a headache the following day with subpar gear, as well as MD 20/20.

So to what level do you want to take it? All the way to the top to minimize these headaches, or somewhere in the middle, where the headaches are not so bad?

I'd prefer to get as close to NO hangover as possible myself.

If you know out of the box with no mods, and no d*cking around, the console will give you that if you spend the money, that is a good reason to get it.
NEWTON IN ORBIT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2012   #94
Gear Guru
 
Kenny Gioia's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,204

Send a message via AIM to Kenny Gioia
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllBread View Post
Let's face it - if the point of our careers was to make the best hourly rate with the lowest overhead then we'd all be plumbers. Not every decision that we make is going to be about the bottom line - some of it is about the tone that we can hear but no one will pay for, personal workflow preferences, and enjoying the time we spend at our jobs.
Amen.
Kenny Gioia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2012   #95
Lives for gear
 
Ward Pike's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,548

Again I ask those who have had experience with both:

Neve 5088 or Neve Genesys?

Please give me some sort of answer if you can. Many thanks.
__________________
--
Free the electrons! Use tubes/valves when possible.
Ward Pike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2012   #96
Gear Guru
 
Kenny Gioia's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,204

Send a message via AIM to Kenny Gioia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Williams View Post
It's still true, only audio "dudes" stress about audio minutia, the average person couldn't give a snot's ass. Go ask some if you don't belive me, just don't ask audio guys, but non audio people.
You've read nothing of what I've written or you've chosen to ignore it.

That's not a debate. You're just orating.

As a laymen, I don't know much about plumbing, but I choose a plumber who does.
__________________
It's a journey. Not a destination. Enjoy yours.

Kenny Gioia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2012   #97
Lives for gear
 
NEWTON IN ORBIT's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 2,340

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Williams View Post
Ask those non audio people and they might ask you, "why are all these new records so hard to listen to?"

Have fun trying to answer that.
Maybe because we are not using tape and discrete consoles that cost 100k anymore?

IC's and zeros and ones.

I truly believe this is at least part of it. I also firmly believe you can have a GREAT song, and it can still be unlistenable if the audio is cold, hard, grating, and has no feel. Or the medium / media does not convey that feel.

People can say the songwriting was better, and that is the reason music was easier to listen to in past decades. But really? For everyone on the planet?

A lot of the same guys that made records then on that old gear, are still making records now. Do they all somehow suddenly suck?

I don't think so.

I applaud manufacturers still making equipment that adheres to old design principles that we know worked. Whatever it costs.

30 years on the charts with that old discrete stuff. Pink Floyd. The Beatles.

6 months with digital summing and ICs galore.

You do the math.

It could be that there is absolutely NOBODY left on Earth that can write a good song, and perform it.

I think it is highly unlikely though.

I say go RND and API. And Aurora, and all the others. Thanks for keeping it alive.

john
NEWTON IN ORBIT is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2012   #98
Gear Guru
 
Kenny Gioia's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,204

Send a message via AIM to Kenny Gioia
Quote:
Originally Posted by NEWTON IN ORBIT View Post
Maybe because we are not using tape and discrete consoles that cost 100k anymore?
I don't think that Jim would be thinking that. Surely, non-audio people never talk about tape and discrete consoles.

The "music doesn't sound good" argument doesn't wash.

It sounds good to this generation. Maybe our friend Jim is moving on in years. People don't usually make music for men of his age. Not sure. But people still love and consume music. And thanks to piracy, it's difficult to gauge if people find it harder to listen to based on sales.
Kenny Gioia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2012   #99
Lives for gear
 
dbjp's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,075

I still don't understand the line of work Jim chose to pursue, given the fact that his stance is a complete 'ha, ha, ha' to customers of his that spent the extra bucks to make their equipment sound just that little bit better, when the modd'r himself claims nobody gives a shit what aesthetic an engineer has and what he or she tries to incorporate into any given record by chosing and using equipments of their choice.
So his ironic stance states: don't spend any money on equipments as listeners don't care. Don't pay me to mod your soundcraft/toft/etc or your mics, as listeners don't give a shit.

Well done Jim.
dbjp is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2012   #100
Lives for gear
 
drew's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Maryland,USA
Posts: 3,825

This should explain it.
drew is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th September 2012   #101
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,080

Hey GPI - congratulations on your Neve console - looks really cool..
Jack P is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2012   #102
Gear addict
 
The Vulture's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 363

Jim, you freaking hipster.
You kick pure ass in this thread!!

I just bought a cheap ramsa wr-t812.
But I consider selling it now just because you are awesome.
I know you dislike ramsa

EDIT.
But the pres sound very good on drums though..
The Vulture is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2012   #103
Lives for gear
 
Ward Pike's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,548

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Vulture View Post
Jim,SNIP I just bought a cheap ramsa wr-t812.
But I consider selling it now just because you are awesome.
I know you dislike ramsa
He doesn't dislike them, he just can't afford them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Vulture View Post
But the pres sound very good on drums though..
That's all Jim needs to hear! ROTFL
Ward Pike is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2012   #104
Lives for gear
 
dbjp's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,075

It's weird cause I have Jim's 2ch preamp, and the clarity and speed (when called for) are amazing.
Should have bought cheap ass 8ch behringer instead. Think of the money saved, and the fact listeners don't give a crap.
Jim no doubt would recommend a mod to make it sound better for some reason though.
dbjp is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2012   #105
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 140

Any Mod Jim has ever done for me has been really great and a noticeable improvement in fidelity.

That being said I just bought a 42 channel 5088
and I am really looking forward to spending the next decade mixing on it. I don't regret spending the money I spent on it.
I bought it because life is short and I want to enjoy walking into my studio and going to work. That at this point means more to me then the money.
__________________
Stephen DeAcutis
Sound Spa Productions
www.soundspa.net
sdd17 is offline  
1
Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2012   #106
Lives for gear
 
DarkSky Media's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,349

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdd17 View Post
...just bought a 42 channel 5088...
Congrats on a fantastic console!! - But is that a typo? I wasn't aware they made a 42 channel version. They're assembled in frames that support 16 (and presumably now, 8) but is there another frame or combination that supports 42 chans?

Quote:
Originally Posted by sdd17 View Post
I am really looking forward to spending the next decade mixing on it. I don't regret spending the money I spent on it.
I bought it because life is short and I want to enjoy walking into my studio and going to work. That at this point means more to me then the money.
DarkSky Media is offline  
1
Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2012   #107
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 140

Its a 32 frame fitted with 10 stereo channels on top of the 22 mono channels
Plus you have another 16 returns in the master section bringing the desk to a total of 58 inputs at mixdown.

I am currently installing a Neve Flying Fader system as well.
Thx for the thumbs Dark Sky
sdd17 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2012   #108
Lives for gear
 
Odey's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,439

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayfield View Post
I would love one of these! I have the Portico Channel strip and am nuts about it. Trying to find a price for this new offering. Anybody have any leads?

Rupert Neve Designs – Michael Cohen Installs the First Eight-Channel 5088
Oh Wow.. that looks awesome. Totally something I would be interested in. Any idea of price?
__________________
Odey's debut EP is available to buy on itunes

http://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/beg...ep/id541654661

www.soundcloud.com/odey
Odey is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2012   #109
Gear Guru
 
Kenny Gioia's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,204

Send a message via AIM to Kenny Gioia
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdd17 View Post
I just bought a 42 channel 5088
and I am really looking forward to spending the next decade mixing on it. I don't regret spending the money I spent on it.
I bought it because life is short and I want to enjoy walking into my studio and going to work. That at this point means more to me then the money.
Kenny Gioia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2012   #110
Gear maniac
 
alvagoldbook's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 222

Jim is freaking awesome.

I have a little humble home studio that I use solely to record my own stuff. I doubt I'll ever sell a record. I could care less. I just want to record my own stuff and make my own stuff sound as good as I can make it, without paying some guy by the hour, putting me in the poor house and ending up with a product that I don't like.

I have a 8 channel Soundcraft Delta SR. It was completely unused when I bought it. Only paid like $150 for it. I don't even remember. It was mint it was so new. Not a scratchy pot on it. It sounds awesome.

If I want Neve sound (which I do) then I'll just pick up a few GAP Pre73's. Oh, the horror. I can have that and not worry about being homeless or declaring bankruptcy.

Some of this stuff is obnoxious. A new Telefunken ELA M251 costs $11,000. Yes, it's an amazing mic. But it's not more amazing than a new car. Get real, people. A metal tube, a few electronic components, a mesh grill, and a capsule shouldn't cost you 11 grand. It shouldn't cost you 11 hundred bucks. Ever wondered what Telefunken's profit margin is? What's yours?
alvagoldbook is offline  
-1
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2012   #111
Lives for gear
 
John Willett's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Posts: 6,753

Quote:
Originally Posted by alvagoldbook View Post
Some of this stuff is obnoxious. A new Telefunken ELA M251 costs $11,000. Yes, it's an amazing mic. But it's not more amazing than a new car. Get real, people. A metal tube, a few electronic components, a mesh grill, and a capsule shouldn't cost you 11 grand. It shouldn't cost you 11 hundred bucks. Ever wondered what Telefunken's profit margin is? What's yours?
You forget that a car is a mass-produced product (especially a cheap car) designed to sell on quantities of tens / hundreds of thousands and every part designed to be manufactured as cheap as possible.

A top microphone is a hand-built product made to exacting standards and designed to be sold in hundreds or the low thousands.

It probably actually takes longer to build a top microphone than to build a car.

Not a fair comparison at all.

A fairer comparison is probably with a watch - and top watches cost far more than a top microphone.
__________________
John Willett
Sound-Link ProAudio Ltd.
Circle Sound Services

President - Fédération Internationale des Chasseurs de Sons

(and lots more - please look at my Profile)
John Willett is offline  
1
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2012   #112
Lives for gear
 
dbjp's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,075

Not to mention depreciation on cars.
dbjp is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2012   #113
Gear maniac
 
alvagoldbook's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 222

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Willett View Post
You forget that a car is a mass-produced product (especially a cheap car) designed to sell on quantities of tens / hundreds of thousands and every part designed to be manufactured as cheap as possible.

A top microphone is a hand-built product made to exacting standards and designed to be sold in hundreds or the low thousands.

It probably actually takes longer to build a top microphone than to build a car.

Not a fair comparison at all.

A fairer comparison is probably with a watch - and top watches cost far more than a top microphone.
Top watches cost so much because rich people are dumb enough to buy them.

C'mon, get real. A MXL V67 costs 100 bucks. No, the MXL isn't the same mic as the Telefunken. But do the raw materials cost $10,900 more? What, does Telefunken use five hundred dollar resistors? How much per hour do they pay their employees to put grill mesh into a press to shape it?

My brother is a guitar luthier. You wanna talk about built by hand, his guitars are built by hand and built to customer specs. He can build a better guitar than you'll ever get from PRS or Gibson, but he charges half as much. I guarantee you it takes less time to make a microphone. Hell, it takes 30 days for the lacquer to cure before he can even buff the guitar out. Should he be charging the same price as General Motors?
alvagoldbook is offline  
-1
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2012   #114
Gear Guru
 
Kenny Gioia's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,204

Send a message via AIM to Kenny Gioia
I can't believe what this thread has turned into.
Kenny Gioia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2012   #115
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 40

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny Gioia View Post
I can't believe what this thread has turned into.
Me too... Weird
Sm58 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2012   #116
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,080

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny Gioia View Post
I can't believe what this thread has turned into.
I can't believe what Gearslutz has turned into..
Jack P is offline  
1
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2012   #117
Lives for gear
 
dbjp's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 2,075

If T-funk could sell a proper 251 for $300 and actually turn a tiny little profit, there's not a shadow of doubt that they'd do so.
They'd sell millions. But they can't. You'd have to be pretty darn thick to think that they could.
As it is AC701 on it's own is approaching $500 a piece these days.
dbjp is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th September 2012   #118
Lives for gear
 
drew's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Maryland,USA
Posts: 3,825

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack P View Post
I can't believe what Gearslutz has turned into..
Ok, let's go one further. I can't believe what Audio Engineering has turned into!!

I'm not that jaded...........yet.
__________________
.......................
Drew Mazurek
.......................
drew is offline  
1
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2012   #119
GPl
Lives for gear
 
GPl's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,615

GPl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th September 2012   #120
Gear Guru
 
Sounds Great's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 15,704

Simple fix:

Future posts to this thread should be limited to experience/opinions about the Neve 5088 and comparisons to other high end consoles.

The merits of such a console versus something cheap or other methods for recording should be left for discussions about such things, which this thread isn't (or at least wasn't intended to be).
__________________
-Rob

There'll be war, there'll be peace.
But everything one day will cease.
All the iron turned to rust;
All the proud men turned to dust.
Sounds Great is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Neve v55 Broadcast Console?Anyone? AlphaDingo Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 8 18th January 2012 05:29 AM
Neve 8816 for remote mixing AllThingsAudio Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 2 24th January 2008 05:20 PM
Neve Broadcast console locosoundman Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 4 22nd September 2007 11:01 AM
Discovered! New 24 channel, 6u rack mixer for £300 lampmeister Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 24 19th June 2007 05:34 AM
Looking for some guidance on a 24 Channel board... topslakr So much gear, so little time! 8 22nd December 2006 03:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:51 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.