Is it High End? Calrec Compressor. Lovely.. - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end

Is it High End? Calrec Compressor. Lovely..
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th July 2012   #1
Lives for gear
 
Agzilla's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 820

Thread Starter
Is it High End? Calrec Compressor. Lovely..

Tried this in so much gear section... So little response? Like i was talking another language???? LIke talking Standing sine waves at an iPod silent disco..

Surely sounds lovely.. Calrec RQD 6400

Is it high end? I don't know.. Being broadcast based it sure is quality..

Just got this old Calrec RQD 6400 compressor / limiter and i'm loving it.. Dual stereo/quad! Can be used as two separate stereo compressors or as two single mono, or one stereo and one more.. Versatile!

Sounds really nice too.. Can be transparent or rough..

I'm going for 1 stereo transparent on the bus.. Second stereo compressor on the drum bus!

Lovely, just had to share my audio hapiness with the world..

If you see one for sale... But it! Or let me know.. I'll have another in the blink of an eye..

Anyone else using on of these here? I did find a few posts by Larry B when i did the SEARCH function... before some muppet repeats the mantra to me... but i just wondered if anyone else had a taste for Calrec stuff....?


Peace.


Zzilla
__________________


COMING STRAIGHT OUTTA CONTEXT!
__________________


COMING STRAIGHT OUTTA CONTEXT!
Agzilla is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 3,236
My Recordings/Credits

Send a message via AIM to Steffmo
Everything Calrec is high end.
Steffmo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
jmikeperkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,134

There are a number of Calrec consoles and Calrec outboard being sold by the BBC in an acution this month. The BBC closed their office in the Bush House building in London and they are moving. Most of the auction is for furniture but if you keep looking you will see the Calrec boards, piles and piles of EV RE-20 mics, a few Neumanns, some BBC ribbon mics and other items for sale. I get you they will go pretty cheap. If I had a good way to move it to Texas, I would bid on one of those Calrec boards.
jmikeperkins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2012   #4
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: London Town
Posts: 264

This will make you cry:

Three 20+ stereo channel calrec broadcast boards - Full of stereo EQ and dynamics modules - went for no more than £2300 each!!

I didn't bother bidding as I thought they would go for nearer £10k...imagine my pain when I saw the final prices when I checked in after work :(

At least I snagged an RQD comp and RQQ EQ though - but for almost the same cost, unfortunately!!!
Disco Cubist is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2012   #5
Moderator
 
Reptil's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: in a low orbit
Posts: 21,334

:'-|
Reptil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,353

Quote:
Originally Posted by Disco Cubist View Post
This will make you cry:

Three 20+ stereo channel calrec broadcast boards - Full of stereo EQ and dynamics modules - went for no more than £2300 each!!

I didn't bother bidding as I thought they would go for nearer £10k...imagine my pain when I saw the final prices when I checked in after work :(

At least I snagged an RQD comp and RQQ EQ though - but for almost the same cost, unfortunately!!!
That was the BBC Radio Worldwide Service - Auction, great Equipment, though you had to bid, then pay VAT+ then get that 20 Channel Neve/Calrec Console out of the BBC Worldwide Radio Service HQ within 24 Hours or it would be JuNkEd!Though by the time I got to the Auction - The Calrec Console were Listed at a Certain Price (Or Reserve) then as no one bought the reserve was dropped. I saw a 80 Channel Calrec with Eq/Dyn/Auto/Matrix/Encoders/ the whole Meatloaf and Sauce go for around 3,200 Pounds GBP........HUGE SIGH!...............!

(My understanding was Calrec were brought in to build R. Neve's Console designs part by part, and then more by BBC engineers so that channel by channel Calrec's & Neves were interchangeable to the BBC's Specifications and some Spec's were +8dbm with 40 Stereo Channels and PPM VU/Bargraph's etc..!) This was all because Mr. R Neve couldn't build his consoles quickly enough! Many people wonder where the AMS comes from in AMS-Neve or more so - Advanced Music Systems whom then sold Calrec Gear so after R.Neve left Siemans (I think this is right) I guess Neve was a natural Fit thus AMS-Neve! (Someone told me that in a roundabout way - might be crap!) I'm sure someone will politely correct me if I'm wrong! more so when it comes to Neve gear! Got a Feeling their was another company with AMS before Neve?
TheLastByte is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 580

Unbelievable auction. I am so envious of the lucky people who bought one of those lovely desks.
waldie wave is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #8
Lives for gear
 
vincentvangogo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,110

I once bought a 24 channel Calrec desk, minus frame for £135.
vincentvangogo is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 5,668

Hi
The 'waffle' about Calrec, AMS and Neve is essentially incorrect.
Neve, Calrec and Audix built desks for the BBC using their own individual 'circuitry' to produce a range of desks with FUNCTIONAL similarity in the late '70's / early 80's. The modules are in no way elecronically 'interchangeable'. The operating engineers would however be able to sit at any desk and 'know' how to drive them as the functions and positions of controls were 'the same'.
Part of the reasoning was that as individual companies any could theoretically go 'bust' which would leave the BBC 'stuck'. I worked for Audix testing some of these, then moved to Calrec doing some of their 'alternatives'. There were 4 'marks' and 4 sub versions (A-D) giving I suppose 16 'permutations' although not all were defined. Some had modules for telephone contribution (live radio) and some were essentially for music.
At one time Calrec and AMS 'merged'.
Later, AMS (with Calrec) were bought by Siemens who at that time also owned Neve.
Calrec then 'demerged' and the remainder became AMS-Neve. There has been more 'to and fro'ing' with the 'owners' of the various companies since.
Matt S
__________________
Matt S
www.mseaudio.co.uk
Matt Syson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #10
Lives for gear
 
vincentvangogo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,110

Any thoughts on the Audix MXT1100, Matt?
vincentvangogo is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #11
Lives for gear
 
Silvertone's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Saratoga Springs, NY
Posts: 2,432

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Syson View Post
Hi
The 'waffle' about Calrec, AMS and Neve is essentially incorrect.
Neve, Calrec and Audix built desks for the BBC using their own individual 'circuitry' to produce a range of desks with FUNCTIONAL similarity in the late '70's / early 80's. The modules are in no way elecronically 'interchangeable'. The operating engineers would however be able to sit at any desk and 'know' how to drive them as the functions and positions of controls were 'the same'.
Part of the reasoning was that as individual companies any could theoretically go 'bust' which would leave the BBC 'stuck'. I worked for Audix testing some of these, then moved to Calrec doing some of their 'alternatives'. There were 4 'marks' and 4 sub versions (A-D) giving I suppose 16 'permutations' although not all were defined. Some had modules for telephone contribution (live radio) and some were essentially for music.
At one time Calrec and AMS 'merged'.
Later, AMS (with Calrec) were bought by Siemens who at that time also owned Neve.
Calrec then 'demerged' and the remainder became AMS-Neve. There has been more 'to and fro'ing' with the 'owners' of the various companies since.
Matt S
Hi Matt, I believe that Rupert (Neve) told me years ago that the "specs" were designated by the BBC and that is why the Neve, Audix and Calrec modules were so similar in sound. Have you heard this before? I suppose I could write Rupert and find out as I think it was back around 1992 that we were talking about this.
__________________
Larry DeVivo
Silvertone Mastering, Inc.
518-581-8141
www.silvertonemastering.com

To see some of our work visit the visual trailer montages located at... http://robertetoll.com/ (all music and sound effects were mastered by Silvertone Mastering).

To see what makes Silvertone a bit unique please take a tour at... http://www.youtube.com/user/silvertonemastering

The Ultimate DI test with Mr. Tony Levin: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-U93h8T7EU&feature=plcp
Silvertone is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 5,668

Hi Larry
The desks in question had been in production for a few years before I started working on them but yes the BBC had laid down the specs for how it should perform, S/N crosstalk, freq response, LF FILTERING, headroom and so on. The 3 manufacturers were left to decide HOW to achieve it. As op amps weren't really available at a sensible price and quality at the start of this proceedings inductor based EQ was most 'practical' hence their use. Later versions of the different modules did move on to the 5534 (the Philips original thich was a TDA??? IIRC).
They all had to have transformer in and out. Audix and Neve used Marinair's which was a company local to both of them. Calrec had gone with Sowters but there were several transformer types used.
MXT1100 ?? I know of the MXT1000 and 1200 but have no recollection of 1100.
Matt S
Matt Syson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Weeks Ago   #13
Lives for gear
 
vincentvangogo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3,110

I'll try to dig out the paperwork, but I think that's the model number. It's a 10:4 desk with just bass, middle and treble sliders for the eq.

EDIT. I've now checked and it's actually an MXT1000 mk3. Not sure where I got the 1100 from.
__________________
'If it looks cool, it is cool.'
vincentvangogo is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #14
Lives for gear
 
Geoff_T's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Tujunga
Posts: 4,015

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastByte View Post
That was the BBC Radio Worldwide Service - Auction, great Equipment, though you had to bid, then pay VAT+ then get that 20 Channel Neve/Calrec Console out of the BBC Worldwide Radio Service HQ within 24 Hours or it would be JuNkEd! as Calrec's and Neve's can be almost interchangeable! Though by the time I got to the Auction - The Calrec Console were Listed at a Certain Price (Or Reserve) then as no one bought the reserve was dropped. I saw a 80 Channel Calrec with Eq/Dyn/Auto/Matrix/Encoders/ the whole Meatloaf and Sauce go for around 3,200 Pounds GBP........HUGE SIGH!...............!

(My understanding was Calrec were brought in to build R. Neve's Console designs part by part, and then more by BBC engineers so that channel by channel Calrec's & Neves were interchangeable to the BBC's Specifications and some Spec's were +8dbm with 40 Stereo Channels and PPM VU/Bargraph's etc..!) This was all because Mr. R Neve couldn't build his consoles quickly enough! Many people wonder where the AMS comes from in AMS-Neve or more so - Advanced Music Systems whom then sold Calrec Gear so after R.Neve left Siemans (I think this is right) I guess Neve was a natural Fit thus AMS-Neve! (Someone told me that in a roundabout way - might be crap!) I'm sure someone will politely correct me if I'm wrong! more so when it comes to Neve gear! Got a Feeling their was another company with AMS before Neve?
Hi

You history is way twisted... Rupert Neve sold the company to Bonochord (later called ESE) in 1973 and was retained as a consultant until he left completely in 1975 - informed not to make equivalent products for another 10 years. He came back briefly to design the AIR consoles with Geoff Watts.

Neve Electronics International was taken over by Siemens in 1985 (ten years later) and disbanded by same in 1992 when they were combined with AMS.

So that's over 17 years after Rupert left the company and Rupert Neve had nothing to do with Siemens.

As for Calrec building Neve designs that's a new one on me and I was there at the time. For a while Neve were considering taking over Ted Fletcher's Alice Stancoil console company and having them build broadcast consoles and Neve music consoles, but it was never sorted out and the notion died before birth.

Posted from my iPhone
__________________
Geoff Tanner
Aurora Audio International

See us on Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/auroraaudio
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/may1...off-tanner.htm
http://www.auroraaudio.net/
http://www.amazon.com/Window-Past-Ge...8737082&sr=1-9
http://www.grandmasterrecorders.com

For quicker responses, please use my email (Geoff at auroraaudio.net) in preference to pm's and visitor messages!
Geoff_T is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #15
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 5,668

Hi
My narrative is not 'twisted' but only relates to the period of late '70's and early 80's and to the GP series of desks for the BBC.
The use of the term 'Neve' was taken as generic of the trading name of the company that built these particular desks (printed on the faceplates), the presence or absence of Mr Rupert Neve was not part of the discussion.
The 3 companies used different circuit designs. Neve and Audix used a single 24 Volt DC rail whereas Calrec used plus and minus 24 Volts.
Neve outputs typically used 'class A' with their particular transformer whereas Audix used an alternative 'push pull' type output with transformers that have a 1:2 step up.
Several of the design staff migrated between Audix and Neve at around that time and it is inevitable that there would be some similarity.
Matt S
Matt Syson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #16
Lives for gear
 
Geoff_T's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Tujunga
Posts: 4,015

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Syson View Post
Hi
My narrative is not 'twisted' but only relates to the period of late '70's and early 80's and to the GP series of desks for the BBC.
The use of the term 'Neve' was taken as generic of the trading name of the company that built these particular desks (printed on the faceplates), the presence or absence of Mr Rupert Neve was not part of the discussion.
The 3 companies used different circuit designs. Neve and Audix used a single 24 Volt DC rail whereas Calrec used plus and minus 24 Volts.
Neve outputs typically used 'class A' with their particular transformer whereas Audix used an alternative 'push pull' type output with transformers that have a 1:2 step up.
Several of the design staff migrated between Audix and Neve at around that time and it is inevitable that there would be some similarity.
Matt S
Hi Matt

My apologies... it was not you making the statement I corrected. I was reading the thread on my iphone and mistook your posts for thelastbytes...

Oops and sorry again.

Anyway, your last bit, at one time or another David Rees, Mike Stapleton, Robin Ireland and myself, all ex Neve engineers, worked at Audix. It was an odd company and had a locked room with a large digitally controlled analogue console that was built for the BBC and rejected lurking inside. I believe that when Tannoy took them over there were later ramifications with the value Audix had applied to their purchase price/worth...

I was long gone by then...

Geoff_T is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #17
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 5,668

Hi Geoff
Mike Stapleton was 'in charge' of me for my duration in the 'projects' department.
I spent some time working on minor aspects of the digitally controlled analogue desk, making up bits of circuitry and testing them. I had a 'cunning wheeze' idea for the massive crosspoint matrixes they wanted but I moved on to Calrec before they hit the PCB layout stage so no idea if it worked in practice. Another EX Neve character was Keith Armstrong, now a major 'light' in the EMC compatability world. Audix were using 2 or 5 percent resistors for much of their gear and Keith came up with a requirement for 0.1 percent matched 'thick film' resistors for balanced mix busing.
Best
Matt
Matt Syson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #18
Lives for gear
 
Geoff_T's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Tujunga
Posts: 4,015

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Syson View Post
Hi Geoff
Mike Stapleton was 'in charge' of me for my duration in the 'projects' department.
I spent some time working on minor aspects of the digitally controlled analogue desk, making up bits of circuitry and testing them. I had a 'cunning wheeze' idea for the massive crosspoint matrixes they wanted but I moved on to Calrec before they hit the PCB layout stage so no idea if it worked in practice. Another EX Neve character was Keith Armstrong, now a major 'light' in the EMC compatability world. Audix were using 2 or 5 percent resistors for much of their gear and Keith came up with a requirement for 0.1 percent matched 'thick film' resistors for balanced mix busing.
Best
Matt
Hi Matt

Yes, I forgot Keith Armstrong but did not have much contact with him at Neve... I recall Audix's broad tolerance resistors also. Keith got the idea for the very close tolerance resistors from Neve and you will find them around the differential input stages of the later consoles... single in line very accurate resistor packs.

Mike, good ol' boy that he is, was nicknamed "Ollie" by the wiremen at Neve. When I was at Audix his "office" was a cupboard under the stairs.

Memories....

Geoff_T is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #19
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,353

To Quote Myself!

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastByte View Post
I'm sure someone will politely correct me if I'm wrong! more so when it comes to Neve gear!
Thank you Gentlemen for the corrections listed much appreciated!
TheLastByte is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #20
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 5,668

Hi
You are welcome.
There are advantages in advanced age, or so I am told!
Matt S
Matt Syson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3 Weeks Ago   #21
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,353

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Syson View Post
Hi
You are welcome.
There are advantages in advanced age, or so I am told!
Matt S
Indeed that's true!
As well as advantages in learned knowledge!
Never such a stupid question as the question never asked or learned from!

Thanks to both you & Geoff for the corrections!
The Auction was a crying shame though! All that gear going for Pennies on the Pound!
Cheers
TLB.
TheLastByte is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sonalksis Comp is a good one Bang Mastering forum 16 29th June 2008 10:09 PM
WHICH 2-CHANNEL HIGH END CONVERTERS FOR ITB R&B, HIPHOP AND POP PRODUCTION Marrone Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 28 17th April 2007 08:45 AM
About the low end of corner bass traps Ydope Low End Theory 34 9th March 2007 10:22 PM
EQ with Selectable High Pass? Lunatic Low End Theory 9 21st February 2007 06:05 AM
Using Logics "Sample Editor" to splice up audio. (Why crack and pop at end?) B@SSLINE Music Computers 8 4th February 2007 09:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:38 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.