Login / Register
 
Manley Cardioid vs. Manley Gold
New Reply
Subscribe
Jay Lee
Thread Starter
#1
23rd May 2006
Old 23rd May 2006
  #1
Gear addict
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 319

Thread Starter
Jay Lee is offline
Manley Cardioid vs. Manley Gold

I need an awsome vocal mic and kinda already decided to go with the gold one, but it's not very clear to me what kind of difference is there between the cardioid one and gold one. Okay, so the cardioid is fixed in that mode, and is said to resemble more like some of the classic mics like U47 or C12...and the gold one should have wider response and it should be very "clear" sounding...

I'm going to need the mic for recording vocals and acoustic guitars in R&B, pop and ballads style...

Now I need that close, clear, wide response sound...but what throws me off, is that I've been on almost every studio/production company website skimming through their gear list...and almost no one has the Manley Gold...some have the cardioid one...
Like Aside Productions who have recorded Celine Dion and such people have the cardioid one. And then there's that Backstreet boys and Britney have used the cardioid one...I just want an awsome vocal mic.
And though C12, U47, Elam 251 are probably the greatest mics...those are quite much pricier than than the Manleys...and though VM1 KHE is the most awsomest mic (lol I use the awsome a lot) that's just a dream with it's I think 9000$ price tag (I think Usher is said to be using one).

Now what do you people who have actually heard these both...what's the difference sonically? Oh and if someone knows some mainstream songs that are recorded with either of the Manleys...could you tell the songs so I can check 'em out.
#2
23rd May 2006
Old 23rd May 2006
  #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 564

Blenn is offline
Honestly - you have got to try the Soundelux E251C. This is fixed cardiod but it's a great fooking mic. It has two tones via it's switch.

Paul
#3
23rd May 2006
Old 23rd May 2006
  #3
Lives for gear
 
jomo1234's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,376

Send a message via AIM to jomo1234 Send a message via Yahoo to jomo1234
jomo1234 is offline
The Manley Reference and Reference Gold are truly great mics, but like everything you really need to hear the mic, especially at the price point you are talking about. The only difference between the standard and the gold version is that the gold version has variable polar patterns and the diaphragm is 3 mil as opposed to 6 mil thick. The Gold version has incredible detail and transient response. The standard has a slightly less immediate 'you are there' sound, but is still a world class performer. Both mics will do the job beautifully.

At this price point, you really need to hear as many mic as possible. There are lots of options out there to choose from.
#4
23rd May 2006
Old 23rd May 2006
  #4
Lives for gear
 
indie's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: C-ville area VA
Posts: 1,618

indie is offline
The reference (Black) is WAAAYY too bright for my taste. It sounds brighter than the gold to me. The Gold is a really great microphone...but bright too.
__________________
rock on,
Micah
http://www.micahmixer.com
#5
24th May 2006
Old 24th May 2006
  #5
Lives for gear
 
jomo1234's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,376

Send a message via AIM to jomo1234 Send a message via Yahoo to jomo1234
jomo1234 is offline
Interesting. I never found the Reference to be overly bright. Were you using an early model w/a 6072 or a current one w/ a 12AX7WA?





Quote:
Originally Posted by indie
The reference (Black) is WAAAYY too bright for my taste. It sounds brighter than the gold to me. The Gold is a really great microphone...but bright too.
#6
24th May 2006
Old 24th May 2006
  #6
Lives for gear
 
thermos's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 4,463

thermos is offline
My dad owns 2 of the Reference Gold ones. I was looking into a vocal mic a while ago and really enjoyed his Gold mic on my voice. He had demoed the cardioid only and didn't think it was in the same league as the Gold mic at all, not voiced as well.
I got a Pearlman, because I'm a little broker than he is and can't afford the Reference gold, and I'm really happy with my choice. It doesn't sound anything like the Manley, but still nice.
#7
24th May 2006
Old 24th May 2006
  #7
Lives for gear
 
indie's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: C-ville area VA
Posts: 1,618

indie is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by jomo1234
Interesting. I never found the Reference to be overly bright. Were you using an early model w/a 6072 or a current one w/ a 12AX7WA?

This was about 6 years ago...not sure about the tube.
#8
24th May 2006
Old 24th May 2006
  #8
Lives for gear
 
midnightsun's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 1,430

midnightsun is offline
Manley Gold

I have had one for years and really like it. If you have decided on the Manley I would definately vote for the multi-pattern model. I use the figure 8 and well as omni fairly regularly. Multi-pattern give you for real versatility, not just something to fiddle with or tweak. The Manley ain't cheap but I think it is well worth the money. It is a tool that I have gotten used to and would buy another in a minute if I lost mine. There are many other great mics out there, you have mentioned them.

My own bias on equipment purchases-- use your ears and then cast your dollar vote for the person or company that you believe in. Manley Labs is one off the companies that I have been happily doing business with for years. For the occasional problem I have had I would rate them A+++++++ on customer service.
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
musician2004 / Gearslutz Secondhand Gear Classifieds
0
musician2004 / Gearslutz Secondhand Gear Classifieds
0
lucey / Gearslutz Secondhand Gear Classifieds
0

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.