![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2006 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 224
Thread Starter | Best/Cleanest way to split source signal
What is the best way to split a source signal to feed 2 different tracking systems? I want to be able to A/B a vocal track going to tape and to PT but want to keep the signal path as pristine as possible... I wasn't sure if a simple passive split would be the best route or not. cheers. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,075
|
If the impedance of the two loads are high enough in relation to the output of your preamp/compressor/channel strip, a Y-cable should be fine. Otherwise a transformer or active splitter box might be necessary. My guess is that if the load impedance is = or higher than the sum of the two source impedances, you should be fine.
__________________ My carbon footprint is bigger than yours. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear nut Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Tucson Az
Posts: 133
|
IIMO If the source impedance is low enough (it usually is) and the input impedance of each input is high enough (it usually is too), a simple mult is the quietest way to split a signal. Isolation transformers and trans-impedance amplifiers are useful when this is not the case or when the reference sensitivity of the two inputs is dramatically different.
__________________ Gearslut/Toolslut=Not needing half of what you have and not having half of what you want. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Mar 2006 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 224
Thread Starter |
cool... thanks.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2006 Location: Ipswich, UK
Posts: 957
| 600 ohm Splitter's. Ipswich, Suffolk.
The best ones on this planet were and are made just down the road from here at Sowter his transformers are the best in the world his only competitor was UL in the states. Give him a ring as its his firm that still makes them to the quality that old Rupert from Cambridge asked for when he gave him a bell. Regards.•:*¨¨*:•. ¸¸.•´¯`•.Mark Fairfax-Harwood, Engineer Springvale Studios PS At 196 sample rate his trasformers will please a passing bat. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HOW TO SPLIT A SIGNAL EFFECTIVELY? | cerla | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 26th August 2006 03:39 PM |
| Best way to split a guitar signal? | Rufuss Sewell | So much gear, so little time! | 22 | 30th June 2006 04:03 PM |
| How do you safely split a balanced signal? | dangeorge6 | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 15th October 2005 08:59 AM |
| Best Way to Split Guitar Signal? | neve1073 | So much gear, so little time! | 23 | 11th February 2005 12:00 AM |
| how do i split the signal between pre and converter? | julian moore | So much gear, so little time! | 9 | 13th September 2004 03:18 AM |
| |