Prism Orpheus vs HD Omni/Native card

[Co615]

BUMP

[smoovemode]

ok, I dug up some info. The Orpheus really seems to kick ass when it comes to I/O. If I understood the specs correctly the Orpheus is 18x18 while the HD Omni is 8x8. That's a huge difference.

[psycho_monkey]

Orpheus isn't PT HD compatible.

Omni requires a PT HD Native, HDX or 2nd hand TDM card to work.

[Yellowbears]

I have an hd omni interface for sale, if anybody is interested

[smoovemode]

Hit me with the price in pm?

[Yellowbears]

Just sent you an email!-)

[once a roadie]

Orpheus has not let me down but I don't work in protools. PS the Orpheus headphone outs also have one d/a shared between them. This means you get another stereo out you can use to drive monitors!


Posted via the Gearslutz iPhone app

[Yellowbears]

For anybody who is interested in buying the Omni HD

http://www.gearslutz.com/board/gears...3-hd-omni.html

[smoovemode]

Other than Track count, what other advantages would PTHD have over PT10? I do not think I will ever record more than 32 audio tracks...EVER!

[Doc Mixwell]

Input monitoring / Disk Caching / 256 track capability [versus 96 with PT10 native] / 64 I/O on HD Interfaces [versus 32 I/O on Core Audio-ASIO with PT10 native] / Bullet Proof Rock Solid, low latency connection to the chosen HD Interface / VCA grouping / Surround Panning / Sync HD capable / The ability to open the HD licence on a laptop with a 3rd party interface / etc, etc, etc, etc, etc

[smoovemode]

What would I miss out on the most if my needs were not extensive (32 io is plenty, 96 total tracks is double what I need, don't know what input monitoring is, lol)