moving from Low to Med-Hi End - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


moving from Low to Med-Hi End

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th August 2011   #1
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 39

Thread Starter
moving from Low to Med-Hi End

Set up is a changin.... Just got a lunchbox with a Great River MP500NV Pre in it. Looking to load it up with some others maybe 2 API512c.

Anyway running ProTools MP 8.03 on a Quad Core 2x2.66ghz MacPro with 16GB or ram and 1066 MHz.

I am using a profire 2626 with it and as i am adding good pre's i think i have to replace it. What should i get? I record rock and jam/psych oriented music. Mics are Shure SM7, SM57, SM 87a beta, Senn e609, Royer R121, C414xlII, and Sterling Audio ST77

Thanks
1960strat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2011   #2
member no 666
 
Fletcher's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 10,108

Pretty tough to go wrong with a pair of 512c's... they're classics for a reason.

Peace
__________________

CN Fletcher

Professional Affiliations:

R/E/P Professional Recording Engineer and Producer forums - serious hobbyists welcome

SoundPure.com


mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33
We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid

Roscoe Ambel once said:
Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light
Fletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2011   #3
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 64

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletcher View Post
Pretty tough to go wrong with a pair of 512c's... they're classics for a reason.

Peace
+1.
WhiteLieMusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2011   #4
Gear Guru
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 11,287

I've used the profire, I know it's sound, you can get things done with them but compared to something that's neutral or euphonic, its converters verge on what I'd call painfully bad.

Imho you'd be way better off using clean, boring preamps and upgrading your conversion than you'd be buying fat, colored preamps and using those converters. Or, get an A2D and use it for all critical tracks, use profire conversion for anything beyond mics 1 & 2.

Whenever upgrading your chain, always assess the weakest link and target that first. People here debate whether conversion is more or less important than preamps, I'm of the camp that if one is more detrimental to the sound than the other, that's where you put your investment dollars.


Gregory Scott - ubk
__________________

Tapey Compressor | Silky Air EQ | Vibey Plugin Squeezebox...

......

Kush Audio: High End Just Got Higher

____________________
u b k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th August 2011   #5
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 117

Quote:
Originally Posted by u b k View Post
Its converters verge on what I'd call painfully bad.

Imho you'd be way better off using clean, boring preamps and upgrading your conversion than you'd be buying fat, colored preamps and using those converters.

Whenever upgrading your chain, always assess the weakest link and target that first. People here debate whether conversion is more or less important than preamps, I'm of the camp that if one is more detrimental to the sound than the other, that's where you put your investment dollars.


Gregory Scott - ubk


I completely second everything he says. I've been a profire owner for a few years and I recently invested in a Lynx Aurora 16/Dangerous D-Box set up. The Profire is a good prosumer unit that will get you by but it can only do so much and be priced that low. Ditch the profire and invest in a higher quality interface.

Some of the differences I immediately heard with the new set up was a greater extension of high and low fequencies, better separaton of instruments (the profire really colors the audio and just makes things blurry), and a reduction in the units noise floor. The profire gets hissy when you turn it up.


The best analogy that I can make for conversion is that the profire is like watching tv on just regular tv...it looks alright but there's nothing special about it. Better conversion is like watching tv in HD. The image is a lot clearer.
spitfire52mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011   #6
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 39

Thread Starter
I have been looking at the aurora 8. Question? why go with a combo or the aurora and the D box? how do you have that set up configured?


Quote:
Originally Posted by spitfire52mm View Post
I completely second everything he says. I've been a profire owner for a few years and I recently invested in a Lynx Aurora 16/Dangerous D-Box set up. The Profire is a good prosumer unit that will get you by but it can only do so much and be priced that low. Ditch the profire and invest in a higher quality interface.

Some of the differences I immediately heard with the new set up was a greater extension of high and low fequencies, better separaton of instruments (the profire really colors the audio and just makes things blurry), and a reduction in the units noise floor. The profire gets hissy when you turn it up.


The best analogy that I can make for conversion is that the profire is like watching tv on just regular tv...it looks alright but there's nothing special about it. Better conversion is like watching tv in HD. The image is a lot clearer.
1960strat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011   #7
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 39

Thread Starter
I am going to upgrade both. Very good advice on the weakest link.


Quote:
Originally Posted by u b k View Post
I've used the profire, I know it's sound, you can get things done with them but compared to something that's neutral or euphonic, its converters verge on what I'd call painfully bad.

Imho you'd be way better off using clean, boring preamps and upgrading your conversion than you'd be buying fat, colored preamps and using those converters. Or, get an A2D and use it for all critical tracks, use profire conversion for anything beyond mics 1 & 2.

Whenever upgrading your chain, always assess the weakest link and target that first. People here debate whether conversion is more or less important than preamps, I'm of the camp that if one is more detrimental to the sound than the other, that's where you put your investment dollars.


Gregory Scott - ubk
1960strat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011   #8
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 117

The reason that I went with both is because I love the features of the D-Box as a monitor controller (2 LOUD headphone outs, 1 ULTRA sensitive integrated talk-back mic, the ability to audition quite a few sources)...

With that being said, I also chose the D-Box because I wanted to transition to out of the box summing. Granted, 8 channels isn't much...and actually the way I have it hooked up, I only get 6 channels of outboard summing. It's still much much better than mixing ITB with Protools plus I get to use my outboard eqs, comps, de-esser, etc.

Summing is a whole other can of worms. If you're looking for quality converters then the Lynx would be a great start.


Keep this in mind:

1. If you buy stand alone converters then you're going to have to buy 8 stand alone pres (assuming that you're tracking drums)
2. You're going to have some sort of monitor controller. There are a host of options to look at. I chose the D-Box because it best fit my needs. Had I not needed some of those options, I probably would have purchased the Gain Train by UBK. Talk to Greg and he'll give you the details on it.
3. The Lynx runs HOT. Leave space for ventilation in your rack.
spitfire52mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th August 2011   #9
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 117

Also,

If you're going to upgrade then go big or go home. Don't upgrade to a box that's just slightly better than the Profire...you'll be kicking yourself down the road when you have to buy again. Probably the best alternative converters are the ones made by SSL. It's around the same price as the Lynx but you get 24 channels. I believe that they are called Alphalink.

Oh... also, if you go Lynx, I'd suggest looking into the AES card. It's a very very fast and stable upgrade from firewire.
spitfire52mm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2011   #10
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 39

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by spitfire52mm View Post
Also,

If you're going to upgrade then go big or go home. Don't upgrade to a box that's just slightly better than the Profire...you'll be kicking yourself down the road when you have to buy again. Probably the best alternative converters are the ones made by SSL. It's around the same price as the Lynx but you get 24 channels. I believe that they are called Alphalink.

Oh... also, if you go Lynx, I'd suggest looking into the AES card. It's a very very fast and stable upgrade from firewire.
I will have to look at that. I decided on Appogee Ensemble. (if i win the fleabay auction that is.
1960strat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th August 2011   #11
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 39

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletcher View Post
Pretty tough to go wrong with a pair of 512c's... they're classics for a reason.

Peace
Ended up with a GR MO500NV, an MA5,and an API 512c.... Probably going to get another API for stereo.
1960strat is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.