API Opamp test - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


API Opamp test

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th July 2011   #1
Gear addict
 
andrew montreal's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 363

Thread Starter
API Opamp test

Hi there all once again,

So I just did a test with some new gear and I'd like to share it with you. I replaced the opamps on two of the channels of my API 3124 with Liebers SL-2520's.

For the test I multi-tracked a four-part harmony vocal line. Each part was recorded simultaneously with two identical mics (my Heyne-modded u87's) glued to each other around a foot from my mouth. To avoid any issue of potential differences in the two mics, I purposefully switched them after the first two passes so that whatever difference in tone they may impart will be equal on both recordings. I tried to set it up so that what you are hearing are the exact same performances with only the opamps being different.

Within Logic, I normalized all clips so that any slight variation in level would be compensated for. I then brought the tracks down around 12dB's and panned them. On the master output, I used the Ozone plugin to EQ slightly and limit.

The first half of the recording is version one, the second half is version two. I put them in the same clip so that you don't have to click any buttons between the two versions. The difference is subtle but it's there.

I'm not particularly interested in guessing games, though if that interests you please do so. I'm more curious about how you feel about the two versions.

Thanks.

Andrew
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 Vocal test.mp3 (1.21 MB, 122 views)
andrew montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2011   #2
Lives for gear
 
NathanEldred's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: West Coast Central Florida
Posts: 7,242

Send a message via AIM to NathanEldred
I'm guessing version 1 ends around 15 sec? The difference is definitely subtle, almost so subtle that I'm wondering if I'm fooling myself in hearing any small difference (admitedly just HD280s through laptop). But v2 might be a bit more compressed sounding and maybe slightly rounder, but we're talking 3% here. v1 sounds maybe more detailed and resonant, which is maybe more impressive for a single track, but I think v2 will fit in a mix with other instruments better. Again, maybe they are both the same and there is no difference(!!).
__________________
Nathan Eldred
Visit Atlas Pro Audio
NathanEldred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2011   #3
Lives for gear
 
Tubthumper's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Beardsville
Posts: 815

I find it hard to judge unless I can do a direct A/B, but I'm feeling like version 2 might be a little crispier up top. Both sounds more than usable though.
__________________
Viral marketeers: reveal yourselves.
Tubthumper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2011   #4
Gear Guru
 
AllAboutTone's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: S.Carolina
Posts: 11,471

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tubthumper View Post
I find it hard to judge unless I can do a direct A/B, but I'm feeling like version 2 might be a little crispier up top. Both sounds more than usable though.
I don't like vocals ran through a 2500, hard for me to judge.
AllAboutTone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2011   #5
Gear nut
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Location: berlin
Posts: 130

first part sounds smoother in the upper mids to me.

if the sl-2520 is similar to the gar2520 (which i have), then i'd say first part is sl-2520.

thanks for the shootout!
__________________

zodiaque is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2011   #6
Lives for gear
 
dysenterygary's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Central, IL
Posts: 1,102

I like the second half the best. A little cleaner sounding, and maybe a little more bass? I definitely like it better than the first half though.
dysenterygary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2011   #7
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12

The first one 15 second were the best for my ears.. I agree with someone up top that maybe the 2nd set might fit better in a mix.. but the first past was more musical on it own. !!
v.D.o is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2011   #8
Lives for gear
 
skybluerental's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Posts: 1,259

the 2nd version sounds better to me and i am guessing that one is the SL Red Dots.
skybluerental is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2011   #9
Lives for gear
 
cheu78's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 1,248

The difference with different opamps are subtle, there's but it's really subtle..

If you change the api input and the output xformers with some cinemags you'll get more audible results..especially in the low end (IMO way better and bigger)..
btw that is not an inexpensive mod.. they will cost you around 50$ each..
But always IMO is what api should put in their preamps instead of the cheaper alternatives..

Personally I'll be glad to pay 100$ more per channel (even if a big company could get way better prices than you buying 2 xformers, so you'll probably end up paying 70-80$ more per channel) but having the quality Api was known for.

If all this is worthed it's up to you.. (for me it is).




just my 0.02$,

Ciao

Cheu
__________________

www.masterdaelion.com
A new, breaktrough way of reading your music scores.


"If you want to be given everything, give everything up"

www.qtrio.ch

www.studio21.ch

Quote:
We're only as good as the musicians we keep; the same goes for the musicians. - Remoteness
cheu78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2011   #10
Lives for gear
 
superwack's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 1,409

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew montreal View Post
On the master output, I used the Ozone plugin to EQ slightly and limit.
Hey Andrew, really appreciate the test not sure which one I prefer.

I can't understand why you would put Ozone on it (?!?!) the difference between same-family opamps is going to be really, really subtle and will involve slight frequency response shifts/transient compression, etc. any EQ or (especially) limiting completely clouds the results.

Any chance you could re-post without ANYTHING on the mix?
superwack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2011   #11
Gear addict
 
andrew montreal's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 363

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheu78 View Post
The difference with different opamps are subtle, there's but it's really subtle..

If you change the api input and the output xformers with some cinemags you'll get more audible results..especially in the low end (IMO way better and bigger)..
Is it a complex process to replace the transformers on a 3124?
andrew montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2011   #12
Gear maniac
 
API Sez...'s Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 157

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheu78 View Post
The difference with different opamps are subtle, there's but it's really subtle..

If you change the api input and the output xformers with some cinemags you'll get more audible results..especially in the low end (IMO way better and bigger)..
btw that is not an inexpensive mod.. they will cost you around 50$ each..
But always IMO is what api should put in their preamps instead of the cheaper alternatives..

Personally I'll be glad to pay 100$ more per channel (even if a big company could get way better prices than you buying 2 xformers, so you'll probably end up paying 70-80$ more per channel) but having the quality Api was known for.

If all this is worthed it's up to you.. (for me it is).




just my 0.02$,

Ciao

Cheu
Don't know where you are getting your information - we haven't seen you in the production/assembly area at API. How do you know API is using cheaper alternatives?

We spend a tremendous amount of time and energy keeping the heritage and tradition of this company as current and accurate as possible. And that includes transformers.

We'll raise your 0.02$
__________________
API
8301 Patuxent Range Rd
Jessup, MD. 20794
301-776-7879
"Let's Be Discrete"
API Sez... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2011   #13
Gear maniac
 
rob61's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 218

Since I use Liebers SL-2520's in some of my stuff, I'm going to guess the second half is the Liebers SL-2520's. The second half has more upper end clarity. That can be good or bad, but there is a bit more hype in the high end on the second half.
rob61 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2011   #14
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,006

V2 sounds a little louder/more compressed. Both sound good, perhaps a slight preference towards V1.
johnnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2011   #15
Lives for gear
 
cheu78's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 1,248

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew montreal View Post
Is it a complex process to replace the transformers on a 3124?
I changed xformers in the 512.. (it should be the same in the 3124)
It's not rocket science but you need to know what you're doing.. As everything else..

Ciao
Cheu
cheu78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #16
Lives for gear
 
Eganmedia's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Location: Burlington, Vermont USA
Posts: 942

Quote:
Originally Posted by superwack View Post
Hey Andrew, really appreciate the test not sure which one I prefer.

I can't understand why you would put Ozone on it (?!?!) the difference between same-family opamps is going to be really, really subtle and will involve slight frequency response shifts/transient compression, etc. any EQ or (especially) limiting completely clouds the results.

Any chance you could re-post without ANYTHING on the mix?
Maybe Ozone plugs do a lot of damage to a signal. I dunno. I do remember a time though when GS members had a field day with audiophile's reports of needing to make sure outlet sockets were equally tight in order to compare the difference in sound between two different high-end IEC power cables. This demand smacks of that. I've had difficulty in finding people who could reliably pick which good mic preamplifier was which in a blind test. Swapping out a clone op amp in the same well designed circuit can only make that more difficult. If any EQ or compression on a naked vocal track nullifies the difference, is the difference really worth considering? I can only imagine the difference between two performances would be greater than what the opamps could show. The difference between two singers would be much greater. The effect of a full mix would almost certainly mask any difference completely.

I get the academic component. I just don't get the religious component. Is there really a situation imaginable where someone would listen to two identically mastered identical mixes of the same song and think, "Geez, I really should have used the other op amp in the preamplifier on that harmony vocal track!"?

I gotta go polish my Shakti Stones.


Posted via the Gearslutz iPhone app
__________________
Joe Egan
EMP
Colchester, VT USA
www.eganmedia.com


"I feel more like I did when I first got here than I do now."
Eganmedia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #17
Lives for gear
 
superwack's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 1,409

Way to overreact! No one is "demanding" anything from anyone - it was a simple request from someone who appreciated the topic and the effort of the OP.

If you don't care or you can't hear the difference between preamps or it doesn't matter to you then don't play along... Honestly it's like going on a high-end cooking site and telling people who's passion is cooking they are wasting their lives trying different kinds of salt when, after all, they will all be "salty" to one degree or another!
superwack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #18
Gear addict
 
abechap024's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Spring City, UT
Posts: 438

I like these kind of tests, maybe it wouldnt pass ULs team for scientific integrity, but hey we record music and that is pretty far from a laboratory most the time. Give us a good idea of the different sounds. 2 definitely has some more harmonics going on. I like.
__________________
AC Sound - CLX-VU and PYE (PI-3141) Compressors, Discrete DIP8 upgrade opamps and more!
abechap024 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #19
Gear addict
 
andrew montreal's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 363

Thread Starter
As was requsted, here are the same tracks without any effects whatsoever. And by the way, just for the record these are the EXACT same performances in both cases.
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 Stock Opamp.mp3 (647.9 KB, 73 views)
File Type: mp3 SL 2520 Opamp.mp3 (650.5 KB, 70 views)
andrew montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #20
Gear addict
 
andrew montreal's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 363

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eganmedia View Post
I get the academic component. I just don't get the religious component. Is there really a situation imaginable where someone would listen to two identically mastered identical mixes of the same song and think, "Geez, I really should have used the other op amp in the preamplifier on that harmony vocal track!"?
Hey there bro,

I totally get where you're coming from. Of course the differences aren't night and day and so in reality it isn't a drastic issue that will make or break a recording. You make the conclusion you want about what you hear. I hear a difference and I'm glad I did the test. Did I learn something? Yes. Do I prefer the Liebers opamps? Yes. Is the difference one that will make we want to change the other opamps on my other two channels? No, there are other things I'd rather do at this point in time.

It's all education, my friend. En passant, the shakti stone comment was hilarious. Thanks for that one.
andrew montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #21
PC Moderator
 
George Necola's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: Winterthur, Switzerland
Posts: 7,974

Send a message via Skype™ to George Necola
No. But why would you do that? The API sound is good. If you dont like it, buy the 999 alternative preamps.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Gearslutz.com App
__________________
Quote:
"recording engineers don't die, they are dragged into the grave by the shear weight of their balls."
Malcolm Chisholm
---------------------------------------------
www.georgenecola.com produce & mix it
shop.georgenecola.com
gear & fun
blog.georgenecola.com reviews & gear
soundcloud.com

twitter
George Necola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #22
Gear addict
 
andrew montreal's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 363

Thread Starter
FOR THOSE WHO ARE INTERESTED:

In the first posting, the first version was the stock opamps, the second version was the SL-2520's.
andrew montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #23
Gear addict
 
andrew montreal's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 363

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by George Necola View Post
No. But why would you do that? The API sound is good. If you dont like it, buy the 999 alternative preamps.
I am looking at ways of improving elements in the preamps that I have which bother me. The way this mod was described seemed to do what I was looking for without having to spend another $1000+ per channel. I hope that explains it.
andrew montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #24
Lives for gear
 
dysenterygary's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Central, IL
Posts: 1,102

On your second set of clips I think the differences are larger, and I still prefer the second one the best. Thanks for posting!
dysenterygary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #25
Gear nut
 
farhadkd's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 92

Send a message via Skype™ to farhadkd
Quote:
Originally Posted by API Sez... View Post
Don't know where you are getting your information - we haven't seen you in the production/assembly area at API. How do you know API is using cheaper alternatives?

We spend a tremendous amount of time and energy keeping the heritage and tradition of this company as current and accurate as possible. And that includes transformers.

We'll raise your 0.02$
WELL SAID!!
farhadkd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #26
Lives for gear
 
NEWTON IN ORBIT's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: East Coast USA
Posts: 2,095

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew montreal View Post
FOR THOSE WHO ARE INTERESTED:

In the first posting, the first version was the stock opamps, the second version was the SL-2520's.
Wow, thanks for doing this
john
NEWTON IN ORBIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #27
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,006

Without the effects I still hear the same differences. Still subtle, and still a slight preference for V1.

Andrew, any plans to try any different opamps? The Gar perhaps?
johnnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2011   #28
Gear addict
 
andrew montreal's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 363

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyc View Post
Without the effects I still hear the same differences. Still subtle, and still a slight preference for V1.

Andrew, any plans to try any different opamps? The Gar perhaps?
If someone is willing to send me a couple I'll do the test. Right now, in terms of investment I'm looking at tube pres.
andrew montreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2011   #29
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 924

Good examples. I picked v2 right away. It is a really good sample of how I feel Red Dots are so much more musical. Imagine if you had twice as many tracks, how much more lush and full those would sound. Then what it would sound like if you had the larger track count of current pop productions. What some call subtle starts to become very easy to hear if not already in these sample.

Andrew thanks for doing this. It helped me remember why I switched out all my op amps.
__________________
Dan Deurloo

Credits
Some of the music I have been part of.

Risen Drums
Custom drum company I co-own. I wont pimp our drums here unless you ask.
dandeurloo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2011   #30
Gear addict
 
abechap024's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Spring City, UT
Posts: 438

I wouldn't be surprised it the input transistor pair/other components in the SL's aren't matched as closely as the API leading to more of the 2nd harmonic distortion that makes the SLs sound "louder" and more juicey.

Not trying to say this was an accident. Just saying it is probably done intentionally.

I prefer the SLs. But would I want that juicy color on everything?? Yea probably!
abechap024 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.