Fairchild 670, Ear 660 or ADL 670? which are the best? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


Fairchild 670, Ear 660 or ADL 670? which are the best?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th June 2011   #1
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 87

Thread Starter
Fairchild 670, Ear 660 or ADL 670? which are the best?

Fairchild 670, 2x Ear 660 or ADL 670? which ones are the best?
walth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2011   #2
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 87

Thread Starter
anyone?
walth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2011   #3
Lives for gear
 
RCM - Ronan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,414

I have not been able to test all these, but you might want to put the Analogue Tube AT-101 into the running.
__________________
Ronan Chris Murphy+ http://ronansrecordingshow.com

Six Day Recording Boot Camps in Los Angeles
July 16-21, 2012


RCM - Ronan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2011   #4
Lives for gear
 
bassjam's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,682

And this!

Tube Equipment Corporation
bassjam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2011   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,462

if that is your options it will certainly be the real 670...what else?
salomonander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2011   #6
Gear Head
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Location: London, UK
Posts: 62

I know 1 Fairchild 670 exceptionally well, and have used a couple of EAR 660's.

Honestly... They both sound phenomenal, but different.
The Fairchild (which I use daily) is as transparent as you like, and compresses in a way that is just magic..
After it's been on a few days it's even better.. It's breathtaking.

The EAR's (to my ears) colour the sound slightly more, and are slightly squashier on GR.

I think I prefer the EAR on some vocals and bass than I do the Fairchild.

I have never used a Fairchild 660.. So I can't compare.

Certainly a pair of EAR's is considerably cheaper than a good Fairchild 670 in top condition.. Also much easier to maintain.

I'd be happy with either.
CatFace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2011   #7
Lives for gear
 
Space Station's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: Chichester UK
Posts: 3,022

The ear660's are outrageously good..I have one but would love a pair..

Im having a Drip 670 built, to custom specs with NOS parts, by someone else(I dont have the time) and it's still coming out at fraction of the cost of the boutique clones out there...cant wait to get it.
Space Station is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2011   #8
Lives for gear
 
Marcocet's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,252

They're all fantastic, and at the price of any of them you'd be a fool not to give a listen and make the decision yourself.

Personally I have and love my ADL, but I certainly wouldn't throw the others out of bed, you know?
__________________
-marc alan goodman

Check out the new website:
StrangeWeather
Brooklyn.com
Marcocet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2011   #9
Lives for gear
 
Dirty Halo's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Hollyweird
Posts: 7,624

For those who are purely interested in the sound and not the "idea," you owe it to yourselves to check out the Anamod 670

-andrews
Dirty Halo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2012   #10
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Location: bk
Posts: 669

Quote:
Originally Posted by Space Station View Post
The ear660's are outrageously good..I have one but would love a pair..

Im having a Drip 670 built, to custom specs with NOS parts, by someone else(I dont have the time) and it's still coming out at fraction of the cost of the boutique clones out there...cant wait to get it.
space station, did you ever get the Drip?
latestflavor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 607

The EAR 660 is the go to compressor for Lead Vocals! The Fairchild 670 works great on Acoustic Guitars or Vocals. I have never tried the ADL. Also for a slightly darker sound I like the Mercury 66's!
__________________
6/2/4 Productions L.L.C.

www.richarddimmette.com

704-345-5169 (Cell)

704-900-8582 (Studio)
SIXTWOFOUR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #12
Lives for gear
 
RoundBadge's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 8,853

I had a pair of Ear 660's..kinda finicky to set up in stereo..super touchy knobs!
semi one trick pony's but yes, sound reeeally nice!
Vocals n' bass ? yes sir.
snare drum?try it.=special.
I found they kinda softened the outer L/R edges of a mix when applied to the stereo buss but added a beautiful rich classy thick yet Hi Fi - kinda audio equivalent of a technicolor cinematic thing to all things stereo..
yet somehow managed to leave the bass freq's intact,sounding big n tight.
1 maybe 2 db's tops and your good.

killer on limit mode for drum buss=HUGE..actually could really give your 2254's a run for the money.
damn,now I'm really wishing I still had them .
RoundBadge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #13
member no 666
 
Fletcher's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 10,108

Having tried all of the above... there still isn't anything like a well set up 670... it really is special. The bitch is getting one really well set up, and then keeping it that way. Its kinda like having a Ferrari... know in advance that an oil change is going to run you several thousand dollars as they have to pull the engine to change the oil. Same thing with a 670... know that every 4-5000 hours you're going to have to change the 6386 tubes... and that a matched set of 8 is going to run you at least a couple thousand dollars. If you have the $35k to get into one, then I suppose the couple thousand every year or so isn't going to be that much of a struggle... but if it could be a struggle, stay away.

We have an ADL 670 at the SP studio... I'd have to say its a very acceptable - close second to an original. Really excellent sounding box that does indeed add the "bwoosh" [can't think of any other way to describe it] thing that the original adds.

The EAR's are also lovely... but in many ways they're more "audiophile" than the original or the ADL. That's not necessarily a bad thing, and to many its a very good thing... but if you're looking for that "bwoosh" thing the EAR's seem to have less of it than the ADL or an original.

This is my perception... as always, YMMV.

Peace
__________________

CN Fletcher

Professional Affiliations:

R/E/P Professional Recording Engineer and Producer forums - serious hobbyists welcome

SoundPure.com


mwagener wrote on Sat, 11 September 2004 14:33
We are selling emotions, there are no emotions in a grid

Roscoe Ambel once said:
Pro-Tools is to audio what fluorescent is to light
Fletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #14
Gear addict
 
BillSimpkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 317

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletcher View Post
Having tried all of the above... there still isn't anything like a well set up 670... it really is special. The bitch is getting one really well set up, and then keeping it that way. Its kinda like having a Ferrari... know in advance that an oil change is going to run you several thousand dollars as they have to pull the engine to change the oil. Same thing with a 670... know that every 4-5000 hours you're going to have to change the 6386 tubes... and that a matched set of 8 is going to run you at least a couple thousand dollars. If you have the $35k to get into one, then I suppose the couple thousand every year or so isn't going to be that much of a struggle... but if it could be a struggle, stay away.

We have an ADL 670 at the SP studio... I'd have to say its a very acceptable - close second to an original. Really excellent sounding box that does indeed add the "bwoosh" [can't think of any other way to describe it] thing that the original adds.

The EAR's are also lovely... but in many ways they're more "audiophile" than the original or the ADL. That's not necessarily a bad thing, and to many its a very good thing... but if you're looking for that "bwoosh" thing the EAR's seem to have less of it than the ADL or an original.

This is my perception... as always, YMMV.

Peace
I am partial to analog gear, but have you tried the 670 plugins (Waves, Bomb Factory, UA)? How do they compare to your hardware units? Color? "bwoosh"?
BillSimpkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #15
Lives for gear
 
baskervils's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1,162

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillSimpkins View Post
I am partial to analog gear, but have you tried the 670 plugins (Waves, Bomb Factory, UA)? How do they compare to your hardware units? Color? "bwoosh"?
This is what I always tell myself about plugs:

It's like comparing a real tube amp to a tube amp plugin.

That said, I've never had a $50k Fairchild.... but can the plugs possibly come close, can they?

What I need is a replicator, like in Star Trek. I'd need a vintage replicator, and not a reissue.
baskervils is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #16
Gear addict
 
BillSimpkins's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 317

Quote:
Originally Posted by baskervils View Post
This is what I always tell myself about plugs:

It's like comparing a real tube amp to a tube amp plugin.

What I need is a replicator, like in Star Trek. I'd need a vintage replicator, and not a reissue.
I have plug-in versions of many pieces of hardware I own and yes, they are very different from the hardware. I had a specific question for Fletcher regarding his hardware and the plugins. Your philosophy on the subject is irrelevant here, but a replicator would be nice, especially for a vintage 670.
BillSimpkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #17
Lives for gear
 
Johnkenn's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,163

I just played around with an Anamod 660 last week. I immediately ordered one. Really fantastic.
__________________
"Reports of my death are greatly exaggerated..."


*All opinions expressed herein are subject to change at listener's whim and/or ability to pay...


http://www.reverbnation.com/c./a4/21...34/Artist/link
Johnkenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #18
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 172

SR71.
bushwick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #19
Lives for gear
 
baskervils's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1,162

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillSimpkins View Post
I have plug-in versions of many pieces of hardware I own and yes, they are very different from the hardware. I had a specific question for Fletcher regarding his hardware and the plugins. Your philosophy on the subject is irrelevant here, but a replicator would be nice, especially for a vintage 670.
No snarkiness intended. I can't compare these to the old ones, but the Fairchild compressor that I liked the best was the old OS9 Bomb Factory one, because it was like a distortion pedal. Technically, most people would call it junk. You could drive the hell out of it and it sounded overdriven and ridiculous.

I have the UA one. Ummmm, well, it doesn't sound like a big, weird, colorful tube compressor to me. Not even close. It's sometimes useful, though. They could have named it Skippy The Troll and stuck a psychedelic graphic plate on the front and I guarantee not a single person would have said "Geez, this really sounds like a Fairchild!!!!"
baskervils is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #20
Lives for gear
 
Marcocet's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,252

Quote:
Originally Posted by baskervils View Post
They could have named it Skippy The Troll and stuck a psychedelic graphic plate on the front and I guarantee not a single person would have said "Geez, this really sounds like a Fairchild!!!!"
Amazing. That's how I feel about every plug in compressor I've tried. I can understand from a sales perspective why they try to corollate them with cool pieces of hardware, but look the other way and they sound absolutely nothing alike. Not that they're unusable, they're extremely powerful tools on their own, they're just not hardware.
Marcocet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #21
Lives for gear
 
baskervils's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 1,162

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcocet View Post
Amazing. That's how I feel about every plug in compressor I've tried. I can understand from a sales perspective why they try to corollate them with cool pieces of hardware, but look the other way and they sound absolutely nothing alike. Not that they're unusable, they're extremely powerful tools on their own, they're just not hardware.
In a way, I suppose it would be better to make plugs something entirely unique, which companies like Sound Toys do, but you are absolutely right. If you call it Fairchild, it will probably sell very well, or at least be more sell-able than Skippy the Compressor!
baskervils is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th January 2012   #22
Lives for gear
 
RoundBadge's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 8,853

I use the puigchild sometimes to smooth/level things out a bit,but the "fairchild" sound?
RoundBadge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2012   #23
member no 666
 
Fletcher's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 10,108

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillSimpkins View Post
I am partial to analog gear, but have you tried the 670 plugins (Waves, Bomb Factory, UA)? How do they compare to your hardware units? Color? "bwoosh"?
There's a color... kind of a brown one... "bwoosh", not so far in this lifetime.

The plugins I've heard have nice graphics... I think the UAD one I used had the nicest graphics... but sonically? Its kinda like spanking the monkey while looking at animated porn featuring something that looks a lot like Gisele Bundchen as opposed to actually having your way with Mrs. Brady.

Best analogy I could come up with at the moment... you asked, I answered. I don't know what you were expecting... but this is the best I've got.

Peace
Fletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2012   #24
Lives for gear
 
bigbone's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: Montreal Qc
Posts: 1,631

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoundBadge View Post
I use the puigchild sometimes to smooth/level things out a bit,but the "fairchild" sound?
Do you mean the PuiGchild WAVES plugins ?
bigbone is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2012   #25
Lives for gear
 
RoundBadge's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles ,Ca.
Posts: 8,853

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbone View Post
Do you mean the PuiGchild WAVES plugins ?
yes
RoundBadge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2012   #26
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Stavenisse
Posts: 1,481

Send a message via ICQ to muziekschuur
What was the price of a Fairchild new? And in what year(s) was it made?
__________________
I use BAGEND SPEAKERS. you should hear em too.

http://www.myspace.com/a-muze#!/556701704
muziekschuur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2012   #27
Gear Guru
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 11,331

Quote:
Originally Posted by baskervils View Post
I have the UA one. Ummmm, well, it doesn't sound like a big, weird, colorful tube compressor to me. Not even close. It's sometimes useful, though. They could have named it Skippy The Troll and stuck a psychedelic graphic plate on the front and I guarantee not a single person would have said "Geez, this really sounds like a Fairchild!!!!"
They couldn't do that because I own the trademark for Skippy the Troll on psychedelic graphic front panels. You'll be hearing from my lawyer for mentioning it without getting a release.

Weren't there some before/after samples in a previous original 670 vs. Anamod shootout a good while back?
__________________
Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO Charmed Quark Systems, Ltd
www.charmedquark.com

Be a control freak!
Dean Roddey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2012   #28
Gear Guru
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 11,331

Quote:
Originally Posted by muziekschuur View Post
What was the price of a Fairchild new? And in what year(s) was it made?
Whatever it is, assuming mid-60s to mid-70s, the actual price in today's dollars will be about 4 to 7 times that much, so you have to adjust to make it realistic. Still, it would have been a good invesment to pick up a bunch back in the 80s, even with inflation.
Dean Roddey is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2012   #29
Lives for gear
 
uncle muscles's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 505

Quote:
Originally Posted by baskervils View Post
No snarkiness intended. I can't compare these to the old ones, but the Fairchild compressor that I liked the best was the old OS9 Bomb Factory one, because it was like a distortion pedal. Technically, most people would call it junk. You could drive the hell out of it and it sounded overdriven and ridiculous.

I have the UA one. Ummmm, well, it doesn't sound like a big, weird, colorful tube compressor to me. Not even close. It's sometimes useful, though. They could have named it Skippy The Troll and stuck a psychedelic graphic plate on the front and I guarantee not a single person would have said "Geez, this really sounds like a Fairchild!!!!"
Absolutely right! The old BF one is my favorite too exactly for that reason
uncle muscles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th January 2012   #30
member no 666
 
Fletcher's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 10,108

Quote:
Originally Posted by muziekschuur View Post
What was the price of a Fairchild new? And in what year(s) was it made?
From what I've been told by people who were around at the time [I wasn't born yet] the 670 was made from '58 until the mid 60's. They went for around the upper $800 range at the time... about the same price as a decent "family" car.
Fletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Patchbays...which are the best? studiogear High end 30 23rd January 2012 11:57 AM
which are the best 12ax7 Tubes? SCDBM High end 9 28th January 2011 10:52 PM
ADAM S3XH, ATC SMC25A, K+H or Barefoot - which are the best musicsound-2 High end 25 16th April 2010 11:45 AM
What are the best Plugins for Fairchild 670? paco de colonia Music computers 75 18th February 2010 01:51 PM
which are the best mastering houses for hiphop carloff Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 13 22nd December 2005 11:09 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:41 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.