Waves SSL vs SSL FX 384 - The Test - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


Waves SSL vs SSL FX 384 - The Test

View Poll Results: Which audio file do you like better?
I prefer Test1 76 44.71%
I prefer Test2 71 41.76%
What are you talking?? They are both the same! 23 13.53%
Voters: 170. You may not vote on this poll

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th February 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
theother's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,089

Thread Starter
Waves SSL vs SSL FX 384 - The Test

Ok, here's the deal:

One audio file was sent to the SSL FX G384 compressor (serial number below 200 = a good one) via Apogee DA-16X and AD-16X.

The other just through the Apogee DA-16X and AD-16X (in and outs cross-patched) and then through the Waves SSL stereo compressor.

All converters clocked by BigBen. 44.1kHz/24bit.

UV22HR 16 bit has been used after the processing on the final files to reduce the download to 16 bit.

I tried to match both compressors as close as possible so I got the best phase cancellation when phase-reversing one file.

Even with the same settings it was obvious that the compression on both units is slightly different, no matter how hard I tried. (You can import both files and phase reverse one to hear the difference yourself)

The settings I used were:

Ratio 4, Attack 10ms, release 0.3, the gain reduction hitting 4db.

Again, I tried to match the gain reduction and level so I got the best phase cancellation.

Now tell us what you think.

Which file is what?
Attached Files
File Type: wav SSL Waves Test1.wav (5.72 MB, 3194 views)
File Type: wav SSL Waves Test2.wav (5.72 MB, 3316 views)
theother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #2
Gear Head
 
ohad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 74

#1

i liked no# 1 better
2 sounded more digital
more boxed is it the wave?
ohad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #3
Gear nut
 
johndough's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 128

Ya I got to go with #1 too. Great test theother!
johndough is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
SiliconAudioLab's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 972

#1 has more anomolies and vibe factor. Sounds like the analog one to me.
SiliconAudioLab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: mexico
Posts: 4,959

1st of all, thanks for doing this.

listening on a laptop. boy are they close! seems to me there's more happening on the 2nd one though. a little more grab (pumping), and maybe a little less high end... as though the threshold were at a lower setting, but the sound is very similar to me.

i have an FX384 but i still haven't gotten my authorizations for the bundle, and i leave town tomorrow so thanks again for posting!

if you find it in your heart to do the same thing @96hKz and also including the file with nothing on it, i'd seriously appreciate it. or just tell us what differences you hear if any @96!

thanks bro.

in order to tell which i like 'better' i'd have to hear a file with no comp on it.

(edit) ok just heard it again, i like #2 better, but without hearing the original it's hard to tell what the comp is really doing.
raal is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,008

I think they are the same!
cap217 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #7
Gear maniac
 
Dom & Roland's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 275

No. 1 is the analog one i reckon....Snap is way smoother and pushes instruments through the mix in a much more musical and groovy way
Dom & Roland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
Ruudman's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 3,086

The first take has a more obvious compressed sound ...

I pefered none of them, not that that helps in any way....


ruudman
__________________
Working Class Hero



Visit this website of Noma Children Hospital Sokoto
Ruudman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #9
Gear addict
 
mplancke's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Detroit/Windsor area
Posts: 366

Send a message via MSN to mplancke
I like the second one, more open sounding. Both seem to have the same compression characteristics.
__________________
SharktankPro.com
mplancke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #10
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 225

I like 1 the best....
BorrelNote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 640

here we go again lol!

besides the slight touch of brightness on cymbals/hh's on #2 they both sound the same. both r too close to call.

whatever the results. waves nailed this SSL bundle
jlotto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #12
Lives for gear
 
theother's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,089

Thread Starter
Just a little tip...

...listen to the punch/grap on the snare drum.

I just did a little blind test myself. Didn't have the time to do it earlier....

Loading both wav into a session and switching solo on both tracks.

Both files are not even in the same country for me. I could hear every time immediately what is what.

Within 2-3 seconds I knew which one is the hardware.

Mind you I got really used to the hardware over the years.

I'm usually not too anal about these things and it happens more than not that I can't hear a difference when people test things.
I'm not an engineer. I'm a musician, yet I can tell you that I like one version and the other not all in this little test.

Funny how we all hear things differently!

Do yourself a favour....Don't read all the other posts until you make the test. Don't give your mind the chance to hear things that are not there. And we all do sometimes!


Great feedback! Keep it coming boys! (and girls?)
theother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #13
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: mexico
Posts: 4,959

Quote:
Originally Posted by theother
Just a little tip...

...listen to the punch/grap on the snare drum.
yeah, IMHO grab wise it's #2 but which is the PLUG!!!!?????

ok... heard again... now that you mentioned the snare thing... just kill me, i don't know anymore.
raal is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #14
no ssl yet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Not a huge difference

Number 2 sounds more open while 1 sounds more compressed.

Cant say I truly like either of them
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #15
Lives for gear
 
John The Cut's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 841

Send a message via MSN to John The Cut
I like 2 the best but not sure why - something maybe in the pump of the bass.

They are very close though - virtually the same on my computer speakers. SO the only concrete conclusion I have come to is that the investment in a real SSL is not worth it
__________________
"NUKEM! Get them before they get you.]
John The Cut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #16
Gear nut
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: European Union
Posts: 80

Well, overall I like No.1 better, it´s got more punch, more bass, whereas the slightly more highs on No.2´s hihats are also nice.

I think No.2 is the digital one...?!
el-folie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #17
Gear maniac
 
Dom & Roland's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 275

just listened again (through my laptop speakers) after reading everybodys posts....i still think 1 is the real deal 2 is the plug....1 sounds better anyway.....so which one is it....its so exciting lol
Dom & Roland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #18
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 515

im going to have to say 1 is the hardware 2 is the plug!? which is which???
JHOOKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #19
Gear nut
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: European Union
Posts: 80

Listened again and must say there´s something on the snare in 2 I don´t like, somehow muffeled right after the attack, not as lively as 1. But in the end very slight difference between 1 and 2 apart from noticeably more highs in 2.
el-folie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #20
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: mexico
Posts: 4,959

someone should do this and post the same file twice. bet the poll results would be very similar.
raal is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #21
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 490

On my laptop speakers they sound very similiar......whatever the verdict in the end they are indeed close.... 1st on I'm leaning towards being the FX and the #2 plugin...
AnalogBob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #22
jdg
Lives for gear
 
jdg's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Location: seattle, WA
Posts: 2,540

i liked the snare on #1 better.
jdg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #23
Lives for gear
 
thermos's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 3,654

1 is hardware.

Both sound good.
thermos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #24
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: mexico
Posts: 4,959

what kills me is i can barely hear a difference and the other says it's night and day!...listening on a laptop but in other threads i've been able to hear differences easily.

the more i listen the less i can dstinguish the two... aaaaAAAAAAAARRRGHHH!!!!!
can't take it. i'm outta here.
raal is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #25
Gear maniac
 
Dom & Roland's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: London UK
Posts: 275

I just looked at the poll and i'm speechless....to my ears no2 screams digital....please put us out of our misery...
Dom & Roland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #26
Lives for gear
 
beyarecords's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Location: Virginia Water, Surrey, England
Posts: 558

Send a message via AIM to beyarecords Send a message via Skype™ to beyarecords
I voted for No. 2 and I reckon that it is the plugin...

Would be very interesting to know the answer mind!!!

Beya
__________________
Know Thyself
beyarecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #27
Lives for gear
 
T_R_S's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: Canuk
Posts: 5,278

#1 is analog # 2 in the plug-in
I like how digital sounds So I pick #2
But with that said they a very close.
I do notice the attack and release sound different on them.
They are not 'exactly' the same.
__________________
FB Page

==========

Surplus Sale
T_R_S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #28
Lives for gear
 
theother's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,089

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by raal
what kills me is i can barely hear a difference and the other says it's night and day!...listening on a laptop but in other threads i've been able to hear differences easily.

the more i listen the less i can dstinguish the two... aaaaAAAAAAAARRRGHHH!!!!!
can't take it. i'm outta here.
Hehe... happens to all of us.....

I've always been an SSL guy from the word go. So maybe I hear things that not everyone hears. This is what I like about this thread. Only because I hear it doesn't mean anyone else does...
theother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #29
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 224

So.....

WHICH ONE IS WHICH?!?!?!?

derker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2006   #30
Lives for gear
 
theother's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,089

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by derker
So.....

WHICH ONE IS WHICH?!?!?!?

Go to sleep and give the Americans a chance to catch up....

You will know soon enough!
theother is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Waves SSL and Duende SSL: both from the same company?! Farshad So much gear, so little time! 40 26th December 2011 01:29 AM
Waves SSl vs SSL Duende VS Focusrite LM Jay Lee Music computers 57 11th January 2010 03:14 AM
CHRIS LORD-ALGE’S SSL SETTINGS NOW AVAILABLE AS PART OF WAVES’ SSL BUNDLE The Press Desk at Gearslutz.com Product Alerts older than 2 months 25 13th April 2008 12:32 PM
Waves SSL vs SSL FX G384 vs URS 1980 - The advanced Test theother High end 237 5th December 2006 08:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:31 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.