![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Slovenia
Posts: 515
Thread Starter | Studio monitors vertical VS horizontal
Is there any benefit in having monitors vertical VS horizontal or vice versa? Purusha |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac |
Hello Purusha: I posted this the other day, in reply to another post... A typical 2-way loudspeaker, that has a tweeter over mid/woofer, when in the vertical position has symmetrical frequency response in the horizontal plane and slightly asymmetrical response in the vertical plane. Meaning that if you move off axis vertically (standing or sitting), the response is slightly different in either direction. All 2-way speakers that have this configuration suffer from this (some are worse than others). It is typically more desirable to have the horizontal response be symmetrical, so it is typically best to leave speakers with this type of design in the vertical configuration. Another issue when laying a speaker on its side is that you will typically have more boundary interference which may adversely affect the frequency response of the speaker system (especially the HF). I hope that helps... Cheers!
__________________ Pascal Sijen Director, Product Management, Cinema Solutions @ Dolby Labs | Former Co-Founder Blue Sky Int. & Audio Design Labs Inc. | I'm also a geek in my spare time. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Moderator emeritus Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,152
|
What Pascal said makes sense. and it also makes sense to place the speakers in the position that they were designed for, but I must say that I've used my BM15's both vertically and horizontally (In both cases, with the tweeters to the outside). And they worked just fine.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Slovenia
Posts: 515
Thread Starter |
Thanks. I have my Genelecs 1031A and NS10 both horizontaly placed on top of each other, because of the specially designed place where the monitors stand. NS10 are designed to be in horizontal position but the Genelecs came from the shop in vertical position. I am not so happy with my Genelecs this very moment, maybe it is also because of the horizontal position. Purusha |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Oct 2005 Location: germany
Posts: 195
|
hi i used to have my genelec 1031 in vertical position and liked them... then i moved them and used them horizontal and had problems all over sudden... so with the 1031 i can second this experience! my ns10´s and my auratone t6´s are horizontal without problems. maybe because they are in an immediate nearfield position this way, and stand together more closely anyways...
__________________ _______________________________________ "...work through a room's gear — I'd sit there with the gear for hours. I think that helped me become a mixer, and to be able to come up with things that were creative and new." -maserati thumbsup _______________________________________ http://www.myspace.com/sashliq |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2004 Location: MO USA
Posts: 2,153
|
Horizontal placement doesn't work very well, in my experience, unless the speakers are designed for that. If you place "vertical designed" speakers on their side, as you move your head horizontally you will be crossing through the separate lobes from the tweeter and woofer, and the perceived tone can change -- sometimes dramatically, depending on the speaker design. It's called comb filtering, and many speaker manufacturers caution against this placement. If you look at 2-way home theater center channel speakers that are designed for on-side orientation, you'll see that the tweeter is often shifted off-center from the woofer to minimize these effects. You can of course easily try this yourself, it's usually easy to hear as you turn your head. I find I don't like to be so restricted in movement when mixing; I prefer to listen from several different positions. But if you don't mind staying in one place, it can work. For 2-drive vertical designs, the null of minimum phase difference is usually midway between the tweeter and woofer. I try to set that height at ear level. If the monitor stands or desk are too tall to allow this, I far prefer to just turn the speaker upside down, with the tweeter at the bottom. As long as it's clear of the stand base or mixer panel, so you don't get too much reflection from those, this placement can work very well. Here's a snip from Tannoy to show the sound wave interference: [img]******//sunsetwind.com/pics/Tannoy_Monitor_4.jpg[/img] Steve |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2002 Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,084
|
As Pascal said earlier, dispersion is key to answering the question. 90% of speakers have different horiz and vert dispersion. Since studio applications require side to side movement and little up and down movement, most studio speakers are engineered for wider dispersion in the horiz plane and limited dispersion in the vertical plane. Think foglights on your car vs headlights. Most people don't think about this and then they tip a speaker on its side and wonder why it now sounds different side to side (the wide horiz is now wide vertical, the the narrower vertical is now narrower horizontal). There is the rather large surface of the console too reflect sound back up and cause some cancellation, affecting tone in a big way. So changing position from vertical to horiz CAN create some rather significant problems. In larger 3 way speakers, the manuf often provides ways to change tweeter location to make it work in either horiz or vertical. ATC does this, I think ADAM does, Genelec, etc. Brad
__________________ TransAudio Group |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Joined: Feb 2004 Location: Kits Beach
Posts: 377
|
I can only speak for Genelec monitors, but if you read the manual that comes with them, you will note that the units CAN be used in the horizontal position. However, you are instructed to rotate the HF driver 90 degrees to maintain the proper dispersion. There are also tips in the manual about positioning the speakers to optimise their performance. I'm certain other manufacturers would give similar instructions about the response and dispertion of their respective units. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2005 Location: Colombia / Montreal
Posts: 1,310
|
You should read the manuals...the company usually provides this kind of information, it depends on the speaker. Pupo
__________________ Looking for a mint condition TD4 Loving the ![]() I HATE gear pimps! |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Slovenia
Posts: 515
Thread Starter | Quote:
Any one else who has experience with 1031A? Regards, Purusha | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Slovenia
Posts: 515
Thread Starter |
I have one other question: What about NS10, is it OK to have them vertically placed? Because if I put my 1031A in vertical position than I have to do the same with Yamaha (no space for them otherwise). Purusha |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2003 Location: On the Move
Posts: 619
| Quote:
__________________ Ozzie Sandstorm Entertainment, Inc. | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 670
|
As far as I understand the only speakers you can use in a Horizontal position are an MTM configuration... Mid Tweeter Mid
__________________ http://www.sozocapacitors.com |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Gear maniac | Quote:
A traditional MTM / D’Appolito speaker (with both mid/woofers operating across the same frequency range) has some significant response "issues" in a horizontal configuration. The only way to get a speaker like that to work well, is to run one of the mid/woofs only for bass, so that you do not get a lot destructive inference between the two drivers in the MF range (think of it as a 2.5 way). The cut-off frequency that is chosen for this one mid/woof is dependant on how wide the Mid/Woof spacing is in the cabinet. This type of design would still yield asymmetrical response and would require a mirror image design. The reason you see a lot of horizontal MTM speakers, especially in consumer world, is because esthetically it looks better. Cheers! | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2003 Location: So-Cal
Posts: 1,778
| Quote:
I think the real reason is because it fits over the console better , argosy console ....as the C24 argosy-console, will place the Monitors way over the head , the tweeter unless laying down would be a foot above the head... having to be seriously positioned down , ... would yield a very small sweet spot.!
__________________ The only regrets We will have in Life......Are the things we Never Tried To do. | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear nut Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 133
|
Speakers are placed flat because the recording engeneer can then see the musicians in the recording room more easely. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Slovenia
Posts: 515
Thread Starter |
I turned the speakers on one side in vertical position. So far I noticed that the bottom has more compact sound on 1031A and it sounds less bright than the horizontal one. It works better this way. thumbsup Does anyone know if the tweater on Yamaha needs to be rotated also or it doesn't matter on NS10s? BTW thanks for your infos. Purusha |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear |
In his old studio..michael Cretu places the BM 15 A's on their side with the tweeters inside. As far as I know..in a tight space at least.. perhaps the most important bit is to have the tweeters at ear level. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Slovenia
Posts: 515
Thread Starter |
My ears are right between the twiter and the bass speaker when I am in my chear, so I guess I have them in the right position. Thanks. Purusha |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Oct 2004 Location: UK/FI
Posts: 194
|
Yamaha brought out NS10s for both vertical and horizontal configuration. As long as you have the front labels the right way up, you have them placed the way they were designed to. Spacey |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 224
|
Anyone use their HR824s horizontally?
|
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 133
| Quote:
Do you realy think that the horizontal model has different components/value's than the vertical model? Or is just the logo placed somewhere else on the speaker? | |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Slovenia
Posts: 515
Thread Starter | Quote:
Purusha | |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| Gear maniac | Quote:
As a side note, if the tweeter is too high and you cannot aim the monitors down towards the listening area, an alternative to laying a speaker on its side would be to flip it upside down. This may not always yield satisfactory results, but it is something worth trying. At the end of the day, use whatever configuration works best for your particular application. Cheers! | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Newburyport, MA, USA
Posts: 181
|
I've owned 3 sets of MTM mains (Dynaudio 1.5, Earthworks 6.3, Audix Nile X), and without a doubt they sound better oriented vertically. Tipping the monitors (usually down) so that the woofers are equidistant from your listening position is very helpful. Horizontal placement of MTM speakers can result in great imaging in one spot, but for those of us that move across a console, or turn our heads, the arrival time discrepancies between the four woofers can be really problematic. Sound Anchors in Florida makes some KILLER adjustable stands, the best I've seen. I've always loved the imaging of Tannoy's concentric speakers, but have never liked the sound of them! I bought some DMT10s a few years back and just could not get used to them enough to keep them around. Pinpoint imaging, though... awesome really. -tom
__________________ tom eaton • producer / engineer type me thomas eaton recording my place universal noise storage and will ackerman's imaginary road studios |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Northern California
Posts: 288
|
I have found this to be of interest. ******//www.bobhodas.com/pub1.html Might contain more information than you want. But there are some examples of horizontal and vertical placement of speakers. Then more details about room.
__________________ Anything that is too stupid to be spoken is sung - Voltaire |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Oct 2004 Location: UK/FI
Posts: 194
| Quote:
Spacey | |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Oct 2004 Location: UK/FI
Posts: 194
| Quote:
Spacey | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2005 Location: Slovenia
Posts: 515
Thread Starter |
OK, I see now. They actually made two types of NS10 monitors. If this is judged from the text written on them, than I have them in wrong vertical position now. I can only have both monitors in one position and so far I like my 1031A much better vertically placed. They sound less bright and more compact. Yeah, what can I do, life is tough and than you die? Purusha |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 792
|
ns10 must have tweeter internal or external (in horizontal configuration)
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Horizontal or vertical placement of monitors - how much does it matter? | daddykev | So much gear, so little time! | 16 | 17th July 2006 04:45 PM |
| Horizontal G5 rackmount kit | Kalara | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 5 | 11th July 2006 09:37 PM |
| Is there a difference between the vertical and horizontal Dakings? | PRuthenburg | High end | 8 | 25th August 2004 03:50 PM |
| Horizontal Rackmount kit for G5 | Stoneface | So much gear, so little time! | 32 | 12th July 2004 01:40 PM |
| |