Login / Register
 
apogee ad16x vs apogee ad16
New Reply
Subscribe
mynaemisjonas
Thread Starter
#1
31st July 2010
Old 31st July 2010
  #1
Gear addict
 
mynaemisjonas's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Lost Vegas
Posts: 483

Thread Starter
mynaemisjonas is offline
apogee ad16x vs apogee ad16

Right now I have an apogee rosetta 800 with an aphex 142 slaved to it... but I am looking to get into 16 out as well to do some OTB summing.

If I sold my rosetta and bought some old 92K AD16 and DA16's would I be taking a big step backwards?

I only ever record at 48K 24 bit.

What is the difference between the AD16 and AD16X?

Do the old ones suck?
#2
31st July 2010
Old 31st July 2010
  #2
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 115

Albert L. is offline
The x has the c777 clock from the Big Ben, it sounds a world better than the original 16 not x
mynaemisjonas
Thread Starter
#3
31st July 2010
Old 31st July 2010
  #3
Gear addict
 
mynaemisjonas's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: Lost Vegas
Posts: 483

Thread Starter
mynaemisjonas is offline
The rosetta doesn't have that clock. So compared to the rosetta where does the old AD16 stand?
#4
1st August 2010
Old 1st August 2010
  #4
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 276

stakeoutstudios is offline
AD16 non X vs X

It's sometimes really hard to get an answer on the AD16 (non X)

I bought one because lets face it, they are insane value for money. I also have a Rosetta 800 and sonically they are similar to me. Just great, no complaints. Love them both.

I've not compared them to the X but it felt like a decent step up from the AD8000 aside from the lack of metering.

The only thing to really look out for is the lack of expansion ports. If you're good with AES, optical or TDIF you'll be fine.

If you see a good deal on one I'd go for it!

Don't forget it's a high end converter... even if a new end model is out which may sound slightly better I'm not convinced its of an order of magnitude that would bother me! 16 channels of apogee A/D for £900 is what I snagged and I wouldn't look back!

Best wishes,
Jason
#5
2nd August 2010
Old 2nd August 2010
  #5
Lives for gear
 
The MPCist's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,630

The MPCist is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert L. View Post
The x has the c777 clock from the Big Ben, it sounds a world better than the original 16 not x
I got it but I don't use its internal clock -- everything clocked from a Big Ben.
__________________
THE MPCIST
#6
3rd August 2010
Old 3rd August 2010
  #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Central Point, Oregon
Posts: 1,670

seanmccoy is offline
I had an AD-16 that I sold when I realized what I really needed was an 8 X 8 for surround mixing, so I bought a Rosetta 800. I was told directly by Apogee that the converters in the Rosetta and the AD-16X are upgraded from the AD-16, but I still work in the studio to whom I sold my AD-16 and I can tell you it is definitely a fine converter. The Rosetta has more features and seems to have a bit more headroom, but sonically I don't hear a pronounced difference.
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
not_so_new / High end
1
MicSlut666 / So much gear, so little time!
4
Sammy / High end
0

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.