To CLASP or to ANAMOD ATS-1 ?

[RoundBadge]

Originally Posted by Dave_Amels

It's not shipping.

/Dave

Whats the deal w/ it?

[Dave_Amels]

Originally Posted by RoundBadge

Whats the deal w/ it?

Waiting for the racks with the advanced features.

[Fleaman]

Originally Posted by Dave_Amels

Waiting for the racks with the advanced features.

What do you mean?

[dbjp]

Originally Posted by Fleaman

What do you mean?

It's an analog modeling of a 24v rack in the api format

[Dave_Amels]

Originally Posted by dbjp

It's an analog modeling of a 24v rack in the api format

That's pretty funny.

The EQs were to interface to racks using a new standard and the modules would be both backward and forward compatible. I'll know more after AES.

Best,

/Dave

[krheatman]

Originally Posted by dbjp

It's an analog modeling of a 24v rack in the api format

Are you sure it wasn't an emulation of a 24 channel console of these-
1970 Rupert Neve Neve 1073 Console Module-Mix Inducts Rupert Neve 1073 Console Module Into 2007 TECnology Hall of Fame

[dbjp]

Originally Posted by Dave_Amels

That's pretty funny.

The EQs were to interface to racks using a new standard and the modules would be both backward and forward compatible. I'll know more after AES.

Best,

/Dave

Any hints as to what company might be behind this new rack? API?

[Dave_Amels]

Originally Posted by dbjp

Any hints as to what company might be behind this new rack? API?

There's more than one.

[Fleaman]

Originally Posted by Dave_Amels

That's pretty funny.

The EQs were to interface to racks using a new standard and the modules would be both backward and forward compatible. I'll know more after AES.

Best,

/Dave

When you say 'backward compatible', I assume you mean they will fit and work in a normal 500 series rack/slot?

[natpub]

Curiouser and curiouser :-)

[Tom H]

I am guessing the advanced rack features have something to do with the recall possibilities of the AMEQP. Hoping to see this connection feature apear on the workhorse in the future maybe....

[Tom H]

Sorry if this has been covered but I was wondering: Does CLASP allow you to use tape as an hardware insert during mixing or is it mainly designed for recording?

[dbjp]

Originally Posted by Tom H

Sorry if this has been covered but I was wondering: Does CLASP allow you to use tape as an hardware insert during mixing or is it mainly designed for recording?

Both. But obviously it's selling point is recording.

[Dave_Amels]

Originally Posted by Fleaman

When you say 'backward compatible', I assume you mean they will fit and work in a normal 500 series rack/slot?

yep

[Hansest]

bada Bump, what happened to this?

[HudHudson]

Originally Posted by Fleaman

Point is, no one is gonna get a CLASP system to only sync 1 or 2 tracks.

Though I do understand what you're saying regardless.

And I wasn't talking about 'print' through, I was talking about bleed, as in, adjacent track bleed. Meaning, you have to practice the same common sense when choosing what tracks lay adjacent to each other as you would with any tape machine, as it is a tape machine being synced. Don't put a snare track next to a whisper vocal track, etc.

This was most noticable with smpte tracks which was normally put on trk 24 (edge track) with trk 23 being used for distorted gtr or left blank if possible. A heavy transient track next to a smpte track can cause dropouts, depending on the machine. Of course with CLASP, there would be no need for smpte, but adjacent track bleed can still be an issue.

Actually, yellow DOG Studios has a CLASP unit in our overdub/edit suite as well as in the main studio. This lets the engineer overdub to tape (1/4" Otari MTR-10) and do tape laybacks and not tie up the big room for those purposes.

[carlheinz]

Does anyone use CLASP while tracking a drummer when virtual instruments are running in the background in real time?Are there any issues to contend with?

[Dave_Amels]

Originally Posted by Hansest

bada Bump, what happened to this?

Please see the thread.