Most efficient way to create a parallel drum sub on SSL - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


Most efficient way to create a parallel drum sub on SSL

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th September 2005   #1
Gear addict
 
ixnys's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 324

Thread Starter
Most efficient way to create a parallel drum sub on SSL

In PT I usually create sends on each drum track, set them to pre fader, and bus them to a stereo aux track. I will compress this stereo aux and blend it with the original drum submix.

On an SSL would I basically do the same thing? Let's say I designate channel 15 and 16 to be the channels that I bus all of my drums to. When I bus over the mono sources like kick in snare, do I bus them to both 15 and 16? Do I have to worry about having a snare panned hard left and hard right? I wouldn't want that to happen.
ixnys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005   #2
Lives for gear
 
djui5's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,664

Send a message via Yahoo to djui5
No..SSL has a nice bussing structre for things like this. You could send the signal post small fader to a pair of busses like 41/42, then set channels 41/42 to receive signal from their busses. No patching required for transfering signal, only inserted outboard if you'd like (I'm sure you would). You could also send the signal post small or large fader to either of the 4 (ABCD) main busses and patch outboard on those inserts. Or you could patch direct out's of the channles in mention (if you had a stere pair for instance), and then patch outboard into the chain and return on a pair fo Large faders.....or or or or ...there's so many ways. If you send post large fader to the busses, it goes post pan too. If you send post small fader, you pan depending on which buss your sending to. Left for odd numbers, right for even.

Which SSL are you talking about BTW? Above ways are for a 9000J....and I'm sure there are more ways than that to route signal for buss compression. I can't remember them all without being in front one. 4K is going to be different, and I'm not sure if there are any new routing options on the XL9K..I haven't used it. 6000 should be more like 9000J I believe...haven't used one in a long time and don't remember.


You can't really do things like this inside Pro-Tools, because it dosen't have a traditional console bussing system. It's a different way of working....neither is necessarialy better...
__________________
_________________

"What is a crossfire hurricane & why wasn't I born in one?"

Randy Wright
djui5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005   #3
Gear addict
 
ixnys's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 324

Thread Starter
Well the studio I go to has a J 9000 and an E 6000
ixnys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005   #4
Gear addict
 
ixnys's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 324

Thread Starter
So let's say I press group ready on channels 41 and 42. For overhead left I'll bus it to 41. For overhead right I'll bus it to 42. However for my kick and snare what bus do I choose? Both 41 and 42? If on the small fader I press "output" which means post fader it will keep my kick and snare panned up the middle right?

I understand I can have the designated group outputs going to a compressor and then returned on some other channels. The main thing I want to understand is how to keep the same panning that I've got going on with my large faders.
ixnys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005   #5
Lives for gear
 
djui5's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,664

Send a message via Yahoo to djui5
Quote:
Originally Posted by ixnys
So let's say I press group ready on channels 41 and 42. For overhead left I'll bus it to 41. For overhead right I'll bus it to 42. However for my kick and snare what bus do I choose? Both 41 and 42? If on the small fader I press "output" which means post fader it will keep my kick and snare panned up the middle right?
Buss them to both 41 and 42. Pan it center. Make sure 41 and 42 are panned hard left and right of course (large fader)

If you do it post small fader (output), it goes post pan..so if you want it center, pan it center....

Quote:
I understand I can have the designated group outputs going to a compressor and then returned on some other channels. The main thing I want to understand is how to keep the same panning that I've got going on with my large faders.
This is all in how you send to the group outputs. Just make sure you have the sends panned the same as the large fader pans (unless going post large fader...then it will go where the large fader is panned), make sure you have the return channels panned hard and left, and you'll be fine.


I think you get the idea. Just remember, it's all in the sends...and sending to a buss on the buss matrix isn't any different than the large fader being sent to the stereo buss...it's just a different buss. The 9J gives you a ton of options on sending to the buss matrix or sending to one of the ABCD busses...
djui5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005   #6
Gear addict
 
ixnys's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 324

Thread Starter
Cool. Thanks.
ixnys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2005   #7
Lives for gear
 
djui5's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 6,664

Send a message via Yahoo to djui5
Quote:
Originally Posted by ixnys
Cool. Thanks.

Anytime,
If you ever need anything else, please feel free to ask.
djui5 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Parallel drum bus comp (dbx 162) Daddy No So much gear, so little time! 5 31st July 2006 01:04 AM
8 Mic's on Drums: Most Efficient Method? Almost Human Low End Theory 31 4th December 2005 05:36 PM
Cost Efficient mics blissmusic Low End Theory 19 3rd December 2005 11:53 AM
Efficient way of loading and testing out drum samples ixnys So much gear, so little time! 14 23rd November 2004 02:32 AM
IS OSX Less efficient then OS9? atticus Music computers 30 14th April 2003 09:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.