![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: europe austria
Posts: 1,612
Thread Starter | Radial JDI or J48 or ? now it´s my time to ask. ![]() i used my passive cordial di for years and i find most Instrument Inputs on Preamps very useful, but my next client told me to use Radial, cause he enjoyed the sound on his last album. so, which way should i go? mainly for E-bass
__________________ ![]() ![]() 1 x Lynx Aurora 16 1950,- 1 x AUDIX DP5aX EUR 649,- 1 x Apogee AD16X incl. X-HD EUR 1600,- 1 x SSL 4000 SL615E PREAMP RACK, 24 Channels 4000,- |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 59
| The J48 is, of course, active and requiring 48v phantom power. It gives you plenty of signal to work with. I own the "re-amp" set which includes the X-Amp for re-amping your DI'd signal, which is handy if you use it for electric guitar. Or bass, for that matter. I also use the JDI for live gigs. Both are stellar units, and built like a tank. Probably the last DI's you'll ever need. If you experience buzz from a ground loop, just hit the ground lift switch and your signal is dead quiet. Sweet! |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear addict | I love our JDI's! My go-to bass setup in the studio is typically through the JDI into a vintech x73i, sounds killer. I did a shoot-out with several DIs, the JDI winning. I also use them on live gigs for bass and keyboards. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Montreal
Posts: 581
| When it comes to electric basses most of the time I use the J48 for fast songs (mainly in metal) and the JDI for a fatter tone (rock, reggae...). That said the fatness added by the tranny in the JDI is subtle, and they both could work well on every applications. You are both good DIs and you should get both, it doesn't really matter which one you get first.
__________________ |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
Posts: 591
| Quote:
But again I like them both and I think it's worth it to have both if it's no big deal for you. | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 434
| Don't know the J48 but own a JDI and a JDV. I like both but prefer the JDV in most cases (e.g. with my passive Fender Jazz Bass). |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
| i have both the J48, JDI Countryman Type 85, and KT DN100. for what it's worth, i personally prefer the KT. to me low end is typically fuller and is alot more open than the others mentioned. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear | A passive DI will interact with a passive instrument's volume and tone control circuitry, producing different (not better or worse...) results as these controls are changed. An active DI (often with a high - 1 M ohm input impedance) will not interact with the passive circuitry. This might lead to the generalization that a passive instrument will sound better through an active DI, and an active instrument (a bass with active pickups, vintage synth, etc.) will sound great with a simpler passive DI. As with all generalizations, both should be auditioned and the best-sounding one should be used. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Gilmore broadcasting area
Posts: 244
| I ordered the JDI a few days ago and hope to be auditioning it this weekend. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DI BOX RADIAL J48 (active) VS RADIAL JDI (passive) | -silent-sam- | Low End Theory | 12 | 30th August 2011 09:18 PM |
| Radial J48 MK2 vs. Radial JDI | heisleyamor | So much gear, so little time! | 8 | 10th April 2010 05:15 PM |
| Radial users, J48 and the JDI. | Chris | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 20th August 2006 04:09 PM |
| Radial J48 versus JDI--active versus passive DI | feyshay | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 21st December 2005 06:38 AM |
| |