Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th November 2009   #1
Lives for gear
 
eddierodriguez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: europe austria
Posts: 1,612

Thread Starter
Radial JDI or J48 or ?

now it´s my time to ask.

i used my passive cordial di for years and i find most Instrument Inputs on Preamps very useful, but my next client told me to use Radial, cause he enjoyed the sound on his last album.

so, which way should i go? mainly for E-bass
__________________


1 x Lynx Aurora 16 1950,- 1 x AUDIX DP5aX EUR 649,-

1 x Apogee AD16X incl. X-HD EUR 1600,- 1 x SSL 4000 SL615E PREAMP RACK, 24 Channels 4000,-
eddierodriguez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2009   #2
Gear Head
 
velopop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 59

The J48 is, of course, active and requiring 48v phantom power. It gives you plenty of signal to work with. I own the "re-amp" set which includes the X-Amp for re-amping your DI'd signal, which is handy if you use it for electric guitar. Or bass, for that matter.

I also use the JDI for live gigs. Both are stellar units, and built like a tank. Probably the last DI's you'll ever need. If you experience buzz from a ground loop, just hit the ground lift switch and your signal is dead quiet. Sweet!
velopop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th November 2009   #3
Gear addict
 
pearldrum944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 384

I love our JDI's! My go-to bass setup in the studio is typically through the JDI into a vintech x73i, sounds killer. I did a shoot-out with several DIs, the JDI winning. I also use them on live gigs for bass and keyboards.
__________________
Tyler Bird
http://www.tylerbird.net
pearldrum944 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2009   #4
Lives for gear
 
jbjoubaud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Montreal
Posts: 581

When it comes to electric basses most of the time I use the J48 for fast songs (mainly in metal) and the JDI for a fatter tone (rock, reggae...).
That said the fatness added by the tranny in the JDI is subtle, and they both could work well on every applications.

You are both good DIs and you should get both, it doesn't really matter which one you get first.
__________________

jbjoubaud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th November 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
-silent-sam-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
Posts: 591

Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjoubaud View Post
When it comes to electric basses most of the time I use the J48 for fast songs (mainly in metal) and the JDI for a fatter tone (rock, reggae...).
That said the fatness added by the tranny in the JDI is subtle, and they both could work well on every applications.

You are both good DIs and you should get both, it doesn't really matter which one you get first.
I agree...... get both if you can. The only difference with me is I tend to settle on the 48 more often then the JDI.

But again I like them both and I think it's worth it to have both if it's no big deal for you.
-silent-sam- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009   #6
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 434

Don't know the J48 but own a JDI and a JDV. I like both but prefer the JDV in most cases (e.g. with my passive Fender Jazz Bass).
buzzjoe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009   #7
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1

i have both the J48, JDI Countryman Type 85, and KT DN100. for what it's worth, i personally prefer the KT. to me low end is typically fuller and is alot more open than the others mentioned.
priszkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 601

Send a message via Skype™ to seriousfun
A passive DI will interact with a passive instrument's volume and tone control circuitry, producing different (not better or worse...) results as these controls are changed.

An active DI (often with a high - 1 M ohm input impedance) will not interact with the passive circuitry.

This might lead to the generalization that a passive instrument will sound better through an active DI, and an active instrument (a bass with active pickups, vintage synth, etc.) will sound great with a simpler passive DI. As with all generalizations, both should be auditioned and the best-sounding one should be used.
__________________
doug osborne | my day job | Flying Faders II - Just Mix...Just Got Better!
seriousfun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009   #9
Gear maniac
 
Keystone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Gilmore broadcasting area
Posts: 244

I ordered the JDI a few days ago and hope to be auditioning it this weekend.
Keystone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th November 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
cdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 3,434

Radial JDV mk3 active direct box super DI

Best non-tube DI on the market
cdog is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
DI BOX RADIAL J48 (active) VS RADIAL JDI (passive) -silent-sam- Low End Theory 12 30th August 2011 09:18 PM
Radial J48 MK2 vs. Radial JDI heisleyamor So much gear, so little time! 8 10th April 2010 05:15 PM
Radial users, J48 and the JDI. Chris So much gear, so little time! 2 20th August 2006 04:09 PM
Radial J48 versus JDI--active versus passive DI feyshay So much gear, so little time! 1 21st December 2005 06:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 PM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.