Login / Register
 
Best quality Digital Optical cable?
New Reply
Subscribe
satl
Thread Starter
#1
11th October 2009
Old 11th October 2009
  #1
Gear Head
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 45

Thread Starter
satl is offline
Best quality Digital Optical cable?

What's the best brand to use? Does it make a difference?

I'll be using them on:

Apogee AD-16x Lightpipe outputs to Lightbridge interface.

Lightbridge output to Lavry DA10 input for monitoring.
#2
11th October 2009
Old 11th October 2009
  #2
Gear Guru
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 12,682

Dean Roddey is offline
Don't waste your money. Get a reasonable quality one and be done with it. There won't be any difference. Anyone who claims to hear the difference is digital cables is hallucinatory pretty much. The only difference is the Monster makes more money.
__________________
Dean Roddey
Chairman/CTO Charmed Quark Systems, Ltd
www.charmedquark.com

Be a control freak!
#3
11th October 2009
Old 11th October 2009
  #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 583

digitrax is offline
satl
Thread Starter
#4
11th October 2009
Old 11th October 2009
  #4
Gear Head
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 45

Thread Starter
satl is offline
digitrax,

Great, thanks! I've also read on other forums, that if you use toslink, that it's best to use glass fiber optics.

Did you receive them in the mail yet? I can't wait to hear what you decide about them.
#5
11th October 2009
Old 11th October 2009
  #5
Lives for gear
 
DarkSky Media's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,483

DarkSky Media is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Roddey View Post
Anyone who claims to hear the difference is digital cables is hallucinatory pretty much.
Quality varies widely. You hear a difference when they fail. Poorer quality ones may fail (and you may hear it) even if you are not "hallucinatory".
satl
Thread Starter
#6
11th October 2009
Old 11th October 2009
  #6
Gear Head
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 45

Thread Starter
satl is offline
Thanks everyone.

I went with all high-quality SonicWave Glass Toslink Cables.

Now I won't have to worry about it either way!

#7
11th October 2009
Old 11th October 2009
  #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 570

dannycurtean@yah is offline
thumbsup
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Roddey View Post
Don't waste your money. Get a reasonable quality one and be done with it. There won't be any difference. Anyone who claims to hear the difference is digital cables is hallucinatory pretty much. The only difference is the Monster makes more money.
That is very true. Analog cables, do make a diff, digital is digital. If digital looses even one bit.,..then it rerequests the whole bite again. So there is never a loss. In digital a l;oss is catastrophic. Clicks...pops....loss of clock.....just bad....so no...never loose anything with digital ever. Youl KNOW if you did.
#8
12th October 2009
Old 12th October 2009
  #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 583

digitrax is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by satl View Post
digitrax,

Great, thanks! I've also read on other forums, that if you use toslink, that it's best to use glass fiber optics.

Did you receive them in the mail yet? I can't wait to hear what you decide about them.
Haven't got 'em yet. But when I do, I'll give 'em the old "wiggle test" to see if I can get an audible click or pop (as I sometimes can with my cheapo HoseYa cables), then I'll null both cables against an AES/EBU feed from the same interface to see if there can actually be any difference sonically. I tend to doubt the latter, but ya never know - I'm more curious about the reliability which I'll bet is better.
#9
12th October 2009
Old 12th October 2009
  #9
Lives for gear
 
DarkSky Media's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,483

DarkSky Media is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannycurtean@yah View Post
thumbsup

That is very true. Analog cables, do make a diff, digital is digital. If digital looses even one bit.,..then it rerequests the whole bite again. So there is never a loss. In digital a l;oss is catastrophic. Clicks...pops....loss of clock.....just bad....so no...never loose anything with digital ever. Youl KNOW if you did.
Umm... so with digital cabling, you never lose anything, but when you do you hear clicks and pops???!!!

I have the uncomfortable feeling there is something seriously wrong with that statement??
#10
12th October 2009
Old 12th October 2009
  #10
Gear Guru
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 12,682

Dean Roddey is offline
He means it's not like analog systems, where you can get real but not necessarily obvious degredation. In digital, it's more likely to be good until it's not good, then it becomes pretty obviously not good because of loss of data causing obvious issues with sync and pops and so forth.
#11
12th October 2009
Old 12th October 2009
  #11
Lives for gear
 
DarkSky Media's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,483

DarkSky Media is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Roddey View Post
He means it's not like analog systems, where you can get real but not necessarily obvious degredation. In digital, it's more likely to be good until it's not good, then it becomes pretty obviously not good because of loss of data causing obvious issues with sync and pops and so forth.
Ya, no kidding.

But, if you use crap digital cables, you will get clicks and pops sooner or later, and that was the original point against which you and your buddy dannycurtean@yah seem to want to "argue".
#12
12th October 2009
Old 12th October 2009
  #12
Gear Guru
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,252
My Recordings/Credits

Jim Williams is offline
I replaced the plastic with glass. It helps.

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
satl
Thread Starter
#13
12th October 2009
Old 12th October 2009
  #13
Gear Head
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 45

Thread Starter
satl is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Williams View Post
I replaced the plastic with glass. It helps.

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
Thanks for chiming in Jim.

In what way did you notice it helped?
#14
12th October 2009
Old 12th October 2009
  #14
Gear Guru
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Mountain View, CA
Posts: 12,682

Dean Roddey is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSM Interactive View Post
Ya, no kidding.

But, if you use crap digital cables, you will get clicks and pops sooner or later, and that was the original point against which you and your buddy dannycurtean@yah seem to want to "argue".
No, he was asking about sound quality, I'm fairly sure. He didn't say anything about build quality. And, frankly, I've never had any digital cable go bad on me and they've all been fairly run of the mill cables. My use of digital cables was mostly back in the home theater days, but I reconfigured my home theater a lot more often than I reconfigure my studio, so they got their fair share of abuse.

If you are talking about buying a $150 cable vs. buying a $25 cable that will sound every bit as good and most likely last just as long, I'd buy the $25 cable. In the off chance that it might go bad in a few years, another one would still leave you $100 ahead of the game.
#15
12th October 2009
Old 12th October 2009
  #15
Gear nut
 
madcap8465's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: detroit
Posts: 76

madcap8465 is offline
I also noticed a difference replacing plastic with glass. The lows are a bit more present. And no I am not smoking anything!
#16
12th October 2009
Old 12th October 2009
  #16
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 261

bmdaugherty is offline
Optical has way more jitter when using plastic interconnects than real glass ones. Doubt it all you want, but it makes perfect sense. Glass transmits more light with less distortion. Wireworld makes good quality glass core optical cables. They do make a difference.

Peace,
Brian
__________________
MixBus2 - Ubuntu | Nuendo - OSX | MacPro 8core | RME MADI | Euphonix Conversion
PDC
#17
12th October 2009
Old 12th October 2009
  #17
PDC
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,888

PDC is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by madcap8465 View Post
I also noticed a difference replacing plastic with glass. The lows are a bit more present. And no I am not smoking anything!
These are the statements I have issues with.
#18
12th October 2009
Old 12th October 2009
  #18
Gear Guru
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,252
My Recordings/Credits

Jim Williams is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by satl View Post
Thanks for chiming in Jim.

In what way did you notice it helped?
The best word to describe the difference is:

Focus.

They were cheap, about $20 from MCM Electronics.

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn  Submit Thread to Google+ Google+ 
 
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
jebjerome / So much gear, so little time!
5
markhan / So much gear, so little time!
6
wilkinswp / Geekslutz forum
0
doug_hti / So much gear, so little time!
1
GigaBoy / So much gear, so little time!
0

Forum Jump

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.