![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NARAS P&E Wing Pro Tools Guidelines v2.0 | Charles Dye | Q&A with Charles Dye | 26 | 9th April 2004 06:18 PM |
| NARAS P&E Wing -- Feingold's Bill: "Competition in Radio and Concert Industries Act" | dave-G | The good news channel | 0 | 15th May 2003 10:00 PM |
| Session Data Interchange Format—Your Suggestions Please | Charles Dye | Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) | 7 | 1st December 2002 05:03 AM |
| PT Session Guidelines Discussion | Charles Dye | Music computers | 31 | 18th November 2002 01:48 PM |
| PT Session Guidelines Discussion | Charles Dye | Expert Question & Answer Archives (read only archive, not open for new posts) | 31 | 18th November 2002 01:48 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Florida
Posts: 2,096
| This Just in from NARAS P&E Wing -- PT Interchange Guidelines Have a looksee at http://www.grammy.com/pe_wing/protools209h.doc The guidelines that it lays out out thus far may seem like common-sense to many of us, but it's a kind of common sense that I wish a lot of the people I collaborate with would subscribe to!! ... "Growing up" in studios with multiple 2" decks, slave-reels, track-sheets, recall sheets and extensive documentation as I have, I find that the open-ended architecture of a DAW-based session often means that different users will come up with widely disparate organizational paradigms (in some cases, I wonder if "organization" is even an appropriate term). It gets pretty tough to mix a couple of songs a day when hours are spent decoding someone else's Pro Tools layout, identifying mislabeled tracks, finding hidden tracks that are still active, and otherwise sifting through the shrapnel of production (etc..etc..etc..)Anyway, rote to some, but hopefully useful to others. Posted here as a dutiful gearslut and academy member. -dave |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Boston area
Posts: 872
| No argument. But the same kinds of problems can arise from poorly documented sessions on any platform or medium. I used to "love" getting 24 tracks of ADAT tapes to mix (without documentation) and sometimes never quite figuring out if track 7 was a tom mic or one of the overheads! |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Florida
Posts: 2,096
| Quote:
but I digress.. Anyway, to your first comment, here's the overall master delivery recommendations... (I think it's been posted here before). http://www.grammy.com/recommendations.pdf While it's overwhelmingly extensive, it does offer some good ideas for standardized practices and documentation. -dave | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |