Digidesign 192 I/O vs 96 I/O

[mac black]

Ok, Just wanted to hear some opinions .
Using an 02R96 and 192 I/O digital, wanted to get an Digidesign analog I/O, I know that the 192I/O is better then the 96I/O but would it make a difference if I work in 96 ? shouldn´t they sound the same at 96k ?

mac

[nukmusic]

when they first dropped, everyone said the 192 was better than the 96, but you still see several studios with the 96's. I even think someone said that the 192 at 48k was still a little better than the 96 at 96k, i maybe wrong. and some said the digi-002 AD was a bit better than the old 888/24's

[wwittman]

For whatever reason the 192 sounds better to me at 96k than the 96 does at 96k.

I haven't compared them at 48, because once i determined that 96k sounded better, I haven't had any reason to record at 48k.

[JonCraig]

Originally Posted by wwittman

For whatever reason the 192 sounds better to me at 96k than the 96 does at 96k.

i second that. (not that my opinion holds anywhere near the weight of mr. wittman...)

--jon

[DivineMusic]

talking to my dealer he said no matter what sample rate the 192 is gonna sound better than the 96 i/o simply b/c the higher quality cconverters

[Aearth]

If you have 192 IO clocking the 96 IO I'm sure it would be fine. I have a 192 IO and I hired a 96 IO and I couldn't really tell the difference @ 48khz recording. The 96 IO is 1/3 cost of the 192 IO that's goina sway you surely.


Nick

[juanlo]

Dear:
I got a
1- digi 192 (no card options installed)
2- Apogee ad-16x (with hd card installed)

I want to get the best configuration for a hd3 system.
How a can get the most ins for the system?

Thanks

[JonCraig]

almost 3 years later...



...gravedigger

[sedohr]

Kalli